stock here: I am quite surprised this is open source.
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf
stock here: I am quite surprised this is open source.
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf
stock: They are also tasked with talking to citizens that are eligible to vote but not registered and helping to get them registered, aka Ballot Harvesting. Their Budget is $1.05 M per year.
Blake Evans, the chair is a Hispanic and a Baptist
Contact Information
2 MLK Jr. Dr. S.E.
STE 802, Floyd W. Tower
Atlanta, GA 30334
Office Number: 404-656-2871
Fax Number: 404-463-5231
Email: elections@sos.ga.gov
Contacts
Blake Evans, Director
Michael Barnes, Deputy Director of Election and Voting Systems
Dr. Jesse A. Harris, Deputy Director of Administration and Election Support Services
—————————————-
stock here: this stinks to high heaven. The Board of Directors are the State Elections Board from 23 Blue States and 2 Red States!
The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The latest available financial data for ERIC can be found in its Form 990 filings. Here are some key points from the most recent filings:
For detailed financial information and access to the full Form 990 documents, you can visit ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer or GuideStar:
These sources provide comprehensive data on ERIC’s financials, governance, and program activities.
stock here, here is the skinny. Expect last minute changes in dirty blue areas to make their cheating “more legal”. One interviewee on the street in Milwaukee stated “I think people should be able to vote anyway they want too” just effing brilliant!
Wisconsin is probably the most important State in terms of the next Presidential Election.
In July 2022, the state Supreme Court, then under a conservative majority, held that absentee ballot drop boxes, which were used widely during the 2020 election, were not authorized under state statute and, therefore, the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) guidance encouraging their use was unlawful.
This is the law. Similar to the Chevron case RE Fishing on the East Coast, regulators just cannot make stuff up and then enforce it as law. In that case, among other injustices, they wanted boat operators to pay for the costs of observers on every boat every day they were out of harbor, and to provide them all the essentials of life, including safety.
Here is the lie called out in plain site, in yellow. They are creating a definition, and one that would be astronomically odds against being able to achieve in practice. How would one person do all this? Or does the Municipal Clerk get to delegate his obligation to others, maybe paid by Zuckerberg or Soros?

What are some possible actions? chat
State Supreme Court justices can face various forms of accountability if their actions are deemed to go against the law as written. Here are some mechanisms by which they can be censored, punished, or have their rulings quashed:
State Supreme Court justices are subject to various checks and balances that can hold them accountable for unlawful actions. These mechanisms ensure that no judicial body operates entirely without oversight or potential consequences for misconduct.
stock here: I got the article summary from Chat, as the article itself kind of rambled about. Orig Substack
https://miri.substack.com/p/putting-the-no-in-hypnosis
The article discusses the use of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) and hypnosis tactics during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests that similar techniques are being used to discourage voting in upcoming elections. The author and NLP trainer, Debbie Williams, describes how repetitive phrases and fear-inducing messages were used during the pandemic to manipulate public behavior. She expresses concern that similar methods are now being employed to dissuade dissidents from voting, thereby maintaining the status quo and benefiting the global elite.
The article ultimately calls for awareness of these psychological manipulations and encourages active participation in elections to counteract the potential undermining of democratic processes through NLP and hypnosis tactics.
Yes, the term “Chosen” (also spelled “Chosun” or “Joseon”) can be sensitive in a Korean context. It historically refers to the Joseon Dynasty, which ruled Korea from 1392 to 1897. However, during the Japanese occupation of Korea (1910-1945), “Chosen” was used by the Japanese to refer to Korea, and it carries negative connotations for many Koreans because of the oppression and hardships experienced during that period.
Using “Chosen” in certain contexts, especially in reference to Korean people or culture, can be seen as a slur or offensive due to its association with the colonial period and the suffering under Japanese rule.
——————————————————————-
So did the surrender of Japan to USA on that carrier coincide with Japan relinquishing control over Korea, was that part of the dealChatGPT
Yes, the surrender of Japan to the United States on September 2, 1945, aboard the USS Missouri marked the end of World War II and Japan’s relinquishment of control over Korea. The formal surrender also signified the end of Japanese colonial rule in Korea, which had lasted from 1910 to 1945.
Following Japan’s surrender, Korea was liberated from Japanese occupation. However, the country was subsequently divided along the 38th parallel into two zones of occupation: the Soviet Union occupied the north, and the United States occupied the south. This division eventually led to the establishment of two separate Korean states in 1948: the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) and the Republic of Korea (South Korea).
how long did USA occupying south Korea, and why did we give half to Russia, or maybe it wasn’t a give, but a strong arm maneuver by Russia
ChatGPT
The United States occupied South Korea from 1945 until the establishment of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) on August 15, 1948. The division of Korea along the 38th parallel was not a straightforward “giving” of territory to the Soviet Union but rather a strategic decision influenced by the circumstances at the end of World War II and the emerging Cold War tensions between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
Here are the key points regarding the division and occupation:
The division of Korea and the subsequent establishment of separate governments marked the beginning of the Korean conflict, which eventually led to the Korean War in 1950. The division was more a product of Cold War geopolitics and power struggles than a simple transfer or “giving” of territory.
when were the nuke bombs dropped on japanChatGPT
The nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan in August 1945:
These bombings were pivotal events leading to Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II. Japan formally surrendered on September 2, 1945, aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay.
stock here, here is a summary by Chat
stock here: more history I didn’t know, that Japan was occupying Korea from 1910 to 1945, see image, which make the NYT article even more inflammatory, as they promote the exploits of the “Chosen Company” since “Chosen” is also a derogatory slur

