This is all Fraudulent and quite illegal. The lack of applying science and natural immunity being ignored is quite telling. It is obvious that the Jab is not about protecting people, please explain how death from all causes is significantly up and they are not COVID deaths. Please explain how COVID patients are sent home to quarantine with no instructions, when there are great treatment protocols using simple stuff like Vit C, D3, and B Vitamins. Please explain why some lots of “vaccine” kill hundreds, whilst other lots don’t kill any? And why are these logistically hard to handle lots distributed all over the USA, east and west coasts, south, and midwest when it would be much easier to ship a single lot to a single place?
The Furin cleavage site, never existing in any close relative Corona virus, makes it quite clear (at least Fishy as….) that the COVID is a bio-weapon released along with a 24/7 stream of media non-sense. The early videos out of China showing people dropping dead in the streets, and hospitals with dead body bags lining both sides of the aisles are equally damning that this is a narrative of which China is a huge participant. The early praise of the tyrannical lockdowns in China by the WHO was quite obvious in intent “tyranny is good”. The videos of huge truck spraying chemicals fogging entire city streets was also laughable, but they created a lot of fear.
Of the various lots of Jabs being distributed, most have at least the Spike S Protein being generated, which targets the ACE-2 receptor sites which are numerous in Testes and Ovaries, and that seems to be a primary goal, a decrease in fertility. The massive amounts of spontaneous abortions from jabbed pregnant women deserves the highest punishments, where punishments that would normally be cruel and unusual, should be made usual. It is already very obvious that a huge decrease in fertility is already being seen in USA and elsewhere.
The simplest analysis of VAERS data shows that in just months, the Jab had killed more people than ALL THE OTHER vaccines, tallied up for 30 years.
The complicit and participatory mass media, owned by just a handful of men, have carried water for all the lies and intentional misdirection. We understand how Nuremberg only applies to Government Actors, and hence the intentional “method” to try to get other Corporate actors, and lower level agencies to push the Jabs. Those at the top pushing this narrative and crimes want protection from international courts when the full impacts of their mis-deeds become beyond glaringly obvious.
And the lies about how the Jabs prevent serious illness and death, when ICUs have more than half Jabbed people. And then the darling company, of the narrative pushers, Pfizer, is rewarded with rebranding a 2003 anti-viral pill which can be made cheaply, and then being allowed to charge health care plans $500 and up for treatment. And it is beyond shameful that the FDA pretending that a super safe and cheap drug, Ivermectin, was not intended for people and that it was only for Horses and Cows. And criminal to withhold this proven anti-viral from Americans. Duly noted: IF there was a treatment available for COVID then it would have been impossible to issue the Emergency Use Authorization for the experimental Jabs.
The preponderance of evidence all points in one direction….the first year was all directed towards one main goal….to get as many people injected with as many formulations as possible, and keep them in fear so that they keep getting injected on a regular basis. Then when dissenting individuals take their freedom of speech “too far” against the narrative, they can be given a “special jab” that either teaches them a lesson or kills them outright.
Then another excuse like Omicron is used to drastically ramp fear again. It is already clear that the South African doctors that detected, and TREATED, Omicron COVID list it as a “VERY MILD” disease, so the border shutdowns and ridiculous action by bad actor State of New York, are also very telling
People of OSHA, I am putting you on notice. You, as Government actors, can be put on trial under the international agreements of Nuremberg. The evidence is abundantly clear that these experimental chemical agents (mislabeled as vaccines) are extremely dangerous, they are killing people acutely in large numbers, they are likely to and and being shown to have longer term dangers beyond sterilization of people, and they hardly work and they are not persistent.
The data is clear: The risk is high and the benefits are minor, and the younger you are, the higher the risk to reward ratio becomes. See attachments which compare the death rates from COVID for various age groups to the death rate from the Jab based on 3 selected VAERS reporting rates.
We the people DEMAND that you cease and desist in these immoral, illegal, and unconscionable actions.
Regulations.gov is a web-based federal rulemaking application supporting the United States government in its rulemaking process. Regulations.gov is provided as a public service to increase participation in the government’s regulatory activities by offering a central point for submitting comments on regulations. This website is an official United States government computer system. Information presented on this website is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Unauthorized attempts to upload information or change information maintained on this website are strictly prohibited and may be subject to criminal prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1995.
Regulations.gov contains regulatory and non-regulatory docket information, as determined by the issuing department or agency. Docket information includes Federal Register notices, supplementary reports and other documents related to the action, and comments and public submissions received by the department or agency. Each department and agency manages its own data within the website according to agency-specific regulatory policy.
The Regulations.gov website includes a compilation of rules and notices as published by the U.S. Office of the Federal Register. Every effort is made to ensure the website includes all rule and proposed rule that are currently open for public comment. Inclusion or exclusion of material from this compilation has no independent legal significance. Users who want to verify the current status of a proposed or final rule and associated comment requirements are urged to check the official edition of the Federal Register, which is available online via the FederalRegister.gov website.
Comments and Public Submissions
Comments may be submitted through this website, or by any method identified in the specific Federal Register document. Any comment you provide through this website should be submitted in accordance with the directions in the Federal Register document. You should be aware that requirements for submitting comments may vary by department or agency. For purposes of submitting comments, some agencies may require that you include personal information, such as your name and email address, on the comment form. Each agency manages its own data within the site, according to agency-specific comment review and posting policy. Comments may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Do not submit information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as Confidential Business Information “CBI”) to Regulations.gov. Comments submitted through Regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information submitted. Some agencies may impose special requirements for submitting CBI or copyrighted works. To view any additional information or instructions for submissions, refer to the specific Federal Register notice on which you are commenting and the website of the department or agency.
Terms of Participation
Public comments help agencies develop regulations; we encourage comments from all viewpoints. Comments submitted to Regulations.gov should be the submitter’s own comments or be submitted with the commenter’s permission. The development of federal regulations is within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Government’s executive branch agencies. It is a violation of federal law to knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation including false statements about your identity or your authority to submit a comment on someone else’s behalf, in relation to the development of such federal regulations, including through comments submitted on Regulations.gov. See 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Subject to 18 U.S.C. § 1028(c), it is also a violation of federal law to knowingly use, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person in connection with the violation of any federal law or the commission of a felony under state or local law. See 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7).
By clicking the submit button, you are verifying that you are not making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation regarding your identity or your authority to submit on someone else’s behalf with regard to the comment you are submitting on Regulations.gov, and that you are not using, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, real or fictitious, in connection with any comment you are submitting on Regulations.gov.
