web analytics

An “Honest Government Ad” Pokes Fun At the Hypocrisy of Australia and “Climate”

All joking aside, China accounts for 30% of ALL of Australia’s exports. China controls Australia, and Australia has responded with total abuse of it’s citizens. Australia has also been rewarded by the bankers that be, by a massive run up in the value of their currency. 40% Increase in the value of their money.



You are spot on Eileen. It is sickening to watch Blinken in this video pretending that this isn’t happening, that the teleprompter mis-steps can be ignored, or that what we are watching isn’t clearly an old confused man in cerebral decay. I also agree that Kalama is absolutely un-presentable. What was the deep state thinking in elevating this weak and incompetent team? 4

Eileen Guthrie

Eileen Guthrie Noble Member Reply to  Bob Barrionuevo 1 month ago

For decades the CIA and the federal government (a big part of the deep state players) installed incompetent leaders in other countries around the world, who are puppets to the New World Order. President Ghani was one of those installed leaders that Obama/Biden placed in Afghanistan and is living off of the millions Obama gave him, while he cut tail and ran. The people of Ukraine voted out the installed President that Biden/Obama install there (who was protecting Hunter Biden). Obama tried to remove Benjamin Netanyahu from Israel but failed as the people of Israel voted him back into office. China is paying us back by installing two incompetent politicians who have no integrity, because of what we did to others in the past. Obama was really big on installing “his” candidates from around the world. It was payback time I’m afraid. I don’t know the answer… Look they didn’t care who was their nominee, Bernie was a liability because of his socialist stance. The democrats weren’t selling Biden as a competent politician or a great leader. He was the anti-Trump candidate and that’s who people voted for; they weren’t voting for Biden per se, they were voting against Donald Trump. It could’ve been John Doe or a purple dinosaur as their candidate. See over the decades I’ve notice that the democrats don’t care if we like or love their candidate, if we think they are competent, or would make a great leader, what they do is to get the people to hate their Republican opponent and the mainstream media helps in selling their candidate to these ignorant surfs. As a psychologist I pay attention to patterns in behavior and the democrats are creatures of habit. They repeat patterns that worked in the past. We need a President who can think on his feet when a crisis arises and that is not Joe Biden or Kamala Harris or Bernie for that matter. Biden has to talk to other people before he makes a decision, he probably calls 5 to 10 people to get their take on it, what he should do and as we’ve seen in the last 9 months, he constantly chooses the wrong action and decision. 
You just DON’T LEAVE AMERICANS BEHIND. YOU REMOVE THEM FIRST, NOT LAST and to fend for themselves in a hostile country to become hostages to a terrorist organization. But Biden doesn’t care about anyone but himself. I have a feeling down the road, Blinken will be thrown under the bus more so then Milley. You do not give away an Air Force Base Bagram Airfield-BAF, that the American taxpayers paid for, there were two ways to get into Afghanistan. Bagram Air force base or in Kabul at Hamid Karzai International Airport.  There are other bases in the region and now not only does China have our weapons, vehicles and supplies but our air force base too.
Now I’ve been doing research on why Biden made this poor decision and it’s as ALWAYS with him, it’s about his wealth. It might make more sense as I explain what I found, and it might explain our hasty retreat. The Bidens own 10% of a Chinese lithium-ion battery company whose stock has soared to almost 300% since he was installed as President. Afghanistan biggest mineral lithium is valued at between $1 trillion to $3 trillion. China was already in talks with the Taliban before Biden’s Afghanistan debacle. China moves in and takes over the lithium market and the Biden’s will profit off of all of this at the expense of American lives. Is it starting to make sense now?
For anyone interested in researching this information themselves, the company is Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL). CATL is the world’s largest maker of electric vehicles batteries. Biden NEVER makes a move unless there is a monetary reward at the end. FOLLOW THE MONEY!! Is it starting to make sense? Thanks to “citizen” journalist, this information is slowly getting out there because the mainstream media doesn’t want the American people to know about this for obvious reasons. As Biden’s greed and corruption is like an onion. You remove one layer and lo and behold there is more greed and corruption. 7


GOMF3602 Famed Member Reply to  Eileen Guthrie 1 month ago

We have been on the same trail.The Chinese will build a pipeline or rail line through Afghanistan to Iran, will take over our bases and don’t be a bit surprised if their own Muslim minorities are used as slave labor in the lithium mines and worked half to death before their organs are harvested to sell to wealthy Muslims who need transplants. These are not accidents of incompetence, follow the money. At this level, there are no accidents. 3

