Brush Junkie continues to knock it out of the Park. I also posted a full meeting, a year and a half before the 8/8 Lahaina Massacre. I wish to get an AI to provide the full transcript. See article above this one.
Hello to all Truth Seekers and Independent Investigators. Retired Assistant Police Chief Clyde Holokai secretly recorded his first private meeting with newly (s)elected Chief John Pelletier and Deputy Charles Hank (The Shank). In this tape, Clyde is basically being interrogated by Hank and Pelletier for rumors they heard about him from other officers. Clyde doesn’t back down though, and even tells them what he heard about them as well, putting them on notice about how if they’re crooked cops he’s “gonna be their worst enemy”.
Highlights: Pelletier: “I’m not gonna candy coat some of this. The administration is me. The administration is me, and we all march to the same drum, and if I have somebody that’s gonna go against the administration, that’s not gonna go very well for them, you know, and I don’t like the, bu11$h!+, and let’s be very clear, I know all about it.
And so, I aint havin’ it.” Clyde: “There’s no bu11$h!+, Chief. Secondly this is what I heard and I’m bringing it up, I’m not pointing the guy out but the guy in this room said it. Ok? This is what I heard, and it’s gotta stop, we are the leaders of this department.”
Hank (The Shank): “Said about you or about him?” Clyde: “About me.”
Hank (The Shank): “What did they say about you?” Clyde: “They said, that they’re gonna work with him [Pelletier] to remove me from my position. I know, I know!”
Hank (The Shank): “His [Pelletier’s] desire is to make this the model agency, not just for the islands, but for the whole country”
Hank (The Shank) to Clyde: “I’ma just keep it real. What I heard about you, What I heard about you. I heard you were comin’ for us, that you were trying to take us down.”
Clyde: “I’m glad you are, I’m sure you guys did hear that.”
Clyde: “It’s been brought up that we’ve all heard things about each other. In the spirit of love moving forward, unity, lets all agree to just judge each other on what we see right from here.
I know who you guys have been talking to people, and this is me; you work and I’ll be your best friend, you don’t work or you’re a crooked cop, I’m gonna be your worst enemy.
You look at my record, it speaks for itself. We’ve gone after, when I was a cop in the city, we put away plenty cops who was dirty, and I hated it, but I’ll do it again.”
Pelletier: “I waited till November, uh, till the final, uh uh confirmation meeting took place before I had set this up, and I know that there was a shake up. I’m not, let’s not sit here and (be like) ‘what does this mean’ and you know it’s, uh, I get it.
I do get it.” Hank: “We had this even come to us with the 3 guys comin’ to Vegas when we had coffee and this was brought up, and uh here’s what was really bothering me, cuz I was just getting on board, and as I start lookin’ at the Maui news and stuff like that,
you guys just caught this knucklehead again, you know the 2nd time with the ‘kiki uh, operation, got him again, and like so guess what, what do they keep doing?
They keep associating him with us, so the public’s perception is that he’s still with us, as though he’s with Maui PD, and he’s not with us.”
Zionism is a political and ideological movement that emerged in the late 19th century with the aim of establishing and maintaining a Jewish homeland in the historic land of Israel, known as Zion. The movement was led by Jewish intellectuals and activists who sought to address the socio-political challenges faced by Jewish communities around the world.
The comment you mentioned brings up some historical references related to the early establishment of Israel as a nation and the conflicts that arose from it. It mentions Joshua, a biblical figure who was given the task of exterminating the Amalekites, a rival tribe, but failed to fully accomplish it. This failure is said to have led to the rise of the Philistines, who produced Goliath of Gath and his brothers. The mention of “six fingers and toes” refers to a biblical account that describes certain descendants of the Philistines as having this physical trait.
The comment also alludes to the ongoing conflict between different tribes and the question of who should be considered the true prophetic inheritors of Zion. This refers to the inheritance promised by Jacob (also known as Israel) to his son Judah on his deathbed, as described in the Bible.
It is worth noting that the comment reflects a specific interpretation of historical and biblical events, and there are varying perspectives and understandings when it comes to Zionism and the history of Israel.
The coordinates of Mount Zion
Mount Zion Zoomed out
Zoomed out further, Zion Mountain, seems to the be center of the area with green mountains to the west and arid mountains to the east
LOL Zion to the Sea
Zion to the Gaza Strip
The whole region
stock here: Seems like Wikipedia and AI like to make Zion seem very vague, hmmmmm
The question of who the real prophetic inheritors of Zion are can have various interpretations and perspectives. Here are some possible answers:
Jewish Perspective: From a Jewish perspective, Zion is often associated with Jerusalem and the land of Israel. In this view, the Jewish people, as descendants of the ancient Israelites, are considered the inheritors of Zion. The establishment of the modern state of Israel in 1948 is seen by many as a fulfillment of the Zionist movement’s goal of creating a Jewish homeland.
Christian Perspective: In Christianity, Zion can have different meanings depending on the interpretation. Some Christians view Zion as a symbol of God’s kingdom on Earth, associated with righteousness, justice, and the reign of the Messiah. Others see Zion as a spiritual concept, representing the heavenly Jerusalem and the assembly of believers in Christ.
Latter Day Saints Perspective: Within the Latter Day Saints movement, Zion is often associated with a community of righteous individuals who practice communitarian economics and strive for unity. The concept of Zion is connected to the belief in the Second Coming of Christ and the establishment of a theodemocratic government.
Metaphorical Interpretation: Zion can also be understood metaphorically as a representation of the people of Israel or the chosen people of God. It symbolizes the loving and caring relationship between God and His chosen people, as described in the Old Testament.
A friend is actually taking on the system, pro se. Corruption is rampant, and its another uniparty example that no one cares as long as they keep their power and privilege.
You can hate on Alex Jones, he is a “player” that is easy to hate. I guess that is part of his appeal. He received a $1B fine in court for saying that some kids did not die at Sandy Hook. So it is obviously all theater.
These guys bring up an important point that I am trying to have go viral, this is an outlet that can promote that goal. The concept of the Classic Liberal compare to the work Neo-Liberal.