The article discusses alleged war crimes committed by members of an American-led volunteer unit in Ukraine known as the “Chosen Company.” Key points include:
The strongest evidence presented includes:
The article implies that these incidents could be part of a broader pattern of war crimes by foreign volunteer units in Ukraine, which the mainstream media has largely ignored.
stock here: Great movie submitted by a reader, our military has been appropriated by woke. The trailer is first, and the full movie is at the bottom. Drop a comment, spread the words, I’m doing my goodest.
When the Dems have (maybe intentionally) flubbed the deadlines and procedures for selecting and certifying a candidate, by their choice of a very late Democratic Convention…
And say roughly 10 states will have ZERO Dem candidate for pres or VP, and it is clear “the elections” cannot go on…will then the military step in and follow in lock step to some plot funded by the elite and rewarded” via woke leadership? “And say roughly 10 states will have ZERO Dem candidate for pres or VP, and it is clear “the elections” cannot go on…
Will then the military step in and follow in lock step to some plot funded by the elite and “rewarded” via large donations to foundations or pet causes of the “Woke Leadership”? The Woke in which we know, believe that any actions no matter how heinous are justifiable if the end result is “good”.
It is not outside possibility, although speaking like this is most public places would be outside the Overton window.
stock here, lets try to republish this: In the area between the lines below, I custom made an html that subtracts the stated number of days in the various state codes for the deadlines. Actually ChatGPT made this html and it worked the first time.
SUMMARY: STATE LAWS REGARDING PRESIDENTIAL BALLOT ACCESS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION Updated January 2020
==========================================
Days before the Election
Deadline Date:
=============================================
This document provides a summary of the laws in each state relevant to the placement of a candidate for president on the general election ballot, and the
requirements for a presidential candidate to run as a write-in candidate. Generally, a presidential candidate nominated by a political party that meets certain
criteria is placed on the general election ballot. The criteria is often based on a threshold number of votes cast at a recent election for a particular office or offices.
A number of states provide an alternative mechanism for an organization to qualify in order to nominate candidates, for example by filing a petition or having a
certain number of voters affiliated with the organization. Additionally, all states have a procedure for independent candidates, and in some cases individual
presidential candidates of a political organization, to obtain ballot access.
Most states also permit a presidential candidate to be a write-in candidate, and many of these states require that the candidate file a notice prior to the election.
The summary for each state includes the
1) Timeframes for certifying the names of the candidates for president and vice-president and the names of the presidential electors;
2) the requirements for a political party to be eligible to nominate a presidential candidate;
3) the number of signatures required on a petition in order for a presidential candidate to obtain ballot access;
4) a description of any additional ballot access methods where applicable;
5) and the timeframes required for filing a
notice in order to be a write-in candidate for president.
============================
It is important to note that the information in this document is based on a NASS review of relevant state ballot access requirements (in 2020).
This document is intended to provide a general overview of these requirements. It is not intended as an interpretation of those laws, or as a procedure guide or manual for political parties or
prospective candidates with regard to presidential ballot access.
States have a variety of filings and other requirements pertaining to political parties, presidential candidates, presidential electors, and petitions. Additionally, ballot access laws may change at any time based on new state laws and/or court decisions.
Candidates and political parties should contact the relevant state election office and/or legal counsel for information on the specific rules and requirements for each state.
Additionally, where political parties nominate a candidate, the nomination process varies greatly based on the state, the legal status of each party, and the rules
and procedures of each party. Individuals should contact the political parties for information on the party nomination process.
State
==============================================
Alabama Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a political party may be placed on the general election ballot. A political party must certify to the
secretary of state no later than the 82nd day next preceding the day fixed for the election the names of the candidates for president and