Intended Use of Information
Federal rulemaking agencies consider public comments during the development of proposed or final rules, as well as comments solicited for opinions on a program initiative, scientific study, respective agency guidance document, or proposed standard. By providing comments through this website, you are consenting to their use and consideration by federal departments and agencies. Agencies may provide additional instructions informing you how to grant consent for use of voluntarily-provided information.
Electronic comments you submit directly through the Regulations.gov website will be maintained in two different locations depending on the agency. For agencies listed on this site as participating in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS), comments will be stored electronically within the system. For agencies listed as Non-Participating (agencies not using FDMS to manage their regulatory process), comments will be sent directly to that agency. In both situations, the department or agency receiving your comment is considered the official custodian of the comment. Your comment will not be considered until it has been properly received by that department or agency in accordance with the requirements described in the Federal Register notice. Users who want to verify that a department or agency has received their comment are urged to check directly with that department or agency. Each agency manages its own data within the site, according to agency-specific comment review and posting policy.
The material you submit to a federal department or agency through Regulations.gov may be seen by various people. Any personal information included in the comment form or in an attachment will be provided to the department or agency to which your comment is directed and may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Regulations.gov offers its public data in machine readable format via an Application Programming Interface (“API”), including comment submitter information (e.g., commenter name or address) if included in the comment submission posted by an agency on Regulations.gov. Third party organizations may use an API to build related applications for the web, desktops, and mobile devices. For additional information, view the Regulations.gov Privacy Notice.
PRIVACY NOTICE
Regulations.gov is a web-based application supporting the United States Government in the federal regulatory process. Regulations.gov is provided as a public service to access and participate in the federal regulatory process. On this site you can:
Search for a regulation such as a proposed rule, final rule, or Federal Register (FR) notice;
Submit a comment on a regulation or on another comment;
Submit an application, petition, or adjudication document;
View docket contents, including public comments and submissions;
Sign up for email alerts about a specific regulation is temporarily unavailable.
Sharing and Disclosure
Comments may be submitted through this website, or by any method identified in the specific Federal Register document, and posted on Regulations.gov. Each department or agency manages its own data within the website, according to the agency-specific comment review and posting policy. The material you submit to a federal department or agency through Regulations.gov may be seen by various people. Any personally identifiable information (e.g., name, address, phone number) included in the comment form or in an attachment will be provided to the department or agency to which your comment is directed and may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov).
Regulations.gov offers its public data in machine readable format via an Application Programming Interface (“API”), including comment submitter information (e.g., commenter name or address) if included in the comment submission posted by the agency on Regulations.gov. Third party organizations may use an API to build related applications for the web, desktops, and mobile devices.
Retention of Information
Electronically submitted information is maintained and destroyed according to the principles of the Federal Records Act and the agency records schedules approved by the National Archives and Records Administration. In some cases information submitted through Regulations.gov may become an agency record and therefore might be subject to a Freedom of Information Act request.
Please note that API users are required to comply with the Regulations.gov Terms of Service, however we have no control over data retention by third-party users who have stored the data.
Site Security
For site security purposes and to ensure that this service remains available to all users, this government computer system employs applications that monitor access to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or change information, or otherwise cause damage. If such monitoring reveals evidence of possible abuse or criminal activity, such evidence may be provided to appropriate law enforcement officials. Unauthorized attempts to upload or change information on this server are strictly prohibited and may be punishable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 and the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act or other law.
Information Automatically Captured
The Regulations.gov website does not automatically collect personal information about you, unless you choose to provide it (e.g., on the comment submission webform). Regulations.gov may send anonymous statistics to third party sites to help analyze use patterns of the site. This information is aggregated into reports that allow us to learn how visitors interact with the site so we can work to enhance system features.
Regulations.gov collects the following: domain name and Internet Protocol addresses from which you are visiting; type of browser and operating system used to access the website; and the time and date of each page visit on the website. This website uses this information to create summary statistics, which are then used to assess what information is of least interest, determining technical design specifications, and identifying system performance or problem areas.
Like many websites, Regulations.gov uses “persistent cookie” technology to follow site usage activity, but only aggregate information is captured. These cookies uniquely identify a browser on a computer, but never a person. In other words, if the same person uses Chrome and Internet Explorer, two unique browser cookies will be assigned, one for each browser, so that person will be counted as two different visitors because visits are based on browsers, not computers or persons. We use persistent cookies in order to understand how people are using the site and how we can make it better.
If you prefer to opt out of having the cookie installed on your machine or device, adjust your internet browsers cookie settings. If you use multiple browsers on your machine or device, you will need to complete this process for each browser used. Please visit www.usa.gov/optout_instructions.shtml for instructions for common browsers.
Handling Email
We use email addresses that you provide (e.g., signing up for notifications or filling out the “Contact Us” webform) only to respond to your request. Such application information is carefully protected and not available in or retained by web tracking software. We may forward your email to a government employee who can best answer your questions. We do not disclose, give, sell, or transfer any personal information about our visitors, unless required for law enforcement or statute.
Social Media Sites
While Regulations.gov maintains a presence on social media sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) in order to share government information and engage with the public, we do not collect any Personally Identifiable Information through those sites. We also do not use personal information made available by the user to these third-party sites.
Privacy Act of 1974
The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) protects the personal information submitted to Regulations.gov and retained in the system. The Privacy Act regulates how the government can disclose, share, provide access to, and maintain the personal information that it collects. Not all information collected online is covered by the Privacy Act.
The Act’s major provisions require agencies to:
Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character, and uses of a new or revised System of Records (SOR);
Keep information about you accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to assure fairness in dealing with you;
Allow you to, upon request, access and review your information held in a SOR and request amendment of the information if you disagree with it.
Thank you for the exchange of Thanksgiving notes. I know you appreciate our Mother would not have deemed such succinct (m)utterings (!) “letters”, short bursts of hastily written thoughts, the electronic equivalents “twits” or “text messages”. A LETTER back in the day required a ream of typing paper on hand and, at a minimum, two, even three dozen sheets of carbon (!!) paper. If only to honor the memory of two dear now departed souls – our Mother and my oldest and best friend, an M.D., I shall assay an honest-to-GOD letter to you and others of our family and close friends, thus honoring and carrying on my Mother’s preferred practice.