Globalist Plan To Destroy Civilization and How We Can Save It: Dr. Bret Weinstein Full Interview
Important facts to add to that list:Sweden had an 80% SURVIVAL rate for ICU patients in 2020. We had an 80-90% DEATH rate. Trials of early treatment protocols were deliberately designed to fail and in the case of Hydroxy, the patients were literally murdered, given toxic doses intentionally.
The Lancet had to immediately retract that garbage study, but the damage was done.
The headline went out that Hydroxy is a killer.
No one ever heard about the correction. Ivermectin trials were rigged to fail and STILL showed a mortality benefit.
Hydroxy went from over the counter in France to BANNED in January 2020, before human to human transmission was even confirmed.
Attorney Ralph Lodrigo sued a Houston hospital and won dozens of lawsuits for ICU patients who were demanding Ivermectin. Nearly all survived despite being on ventilators for weeks while the court cases were argued.
The WHO published the raging success story of Uttar Pradesh, citing preventative treatment as a huge success. They failed to mention that Ivermectin was part of that package.
And continued to force vaccination rather than suggest using Uttar Pradesh as a blueprint for the rest of the world.
The FDA lowered the already egregiously low standard of 75% mRNA purity for a large batch of Pfizer jabs to 55% so that the batch would not have to be disposed of.
Pfizer told its stockholders in January 2022 that full approval would NEVER happen due to the frequency of serious adverse events. The cherry on top is that every “containment action” that was taken was IMHO designed to completely destroy the possibility of herd immunity forever.
stock here: I have 2 concepts that I intend to put effort into making them go viral, 2 weeks ago, my goal was 2 weeks. So far I have failed, but there is some traction.
These concepts are definitely not commonplace at this time, but I ask you to help spread the word. We will have a better place when these concepts are widely dispersed.
There is a personality type that was labelled maybe a hundred some years ago as “Liberal”, maybe beginning with John Locke even. Individual rights, limited government, rule of law, free markets, personal freedom, freedom of speech. My idea is that these people also operate quite a bit with “feelings” and care of others.
I have quite some time ago dubbed this as a Classical Liberal.
There is another group that leans towards a more authoritarian approach to things, perhaps even some of these people are on power trips, control of others is a main driver in their pysche. Many would agree with me that this can be called “the left”.
The “Left” have used the good heartedness of the Classical Liberal, and infiltrated them with a series of little lies, that has grown into the current massive lies of the Neo-Liberal into promoting that mutilation of children, and murder of babies in the womb up to the minute before birth is the caring feeling way to go about life.
OK Items 1 to 4 above need to be promoted in a way that who have been captured, can see how they are being used in ways exactly against their basic nature.
Here is a summary of what we all need to stop. Stop using the term “liberal”. It must only be used as Classical Liberal, or Neo-Liberal and understood that Neo-Liberal is a transformed form which is very much like “The Left”
What kind of advice did Clinton get from Kissinger in 3 specific events, and also a 4th being discussion with japan after Fukushima and the USA deicsion to buy their agriculture without radioactive testing
Based on the available search results, there is limited information specifically detailing three specific events where Henry Kissinger provided advice to Hillary Clinton. However, it is known that Hillary Clinton has mentioned her connection to Kissinger and has praised his tenure at the State Department. Kissinger has also been known to offer his views and ideas to various politicians, including Clinton, as well as other secretaries of state such as Condoleezza Rice, John Kerry, and Mike Pompeo.
It is worth noting that Kissinger’s involvement and advice to political figures may vary and can be subject to interpretation. The specific details of their discussions and any advice given would likely be known only to those involved.
Regarding the discussion with Japan after the Fukushima nuclear disaster and the alleged decision to purchase radioactive food without testing, there is a claim in one of the search results that Kissinger advised Clinton on this matter. However, it is important to note that this claim is not widely supported or substantiated by multiple sources. It is advisable to consult more comprehensive and reliable sources for a complete understanding of the events and decisions related to the Fukushima disaster.
Remember, the information provided is based on available search results, and the specific details of Kissinger’s advice to Clinton in these events may require further research or consultation of primary sources.
Let me know if there’s anything else I can assist you with!
The division between Sunnis and Shiites is an ancient schism within Islam. While they share many fundamental beliefs and practices, there are differences in doctrine, ritual, law, theology, and religious organization. Here are some prime characteristics of Sunnis and Shiites:
Sunnis:
The majority of the world’s Muslims are Sunnis, estimated to be between 85% and 90% of the global Muslim population.
Sunnis consider themselves the orthodox branch of Islam.
They believe that the position of Caliph should be elected by the religious leaders of the Islamic community, rather than dependent on direct lineage from Prophet Muhammad.
Sunni Islam is prevalent in countries like Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, where Sunnis make up a significant majority of the population.
Shiites:
Shiites are the second-largest branch of Islam, making up around 10% to 15% of the global Muslim population.
They consider certain direct descendants of Ali, the cousin and son-in-law of Prophet Muhammad, as infallible and the true inheritors of Muhammad’s leadership.
Shiites believe in the concept of Imams, who are considered spiritual and political successors to Prophet Muhammad. The line of Imams ended with the 12th Imam, who is believed to be in hiding and will reemerge as the Mahdi or Messiah in the future.
Shiites are predominantly found in countries like Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon.
In the context of Palestine and the Gaza Strip:
The population of the Gaza Strip is predominantly Muslim and overwhelmingly Sunni. Over 99% of the population in the Gaza Strip is Muslim, with a small percentage of Christians.
Hamas, the ruling authority in the Gaza Strip, is a predominantly Sunni organization. It is the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which shares a common set of values with Iran despite the historical divide between Sunnis and Shiites
. While there have been reports of individuals in Gaza converting to Shiism, the number of Shiites in Gaza is limited, and Hamas has taken measures to address this phenomenon discreetly
.
Regarding your question about Arabs, it is important to note that not all Arabs are Muslims. The Arab world consists of diverse religious communities, including Muslims, Christians, Druze, and others. While Islam is the predominant religion in many Arab countries, it is not the exclusive religion of all Arabs.
Based on the available search results, here is a breakdown of religious affiliation in selected countries in the Middle East and North Africa:
Egypt:
Predominantly Sunni Muslim, with estimates ranging from 85% to 90% of the population identifying as Sunni.
A small Christian minority, primarily Coptic Christians, comprising around 10% to 15% of the population.