vice-president and the names of the presidential electors.
A political party is an organization of electors which received more than 20% of the entire vote cast in the state at the last general election.
An organization may also qualify as a political party by filing with the secretary of state on the date of the first primary election a petition
containing the number of signatures equal to or exceeding 3% of electors who cast ballots for the office of governor in the last general
election.
Petition
An independent candidate for president may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with the secretary of state no later than
82 days before the election a petition containing the signatures of at least 5,000 qualified electors. The petition must be accompanied by a
list of presidential electors.
Write-In
In all non-municipal elections a voter may write-in the name of any person not included on the ballot.
(Alabama Code §§ 17-6-22, 17-6-27, 17-6-28, 17-6-29, 17-13-40, 17-13-50, 17-14-31).
Alaska Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a recognized political party may be placed on the general election ballot. A recognized political
party must certify to the division of elections no later than the 48th day prior to the election the name of the candidates for president and
vice-president. The political party must certify to the director of election no later than September 1st the names of the party’s nominees
for presidential electors.
A recognized political party is an organized group of voters whose candidate for governor in the last general election received at least 3%
of the votes cast for that office, or whose number of registered voters is equal to at least 3% of the total votes cast for governor at the last
general election. If the office of governor was not on the ballot at the preceding general election but the office of united states senator
was, the 3% threshold applies to that office. If neither the office of governor nor the office of united states senator was on the ballot, the
3% threshold applies to the office of united states representative.
A limited political party may be organized for the purpose of selecting candidates for presidential electors by filing with the director of
elections at least 90 days before a presidential election a petition signed by a number of qualified voters equal to at least 1% of the
number of votes cast for president at the last presidential election.
Independent Candidate Petition
An independent candidate for president may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with the director of elections no later
than the 90th day before a presidential election a petition containing the signature of qualified voters equal to at least 1% of the number
of votes cast for president at the last general election. The candidates must certify to the director of elections no later than September 1st
the name of the candidates for president and vice-president and the names of the presidential electors.
Write-In
A write in candidate for president must file a letter of intent with the director of elections at least 5 days before the general election.
(Alaska Stat. §§ 15-25-105, 15.30.020, 15.30.025; 15.30.026; 15.80.010)
Arizona Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a recognized political may be placed on the general election ballot. Each recognized political party
must file with the secretary of state no less than 90 days before the primary election the names of the party’s nominees for presidential
electors.
A recognized political party is a political organization that received at least 5% of the total votes cast for governor or presidential electors
at the last preceding general election, or a political organization entitled to continued representation by having registered voters equal to
at least 2/3 of 1% of the total number of registered voters in the state.
A political organization may also become eligible for recognition as a political party by filing with the secretary of state no less than 140
days before the primary election, or no less than 75 days prior to the presidential preference election, a petition containing the signatures
of at least 1 and 1/3% of the total votes cast for governor at the last preceding general election. The petition must include signatures from
electors in at least 5 different counties, and at least 10% of the signatures must be from electors in counties with populations less than
500,000.
Petition
A presidential candidate who is not a member of a recognized political party may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with
the secretary of state no less than 60 days before the general election nomination papers and a petition containing the number of
signatures equal to 3% of the registered independent voters in the state. The petition must include the names of the presidential electors.
Each of the electors must also file nomination papers.
Write-In