Today as you also appreciate, your brother a veteran Doom & Gloomer, I speak more usually about that which is artificial, human conceits at best, after Nature’s own natural took a discrete if not discreet back seat to “progress” and “progressives”, “environmentalists”, “anti-individualistic socialist communitarians” (aka “communists | corporatists” in older lingo). [We have re-buttered up!!] As seems the age-old practice of The Power$ That Be, TV adverts had warned us: “It’s not NICE to fool Mother Nature!”, which TP$TB proceeded to do with margarine and few gazillion other “modern products”. In our lifetimes, all that consummated merely Phase N of countless other forays in the “material world”, battle grounds and fronts each and all in The War Against Mankind. “…With no part left untouched…”, as Arlo Guthrie wryly commented during his “Alice’s Restaurant” ballad in a verse dealing, appropriately enough, with his draft-era physical examination prior to induction into the US Army (right, as if, “I will not comply”!).
As an unabashed veteran Doom & Gloomer, I often refer to seemingly more innocent decades, especially the Age of Global coolingwarming “weather climate change”, which scam still lurks beneath, around, and layered over the Great COVID Scamdemic, the latter fair to call the biggest psychological operation in recorded human history. In actuality, given real and true and accurate history edited and re-written by victors probably for several millennia – I know, hard to fathom off the top of one’s head! – we got born into the heyday of predators salivating for prey, TP$TB having prepared the way for centuries literally! Both in fact and in conviction, The War Against Mankind commenced so long ago we seek its beginnings in earliest extant myths. As a passing reference, the words Archon and Gnostics and Phoenicians might suffice as I move on from here to other topics germane to the day.
We have long since entered decades – I optimist deploy the plural while Me pessimist scoffs quietly behind hands covering a wickedly pained grimace! – when funerals outnumber both weddings and christenings counted together, a time exacerbated by many not getting “hitched” and not having children! We might speak of the commonly practiced scattering of ashes of one’s (then) former vehicle. Graves per se seem so yesterday.
Soon we shall have the option of “donating” our physical body – preferably along with still functioning organs, not only to Big Science but also to Big Med and its joined-at-the-hip evil twin, Big Pharma, born respectively of (a) body mechanics and blood letting and (b) patent medicine, never venturing much further into healing and health, both “Biggies” today primary perpetrators and consumers of fresh baby parts obtained from still living, viable babies in the womb. Can there be greater sin? The science-fiction-y, futuristic, dystopian novel Soylent Green pulled a punch or two, as it turns out. The Truth of Reality goes much darker, unto blackness itself.
My dear doctor friend, may his soul find spiritual balm, immediate rest, and indefinite solace (not solitude!), had an oncologically nasty exit from this plane. Before the terminating worst, he and I had engaged a series of occasions extending over several years to discuss “after life”, whether or not it “exists” (!), all the usual considerations. As so few seem able today, he and I agreed, most of the literature (secular and spiritual), nearly the entirety of religion, appeared intended to obfuscate, to conceal, and to befuddle and fool common folk, all the while taking in high-falutin’ educated atheistic, agnostic, skeptical, solipsistic elite AND self-righteous, dressed-to-the-hilt religious poohbahs. Politics and religion and worse subjects (to most I know!) dominated our discourse and written exchanges.
For example, four to five years ago, I could not disabuse the good doctor of his reflexive, hopeful support of Donald J. (!) Trump as “POTUS” any more than I could dissuade his polar opposite in a friend (Ph.D., Psychology) suffering to this day from TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)! JUST WHAT IS IT about the sheer logic, symbolic obviousness of the good Rev. Dodgson’s Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum that modern, thinking folks cannot grok?? I do not understand! Perhaps when I too get to the “other side”….
Many, many years before in college (1966-1967), we and others would sit late at night through to wee hours in our first-floor, sex-segregated dormitory hallway – serendipitously well designed as a site of “super-ball tournaments”. (We relegated such “serious”, standardized games as contract bridge [of which I also partook] to the common dormitory lobby.) Backs against painted concrete blocks, never a thought for creature comforts, we vigorously discussed, rationally or metaphorically, Life, Death, and The Reason WHY. Later hindered by inexorably advancing age – now both of us “doctors”, he and I, he the kind that (used to) help people, aided by broader, more diverse experiences than we had then to share at ages 18 and 19 years, respectively, Dr. He and Dr. Me managed again and again to solve the world’s main problems at least partly and to answer questions of mutual interest to us.
Then, the Earth turned sufficiently to declare a new day dawned – whereupon, eventually, always, he and I and all of us found the very same problems festering anew! Nature had renewed, only Time “wasted” and, in a slightly smilingly sense, only our losing a degree or two of physical and mental stamina for the next day or so. Overall, we gained little and lost Nothing to the maya of moments ahead. In recompense, to a certain fateful time, as grown-up children, hand in hand, Dr. He and Dr. Me reaped rewards of solidarity and depth of friendship, the capital “F” variety that sufficed us both unto the day, to this very day, as we might rhyme.
In the end, which my doctor friend encountered before us, an uncountably large number of souls gone before and lined up behind, the latter abiding in patience (or not!), awaiting the unknown appointed hour, a welcoming spirit contending with feelings of fear, fragments of memorably imprinted lines of songs come to my mind in GOD’s way of teaching, for instance, the following: “…my only friend”, “you go your way, I’ll go mine”, and “the love you make is equal to the love you take”. Lost in the witting welter of bad influences that beset mankind, immersed in cesspools constituted by comparatively few poisoned springs from which putrid, fluoridated flows emanate for our imbibing, I too struggle to grasp firm hold of outstretched arms with life-jackets and floats, scarcely able to believe, much less have full faith, despite eyes wider open than ever, certainly blinded neither by sunlight nor by electric torches, still seeking to see unfiltered Light, a Fool’s Errand, of course!
Yet, I have confidence. I shall not find myself alone when I embrace my personal end, albeit in an atmosphere of not knowingness, with doubts hardly commensurate with those of Thomas, so magnitudinous for (reportedly) a direct apostle of the Master Jesus, for GOD’s sake! Like “folk tales”, I wonder whether that New Testament story (among so many others) got included for its pedagogical worth, if not as a deliberately ironic “faithful account” by editors and re-writers of “books” of the New Testament. I find it impossible to accept that degree of skepticism in a man who had a spiritual awakening and came to greater maturity under the tutelage of the Master Jesus. After all, ancient myths had incorporated this theme (rising from the “dead”, or ashes, if you will, not to mention, in the lifetime of Thomas himself, the fate and resuscitation of Lazarus!). Nothing new under the sun! Though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death….