Eileen Guthrie

Eileen Guthrie Noble Member Reply to  GOMF3602 1 month ago

I NEVER buy what are politicians and the media tells us, because they are in the disinformation business. So, when something happens that might be something horrible for the people of this country. (i.e., the second 9/11 attack under Obama, Biden and Hillary in Benghazi in 2012, what happened in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and pick a poor decision or you name it), where something horrible happened to Americans here or abroad and it doesn’t have to do with one political party as they are all culpable in lying and misleading the American people. THEY ALL HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE. If you knew the research I did on Benghazi and what the three stooges did, it would shock the hell out of you and why it happened in the first place. Once again it was a cover up their malfeasance of selling arms to the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Libya. J. Christopher Stevens brokered the deal in the first place and Benghazi was covering up that original deal. They were expecting the two terrorist organizations to return the weapons and that’s why Steven was in Benghazi. WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE SO NAÏVE AND GULLIBLE? They had hoped that the American people wouldn’t know about the deal, and it blew up in their faces. They killed 4 Americans and injured God knows how many others. It’s why Obama and Clinton sent 37 US troops to Italy and didn’t want additional security. The less people the easier it was to control the outcome. And the same damn people who were in charge when Benghazi happened are the same exact people who were in charge and in control of Afghanistan. Some very big names in politics did know about this and one of them was John McVain as he helped put the arms dealer with the Obama administration. Research the name Marc Turi. They DOJ charged him with crimes. But he and his lawyer threaten to expose Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Barack Obama. They had emails and recorded phone calls that would have exposed them all. Loretta Lynch was forced to drop the charges. Do you think it was an accident that her plane was sitting on the Arizona tarmac, it was more than Bill Clinton pressuring Loretta to drop the investigation into Hillary, it was also about the arms deal too, that’s what she was originally there for the negotiation with Marc Turi and his attorney’s? The other question I ask myself when I do research is to connect the dots to the most corrupt politicians this country has ever seen. I spent 4 years of my life looking into the events in Benghazi and I did discover the truth thanks to Canada and Australia who covered the stories and did their own investigations and what they uncovered.
I am immediately suspicious at what they are telling us. I LOVE doing research, I’ve always have done it and I set out to prove them wrong and expose their lies and misinformation as they try to confuse the American people. The first question I ask myself is who will profit financially from these lies and misinformation.  FOLLOW THE MONEY. And look at previous villains and greedy pieces of shit, politicians who line their pockets, people who have no integrity, the wealthy entitled elitist, people who are emotionally, morally and mentally bankrupt. Who are the sociopaths, psychopaths and people who have NO REDEEMING QUALITIES, A SOUL OR A CONSCIENCE they are unable to feel regret or remorse for their actions? There are news organizations who do cover the truth, unfortunately, they aren’t in the US. Canada and Australia do cover US politics and they are reporting the truth. In the US, six conglomerate own and control the US mainstream media and that is why their scripts and reports all sound the same… they are controlling the news and what information gets released.
These are OUR LEADERS, and these are the true dregs of society. They are just horrible people who shouldn’t be anywhere near positions of power. But they always find their way into power. The next question I ask is are the Soros’s, the Clinton’s, the Biden’s, the Obama’s, McConnell, and etc., are involved in any way shape or form involved in what happened and just how much money did they put into their private bank accounts because of what happened. The answer is, very sadly usually YES. If there’s a buck to be made, then they are involved in it. The problem is the deep state chooses candidates who are compromised in some way to another leader or Country. It’s how they control them. You made a profit off of selling your vote on any legislation, the deep state knows it and they are going to have this politician twisting in the wind. AND EVERY FEDERAL OR STATE AGENCIES ARE SO CORRUPTED BY THESE SAME PEOPLE. Unfortunately, they will use these agencies to go after their political enemies and the American people who don’t buy into their bullshit.
Take the latest news… The Arizona audit is OVER. They made a deal with Maricopa County officials about the audit and now nothing will happen to them. This is what I’m talking about, weak compromised leaders buckle under the pressure, they won’t get hurt by this, it will hurt the people of Maricopa County and it has ONLY emboldened them to continue to steal elections. They got away with it once, twice or a hundred times. Don’t ever trust these people to do the right thing for the Country, THEY WON’T. We had hoped that Bill Barr was going to go after the crooks and criminals in DC. We got a lot of lip service from him, and he did absolutely nothing but talk. He was part of the DC cesspool of corruption. If you think Durham will get Hillary Clinton, you’d better think again. She is one of the corrupt entitled elitists and is the protected class. 
It was why they hated Donald Trump; the deep state, DC’s corrupt entitled politicians in both parties and the media had no way to control him, he was uncompromised. He wasn’t compromised to another country or leader; he was an outsider who said he would drain the swamp.  Other President’s (Clinton, the Bushes and Obama come to mind) have made that same promise, but the swamp only grows deeper and longer. The swamp is the deep state and the DOJ, and the FBI are now criminal organizations… more in line with the mafia, than any law or justice agencies, you’d better think again and get that silly thing that the American people will get justice out of your mind. Karen Fann sold us out, and she is celebrating this as a victory but she’s just like the other spineless Republicans ALWAYS DO. She dropped some of the charges, which means she probably got their endorsement of her for future elections she will run in. That’s the stench I smell here.  Now do you believe me when I say most politicians are sociopaths and psychopaths and they are entrenched in both parties. Trump is going after all of them, and he has all of the evidence to show us what they have done to this Country for DECADES. I was wondering why Nancy Pelosi was being all smug, arrogant and condescending by demonizing Trump voters in a foreign country. She knew about the deal; she probably told those RINOs in Arizona to give Karen Fann what she wants to get the audit off of the front page. Because when I see her all smug and arrogant, I know she’s up to something and some sleazy deal was being made at her behest. It’s about protecting the democrat party and especially Joe “where am I” Biden. Like I previously said, the democrats are creatures of habit. They repeat patterns that worked in the past that got them the result they were after, and they will use these same patterns until the American people wise up and call them out on their bullshit. The powers that be are terrified of Donald Trump, he has them all trapped in their own bullshit, in their decades of lies and mistruths, it will eventually take them down, I’m sure but at what cost will it be to us and our Country between now and then. They will never understand that it’s the cover up that will get them in the end. Eventually, they won’t be able to buy people’s silence as their crimes get worse and more maniacal and psycho


EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data

stock here, this is good stuff. I like how they used Flu vaccine as a Control Group compared to COVID VXX

EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data
Grouchy Math Grad

Grouchy Math Grad 13 hours ago

We can do two paths of further study:
1) see what states got the bad lots first. Were the lots distributed after a certain number of adverse events were reported in the first few states?

2) Is there a different pattern of adverse events or causes of deaths in the bad lots vs. the overall average?

I’ll take a whack at these questions if I don’t see that anyone else has in the next couple of days. 5 Reply

Kat Stevens

Kat Stevens Reply to  Grouchy Math Grad 9 hours ago

Already done by Karl Denninger: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109

Uh, That’s Not A Conspiracy Theory [Comments enabled]

There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number.

What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them — in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned.  That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads.  What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing.

Lots are quite large, especially when you’re dealing with 200 million people and 400 million doses.  Assuming the lots are not preferentially assigned to certain cohorts (e.g. one goes to all nursing homes, etc) adverse reactions should thus be normally distributed between lots; if they’re not one of these things is almost-certainly true:

  • There is a serious manufacturing quality problem or you produced something without understanding how it would work in the body and thus failed to control for something you had to in order to wind up with reproduceable results.  That is, some lots are ok, others are contaminated, have too much or too little of the active ingredient in them, some produce wildly more spike-protein than others in the body when injected, etc.

  • Much worse, the lots are intentionally segregated to produce different results. This implies some sort of nefarious intent such as killing people on a differential basis or that the manufacturers are running unsanctioned experiments on a mass basis among the population at-large, since they know what is in each lot and intentionally varied the contents.

  • Perhaps worst of all, reports are now being intentionally suppressed, the injury and death rate hasn’t changed and there are lots with one of the two above problems but it is being intentionally not reported, having been detected almost-instantly and health providers were directed to not report anything serious (e.g. death) associated with the jabs.

Now let’s talk about VAERS.  You can grab the public data from it, but VAERS intentionally makes it difficult to discern differences in lot outcomes.  Why?  Because they separate out the specifics of the vax (the manufacturer, lot number, etc.) into a different file.  This means that simply loading it into Excel does you no good and attempting to correlate and match the two tables in Excel itself is problematic due to the extreme size of the files — in fact, it blew Excel up here when I tried to do it.  But that’s an external data-export problem; internally, within HHS, it is certainly not hard for them to run correlations.

Indeed the entire point of VAERS is to find said correlations before people get screwed in size and stop it from happening.

Let’s step back a bit in history. VAERS came into being because back in the 1970s the producers of the DTP shot had a quality control problem.  Some lots had way too much active ingredient in them and others had nearly none.  This caused a crap ton of bad reactions by kids who got the jabs and parents sued.  Liability insurance threatened to become unobtanium (gee, you figure, after you screw a bunch of kids who had to take mandatory shots?) and thus the manufacturers pulled the DTP jab and threatened to pull all vaccines from the market.

Congress responded to this threat of intentional panic sown by the pharmaceutical industry by giving the vaccine firms immunity and setting up a tax and arbitration system, basically, to pay families if they got screwed by vaccines.  Rather than force the guilty parties to eat the injuries and deaths they caused Congress instead exempted the manufacturers from the consequences of their own negligence and socialized the losses with a small tax on each shot.

Part of this was VAERS.  We know VAERS understates adverse events because it while it is allegedly “mandatory” it is subject to clinical judgment and there is a wild bias against believing that these jabs, or any jab for that matter, has bad side effects.  In addition there is neither a civil or criminal penalty of any kind for failure to report.  We now know some people who have had bad side effects from the Covid-19 jabs have shown up on social media after going to the doctor and then tried to find their own record, which is quite easy to do if you know the lot number from your card, what happened and the date the event happened — their doctor never filed it.  This does not really surprise me since filing those reports takes quite a bit of time and the doctor isn’t paid for it by the government or anyone else, so even without bias there will be those who simply won’t do the work unless there are severe penalties for not doing so.  There are in fact no penalties whatsoever.  The under-reporting does not have a reliable boundary on it, but estimates are that only somewhere between 3% and 10% of actual adverse events get into the database.  That’s right — at best the adverse event rate is ten times that of what you find in VAERS.