A write-in candidate for president must file nomination papers with the secretary of state no later than the 40th day prior to the election.
Each of the presidential electors must also file nomination papers.
(Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 16-243, 16-244, 16-312, 16-341, 16-344, 16-801, 16-803,16-804)
Arkansas Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a political party may be placed on the general election ballot. A political party must certify to the
secretary of state no later than September 15th the names of the presidential electors.
A political party is a group of voters whose candidate for governor or nominee for presidential electors at the last preceding general
election received at least 3% of the entire vote cast for the office. A new political party may be formed by filing with the secretary of state
no later than 45 days before the preferential primary election a petition containing the signatures registered voters in an amount that
equals or exceeds 3% of the total votes cast for Governor in the immediately preceding general election for Governor.
Petition
A presidential candidate of a political group may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with the secretary of state no later
than the first Monday of August a petition containing the names of 1,000 qualified electors. The group must file with the secretary of state
no later than the 75th day before the election a certificate stating the name of the candidates for president and vice-president and must
certify to the secretary of state no later than September 15th a list of presidential electors.
An independent presidential candidate may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with the secretary of state no later than
the first Monday in August a petition containing the names of 1,000 qualified electors and certifying to the secretary of state no later than
September 15th a list of the presidential electors.
(Ark. Code Ann. §§ 7-1-101, 7-5-525, 7-7-205, 7-8-302).
California Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a qualified political party may be placed on the general election ballot. A qualified political party
generally must certify to the secretary of state no later than October 1st the names of the presidential electors.
A qualified political party is a political party that received for any of its candidates for statewide office at the last preceding gubernatorial
election at least 2% of the entire vote statewide.
A group may also qualify as a political party if on or before the 135th day before any primary election a number of registered voters equal
to at least 1% of the entire vote of the state at the last gubernatorial election are affiliated with the party; or, if it files with the secretary of
state no later than 135 days prior to the primary election a petition signed by the number of voters equal to at least 10% of the entire vote
of the state at the last gubernatorial election.
Petition
An independent presidential candidate may obtain ballot access for the general election by filing with county election officials no later
than 88 days before the election a declaration of candidacy for each of the presidential electors and nomination papers signed by the
number of voters equal to at least 1% of the entire number of registered voters in the state. The nomination papers must include the
name of the presidential electors, and may include the name of the candidates for president and vice-president.
Write-In
A write-in candidate for president must have each of the presidential electors file a declaration of write-in candidacy with the secretary of
state no later than 14 days before the election.
(California Elections Code Ann. §§ 338, 5001, 5100, 6901, 7100, 7110, 7300, 7578, 7843, 8303, 8304, 8400, 8403(a)(2), 8451, 8550, 8650,
8651, 8652, 8653)
Colorado Political Party Nomination
A presidential candidate nominated by a major or minor political party may be placed on the general election ballot. Political parties must
file with the secretary of state no later than 60 days before the general election a certificate of nomination for presidential electors. The
name of the presidential candidate may be added to the certificate.
A major political party is a political party that that was represented on the ballot at the last preceding gubernatorial election by a political
party candidate or individual nominee who received at least 10% of the total gubernatorial votes cast.
A minor political party is a political party that had a candidate for statewide office in either of the last two preceding general election
receive at least 1% of the total votes cast for any statewide office, or has 1,000 or more registered electors affiliated with the party prior to
July 1st in either of the last two preceding general elections.
A political party may also qualify as a minor political party through any of the following methods:
stock here: my last post got a bit long in the tooth. Just check this out. First snippet is for New Jersey, LOL. Info is from:
https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_election,_2024#Upcoming_dates