When I do come to an end, I shall think it not too much to ask of GOD – an early, post-mortem “To Do” if not a reward for good, certainly not stellar behavior – to permit my tracking Gordon down on the “other side”, to be together again, this timeless moment on the banks of the heavenly river flowing infinitely slowly, to hash over by then to us almost mythical times. We shall once again ponder next adventures, whether together or apart. Still alive and “kicking against the pricks” – an act against which John Irving (“The Hotel New Hampshire”) strongly counselled – I remain grateful for the moments Dr. He and I shared this lifetime, face to face, in writing, and mostly in spirit.
See you anon, dear Friend, after we both doff the title “doctor”!
Did my best, sister, several drafts! Environmentalists will applaud my savings on “carbon paper.” All the rest, not sure! 😉
May our hearts, the hearts of all mankind, be filled with Love, Joy, and Peace, always.
1. The UNIFIED FIELD. Newton, Lagrange, Coulomb and Maxwell all gave us UFT’s.
2. RELATIVITY. Relativity is true; many of the equations are not. The muon, lightclock, Minkowski, Friedmann, Pound-Rebka, and the falsification of gamma.
3. CALCULUS. The calculus works, despite many fudges and cheats.
4. QUANTUM PHYSICS. Early mistakes, including superposition, entanglement, tunneling, nonlocality, Bohr’s equations.
5. ELECTROMAGNETICS. Solid-state fudging, current, inductance. Also the Sun and planets. Tides. Bode’s Law and interplanetary influences.
7a. My Opposition.I have bumped this paper up to section i., to be sure my opposition didn’t miss it. Also see #367 below. 10pp.
7b. A Letter from the Mainstream. I publish here a series of emails I received several years ago from a mainstream physicist, as confirmation from the inside that I am right, both in my criticisms of academic physics and in my new theories.
7c. Another Letter from the Mainstream. I publish here a more recent email from a mainstream researcher, showing that not only am I being read by real physicists in the field, but that I am able to solve their problems where the mainstream cannot.
7d. Something for My Critics. A general Google search on my papers find something astonishing: many are outranking Wikipedia, Harvard, MIT, and the Dictionary on their respective topics. 20pp.
SECTION 1: The UNIFIED FIELD
8. The Moon Gives up a Secret.Numbers from the Moon are analyzed to show that “gravity” is a compound field. 4pp.
9. The Unified Field Theory.Newton’s gravitational equation is shown to be a compound equation that includes the E/M field. I mathematically separate the two field equations, do transforms on them, and create simple and useful Unified Field Equations. 24pp.
10. The Unified Field Equation is Confirmed.I show that my velocity equation from the galactic rotation problem is equivalent to my relativistic unified field equation, from the paper above. 2pp.
200 (moved). Perturbation Theory in the Light of Charge.This is a continuation of my paper on Laplace, showing specific examples of the charge field in historical field equations. I also show Newton’s close pass to the Lagrangian. 8pp.
23. Is Big G a Constant? No.A brief clarification on this, as well amusing commentary on Rupert Sheldrake and his detractors. 6pp.
SECTION 2: RELATIVITY
24. Relativity as a Concept.An introduction to the problem, preparing the reader for the mathematical arguments in later papers. 6pp.
25. Relativity Demystified.Here I try to explain both SR and GR in the simplest and clearest possible terms, for laymen and experts alike. 14pp.
26. The Michelson/Morley Interferometer.Here I explain the flaws in various conceptualizations of the interferometer, showing that no fringe effect should have been expected. It was originally published as Appendix A to the long paper in chapter 30. 12pp.
28. The Discovery of First-Degree Relativity and the Refutation of Gamma. This is the paper I sent to several journals, including Annalen der Physik and Physical Review Letters, from 2001 to 2004. It condenses the information from the longer papers in chapters 12 and 13. 21pp.
29. A Critique of Einstein’s Original Paper.Here I attack Einstein line for line, using “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” (Annalen der Physik, 1905) as my text. This was to answer critics of my first paper [chapter 13] who believed that Einstein’s paper of 1905 still had precedence over math published later in the books Relativity and The Meaning of Relativity. This paper was originally published as Appendix C to the longer paper below. 12pp.
30. An Algebraic Correction to the Transformation Equations (The Lorentz Equations) of Special Relativity.This is my first paper on Special Relativity. It includes new first- and second-degree transforms, as well as new transforms for movement toward an observer and at an angle to an observer. In addition, it explains the interferometer, discusses the Hafele-Keating experiment, and suggests a solution to the Pioneer Anomaly. 48pp.
32. The Light Clock.A close analysis of the light clock, showing the many ways it fails as a visualization of time dilation. 3pp.
33. A Final Argument against x’ = x – vt.A short addendum to my proofs against this equation, once again using a text of Feynman as an example. 2pp.
34. The Equation x’ = x – vt, Again. One more useful visualization of the problem, focusing this time on the immobility of origins in relative motion. 3pp.
41. How New Transforms in Special Relativity Affect Mass, Momentum and Energy Equations.Here I show that Einstein’s mass and energy transforms are also incorrect, including the famous E=mc2. I also show, for the first time, that the classical equation E=mv2/2 is not an approximation. Finally, I derive the number 108 for the proton. 41pp.
45. More Problems with the Friedmann Metric.I show that the generic metric is mathematically compromised in many ways, the most important of which is its hidden derivation from x’ = x – vt. 7pp.
46. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 1.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, going straight the original papers of Einstein. 14pp.
47. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 2.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, concentrating here on subsection 5, where I show the total collapse of the proof. 5pp.
48. The Einstein Field Equations, Part 3.I continue my previous analyses of the General Theory, concentrating here on subsection 13, where I show how the fundamental tensor fails. 8pp.
49. Lorentz Invariance.How my corrections affect so-called Invariance, covariance, and violations. 4pp.
50. A Critique of General Relativity.A refutation of Einstein’s thought problem of the spinning disk and an analysis of the tensor calculus. Also, a solution to the primary problem of GR (the deflection of starlight) without tensors or Riemann. 13pp.
53. The Aberration of Starlight,including analysis of Airy’s water-filled telescope, the Sagnac Effect, the Hammar experiment, and the Lodge experiment. 18pp.
72. A Re-definition of the Derivative (why the calculus works—and why it doesn’t).This paper establishes for the first time the true foundation of the calculus. Rather than pursue a diminishing differential, as has been the quest of history, I have discovered the constant differential underlying the basic equation of the calculus. In doing this, I show that instantaneous values are impossible. 40pp.
77. The Derivative of log(x) is also Wrong.I show more problems with the Modern Calculus using my simple differential tables. I find a new slope for log(x) which is fantastically close to the current slope, but which comes from a completely different analysis. 5pp.
78. A Study of Variable Acceleration.I show that the calculus is currently taught upside down, by analyzing a textbook solution of cubed acceleration. 8pp.