But now it gets interesting because VAERS exports, it appears, were also set up, whether deliberately or by coincidink, to make it hard for ordinary people to find a future correlation between injury or death and vaccine lot number.


You’d be wrong; the data is across two tables and uncorrelated as VAERS releases it and there is no quick-and-easy reporting on their site that groups events on a comparative basis by lot number.  While it is possible to do this sort of analysis from their web page it’s not easy.

(Further, and this also intentionally frustrates analysis, VAERS keeps no record nor reports on the number of shots administered per lot, making norming to some stable denominator literally impossible.  If you think that’s an accident I have a bridge for sale.  It’s a very nice bridge.)

But, grasshopper, I have Postgres.  Indeed if you’re reading this article it is because I both have it and know how to program against it; this blog is, in fact, stored in Postgres.

Postgres, like all databases, is very good at taking something that can be foreign-key related and correlating it.  In fact that’s one of a database’s prime strengths.  Isn’t SQL, which I assume VAERS uses as well, wonderful?

So I did exactly that with the data found here for 2021.

And….. you aren’t going to like it.

Having loaded the base table and manufacturer tables related by the VAERS-ID I ran this query:

karl=> select vax_lot(vaers_vax), count(vax_lot(vaers_vax)) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) = vaers_id(vaers_vax) and died=’Y’ and vax_type=’COVID19′ and vax_manu(vaers_vax)=’MODERNA’ group by vax_lot(vaers_vax) order by count(vax_lot(vaers_vax)) desc;

This says:

Select the lot, and count the instances of that lot, from the VAERS data where the report ID is in the table of persons who had a bad reaction, said bad reaction was that they died, where the vaccine is a Covid-19 vaccine and where the manufacturer is MODERNA.  Order the results by the count of the deaths per lot in descending order.

vax_lot | count
039K20A | 87
013L20A | 66
012L20A | 64
010M20A | 62
037K20A | 49
029L20A | 48
012M20A | 46
024M20A | 44
027L20A | 44
015M20A | 43
025L20A | 42
026A21A | 41
013M20A | 41
016M20A | 41
022M20A | 41
030L20A | 40
026L20A | 39
007M20A | 39
013A21A | 36
011A21A | 36
031M20A | 35
032L20A | 35
010A21A | 33
011J20A | 33
030A21A | 33
028L20A | 32
011L20A | 32
004M20A | 32
025J20-2A | 31 << — What’s this? (see below)
041L20A | 31
011M20A | 31
031L20A | 30
032H20A | 29
030M20A | 28
042L20A | 27
Unknown | 27
006M20A | 27
012A21A | 25
002A21A | 25
043L20A | 24
032M20A | 24
023M20A | 23
040A21A | 23
027A21A | 23
017B21A | 22
036A21A | 20
unknown | 19
020B21A | 19
047A21A | 19
006B21A | 18
044A21A | 17
038K20A | 17
048A21A | 15
003A21A | 15
014M20A | 15
031A21A | 15
031B21A | 15
021B21A | 15
025A21A | 14
007B21A | 14
003B21A | 14
001A21A | 13
038A21A | 13
025B21A | 13
001B21A | 12
046A21A | 12
027B21A | 11
045A21A | 11
038B21A | 11
025J20A | 11
002C21A | 11
016B21A | 11
036B21A | 11
039B21A | 10
002B21A | 10
018B21A | 10
019B21A | 10
008B21A | 10
029K20A | 10
029A21A | 10
028A21A | 9
047B21A | 9
001C21A | 9
044B21A | 8
045B21A | 8
009C21A | 8
048B21A | 8
026B21A | 8
039A21A | 7
040B21A | 7
046B21A | 7
032B21A | 7
038C21A | 6
030m20a | 6
027C21A | 6
008C21A | 6
006C21A | 6
004C21A | 6
047C21A | 6
007C21A | 5
025C21A | 5
042B21A | 5
043B21A | 5
025J202A | 5  << — Same as the above one?
052E21A | 5
003C21A | 5
030B21A | 5
030a21a | 5
016C21A | 5
017C21A | 5
N/A | 5
037A21B | 5
037B21A | 5
024m20a | 4
031l20a | 4
003b21a | 4
026a21a | 4
041B21A | 4
005C21A | 4
033C21A | 4
035C21A | 4
021C21A | 4
040a21a | 4
041C21A | 4
006D21A | 4
022C21A | 4
037k20a | 4
048C21A | 4
03M20A | 3
008B212A | 3
039k20a | 3
024C21A | 3
016m20a | 3
038k20a | 3
025b21a | 3
033B21A | 3
026C21A | 3
Moderna | 3
033c21a | 3
014C21A | 3

There are 547 unique lot entries that have one or more deaths associated with them.  Some of the lot numbers are in the wrong format or missing, as you can also see.  That’s not unusual and in fact implicates the ordinary failure to get things right when people fill out the input.  For example “Moderna” in the above results is clearly not a lot number.  I’ve made no attempt to “sanitize” the data set in this regard and, quite-clearly, neither has VAERS even months after the fact with their “alleged” follow-up on reports.