Iran:
Predominantly Shiite Muslim, with estimates ranging from 90% to 95% of the population identifying as Shiite.
A small Sunni Muslim minority, comprising around 5% to 10% of the population.
There are also small communities of Christians, Jews, and other religious groups.
Iraq:
Predominantly Shiite Muslim, with estimates ranging from 60% to 65% of the population identifying as Shiite.
A significant Sunni Muslim minority, comprising around 35% to 40% of the population.
There are also small communities of Christians, Yazidis, and other religious groups.
Saudi Arabia:
Predominantly Sunni Muslim, with estimates ranging from 85% to 90% of the population identifying as Sunni.
A small Shiite Muslim minority, comprising around 10% to 15% of the population.
There are also small communities of Christians, Hindus, and other religious groups, but they are primarily expatriates.
Syria:
Predominantly Sunni Muslim, with estimates ranging from 70% to 75% of the population identifying as Sunni.
A significant Shiite Muslim minority, comprising around 10% to 15% of the population, primarily Alawites.
There are also small communities of Christians, Druze, and other religious groups.
Tunisia:
Predominantly Sunni Muslim, with estimates ranging from 95% to 99% of the population identifying as Sunni.
There are also small communities of Christians and Jews.
There are differing perspectives on the legitimacy and motivations of Hamas as a resistance group. While some view Hamas as a legitimate resistance movement fighting against perceived Israeli occupation and injustices, others consider it a terrorist organization. It is important to note that the views expressed here are not an endorsement of any particular perspective but rather an attempt to provide a balanced understanding of the topic.
Hamas, officially known as the Islamic Resistance Movement, is an Islamist militant group and one of the major political parties in the Palestinian territories, particularly in the Gaza Strip. It was founded in 1987 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and has since been involved in armed resistance against Israel. Hamas rejects the recognition of Israel and seeks to establish an independent Islamic state in historical Palestine.
Supporters of Hamas argue that the group’s actions are driven by legitimate grievances, including the Israeli occupation, settlement expansion, and perceived violations of Palestinian rights. They view Hamas as a resistance movement fighting for self-determination and the liberation of Palestinian territories. Some argue that as long as these grievances persist, there will always be groups like Hamas.
Critics, on the other hand, view Hamas as a terrorist organization due to its use of violence, including acts of terrorism, against Israeli civilians. They argue that Hamas’s refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist and its rejection of previous peace agreements undermine the prospects for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
It is important to approach this topic with sensitivity and consider multiple perspectives. The information provided here is based on available sources and does not represent a definitive stance on the matter.
Zionism is a multifaceted term that has evolved over time. It originated in the late 19th century as a political movement advocating for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The term “Zionism” is derived from Zion, a hill in Jerusalem that holds religious significance in Judaism. The movement aimed to address the historical persecution and displacement of Jewish communities and to create a safe haven for Jews.
The concept of Zionism has undergone various interpretations and developments throughout history. Initially, it focused on the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, with an emphasis on Jewish self-determination and the return to the ancestral homeland. This vision was influenced by factors such as rising anti-Semitism, Jewish nationalism, and the desire for a national identity.
Over time, different branches of Zionism emerged, each with its own perspectives and goals. For example, political Zionism, associated with figures like Theodor Herzl, focused on achieving international recognition and support for the establishment of a Jewish state. Cultural Zionism, represented by figures like Ahad Ha’am, emphasized the revival of Jewish culture and the development of a spiritual and intellectual center in Palestine.
It is important to note that Zionism has been a subject of debate and criticism. Some critics argue that it led to the displacement of Palestinian Arabs and the establishment of the State of Israel, resulting in ongoing conflicts in the region. Others view Zionism as a legitimate expression of Jewish self-determination and a response to historical persecution.
The understanding and interpretation of Zionism can vary among individuals and groups. It is essential to consider different perspectives and engage in informed discussions to gain a comprehensive understanding of this complex topic.
There have been numerous influential figures associated with Zionism throughout history. Here are some notable individuals:
Theodor Herzl: Considered the father of modern political Zionism, Herzl initiated the convening of the first Zionist Congress in 1897 and played a crucial role in establishing the Zionist Organization.
Chaim Weizmann: Weizmann, a renowned scientist, led efforts to obtain the Balfour Declaration in 1917, which expressed British support for the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. He later became the first president of Israel.
Louis Brandeis: Brandeis, an American jurist, was a prominent advocate for Zionism. He played a significant role in shaping American public opinion in support of the Zionist cause.
Henrietta Szold: Szold was a key figure in the Zionist movement and the founder of Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America. She made significant contributions to education and healthcare in Palestine.
Ze’ev Jabotinsky: Jabotinsky was a prominent leader of the Revisionist Zionist movement. He advocated for a more militant approach to achieving Zionist goals and founded the Betar youth movement.
Golda Meir: Meir, born in Ukraine, became the fourth Prime Minister of Israel and played a crucial role in the establishment and development of the country. She was a prominent figure in international diplomacy and a strong advocate for Zionism.
David Ben-Gurion: Ben-Gurion was the primary founder and the first Prime Minister of Israel. He played a pivotal role in the establishment of the state and the development of its institutions.
The United States provides significant aid to Israel for various reasons, including historical commitments, strategic alliances, shared values, and mutual interests. The aid package includes both military and economic assistance. Here are some key points to consider:
Strategic Ally: The United States sees Israel as a crucial strategic ally in the Middle East. The two countries share intelligence, conduct military drills together, and cooperate on various security matters
.
Historical Commitments: The U.S. has a long-standing commitment to supporting Israel, dating back to its support for the creation of the Jewish state in 1948 . Over the years, both Republican and Democratic administrations, as well as bipartisan leaders in Congress, have approved aid to Israel
.
Military Cooperation: The U.S. aid to Israel has helped it develop one of the most advanced militaries in the Middle East. The assistance has supported the modernization of Israel’s aircraft fleet and the maintenance of its missile defense system
.
Shared Values and Interests: The United States and Israel share democratic values and have common interests in the region. The aid to Israel is seen as a way to promote stability, security, and peace in the Middle East
.
Economic Ties: The U.S. and Israel also have strong economic ties, with significant trade between the two countries. The aid provided by the U.S. has helped support Israel’s economy and foster economic cooperation
.