80. Trig “Derivatives” found without the old Calculus.Here I show that my simple exponent table from my calculus paper, and the constant differential, apply just as easily to trig functions. 3pp. Also proof the chain rule is fudged.
82. Another Fatal Flaw in the Historical Foundation of the Calculus.A further flaw in the current proof of the derivative, specifically in the assumption that the terms in an infinite series can approach a limit. I show that the sum approaches the limit, but the terms do not, nullifying the accepted procedure. 4pp.
85. A Clarification of the Equation a=v2/r. I import new information from my π papers to extend my findings regarding orbits. I also show that the centripetal acceleration is not instantaneous. 6pp.
89. Quantum Mechanics and Idealism.My paper on the calculus is tied to QED here. Also a comparison of the idealisms of Heisenberg and Berkeley. Finally, a disproof of both idealisms, and a simple logical and mathematical refutation of the Copenhagen interpretation. 10pp.
91. Superposition.Both superposition and the wave-particle duality are explained mechanically, with a straightforward visualization. This falsifies the Copenhagen interpretation in the most direct way imaginable. 5pp. Also see #72 below.
92a. Superposition Again.The problem of beam splitters in sequence is solved mechanically, with diagrams. 6pp.
92b. Polarizers in Sequence. I pull apart another Youtube video for my readers, showing the layers of misdirection we continue to get from mainstream physics. 4pp.
93. Quantum Entanglement.A critique of David Z. Albert’s new article at Scientific American, and a mechanical explanation of entanglement. 8pp.
94. Quantum Teleportation? NO.I show that the current interpretation is fudged in at least three major places. 6pp.
95. CHSH Bell Tests.Another bold mathematical cheat from the mainstream, done right under your nose. 3pp.
96. Schrodinger’s Cat.Where I give Schrodinger’s cat mouth-to-mouth, bringing him back to life. 5pp.
97. On Quantum Nonlocality.I show the real mechanical solution, correcting and extending the wavefunction to do it. 6pp.
106. More Problems with Bohr.Part 1 of 2, preparing us to look at the absorption lines of hydrogen. 8pp.
107. Rewriting the Rydberg Formula.I show how the Balmer equation and Rydberg equation can be rewritten to show the mechanics of the charge field. Part 2 of a two part analysis. 8pp.
108b. Levitation by Heat. I analyze a recent experiment and announcement from the University of Chicago, showing how it acts as proof of my theory of heat, my theory of rising charge, and disproof of mainstream theory across the board. 12pp.
108c. New “Electron Paradox” again proves my Charge Field. I show that the “superballistic” motion of electrons in metals is not a paradox or quantum effect, but a simple outcome of charge channeling and photon potentials. 9pp.
112. The Stern-Gerlach experiment.The mathematical and axiomatic flaws in the experiment, including the illogic of a dipole electron and a spin of 1/2. 6pp.
120. An Analysis of Anderson Localization.A destruction and a replacement. Anderson Localization falls with the Drude-Sommerfeld model. Also a look at bio-reflectivity. 27pp.
135. The Cause of the Solar Cycles.The magnetic and sunspot cycle is shown to be caused by charge from the Jovians. 8pp.
135b. Climate and the Seasons.I just found a paper from more than a year ago that I posted but forgot to link into this Updates page. So it is new to you, I think. 14pp.
135c. The Next Maximum.Where I fine-tune the Solar Cycles, by including the line to the Galactic Core. 22pp.
135d. Are You Ready for Some Good News?I provide the full charts for the Solar Cycles, showing both the since wave and the amplitudes, by including angle to Core as well as angles among the planets. I also provide a detained prediction of the next maximum. 33pp.
140. More Trouble with Tides.An analysis of Newton’s Prop. 66. And I show the simple math proving the eccentricity of the Moon is caused by the Solar Wind. 10pp.
147. The Strange Moon Enceladus.Where we discover this moon is far too bright for current theory to explain. 17pp.
148. More on Enceladus and Albedo.I show that the mainstream has covered up the brightness of all celestial bodies, including the Moon. I replace “opposition surge” with a mechanical explanation using the charge field. 11pp.
167. Celestial Mechanics.A demonstration of the inadequacies of current theory regarding gravity, orbits, and nebulae. 18pp.
168. Another Hole in Celestial Mechanics.The late Ralph Rene gives us an important clue: The force on the Moon from the Sun is greater than the force on the Moon from the Earth. 4pp.
171. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part I.No curved space, no force at a distance, no force-carrying particle. Gravity is explained here simply in terms of straight-line motion. Mass, inertia and gravity are all shown to be equivalent, reducible to the same motions. 9pp.
175. The Third Wave: a Redefinition of Gravity, Part V.The aberration of starlight and gravity at the quantum level are explained. A proposal concerning the strong force is also made, linking it to the expansion of matter. 14pp.
181. The Speed of Gravity.I show that the speed of gravity is not c, but infinite, by analyzing papers of Fomalont & Kopeikin, van Flandern, and Carlip. 11pp.
182a. The Cause of Gravity.I show perhaps a better way to create the vector of gravity, without expansion. 5pp.
186. The Allais Effect and Majorana.Plus commentary on LeSage, Podkletnov, NASA, Wiki, and others. Showing how my compound field answers anomalies where other fields do not. 32pp.
192b. New Particles? No, Bad Theory.I show that the mainstream is not detecting new particles at the south pole, it is detecting more proof of my core theory and my theory of through charge. 5pp.
198a. Canada’s Gravity Deficit.I replace the Simons/Hager pseudo-theory with a real mechanical theory, using the unified field. 13pp.
198b. The Wilkes Land Anomaly and the Charge Field. I show the “gravity” anomaly in the Antarctic is caused by neither a giant crater nor by a buried alien object, but by the incoming charge vortex. 10pp.
211. The PLANCK Probe’s CBR Map.Rather than indicate the Cosmic Background Radiation, the newest maps are clear evidence of my ambient Charge Field. 6pp.
222b. Black Hole Signatures Called into Question.Where we look closely at a recent peer-reviewed paper on black holes, finding that mainstream physicists are not all onboard. 6pp.
232. A Reworking of Quantum Chromodynamics,while dismissing the quark, the bosons, the gluons, the strong force, the weak force, and the Higgs field. Also including a new analysis of beta decay. 22pp.
233. Hadronization.An analysis of the sad theory of hadronization. 8pp.
234. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.I analyze NMR as an outcome of charge channeling. Also an analysis of EPR, Larmor precession, and the magnetic moment. 21pp.