But there is a wild over-representation in deaths of just a few lots; in fact fewer than 50 lots account for all lots where more than 20 associated deaths accumulated and out of the 547 unique entries fewer than 100 account for all those with more than 10 deaths.

Normal distribution my ass.

How about Pfizer?

vax_lot | count
EN6201 | 117
EN5318 | 99
EN6200 | 97
EN6198 | 89
EL3248 | 86
EL9261 | 84
EM9810 | 82
EN6202 | 75
EL9269 | 75
EL3302 | 69
EL3249 | 67
EL8982 | 67
EN6208 | 59
EL9267 | 58
EL9264 | 57
EL0140 | 54
EN6199 | 54
EJ1686 | 51
EL9265 | 50
EL1283 | 48
ER2613 | 48
EN6204 | 47
EN6205 | 45
EK9231 | 43
EL3246 | 43
EN6207 | 41
EN6203 | 41
ER8732 | 40
EL1284 | 39
EL0142 | 38
EJ1685 | 38
ER8737 | 37
EN9581 | 36
EN6206 | 35
EP7533 | 35
EL9262 | 34
EL9266 | 33
EL3247 | 32
ER8727 | 28
EP6955 | 27
ER8730 | 26
EW0150 | 25
EK5730 | 24
EP7534 | 24
EM9809 | 22
EK4176 | 22
EH9899 | 21
EW0171 | 21
unknown | 20
ER8731 | 19
ER8735 | 18
EW0172 | 18
EL9263 | 17
EW0151 | 15
ER8733 | 15
EW0158 | 14
EW0164 | 14
EW0162 | 14
EW0169 | 14
ER8729 | 13
ER8734 | 13
Unknown | 13
EW0153 | 13
EW0167 | 12
EW0168 | 10
EW0161 | 10
EW0182 | 9
EW0181 | 8
EW0186 | 8
ER8736 | 8
EW0191 | 8
FF2589 | 7
EW0173 | 6
EW0175 | 6
FA7485 | 6
EW0177 | 6
FD0809 | 6
301308A | 6
EW0170 | 6
FC3182 | 6
EW0217 | 6
EK41765 | 5
EW0196 | 5
EW0176 | 5
EW0183 | 4
EN 5318 | 4
el3249 | 4
EW0178 | 4
EW0179 | 4
EW0187 | 4
FA6780 | 4
FA7484 | 4
EN 6207 | 4

Pfizer has 395 unique lot numbers associated with at least one death and, again, there are a few that are obviously bogus.  But again, normal distribution my ass; there is a wild over-representation with one lot, EN6201, being associated with 117 deaths and fewer than 20 are associated with more than 50.

For grins and giggles let’s look at the age distribution for 039K20A — the worst Moderna lot.

karl=> select avg(age_yrs) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) = vaers_id(vaers_vax) and vax_type=’COVID19′ and vax_manu(vaers_vax)=’MODERNA’ and vax_lot(vaers_vax)=’039K20A’ and age_yrs is not null;
(1 row)

Ok, so the average age of people who got that shot, had a bad reaction (and had a valid age in the table) is 51.

How about for 030A21A which had 33 deaths?

karl=> select avg(age_yrs) from vaers, vaers_vax where vaers_id(vaers) = vaers_id(vaers_vax) and vax_type=’COVID19′ and vax_manu(vaers_vax)=’MODERNA’ and vax_lot(vaers_vax)=’030A21A’ and age_yrs is not null;

(1 row)

Well there goes the argument that we jabbed all the old people in nursing homes with the really nasty outcome lot and they died but it not caused by the jab and the second lot, which had a much lower rate, all went into younger people’s arms and that’s why they didn’t die.  Uh, no, actually when it comes to the age of the people who got jabbed in these two instances its the other way around; the second lot, which was less deadly, had bad reactions in older people on average yet fewer died — and significantly so too (by 10 years.)

In addition there is no solid correlation between the “bad” lots and first report of trouble.  The absolute worst of Moderna had a bad report in the first days of January.  But — another lot of their vaccine with only 172 reports against it (1/20th the rate of the worst for total adverse events) had its first adverse event report on January 6th.

What is normally-distributed?  When people died.

What the actual **** is going on here?  You’re going to try to tell me that the CDC, NIH and FDA don’t know about this?  I can suck this data into a database, run 30 seconds of queries against it and instantly identify a wildly-elevated death and hazard rate associated with certain lot numbers when the distribution of those associations should be normal, or at least something close to it, across all the lots produced and used?  Then I look to try to find the obvious potential “clean” explanation (the higher death rate lot could have gone into older people) and it’s simply not there when one looks at all adverse event reports.  I have Moderna lots with the same average age of persons who died but ten times times the number of associated deaths.

Then I look at reported date of death and…. its reasonably close to a normal distribution.  So no, it wasn’t all those old people getting killed at once in the first month.  So much for that attempted explanation.

Oh if you’re interested the nastiest lot was literally everywhere in terms of states reporting adverse events against it; no, they didn’t concentrate them in one state or region either.

The outcome distribution isn’t “sort of close” when most of the lots have a single-digit number of associated deaths.