It is worth noting that the topic of U.S. aid to Israel is a subject of debate and differing opinions. Some argue that the aid is essential for Israel’s security and stability, while others question the amount and allocation of the aid, considering factors such as U.S. budgetary constraints and the economic capabilities of Israel .
Here are the last 5 times that the United States and Israel conducted joint military drills:
Juniper Oak 23: In January 2023, the United States and Israel conducted the largest-ever joint exercise between their militaries. The drill involved thousands of forces, a dozen ships, and 142 aircraft, including nuclear-capable bombers
.
Intrepid Maven: In February 2024, the U.S. Marines held a 10-day-long joint exercise with the Israel Defense Forces. The drill focused on enhancing cooperation and coordination between the two forces
.
Juniper Oak 2023: In late 2023, the U.S. and Israel conducted a major drill known as Juniper Oak. It was described as the first in a series of planned drills and aimed to simulate long-range operational scenarios and long-distance flights
.
Exercise Juniper Oak: In February 2022, the U.S. and Israel launched a massive joint military exercise. The exercise involved a significant number of personnel, aircraft, and ships, and aimed to demonstrate the integration and capabilities of the two forces
.
Exercise Juniper Oak 23.2: In 2022, the U.S. and Israel concluded exercise Juniper Oak 23.2. It was the largest-ever U.S.-Israel partnered exercise in history and involved the integration of advanced fighter assets, live-fire exercises, and the participation of thousands of troops
.
Please note that the information provided is based on search results and may not include all recent joint military drills between the U.S. and Israel.
The trade relationship between Israel and the United States is significant and covers various sectors. Here is some information about the amount and categories of trade between the two countries:
Total Trade: In 2021, Israel exported goods worth $17 billion to the United States, while the United States exported goods worth $10.5 billion to Israel
.
Israeli Exports to the United States: The main products that Israel exports to the United States include diamonds, packaged medicaments, and medical instruments . Additionally, Israel also exports services to the United States, with computer and information services being a significant category
.
U.S. Exports to Israel: The United States exports a variety of products to Israel, including diamonds, integrated circuits, and cars . In terms of services, the United States exports services to Israel in sectors such as research and development, travel, and transport
.
Trade Agreement: The United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was established in 1985 and was the first free trade agreement entered into by the United States. The FTA has played a role in promoting trade and reducing barriers between the two countries
.
Trade Balance: The trade balance between the United States and Israel has varied over the years. In 2019, the U.S. goods trade deficit with Israel was $5.1 billion, which represented a decrease compared to the previous year .
The relationship between Israel and Iran is indeed complex and has various dimensions. While the mainstream media may not always provide a comprehensive picture, there are indications of tensions and conflicts between the two countries. Here are some key points to consider:
Iran’s Role: Iran has been accused of supporting militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, which have engaged in conflicts with Israel. There have been reports of Iranian involvement in planning attacks against Israel
.
Threat Perception: Israel views Iran as a significant threat to its security. Israeli leaders have expressed concerns about Iran’s nuclear program, its support for militant groups, and its hostile rhetoric towards Israel.
Regional Power Dynamics: The rivalry between Iran and Israel is influenced by broader regional power dynamics. Iran seeks to expand its influence in the Middle East, while Israel aims to maintain its security and regional stability
.
Proxy Conflicts: Israel has been involved in conflicts with Iran-backed groups, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. These conflicts have contributed to the tensions between Israel and Iran
.
Geopolitical Considerations: The relationship between Israel and Iran is influenced by geopolitical factors, including the involvement of other regional and international actors. The United States, for example, has its own interests and policies in the region that can impact the dynamics between Israel and Iran
Based on the available information, there is no direct evidence to suggest that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, influences some sections of Hamas. However, it is important to note that the relationship between intelligence agencies and militant groups can be complex and multifaceted. Here are some key points to consider:
Iranian Support: Hamas receives significant support from Iran, including funds, weapons, and training. Iran is one of Hamas’s biggest benefactors, providing substantial financial assistance to the group and other Palestinian organizations designated as terrorist organizations by the United States
.
Historical Context: In the past, there have been reports of Israeli involvement in supporting certain Palestinian groups, including Hamas, as a counterweight to secular and leftist factions such as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Fatah. However, these reports are controversial and disputed
.
Tensions and Conflicts: Israel and Hamas have been engaged in conflicts and hostilities for years. Israel has conducted military operations against Hamas, and Hamas has fired rockets and carried out attacks against Israel. These actions have contributed to the ongoing tensions between the two parties
.
Intelligence Operations: Intelligence agencies, including Mossad, engage in various activities to gather information and protect national security. While Mossad has been involved in operations related to Palestinian groups in the past, the specific nature and extent of its involvement with Hamas are not publicly known .
I’ll detail the AI censorship that is now coming at me. My last work was dealing with the 30 Trillion Spike S generated over months after injection with the so called COVID vaccine. ChatGDP totally defended the mainstream medical narrative, and dismissed my statements as if they were Barnum statements not even worthy of consideration. It’s too bad, I had a lot of good work in there that I can no longer access. I should have copy pasted all of it. I screen captured the whole process and will present that at some point. I stand outside the Overton window, looking in at the fascist suppressors who run the tech world. Rush 2112 comes to mind.
Here is “You” AI, on defining fascism:
Elements of Fascism in Mussolini’s Regime
Fascism, as defined by Benito Mussolini, encompassed several key elements that characterized his regime in Italy. Here are some of the main elements of fascism in Mussolini’s rule:
Authoritarianism: Mussolini’s regime was characterized by one-party, totalitarian control over the nation and its economy
.
Nationalism: Fascist regimes, including Mussolini’s, placed a strong emphasis on nationalism, often building nationalist fervor around a concept of shared racial or ethnic superiority.
Militarization: Fascist regimes valued militarization and often pursued aggressive foreign policies. Mussolini’s regime sought to revive the greatness of the Roman Empire and reinforce his authority through military strength
.
Rejection of Liberalism: Fascism rejected individual rights, civil liberties, free enterprise, and democracy. Mussolini’s regime targeted democratic institutions, dismantled free speech, and attacked political opponents.