This is sure curious, Wisconsin and California are the only 2 states with equal Dem and Rep wins

So I tried to get ChatGPT to actually find each States Election Deadlines, and it crapped out with this fake table. Then I asked it to search specifically for each State one by one, and it only did Alabama of which their deadline is August 15, earlier than the Dem Convention of Aug 19 to 22. Hmmmmm

For the 2024 presidential election, Alabama has set specific deadlines for the certification of nominations by political parties. Here are the details:
I found a document from 2020 that already summarized each state, and that is HERE
https://www.nass.org/sites/default/files/surveys/2020-07/research-ballot-access-president-Jan20_0.pdf
Chatty then came up with this:
Alabama: August 15, 2024.
Alaska: September 4, 2024.
Arizona: September 6, 2024.
Arkansas: August 1, 2024.
California: August 9, 2024. {after an hour of research, it was found the real deadline is a soft deadline of August 24th, see below}
“The document provided was from 2020, so it would be disastrous for the dem party to miss the deadline on California, so can you deep dive on California’s deadline for certification? using 2024 laws and regs.” was asked of Chat
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/general-election-nov-5-2024/key-dates-deadlines
They start off with a Climate Scare:

“If you choose Trump, You will all burn up!!!!”
The summary table for California is vague, what is this notice to candidates 73 days before the election, Aug 24. 73 is rather an odd number too, just saying. SPOILER: It took me an hour, but finally got to the meat of the matter, and California just changed their laws this year and that law allows a “soft deadline” of Aug 24 to submit the candidate, unless the national convention had not occurred, and then that party can just submit all presumptive candidates, like Gaven Newsome, with no deadline to ever submit the final choice. Seriously folks, they just changed the law this year, as if they have AI working on “how can we delay and cheat the most”. The details are in 6901.5 as listed far below.


It is fairly odd that the Republican and Democrat parties are so enshrined within California law as to have separate sections of the law define the requirements for each party. The below applies to a “primary election”, and 88 days before would be August 9th in relation to the Presidential election, just saying.
(a) The Secretary of State shall place the name of a candidate upon the Republican presidential primary ballot when the Secretary of State has determined that the candidate is generally advocated for or recognized throughout the United States or California as a candidate for the nomination of the Republican Party for President of the United States.
(b) On or before the 88th day preceding a presidential primary election the Secretary of State shall publicly announce and distribute to the news media for publication a list of the candidates the Secretary of State intends to place on the ballot at the following presidential primary election. Following this announcement the Secretary of State may add candidates to the Secretary of State’s selection, but the Secretary of State shall not delete any candidate whose name appears on the announced list.
(Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 149, Sec. 8. (SB 505) Effective July 30, 2019.)
The procedures for the actual Presidential election do not seem to be defined….but they do seem sincere on being available to and and all the minority groups in California. You can “email” them, but not really…you have to use their form, which is a denial of communication due to too lengthy, and no tracking (like if you used your standard email program in which your outgoing email would be preserved). Form is below the contact page.


Chat has now determined that the Certification date must be August 15th because that aligns with the “randomized alphabet drawing for the order of the candidates”, which is still a leap of logic, since they could take the 5 parties that they have separate sections in the code, in order in the code: Democrat, Republican, American Independent Party, Peace and Freedom Party, Green Party. And do the randomized selection, even if one of those parties failed to send in their certification at a later date.
They publish a General Elections calendar, which is detailed, and cites relevant code. This snippet is an example, but it appears to be for the counties, since you would think the Presidential race details would happen at the State level, by the pHD Secretary of State

Here is the calendar link
AH!!! Here it is, 8-22-2024 is the real deadline, although it is a “soft” deadline (if the national convention has not yet been held). Aiyaiyai!!!