Isn’t it also interesting that when one removes the “dead” flag the same sort of correlation shows up?  That is, there are plenty of lots with nearly nothing reported against them.  For Moderna within the first page of results (~85 lots) there is more than a three times difference in total adverse events.  The worst lot, 039K20A with 87 deaths, is not only worst for deaths; it also has more than 4,000 total adverse event reports against it.  For context if you drill down a couple hundred entries in that report the number of total adverse events against another lot, 025C21A number 417 with five deaths.

Are you really going to try to tell me that a mass-produced and distributed jab has a roughly ten times adverse event rate between two lots and seventeen times the death rate between the same two, you can’t explain it by “older people getting one lot and not the other” and this is not a screaming indication that something that cannot be explained as random chance has occurred?

Here, in pictures, since some of you need to be hit upside the head with a ****ing railroad tie before you wake up:

That’s Pfizer deaths by lot, worst-to-best.  Look normal to you?  Remember, zero deaths in a given lot doesn’t come up since it’s not in the system.

How about adverse events of all sorts?

(Yes, there are invalid lot numbers, particularly in the second graph, with lots of “1s”.  The left side however is what it is.)

There’s a much-larger problem.  Have a look at Moderna’s chart of the same thing.  First, deaths:

And AE’s….

These are different companies!

Want even worse news?

JANSSEN, which is an entirely different technology, has the same curve.


What do we have here folks?

Is there something inherent in the production of the “instructions”, however they’re delivered, that results in a non-deterministic outcome within a batch of jabs which was not controlled for, perhaps because it isn’t understood SINCE WE HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BEFORE IN MAN OR BEAST and if it goes wrong you’re ****ed?

This is a power-law (exponential) distribution; it is not a step-function nor normally distributed.  Those don’t happen with allegedly consistent manufacturing processes and the potential confounding factor that could be an innocent explanation (all the bad ones were early and killed all the old people early who died of “something” but it wasn’t the vaccines since they all got the jab first) has been invalidated because the dates of death are in fact reasonably distributed.

Have doctors been told to stop reporting?  Note that HHS can issue such an order under the PREP Act and there is no judicial review if they do that.  Did they?

This demands an explanation.  Three different firms all using spike proteins, two using a different technology than the third, all three causing the body to produce the spike rather than deliver it directly and all three of them have a wild skew of some lots that hose people left and right while the others, statistically, do not screw people.

This data also eliminates the hypothesis put forward that lack of aspiration technique is responsible — that is, that occasional accidental penetration of a vein results in systemic distribution.  That would not be lot-specific.

Next question, which VAERS cannot answer: Is there an effectiveness difference between the lots that screw people and those that do not?

Are we done being stupid yet?  Statistically all of the adverse events of any sort are in a handful of lots irrespective of the brand.  The rest generate a few bad outcomes while a very, very small number of lots generate a huge percentage of the harm.  And no, that’s not tied to age bracketing (therefore who got it first either); some of the worst have average age distributions that are less than lots with lower adverse event rates.  It is also not tied to when used either since one of the “better” lots has a first-AE report right at the start of January — as do the “bad” lots.

The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body.  The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem.  The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person’s average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. “certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.”)  While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as “but the highest risk got it first” fails as well.

In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale.  This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirusjab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be “hot” and harm crazy percentages of those they’re given to with no way to know in advance.  The basic premise used here — to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. 

The entire premise of calling something that does this a “vaccine” is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely.

Something is very wrong here folks and the people running VAERS either aren’t looking on purpose, know damn well its happening and are saying nothing about it on purpose — never mind segregating the data in such a fashion that casual perusal of their downloads won’t find it — or saw it immediately and suppressed reporting on purpose.

If these firms were not immune from civil and even criminal prosecution as a result of what Biden and Trump did the plaintiff’s bar would have been crawling up *******s months ago.

This ought to be rammed up every politician’s ass along with every single person at the CDC, NIH and FDA.  They know this is going on; it took me minutes to analyze and find this.

What the HELL is going on here?

THESE SHOTS MUST BE WITHDRAWN NOW until what has happened is fully explained and, if applicable, accountability is obtained for those injured or killed as a result.  If embargoing of reports is proved, and its entirely possible that is the case, everyone involved must go to prison now and the entire program must be permanently scrapped.



Fully Vaccinated are Suffering Far Higher Rates of Infection than the Unvaccinated, and It is Getting Worse



h/t to Lot’s Wife

For the undecided in this audience, James Giordano, PhD., may breach your spillway.

His (1:11:00) presentation will tighten juncture boxes – a dot-connecting exercise – between suspicion and fact.

At 40 minutes, Giordano provides explicit details about his sector’s capabilities. Grasp their impact in light of the national experience these last 19 months. 


VAERS Reveals DEATH BY LOT NUMBER: Specific States Get Certain Vials

I broke this story in middle August 2021, republished it on my new Blog after Google banned me, 6 hours after publishing this.


The “Vaccines” Are Quite Risky in the Short Term, Unknown in The Long Term, And They Don’t Even Work

So Mandate them!!!!!