Propaganda: Fascist regimes, including Mussolini’s, used sophisticated propaganda techniques to arouse popular enthusiasm and promote their ideology. Propaganda was employed to promote anti-liberalism, anti-socialism, and the exclusion of certain groups
.
It is important to note that these elements are not exhaustive and that fascism is a complex and multifaceted ideology. Mussolini’s regime also had its unique characteristics and historical context.
Leaders Considered Fascist in the Era
During the era when fascism was prominent, there were several leaders who were considered fascist or had fascist tendencies. Here are some notable leaders:
Adolf Hitler (Germany): Adolf Hitler, as the leader of the Nazi Party, implemented a fascist regime in Germany. His ideology, known as Nazism, shared many similarities with Italian fascism under Mussolini.
Francisco Franco (Spain): Francisco Franco led a fascist regime in Spain after the Spanish Civil War. His regime, known as Francoism, was characterized by authoritarianism, nationalism, and suppression of political opposition.
António de Oliveira Salazar (Portugal): António de Oliveira Salazar established an authoritarian regime in Portugal known as Estado Novo. Although not strictly fascist, Salazar’s regime shared some characteristics with fascism, such as strong nationalism and corporatism.
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu (Romania): Corneliu Zelea Codreanu founded the Iron Guard, a fascist and anti-Semitic organization in Romania. The Iron Guard gained influence during the 1930s and played a significant role in Romanian politics.
Engelbert Dollfuss (Austria): Engelbert Dollfuss was the Chancellor of Austria and established an authoritarian regime known as Austrofascism. Dollfuss aimed to suppress both communism and Nazism in Austria.
Hideki Tojo (Japan): Hideki Tojo served as the Prime Minister of Japan during World War II. Although Japan’s political system differed from European fascism, Tojo’s government pursued aggressive militarism and expansionist policies.
It is important to note that while these leaders and regimes shared some characteristics with fascism, each had their own unique ideologies and historical contexts.
The term “anti-Semitism” was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns underway in central Europe at that time . Prior to the emergence of the term, anti-Jewish hatred and discrimination existed throughout history, with various forms of persecution, expulsions, and violence against Jews dating back to ancient times
Wilhelm Marr, the German agitator who coined the term “anti-Semitism” in 1879, did not express a rational basis for choosing the term specifically. However, it is believed that Marr wanted to give Jew-hatred a more scientific-sounding name and create an all-encompassing word that would include Jews who were no longer practicing the religion or had converted. He chose the term “Antisemitismus” to refer to the anti-Jewish manifestations of the period and to voice and gain support for his opposition to Jews. Marr favored the term “Semite” because it already had literary advantages and reminded him of Sem Biedermann, his Jewish employer from the Vienna period
.
It is important to note that the term “Semite” itself refers to a group of languages traditionally spoken in the Middle East and parts of East Africa, including Hebrew, Arabic, and others. It is not a racial category, but Marr used it in the context of anti-Jewish sentiments
.
I apologize, but I couldn’t find any specific works by Wilhelm Marr that provide translations of his writings from old German into English. However, there are resources available online that can help decipher and translate old German script, including Fraktur, which was commonly used during Marr’s time.
Here are a few websites and tools that may assist you in deciphering and translating old German script:
Brigham Young University: The German Script Tutorial
FamilySearch Wiki: Germany Handwriting
Genealoger: German Genealogy Language, Handwriting, and Script
My Ancestors and Me: Helps for Translating That Old German Handwriting
Omniglot: German
Transkribus: Software for converting old German scripts into readable text
These resources offer tutorials, translators, and transcription editors that can aid in understanding and translating old German script. You may find them helpful in deciphering Wilhelm Marr’s writings or any other old German texts you come across.
Please note that the accuracy and quality of machine translations may vary, so it’s always recommended to consult with experts or professional translators for precise translations.
.
It is important to note that the term “anti-Semitism” specifically refers to hostility or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group, rather than being directed towards a language group The term was used to describe the hatred or hostility toward Jews and has since been widely accepted and understood to mean prejudice against Jewish people
.
Please let me know if there’s anything else I can assist you with.
I apologize, but I couldn’t find specific information about Wilhelm Marr’s related works in the search results provided. However, Wilhelm Marr is known for coining the term “anti-Semitism” and for his involvement in promoting anti-Jewish sentiments in Germany during the late 19th century. He was a prominent figure in the early development of modern anti-Semitism and played a role in shaping the ideology that would later influence the Nazi Party.
Marr’s ideas and writings contributed to the spread of anti-Semitic propaganda and the formation of organizations such as the League of Anti-Semites. His work, “The Victory of Judaism over Germanism: Viewed from a Nonreligious Perspective,” published in 1879, is considered one of his notable works. In this book, Marr expressed his anti-Semitic views and argued for the exclusion of Jews from German society.
It’s important to note that Marr’s writings and ideas were influential in promoting anti-Semitism, which had significant consequences in the following decades, particularly during the rise of the Nazi regime in Germany.
If you require more specific information about Wilhelm Marr’s works, I recommend consulting academic sources or books that delve into the history of anti-Semitism and the development of far-right ideologies in Germany.
A Google search led me to the following:
Wilhelm Marr (1819–1904) and the Left in Germany: The Birth of Modern Antisemitism
The birth of modern antisemitism in Germany is often associated with journalist Wilhelm Marr, whose life stretched through both the upheavals of 1848 and the birth of the German Empire. Marr does not occupy an important place a priori in the antisemitic movement, unlike pastor Adolf Stoecker, nationalist Heinrich von Treitscke, or Houston Stewart Chamberlain. However, because of his fame, the study of his life and impact in German society makes it possible to better understand the modes of dissemination of antisemitism, and to better measure its originality. Although he is credited with coining the concept of antisemitism, a point we will examine later on, Marr’s career has interested only one biographer, Moshe Zimmermann, who published a work entitled Wilhelm Marr The Patriarch of Antisemitism. Born in Magdeburg in 1819 to an actor father, who then became director of a Hamburg theater, nothing in Marr’s itinerary predicted his notoriety or originality. Politically speaking, he was on the left side of the spectrum, and he did his ideological apprenticeship in Switzerland, a refuge for Europeans who were being persecuted for their political commitment. Marr was introduced by Julius Fröbel, a member of the Radical Party and director of the newspaper Der schweizerische Republikaner (The Swiss Republican), and his circle, and to poet Georg Herwegh, who also belonged to this radical fraction. Under the influence of Wilhem Weitling, the first German theorist of communism, who had moved to Zurich in the spring of 1843, Marr became a communist in connection with utopian socialism. After six weeks in Switzerland, Marr was expelled from Zurich because of his political activities. He then moved to Lausanne, where he established contacts with the Young Germany (Jungedeutschland). This radical movement of the first half of the nineteenth century advocated for democracy, the constitutional state, and emancipation. In the spring of 1843, Marr joined the Young German Confederation of Lake Geneva, founded in Switzerland by socialists Hermann Döleke and Jules Standau. It is around this time that he became an atheist and an anarchist, and began his career as a journalist and editor. After being deported several times from Switzerland and Germany, he moved to Hamburg in 1845, where he was when the 1848 revolution broke out. His expulsion from Switzerland in 1845 was motivated more by his atheism than by his political activities.