236. More on the Orbiton.A continuation of the previous paper and a close reading of the letter at Nature, showing how the data on electron splitting is pushed. 11pp.
244. Higgs Parade gets Rained Out.A long analysis of the formal Higgs announcement, showing it is pushed math and propaganda. 20pp.
245a. A Higgs Update.A December 2012 announcement by LHC confirms my predictions from September, concerning multiple “Higgs” at the 120GeV level. 5pp.
245b. The Bottom Baryon. I show that the new “beauty” baryon isn’t a baryon and that the theory around it isn’t at all beautiful. I show how to create it with spins instead of quarks. 18pp.
245c. The Pentaquark. A better theory, using spin mechanics. 11pp.
256. The Electron Radius as a Function of c.I show the flaw in the current equation for the classical electron radius: a scaling constant has been left out, giving us a radius too large by 252x. 6pp.
262b. More on the Fine Structure Constant. I show yet another way to calculate and interpret the fine structure constant, using another gap in mainstream numbers. 9pp.
262c. The Fine Structure Constant Again. I simplify this problem down one more time, answering Feynman’s biggest question in the most concise manner possible. 5pp.
267. The Stefan-Boltzmann Law,a simplified derivation, showing the mechanics beneath the equation. Also, how to apply the equation to a sphere rather than a flat surface. 6pp.
268a. The Double Slit Experiment.A simple mechanical explanation of the single photon problem and the detector problem. 7pp.
268b. The Stark Effect. Not only do I show charge field causes of both the shift and the split, I show a new cause of spectral lines—one that has nothing to do with electron orbitals. 40pp.
269. Unifying the Photon with other Quanta.Showing that the photon is another spin level of the fundamental quantum. Also, I calculate a mass for the photon. 7p.
296b. Solid Light? NO. While analyzing the recent paper from Princeton, I explain high-temperature superconduction mechanically, including showing the physical cause of the Meissner Effect. This destroys BCS and RVB theory, Cooper pairs, polaritons, dimer math, and the rest of the fudged pseudo-explanations of solid-state physics. 30pp.
296c. Dark Matter Detection?No, just more desperation from the mainstream. I show the axion is another fake particle, created to hide the charge field. 5pp.
306a. The Photon Spin is Real.We go to the University of Glasgow for indication the orbital angular momentum of the photon is a real spin. 2pp.
306b. An Argument for the Photon.A brief look at the unquantum model, showing that new experiments refute mainstream photon theory, but not the photon itself. 5pp.
309a. Rainbows, Prisms, and non-edge Diffraction.Part 2 of my rainbow papers, where I show the color split using the unified field. Including analysis of Goethe’s theory of color. 20pp.
323. The Nuclear Shell Model of Wigner.How this model fails, and why my model is superior. With a mechanical explanation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle. 7pp.
329. Period Fourof the periodic table, where I analyze the nuclear structure of many important metals. 20pp.
330. Period Sixof the periodic table, where I analyze the Lathanides and the elements around them, showing an important variant nuclear structure. 22pp.
331a. The Great Methane Stink.I show how Methane is created, disproving electron orbital theory once again. 12pp.
331b. Graphene. Where we see all the mainstream explanations are wrong. Why? Because they are based on electron bonding theory, which is a fudge from the first word. 10pp.
332. Diatomic Hydrogen.My new charge bonding explains this much better than electron sharing. Plus an analysis of spin isomers. 9pp.
333. Deuterium and Tritium.I show the nuclear diagrams for these, as well as for heavy water. 20pp.
334a. The Phosphorus-Hydrogen Bond.Scientists recently admitted positive Phosphorus bonds to positive Hydrogen, and I show you why. The continued destruction of electron bonding theory, with nuclear diagrams. 33pp.
336. The Gas Discharge Lamp.Or, why Noble Gasses make good lamps. A better theory, using nuclear charge channeling rather than electron orbitals. 27pp.
337. Hollow Neon Atoms?New experiments are more proof of charge channeling, not of hollow atoms. 9pp.
338. The Neutron.A closer look at the charge profile of the neutron, confirming repulsion. 3pp.
339. Is Helium4 a Boson? No.A long analysis of bosons, fermions, spin-statistics, and superfluidity. 12pp.
340. The Fourth Phase of Water, part 1.I look at Gerald Pollack’s book, analyzing polywater, the exclusion zone, and charge channeling. 15pp.
343. The Magnetic Moments of Proton, Neutron, and Electron.I show how the magnetic moments are caused mechanically, using the recycled charge field. I then show how to calculate them from first principles, and to calculate one from the other. 7pp.
SECTION 10: OTHER MAINSTREAM MISTAKES
344. String Theory: the Inelegant Universe.A Critique of String Theory and M-theory using Brian Greene’s book The Elegant Universe as my text, including a foundational correction to the 11-dimensional math. 14pp.
346. Zeno’s Paradoxes.A short paper on Zeno’s various paradoxes showing, among other things, that I am not opposed to limits or infinities in mathematics or in physics when they are used properly. 6pp.
347. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.Commentary in passing on Kurt Godel, including analysis of Karl Popper, Bertrand Russell, and others. 6pp.
348. Why Noether’s Theorem is a Tautology.A short proof of Noether’s Theorem by algebraic means, showing that symmetries are equivalent to conservation laws. This contradicts the current interpretation that symmetries are primary. 2pp.
349. Entropy.A refining of the concept of entropy, and a rebuttal to the current conceptions of order. 5pp.
350. What is π?Here I show that π is a centripetal acceleration and that the circumference of any circle has complex dimensions. 6pp.
351. The Extinction of π.Here I show that the true value of π, defined as the ratio of circumference to diameter, is 4. 15pp.
353c. More on the Running Track.This is to clarify my recent addendum to my paper on pi=4. I show that both the distances and velocities are being miscalculated in the curves on normal running tracks. 6pp.
358. Does Size Matter?The first entry in a new section answering readers’ questions. Here I answer a question about the ratio of volume to surface area changing with size. 3pp.
359. Why do Stars Twinkle?A new answer to this question and some commentary on the old answer. 6pp.
361. Squaring the Circle.Here I show various operational inconsistencies in claiming that the circle cannot be squared “with a straight edge and compass.” 12pp.
377b. They Finally Retire the Stephen Hawking Impostor. You probably know Hawking “died” recently, but unless you are in the UK, you may not know that two months earlier The Daily Mail in London reported on my outing of him as a fake. 3pp.
386. Time and the Photon.I address the question, “If a photon doesn’t experience time, how does it travel?” showing the mainstream answer is wrong. 5pp.