Stunning New Study Undercuts the Case for Vaccine Mandates

One lie that they have trotted out repeatedly, is that VXXd who get COVID have much less severe sickness, and MUCH less chance of Death. And those are utter effing lies, but the brain dead latch on without even trying to do any research.

With President Biden’s federal vaccine mandate and local government employment mandates looming, the future of countless workers is up in the air. Yet new research undercuts the stated justification for these mandates.

Big-government politicians claim that vaccine mandates are necessary because unvaccinated individuals are a danger to not just themselves but society. They argue that choosing to remain unvaccinated exacerbates the spread of the deadly virus. But according to a new study published in the Lancet, this doesn’t appear to be true. 

The article below points out some of these facts, but accepts the lie about less severe and less deaths without examination, and ignores the dangers of the vaccine. So its weak. Its partly on point, and then it throws in the towel in the conclusion.

The vaccines do appear to highly reduce the chance of hospitalization or death from COVID-19. That’s why I chose to take the COVID vaccine and have encouraged several people in my life who are at risk of COVID to do so. But the fact remains that the main benefit of COVID vaccination is personal, not societal. 

This is why Stanford epidemiologist Jay Bhattacharya calls the development of these vaccines “a wonderful achievement” that has “protected so many people from severe outcomes of the disease,” but ultimately concludes that vaccination is a matter of personal health—not public health. 



Recent Solar CME Rocked the Combined Magma Chamber of Hawaii


The Cargo Ship Crisis is Manufactured – Creating Supply Chain Nightmare

These have been my thoughts for many weeks. I have seen a few parts outages, and I am in a building supply store probably 2 to 4 times a week. Most of the news is overblown, of course.

But of course it would be in California….and the worst of it at Long Beach of which the Chinese actually held the lease on that Port until Trump grabbed it back. Commie Newsome is handling the “management” of the obstacles placed on the logistics. Still, if something is important to you, and the quality of your life would be degraded without it, I urge you to get several months supply.

Not to add fuel to the fire, to be realistic. The more normal one can live, the more you will be able to navigate through and handle the problems that ARE going to be thrown our way.

We travel up the coast to the Port of Los Angeles to see all the backed up cargo ships. These ships are waiting to enter the port to get unloaded. It gets worse by the week. Our Economy is collapsing before our eyes. #CargoShips #Inflation #PortofLA #iAllegedly #TheFed #inflation #SupplyChain

This pretends to be real news, but it is more bullshit. More panic production. More fear that “not even Christmas” will be allowed this year. And the vast stupidity of “just in time” production in factories and food processing, based on a stupid idea that there is some large time value of money…..well the blame is on us. Long ago, I was a production line manager. I operated on “just in case” breaking Corporate protocol by finding clever hiding spots for my emergency parts. I out produced everyone else in the factory.


Live Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Kenosha Wisconsin

This judge seems like a real person, with a broad knowledge of legal history. His name is Bruce Schroeder

There are some things he won’t waiver on, such as using the word victim.

“This is a long-held opinion of mine, which very few judges, I guess, share with me. I think the word victim is a loaded, loaded word,” Schroeder said.

LIVE: Kyle Rittenhouse trial begins in Kenosha, Wisconsin


96 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted


Medscape Periodical Now Carries Water For Communism, aka Collectivism

Perceived invincibility from the threat of SARS-CoV2 may be undermining efforts globally to reach herd immunity with COVID-19, researchers conclude in analyzing survey responses from more than 200,000 people across 51 countries.

James Leonhardt, PhD, associate professor of marketing at the University of Nevada in Reno, and colleagues write that controlling the disease requires that people be both concerned about taking preventive measures, such as wearing a mask, and be willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19.

Findings were published online yesterday in PLOS ONE.

However, these “prosocial” actions may depend on people’s level of perceived invincibility, their data show. The ties between invincibility and low desire to take prosocial action are particularly prominent in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, where there is greater focus on autonomy and individual freedoms, the researchers say.

Leonhardt told Medscape Medical News that they expected to find, and did find, that high levels of “perceived invincibility” were correlated with low levels of wanting to help prevent the spread of the disease and low levels of vaccination.

What they didn’t expect to find, he said, was that the factor that made the difference in whether those with perceived invincibility were motivated to help prevent COVID-19 in themselves or others was whether they came from a culture of “collectivism,” meaning they believed that their own health was dependent on the health of the community as a whole.

Dr James Leonhardt

He explained the importance of the collectivist mentality: “Even if I think I’m invincible but I’m in a more collectivistic culture, my feelings of invincibility are going to have less of an effect on whether I want to get vaccinated,” he said. So people with the collective mindset who feel invincible may say [that] although they don’t feel at risk themselves, they will go ahead and get the vaccine for the good of the community.

Knowing that collective-culture thinking is correlated with better performance on vaccine prevention may hold clues for changing the public health messages surrounding the vaccine, he said.

How to Frame the Message

So how to promote an all-for-one mindset regarding COVID-19?