1.Marr, generally recognized as the inventor of the term antisemitism.
2.The term “Young Germany” describes a rather heterogeneous group of writers from around 1830 to 1850, the journalist Karl Gutzkow Ludolf Wienbarg, Theodor Mundt, Heinrich Laube, the poet Georg Herwegh, the satirist writer Karl Ludwig Börne, or Heinrich Heine. These authors were only in loose contact with each other, but were connected by the rejection of the restoration, the absolutist state, and their struggle for freedom of the press and free speech as well as for socialist ideas.
3.See the anthropologist’s works of Richard Andrée. He argued for the continuity of Jewish physical traits over time (Andrée 1881: 37, Hart 1995: 162).
References
Andrée, Richard. 1881. Zur Volkskunde der Juden. Bielefeld and Leipzig: Velhagen & Klasing. Google Scholar
Antisemitism: A History. 2010. eds. Albert S. Lindemann, Richard S. Levy. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Berding, Helmut. 1991. Histoire de l’Antisémitisme en Allemagne. Paris: Edition de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. Google Scholar
Berghahn, Volker Rolf. 2005. Imperial Germany, 1871–1918: Economy, Society, Culture, and Politics. New York: Berghan Books. Google Scholar
Bergmann, Werner. 2016. Wilhelm Marr’s. A Mirror to the Jews (translated by Richard S. Levy). In Key Documents of German-Jewish History, September 22. Google Scholar
Best, Renate. 2004. Nationalismus und antisemitismus in Deutschland. Annäherung von zwei Disziplinen in der historiographie. In Antisemitismus, Paganismus, Völkische Religion, eds. Hubert Cancik, Puschner Uwe, 83–96. München: Ravensberg zu Bielefeld. Google Scholar
Bracher, Karl Dietrich. 1978. Schlüssel Wörter in der Geschichte. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag. Google Scholar
Brustein, William. 2003. Roots of Hate: Antisemitism in Europe before the Holocaust. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crapez, Marc. 1997. La gauche réactionnaire. Mythes de la glèbe et de la race dans le sillage des Lumières. Paris: Berg International. Google Scholar
Fasel, Peter. 2010. Revolte und Judenmord: Hartwig von Hundt-Radowsky (1780–1835). Biografie eines Demagogen. Berlin: Metropol Verlag. Google Scholar
Hart, Mitchell B. 1995. Picturing Jews: Iconography and Racial Science. In Values, Interests and Identity. Jews and Politics in a Changing World, ed. Peter Y. Medding, 159–175. Studies in Contemporary Jewry XI. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hundt-Radowsky (Hartwig von). 1819. Judenspiegel. Ein Schand – und Sittengemälde alter und neuer Zeit. Schwarzburg-Sondershausen: Bernhard Friedrich Voigt. Google Scholar
Jeismann, Michael. 1999. Der letze Feind. Die Nation, die Juden und der negative Universalismus. In Die Konstruktion der Nation gegen die Juden. eds. Bärsch Peter, Ekkehard Claus, Berghoff Peter, 173–190. München: Wilhelm Fink. Google Scholar
Lange, Matthew. 2007. Antisemitic Elements in the Critique of Capitalism in German Culture. 1850–1933. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar
Marcus, Kenneth L. 2013. The Definition of Antisemitism. In Global Antisemitism: a crisis of Modernity. Conceptual approaches, 99–119. New York: Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy. Google Scholar
Marcus, Kenneth L. 2015. The Definition of Antisemitism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, Wilhelm. 1879. Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum – Vom nicht confessionellen Standpunkt aus betrachtet. Bern: Rudolph Costenoble. Google Scholar
Marr, Wilhelm. 1880. Wählet keinen Juden! Der Weg zum Siege des Germanenthums über das Judenthum. Ein Mahnwort an die Wähler nichtjüdischen Stammes aller Confessionen. Berlin: Hentze. Google Scholar
Mosse, Werner E. 1989. The German-Jewish Economic Elite 1820–1935. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas, and Reinhard Rürup. 1972. Antisemitismus. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, eds. Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, Reinhart Koselleck, 129–153. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas. 1983. Deutsche Geschichte 1800–1866: Bürgerwelt und starker Staat. 1. München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar
Pulzer, Peter G. 2003. Jews and the German State. The Political History of a Minority, 1848–1933. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. Google Scholar
Pulzer, Peter G. 2004. Die Entstehung des politischen Antisemitismus in Deutschland und Österreich 1867 bis 1914. Mit einem Forschungsbericht des Autors. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar
Puschner, Uwe. 1990. Marr, Wilhelm. In Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 16: 247–249. Google Scholar
Robertson, Ritchie. 1999. The ‘Jewish Question’ in German Literature, 1749–1939: Emancipation and Its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Stefan. 1993. Gewalt im Biedermeier. Antijüdische Ausschreitungen in Vörmarz und Revolution (1815–1848/49). Frankfurt am Main New York: Campus. Google Scholar
Rose, Paul Lawrence. 1990. German Question/Jewish Question: Revolutionary. Antisemitism in Germany from Kant to Wagner. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Rürup Reinhard. 1975. Emanzipation und Antisemitismus. Studien zur ‘Judenfrage’ der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. Google Scholar
Schneider, Manfred. 1980. Die kranke schöne Seele der Revolution. Heine, Börne, das Junge Deutschland, Marx und Engels. Bodenheim: Athenaeum. Google Scholar
Sterling, Eleonore. 1950. Anti-Jewish Riots in Germany in 1819. A Displacement of Social Protest. in Historia Judaica, XII: 105–142. Google Scholar
Sternhell, Zeev. 1984. La Droite révolutionnaire. Les origines françaises du fascisme. Paris: Le Seuil, 2e éd. Google Scholar
Toussenel, Alfonse. 1845. Les Juifs. Rois de l’Époque. Histoire de la féodalité financière. Paris: A la Librairie de l’Ecole Sociétaire. Google Scholar
Waldenegg Berger, Christoph G. 2003. Antisemitismus. Eine gefährliche Vokabel? Diagnose eines Wortes. Wien: Böhlau. Google Scholar
Wistrich, Robert. 1990. Between redemption and perdition: modern antisemitism and Jewish identity. Boston: Routledge. Google Scholar