387. Is Time an Illusion? NO.We look at recent magazine articles to find more misdirection in physics. 33pp.
400. Jack Parsons and JPL.Where we look at the foundations of the Jet Propulsion Lab and Aerojet. 20pp.
7,275 pp. total. 1/1/2019. This total page count was recently revised to reflect the large size of a PDF page, which is about 3 times larger than a standard book page. Not all papers are listed above. See updates for papers not on this list.
stock here. I have covered this issue before, it wasn’t on my radar until the last few years. All the press gives them a pass, all except alternative media. It’s #FaF
Ruby was certainly informed about the precise moment when Oswald would be transferred from the Dallas Police Station to the County Jail. According to former British Intelligence Officer Colonel John Hughes-Wilson, it was Sam Bloom, the Jewish chairman of the “host committee” who had invited Kennedy to Dallas, who suggested to the Police “that they move the alleged assassin [Oswald] from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsmen a good story and pictures.” And “when the police later searched Ruby’s home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom’s name, address and telephone number on it.”31
In an apparent attempt to make it impossible for him to fulfill his contract, Ruby tried to warn the Dallas Police anonymously: Lieutenant Billy Grammer, a dispatcher for the Dallas Police Department, whose statement can be heard here, received an anonymous phone call at 3 a.m. on November 24 from a man who knew Grammer’s name. The caller told Grammer that he knew of the plan to move Oswald from the basement and that unless the plans for Oswald’s transfer were changed, “we are going to kill him.” After Oswald was shot, Grammer, who knew Ruby and had found the voice familiar at the time of the call, identified Ruby as the caller.32
stock here: this highly promoted tweet, got 1.5M views….that means the Cabal really pushed it out there.
It is a blatant attempt to create division and hatred. Everyone not Hawaiian is labelled a law breaking outside….probably non-vaxxed too OMG!~!! The Horror.
And Yahoo has turned off the comments to “improve the community experience”.
The play the “safety card” and the “top secret military comms card
There are ZERO consequences that are negative to anyone, because some non-Sheep have the guts to ignore stupid rules and enjoy nature
Haven’t seen these in years. Running the HEPA filters for sure. Will also do a few Geiger runs.
Had to remove a Doxing comment from Jay Cullen, you know U Vic asshole who went on attack against Dana Dunford for doing independent research et al, it is an accurate IP address for his University.
Several attempts here to post pictures of the chemtrails were not effective….I have a work around, my Blogger site that has not been censored…..yet. Note to self, back that site up also!!
It’s time to revisit the coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse. With the news that he has been acquitted on all counts, don’t forget the ways that Dems and the corporate press came together to craft a false narrative in his case. Let’s break down how we got here1:12 PM · Nov 19, 2021·Twitter for iPhone9,068 Retweets1,674 Quote Tweets25.2K Likes
There is a lot that could be written on this story. Its #FaF. It Doesn’t really make sense. Heavy, which is Cabal controlled propaganda, actually did a pretty good writeup, for starts at least.
stock here: I am curious about the week of deliberations, and ending on Friday. I guess that means a full weekend to hire the BLM thugs back and burn some shit down. We shall see. My fear was the start of riots and the national guard ambushed as they try to mobilize. “On call” is quite different than being “in place” as they should have been.
On the above article, saw this race baiting comment, and said response.
Why have gun laws if they are not consistently enforced? Who acquired the weapon for Kyle, who transported the kid to the protest, why didn’t the cops immediately arrest him but instead gave him water and sent him home (only to be arrested the next day)?
I suspect if Kyle were black the police interactions would be quite different.
ef off race baiter. You have not done even the most basic research on gun laws. And the transporting bullshit, like you want charges against his mom, or did you not even research that. You bakas of low research, acting out of feeling –that are also wrong, are a serious problem this country faces, you are so easily swayed by the mainsteam narrative. He was a lifeguard in Kenosha, his job was there and his father was there. The allegations of who “acquired” the rifle for him hints at a “straw purchase” of which it was nothing of the sort, he borrowed the long rifle from a friend in Kenosha. Shameful shame on you.
Below the Embed, is a link that is Thread Reader App showing a dozen of the ignorant race baiting jag off that may actually believe they are doing reporting.
Sigh…..we have to be happy that finally, obvious justice is done.
Reporter asks if President Trump condemns the actions of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teen charged for killing two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Deaths from Jab USA, and Orange Reported as “Foreign”
After We Discovered and Reported That Certain Batches Were Being Widely Distributed to Many States, Logistically Hard, and Why Would anyone Do this? And Certain Batches were killing Hundreds Reported…..shortly After That, The VAERS Reports Started Listing Almost All The Deaths as Foreign.
There is no end-game. An exit strategy does not exist. A way out of this current oppression has not been considered, let alone set in motion.
It has been a year-and-a-half since Hawaii Governor David Ige started exercising his statutory 60-day emergency order authorization. Nobody seems to care that it just goes on forever without any end in sight. – Advertisement –
A few months ago, the Governor had promised that when Hawaii reached 70% vaccination rate, all restrictions would be terminated. In reality, just the opposite happened. He doubled down along with Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi by tightening the screws with a vaccine mandate that prevents Hawaii residents from living a normal life.
Do you even remember what it was like to live a normal life without having to check on the most current health department restrictions? – Advertisement –
The vaccine mandate which began on September 13th was limited by statute to 60 days which ended on November 11th. But the lack of inquisitiveness of the Hawaii media is surpassed only by that of the Hawaii Restaurant Association which doesn’t know or care when or if they will be able to stop checking vaccination cards or negative COVID-19 tests for dine-in customers.
Calls to several national franchise restaurants here on Oahu were met with different results. One said they would stop checking. Another said they would not. A reputable local establishment said that the mandate will never end.
Nobody has a plan.
They don’t want to put themselves in the spotlight by asking. Everybody prefers to slink in the darkness and let somebody else expose their brashness by inquiring. Or not.
The status quo is easy for those who have neither initiative nor incentive.
Some restaurants have just cut out sit-down-inside dining altogether by preparing all meals in takeout containers and allowing customers to sit outside without having their vaccination status verified. It’s obvious that the profit margin of local establishments is being undermined, but nobody has the guts to challenge this unnecessarily oppressive government.
There is no doubt that the authorities are more concerned about appearance than substance.
If there ever was a health crisis, it is definitely over now. The Governor of Hawaii realized that his presence here in the 50th state was absolutely unneeded when he went on a boondoggle at taxpayer expense to a climate change conference in far away Europe. Somehow, it’s hard to imagine that a 6,898 mile airline flight from Hawaii to Scotland would reduce the global carbon footprint.