Leonhardt said that will be especially difficult in the US, which “is the least collectivistic culture on Earth,” based on their analysis.

He said that — given this new data — a message that might be more persuasive than emphasizing the danger of the disease on an individual basis would be to emphasize that getting vaccinated will help the groups people care about, whether that is family, a school, a city, or a nation, for instance.

At Leonhardt’s university, he pointed out, the sports teams are nicknamed the “Wolf Pack” and the vaccine pitch is “Let’s Vax the Pack


Our First Hand ICU Story – What is ACTUALLY Killing People In The Hospital [21:42]



The Bill Gates Story

There is more to the Gates story. He is NOT just a nerdy computer guy. He is a psychopathic eugenicist, and a narcissist. He is so evil that even his evil wife can’t stand him anymore.


17,137 Reports of Flu Like Symptons After the VXX!

If they are correctly stating what is in the VXX, then how the heck does flu like symptoms occur?

The answer should be obvious.

Fever, Flu like symptoms., chills/sweating for 72 hrs, Body aches and severe joint pain, disorientation, severe anxiety and jittery, rapid heart rate, Resting heart rate was between 130-140 beats per minute. Severe fatigue and weakness. Stayed in bed for 48+ hrs after adverse symptoms began with little relief.
This was my second vaccine for Covid.  I experience headache, shaking chill and flu- like symptoms.  My left arm was also sore.  I had similar sx with the firat dose of the two but the second dose was definitley more symptomatic.  My chillswere so bad that I could bvarely open the Tylenol container to get the medicine out.  I should also state that I also had the Covid disease and I know that this is a risk factor for having a reaction.  I think people should be told that they could have a reaction so they do not plan anything important the following day, but they should still get the vaccine. The day following the reaction I felt perfect.
body aches, injection site soreness,  joint stiffness,  nausea, head ache,  flu like symptoms
4″x5″ large red raised painful bump  which was hot to the touch flu like symptoms-lethargy, sore throat, stomach upset The symptoms increased in intensity over three days, beginning to see decrease on fourth Treated with ice and Tylenol.  Antihistamin on first day.


The above is a folder that contains 6 spreadsheets that break down VAERS Events into objects I choose to study.

Please review and share


MEDALERTS Has A VAERS Wayback Machine to Detect Changes in a Specific VAERS Report



COVID Was A Terror Tactic To Beat Down People So They Could Be Coerced Into the Real Weapon, the VXX!

Sometimes I see a comment so spot on, its deserves to be preserved and promoted… here is one of those

Finally, the underlying agenda is laid bare.

I’ve wondered watching the hysteria on the part of all the Authority figures – especially the Federal Government- to get EVERYBODY jabbed with their ‘genetic cocktail’ exactly ‘what’ the press to do so was motivated BY.

IF the preceding is to be believed, then COVID was simply used as a terror tactic to allow the PTB to manipulate the general populace into accepting the actual weapon with sheep-like docility… that being the vaccine itself. Naturally, any such weapon would need to have a sufficiently long period of relative quiescence before manifesting symptoms; if people started dropping dead a week after the jab the jig would be up in short order, wouldn’t it? No, this approach is utterly BRILLIANT in it’s conception (again, IF true!) since by now multiple Billions of People have received the vaccination World-Wide.

If, the assertion regarding the ongoing diminution of immune response is scientifically factual, then not only will the UK be virtually depopulated by the coming March but everyone Stateside who received the ‘vaccine’ will by – Oh say, late June – be on the cusp of final immunological collapse. According to various reckonings that would be between 30-45 per cent of the American population DEAD by not later than August at the outside…without a shot having been fired. You almost have to admire such ruthless efficiency…it’s simply breathtaking in it’s scope, truly.

FWIW, neither myself, nor ANYONE in my family has – or WILL – be receiving ‘the Jab’ regardless of the level of coercion involved. That said, there IS a limit to how much bullshit we’re going to put up with before responding in kind; remember Frank Herbert’s famous line from his epic, Dune, “He who can DESTROY a thing CONTROLS a thing.”…and Civilization as we know it is very, very frail indeed. Nuff said…



The Future, Robots serving you fabricated meats made from GMO plants and served on very suspect baked grains.

The Future, Robots serving you fabricated meats made from GMO plants and served on very suspect baked grains.



Q Was A Psychological Operation, Probably Run By CIA

The “Q” entity was a clever “controlled opposition”. It was a Psy-op by the cabal. It tricked many people who may have rose up against the corruption, the cabal, by instead having them convinced that powerful forces were “on the case” and that “we have everything”. The lies have an element of the truth, and the Q psy-op used this technique.

This is a video referenced in the last “Q Drop” December 8, 2020. Q was pretty quiet after the election was stolen. When Q was no longer needed, they simply stopped posting.

Some still carrying on with the Q thing. It is far easier to fool a man than to convince him that he was fooled. This video was censored from YouTube but I was able to find it on Bitchute.

What do y’all think?


As The Mock Trial of Kyle Rittenhouse Begins, Lets Review the Original Footage

This is one of the assholes who physically attacked Rittenhouse and was killed.