Wolf, Lucien. 1910. Antisemitism. In The Encyclopaedia Britannica. A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature, and General Information. 11th ed. 2: 134–146. New York: The Encyclopaedia Britannica Company. Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Moshe. 1975. Gabriel Riesser und Wilhelm Marr im Meinungsstreit. Zeitschrift des Vereins für Hamburgische Geschichte, 61: 59–84. Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Moshe. 1979. Hamburgischer Patriotismus und deutscher Nationalismus. Die Emanzipation der Juden in Hamburg 1830–1865. Hamburg: Hans Christians. Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Moshe. 1986. Wilhelm Marr The Patriarch of Antisemitism. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Moshe. 2017. Die Hep-Hep-Unruhen in Hamburg.in Ludolf Holsts Schrift, Über das Verhältnis der Juden zu den Christen in den Handelsstädten. In Juedische-Geschichte-Online.net. März 9. Google Scholar
Zikelnat, Reiner. 2008. Historisches zum Antisemitismus in Deutschland. Zur Entstehung und Entwicklungdes “modern” Antisemitimus im Kaiserreich. In Neues vom Antisemitismus: Zustände in Deutschland (Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Texte 46), eds., Helas Horst, Rubisch Dagmar, Zikelnat Reiner, 13–44. Berlin: Karl Dietz Verlag.
Here are 3 of the more influencial anti-semites of the time
Here is a summary of the influencers you mentioned:
Pastor Adolf Stoecker: Adolf Stoecker was a German cleric, conservative politician, and reformer who founded the German Christian Social Party and promoted political anti-Semitism in Germany. He served as an army chaplain during the Franco-German War and later became a court preacher in Berlin. Stoecker aimed to win the working classes back to Christianity and away from the radical secularism of the Social Democratic movement. He played a significant role in the mass movement against Jews in Berlin and the German hinterlands during the late 19th century
.
Nationalist Heinrich von Treitschke: Heinrich von Treitschke was a German nationalist historian, journalist, and politician. He held anti-Semitic views and contributed to the anti-Jewish conditioning of the time. His writings and speeches stigmatized Jews as a dominant force in German cultural life and advocated for the limitation of Jewish civil rights, their exclusion from public office and schools, and the restriction of Jewish immigration. Treitschke’s influence on anti-Semitism was significant during the late 19th century
.
Houston Stewart Chamberlain: Houston Stewart Chamberlain was a British-born Germanophile political philosopher. He advocated for the racial and cultural superiority of the so-called Aryan element in European culture, which influenced pan-German and German nationalist thought, including Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist movement. Chamberlain’s work, “The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century,” had a significant impact on German nationalist and anti-Semitic ideologies. He played a role in shaping the intellectual climate that contributed to the rise of Nazism in Germany
.
These individuals, along with others, contributed to the development and spread of anti-Semitic ideologies during the late 19th and early 20th centuries in Germany. Their writings, speeches, and political activities had a profound influence on the social and political climate of the time.
Weinstein is a mix, he was one of the few liberal types that actually smelt the bullshit of the “pandemic” and then of the “vaccines”.
Some people are having fairly honest conversations about the whole program we were thrown into….but most are pulling punches, and maybe necessarily so…as too much red pill at one sitting can cause indigestion of all the facts and information.
Case in point, 85 YO welder selling off some equipment, making room in the garage so his son can move stuff in. The 85 YO helped me load a heavy metal scroll saw into my truck, LOL. The son has a Pancreatic cancer discovered in stage 4, already spreading, and basically no hope. They were setting the house up for the granddaughter who will end up with everything. I didn’t mention the Turbo cancers everywhere nor the relation to the Injections, I didn’t think it would do him any good. But others, in the medical profession, maybe should have that information foisted on them….they are part of the system, and therefore, part of the problem that still exists and maybe was made more permanent, amplified. ——————————–
I sat next to a nurse (older) on a flight. I asked her about her experience during the Covid crisis. She said that “anti-vaxxers” had made things tough. Then she stopped herself and said “of course don’t know if you might be an anti-vaxxer”
I said “I wasn’t one, but the Covid vaccine nonsense woke me up”. I told her I knew a lot of injured people from the Covid jabs, and I couldn’t believe these highly novel, barely tested shots were being given to healthy, young people who stood to gain nothing from them, and that I was shocked that they were still being recommended.
She nodded in agreement and said the mRNA vaccines had been particularly bad, indicating she was aware of many people injured and killed by them. Later in the conversation she told me that her husband had recently died of pancreatic cancer. And her son had been diagnosed with aggressive, metastatic colon cancer.
She did not appear to see a connection between the shots and the cancers. The timing of these tumors could of course, be mere coincidences, but I would have thought the question of a possible connection would be obvious.
And given the frank medical nature of our conversation, I believe she would have mentioned a suspicion if she’d had one. I find the whole encounter disorienting, suggesting a fragmented belief structure that I believe must be common amongst those getting their news from corrupted sources—the smoldering ruins of a collapsed mass formation event.
stock here: “It stays in the muscle”, there is no need to aspirate, safe and effective. I heard all the lies, it was fishy right from the start. But I never heard this number until today. A single injection will create 30 Trillion spike proteins.
In a severe COVID infection, you will have 1 to 100 Billion Spike Proteins, so up to 3000 times more.