Cool, they just amended this section in 2024, Jan 1.
https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-elec/division-6/part-2/chapter-1/section-6901-5/
“Added by Stats 2023 ch 72 (SB 437),s 1, eff. 1/1/2024.” Cal. Elec. Code § 6901.5
The “Electors” are important, and there meeting after the election and prior to the “Crowning Ceremony” is where the State’s Electoral College points are issued/appointed. They just changed this law too, allowing for the chance of a “State of Emergency” in which case they can meet in any secret place they want to “Elect the President”. Not fishy at all.
And what is this BS on picking that meeting date….is this intentional to throw off AI attempts at summarizing the dates?
(a) The electors chosen shall assemble at the State Capitol at 2 o’clock in the afternoon on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December next following their election.

OK Here are some other Heavy Hitters in the Electoral College:
California:
Texas:
Florida:
Chat say
New York:
New Jersey:
For the most accurate and up-to-date information, please refer to the New York and New Jersey State Board of Elections websites or contact their offices directly.
LOL Jersey does the same BS confusion

stock here: by putting this out there, maybe we can prevent it from happening, LOL publishing their thought crime in advance to preclude the real crime. We will look at FBI Neo-Nazi Bike Gangs and the Entrapment involved in another article, think Mueller.
It was always suspicious to me that the Communists Democrats put their caucus in late August 19 to 22 in Chicago of all places. Noted that the Republicans do their convention in Milwaukee July 15 to 18. This date comes after the deadline for finalizing a candidate in some states, all states have their own rules. It was claimed a week or two back that the Dem convention would therefore miss the Colorado deadline, but Colorado states the party must submit a certificate of nomination 73 days before the election which is August 24, 2024 so it seems that it could work out. I wonder if the law was changed? Or if the earlier reporter had jumped the gun and the shark?
Some states have strict requirements for changing a candidate as the election comes closer, such as in Wisconsin the only reason that a different candidate could be picked is “Death”. Let’s say that Biden doesn’t die, but is so incapacitated that it is clear he cannot serve another term, much less even start another term, that is 10 states, there is NO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. Talk about the outrage factory….this “right wing neo nazi plot” to destroy our democracy, and it was Trump that made Biden go bad by his continuous insults and jabs at this poor old man….and therefore we need to suspend the constitution until a new government can be formed and have proper elections, maybe in spring time (after you peons have gotten used to Marshall law whilst we release another bio-weapon too).
I hope this is a warning and not providing them a game plan <sarc>
stock here


stock here, in her newish video, the clues to an MK-Ultra type of enslavement / satanism are quite clear. Are the forced to occasionally show their truths?