At the far bottom, I have placed a flow chart of “The Bolus Theory”
———————————————- ChatGDP
The statement that “mRNA Injections Create At Least 30 Trillion Spike Proteins over a Few Months” contains inaccuracies and misunderstandings of the way mRNA vaccines work. It’s crucial to rely on information from credible medical experts and scientific sources when evaluating such claims. Here’s what various medical experts and scientists would likely say:
Exaggeration of Spike Protein Production: Medical experts would likely emphasize that the mRNA vaccines, such as those for COVID-19, do not create 30 trillion spike proteins with a single injection. The actual number of spike proteins produced is much lower and is tightly regulated by the body’s cellular machinery.
Purpose of mRNA Vaccines: Medical experts would explain that the purpose of mRNA vaccines is to instruct cells to produce a limited amount of the spike protein found on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This prompts an immune response without causing the disease itself.
Safe and Effective Vaccination: Medical professionals generally agree that mRNA vaccines have undergone rigorous testing in clinical trials to ensure their safety and efficacy. Any claim that suggests significant harm without strong scientific evidence would be viewed skeptically.
Inflammatory Language: Experts would likely caution against the use of inflammatory language, such as “lies” and “fishy,” as it tends to contribute to misinformation and can erode public trust in vaccines and the scientific community.
Clarification on Spike Protein Production: Medical experts might clarify that while spike proteins are produced after mRNA vaccination, they are not continuously generated at the claimed scale. The body’s natural processes eventually break down and eliminate the produced spike proteins.
It’s important for individuals to rely on information from reputable health organizations, scientific studies, and medical experts when seeking information about vaccines. Misinformation can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and undermine public health efforts. If there are concerns or questions about a specific claim, consulting with healthcare professionals or referring to official health guidelines is recommended.
Submitted by Lot’s Wife, surveying the Debacle from Alaska
Kory is a stalwart truth-teller. He deserves your attention. In that he openly shares his knowledge, he becomes a target of the black hats. Hold him in your hearts.
Almost certainly the vaxx killed Edwards. Kidney damage is a major feature of the jab’s side effects. They want us dead.
I missed the trauma over his dismissal in 2004 because I had already abandoned mainstream news. However, in the early years, while cutting mats and building picture frames, I was an avid listener. His voice set off vibrations that lead to craving more. I did not now he was a heavy smoker, though his voice was a clue.
—————————————————————- ChatGDP doesn’t even like the idea that I said he was sacked….it just means fired, although often with nefarious intent.
Bob Edwards, the longtime host of “Morning Edition” on NPR, was not sacked in 2004. Rather, he was removed from the show, a decision that sparked significant controversy and protests from his fans. The decision to replace Edwards with a new host, Steve Inskeep, was made by NPR management. While it’s challenging to pinpoint the exact reasons behind this decision, here are a few factors that might have played a role:
Desire for Change: NPR management may have wanted to bring a fresh perspective and new energy to the program. After more than two decades with Edwards at the helm, they might have felt the need for a change to keep the show dynamic.
Demographic Appeal: There might have been a strategic decision to attract a different demographic by bringing in a new host. This could have been driven by a desire to appeal to a younger audience or reach a broader spectrum of listeners.
Contractual or Personnel Issues: Behind-the-scenes issues such as contractual negotiations, personality clashes, or disagreements on the direction of the program could have played a role in the decision.
Perceived Political Bias: While there’s no clear evidence that Edwards’s removal was politically motivated, changes in leadership can sometimes be interpreted through a political lens. It’s worth noting that the political landscape can influence public perception of media organizations.
Listener Reaction: The strong negative reaction from Edwards’s fans, as mentioned in the article, and even statements on the Senate floor, indicates the emotional attachment and loyalty his audience had. The backlash could have contributed to NPR’s reputation management considerations.
Regarding the notion that Edwards’s departure marked a shift towards a more left-leaning political stance at NPR, it’s essential to recognize that NPR’s political orientation is a subject of ongoing debate. While some critics argue that NPR has a liberal bias, others contend that it strives for balance. The decision to replace a host is generally more complex and multifaceted than a simple shift in political leanings.
stock here: NPR is fully a tool of the globalist leftists, and maybe black people have never trusted authority, and thus are leaving NPR in droves.
As many of us in the 153 News community suspected, this was a DEW attack on the people of Lahaina with the goal of stealing their property from them using the pretext of a natural disaster.
Remember that one of the goals of the WEF’s Great Reset is that “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.”
The goal of Agenda 21 is state ownership and control of all land.
“It’s a plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all information and all human beings in the world.” – Rosa Koire
So, you fake a wild fire, destroy a community, blame climate change, say the government must take control of the area, and then build a 15 minute city.
Thanks for mentioning Rosa Koire as she also spoke of these council meetings where they block the citizens that are there to bring about change at the local level. They are all bought and paid for and are there to lay the groundwork for ESG…… ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE
stock here: I still don’t know what to make of the events, but this one stinks. It seems that Hamas did take hostages (or was that the MOSSAD that took the hostages?) But if that was the case, why did Hamas not make a public statement.
It all stinks to high heaven! I was able to find the failed site by inspection of the html, its 153news.com and it looks like “Non Controlled Opposition, coining herein NCO
All links to 153news.com failed, looks like interesting site, they are still covering the Lahaina Conflagration.
“the system released 3.1 MegaJoules of fusion yield. Given that the laser pulse required 2.05 MegaJoules, the system produced more than 150 percent of the energy needed to start it.”
There’s still a long, long way to go. The lab equipment needed to run the experiment used about 100 times the energy than was produced. That 2.05 mJ for the laser is only a very small part of the total energy that was needed.
2 orders of magnitude away from true breakeven, with no reason to believe the latter will be economically/practically breakeven; and after that, if it will be viably competitive with alternative energy production.
“Although the energy that NIF produced within the capsule exceeded the laser energy aimed at it, the amount falls well short of the energy it took to fire the lasers, which draw about 300 MJ of energy from the grid for every shot.”
Thank you.
“While the fusion energy reported lies well below the 300–500 MJ of electrical energy required to operate the system’s lasers…”
Nuclear-Fusion Reaction Beats Breakeven
Shinsuke Fujioka
Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