From the link
The video’s first scene is rife with symbolism relating to Monarch programming.
Taylor Swift is in a psych ward-type room and is chained to a bed. Her bed is “floating” in the air, which hints at her dissociative state as an MK slave. Other items in the room are askew or upside down, further conveying the slave’s confused perception of reality due to various techniques, including lots of drugs. Speaking of which, a creepy (upside down) nurse enters the room to give Taylor her dose.
An astute commenter had this to say:
I’m not completely confident that the NWO tyrants will allow elections to take place this November.
I’m very concerned that they’re planning to stage another 911 type event, but far more serious (perhaps a nuclear bomb going off in an American city?).
Or it could be another “pandemic”, but one that is much more lethal. Monkeypox hasn’t exactly worked out for them, but I’m confident they have dozens of other much more serious diseases waiting for deployment, when and if needed.
Carrying out another extremely catastrophic pre-planned event will allow them to instantly declare martial law, “temporarily” suspend the elections… and that will be the end of our freedoms.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they even put a cherry on top by using pre-arranged “assets” that implicate “right wing domestic terrorist groups”, undoubtedly Trump supporters.
I SINCERELY hope I’m wrong, but given that an integral part of the fascist NWO ideology is to massively reduce the number of “useless eaters”, murdering several tens of millions of innocent people to further their agenda isn’t unimaginable.
In their twisted world view it would be considered a benefit, killing two birds with one stone so to speak.
After all, look what they did with covid. They could have never stolen the 2020 election like they did without the almost complete suppression of the old voting system and its replacement with the illegal covid scam version.
If the NWO tools in the democratic party lose big enough in 2024 – and it looks inevitable at this point – it would seriously undermine their efforts to fully take over the country, and then the world.
A rat is the most dangerous when it’s cornered.
stock here, not much down side is you are a reasonable person acting in reasonable ways. Start with this video. My thoughts are that a covert dashcam would be the best option. Perhaps you did make a driving error, and “they” ask for your dash cam footage as “evidence”.
Tyranny is one basic characteristics of some humans. It needs to be not accepted.
You have never studied the law. You’re just revenuers for a corporation operating under statues and codes” F…ing Gold
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
stock here: some comments on YouTube are extremely astute. I don’t remember this one, but I used to write my own Star Trek episodes.
A-Eye
Gene Roddenberry was 100% spot on with his Star Trek episode Season 2 Episode 21 ” Patterns of Force”
The “Star Trek” episode “Patterns of Force” (Season 2, Episode 21) is notable for its provocative storyline, where the crew of the USS Enterprise discovers that a Federation historian, John Gill, has imposed a Nazi-like regime on the planet Ekos. This episode explores the dangerous consequences of attempting to use a fascist system to create order, showcasing how such ideologies can be twisted to justify atrocities and totalitarian control.
The episode begins with the Enterprise arriving at the planet Ekos to investigate the disappearance of Federation cultural observer John Gill. The crew is shocked to find that Ekos has developed a society mirroring Nazi Germany, complete with swastikas and Nazi-style uniforms. They discover that Gill, attempting to bring order to a chaotic society, modeled Ekos’ government after Nazi Germany, believing it to be the most efficient system. However, his intentions are perverted by his deputy, Melakon, who uses the regime to promote xenophobia and genocide against the neighboring planet, Zeon.
Kirk and Spock infiltrate the regime, eventually finding Gill drugged and used as a puppet by Melakon. With the help of the resistance, they manage to awaken Gill temporarily, who then denounces the regime and cancels the planned genocide before being killed by Melakon. The episode ends with the Ekosians and Zeons beginning to rebuild their societies without the oppressive Nazi influence.
The episode is a stark commentary on the allure and danger of authoritarian systems, demonstrating how even well-intentioned actions can lead to horrific outcomes when such ideologies are employed. It also critiques the idea of imposing external governance systems on other cultures, highlighting the ethical breaches and unforeseen consequences of such actions.
“Patterns of Force” was controversial, especially in Germany, where it was banned from broadcast until 1995 due to its depiction of Nazi symbols and themes. This underscores the sensitive nature of its content and the powerful impact of its anti-fascist message.
Overall, Gene Roddenberry’s vision in this episode was to use science fiction as a lens to critique real-world political and social issues, a hallmark of the “Star Trek” series.
For more detailed information, you can check the episode’s summaries and analyses on sources like Wikipedia and Memory Alpha.
She is not “circling back” she is “stepping back”. KJP has a special place in hell waiting for her.
From comments on Zelensky and Ukraine and Orban Visiting from Hungary.
Another comment, about the US congress. Very few have come out against the clearly dangerous mRNA products, for one point. What are the common aspects of those noted here. Sad that I can only name VERY FEW IN CONGRESS in the United States that I say I have faith in THEIR LOVE OF OUR COUNTRY !! Marjorie TAYLOR GREEN EVEN ROUGH AT TIMES SHE ABSOLUTELY LOVES OUR COUNTRY!! Kat CAMMACK, HARRIET HAGEMAN, THOMAS MASSE CHIP ROY AND MATT GAETZ, RON JOHNSON , JIM JORDAN, COMER, TED CRUZ,JOHN CORNYN ARE THE ONLY ONES I HAVE NO DOUBT THEY LOVE AMERICA!!
ChatGPT
The comment expresses a strong opinion about the perceived patriotism and stance of certain U.S. Congress members, particularly in relation to their positions on various issues, including the controversial mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Let’s break down the key elements and common aspects of the named individuals:
Overall, the common aspects among these individuals include a strong alignment with conservative values, a vocal and sometimes controversial approach to political issues, and a focus on patriotism and love for the country as perceived by the commenter.