By all means, Hawaii is not the worst place on Earth for vaxximania.
Austria, the birthplace of Adolf Hitler, learned nothing from the Third Reich and is now locking down all unvaccinated people. Today there were unconfirmed reports that they may actually start force-vaccinating people there. Vienna was once respected as a center of classical culture. It may soon be best known for those little sausages that you buy in a can in the market.
Canada has stormtroopers marching into Christian churches and expelling worshippers as they lock the doors. Sometimes they even hog-tie pastors in the middle of the highway if they don’t comply with government edicts.
What goes on in China, we will never know because information is locked down just as tightly as are human victims. But, Joe Biden and Xi Jinping are bosom buddies, so what the hey.
The United States of America has been known as a bastion of freedom for a very long time. Hawaii has the reputation of being a tropical paradise. Looks can be deceptive. What you see may actually be a mirage.
The brain drain will continue and intensify as Hawaii refuses to employ common sense. A handful of politicians on the mainland are standing up against the brain-washing of American citizens. You are going to be hard-pressed however here in these islands to find anyone willing to buck the trend and take the flack.
In what universe is class warfare preferable to peace, harmony and tranquility?
Yet our elected leaders here in Hawaii are totally unresponsive. They keep moving the goalposts to accommodate their greed for power. No one has ever held them accountable before, so why would they think the voters would suddenly do an end-run for the touchdown?
As long as we keep trying to barrel right up the middle, we’re going to win even less often than the current U.H. football team.
Ask yourself, where are we going to be at this time next year? When 2020 ended, it was like taking off a shoe that was too tight. But, there is even less anticipation now at the end of 2021 that the future will bring something better in 2022.
Does anybody really doubt that there will be the same worn out politicians playing musical chairs to become our next Hawaii Governor? Will you be surprised when the incumbent Hawaii Senator and two Congressmen get sent back to Washington again?
Nothing really ever changes here. Because nobody wants it to.
You will have no one but yourself to blame if you just sit on your okole and let things happen around you. Think back to a couple of years ago when you made plans for Thanksgiving and Christmas without waiting to see what your fearful leaders were going to deign to permit you to do. Those were personal and family decisions, not for elected officials to determine and impose upon you against your will and contrary to your better judgment.
Those were the days, my friend. We thought they’d never end. But they did. Forever!
In 2022, all those 2’s are going to resemble serpents!
The vaccine is not intended to save your life, or even help you. its intent is literally to kill you slowly… not quickly so the numbers are fucked since most deaths have not occurred yet. those are about to start and youre right they will blame a virus not the vaccine when that happens.
A review of the basic sciences for covid on a understandable level, with only root level sources.
The PCR tests (which they call COVID tests) do not detect covid.
They can only detect viral material.
The inventor of the PCR test which these days they call the covid test Kary Mullis warned us long ago that they were using the pcr tests and changing the thresholds and creating false detects to tell the patients they were infected with AIDS.. exact same scam they do with covid. (see the videos below for this and more about Fauci)
The test cannot tell if its a cold sore, AIDS, covid, the flu, pnuemonia or what virus it is. They also lower the threshold of detection so it detect the smallest bit of viral material.
That’s how they are creating all these cases, if you have ANY small amount of ANY virus when you take the covid test you get told you have covid and then are poisoned with a drug that gives symptoms of covid. This is also why ANYONE vaccinated, not vaccinated, already had covid passed a test 5 minutes ago etc.. can test positive for covid, and even a papaya (yes the fruit) once did..
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mqWe8xvO41XQ/
The above video is the inventor of the PCR test Kary Mullis telling us before covid that they were misusing the test and the below video is him telling us that Fauci does not know shit, and is paid to lie.
Kary Mullis died just before covid hit on August 7, 2019.
The standard drugs prescribed both in hospitals and vaccines have killed lots of people and animals in trials, certainly a higher percentage than covid, killing over 50 percent of humans and 100 percent percent of animals in their only trials.
The only approved drug for treatment of covid is remdisvir. That Fauci calls the standard of treatment. This is the most common drug prescribed because Fauci said it should be is. remdisivir.
The ebola trials were the only trials remdisvir underwent prior to this. Notice how it killed over half the people that took it so the results were unable to be completed. The drug that Fauci introduced killed the second most. Neither of those two got to finish the study with two other drugs that did, because of so many deaths associated. Here are the results admitting that on a government website.
“Among patients in the remdesivir group, the estimated median time was actually more than 28 days because mortality exceeded 50% and expired patients were assigned a time of “>28 days”.”
If this doesn’t disturb you incredibly…. It’s called FAUCI-CIDE.. why would anyone prescribe such a damaging drug to such a easy to beat illness?
In this video a chiropractor discusses how he ran across the above mentioned ebola trials results showing the over 50% death rates, with the devastating results, and realized Fauci was insane to have known about that and still made the drug the standard for covid care.
100 Percent of animals given the covid ‘vaccines’ or mrna injections died.
animal testing
By both traditional scientific, and traditional legal standards the mRNA shots they give for covid and call vaccines do not qualify as vaccines. But dont worry they decided to change both right before and even after covid-19 to cover it. How convenient that they would have such foresight.
The above video is of course elite level professor of immunology Dolores Cahill. In the video she answers questions about if the covid injections should be considered vaccines, and how the animals reacted in the animal studies for the mRNA shots. Dolores Cahill has decades of elite level achievements, and has never until recently been questioned about her credentials until she went against what paid science is saying. This is of course the case with all of the very brave people being mentioned on this page.
The people pushing these vaccines know they are killing people. but the deal is it took a year or two so we aren’t seeing the most deaths yet
In the video below, Gina, a molecular Biologist blows the whistle very hard at a council meeting in Dawson Creek, BC. This is a mind blowing wow for a city council meeting.
In the below video Dr of Immunology, Dr Thompson reports his findings from tests he preformed He did immunity blood tests both before and after (covid injections). The results blew his mind.
OK the conclusion first…..there is ZERO Comirnaty in the USA, and Pfizer has no intention of bringing Comirnaty to the USA at least for months.
There is no vaccine available in USA that is “fully approved”
Comirnaty is the only “fully approved” Vax in the USA
There is ZERO statement that definitively says that the composition of Comirnaty is the same as BNT162b2, and when they got EUA approval for our children I thought it was #FaF that they just slipped in an anti-heart attack drug to the mix without some massive or ANY study.
This headline from the FDA seems to state that these are separate entities.
According to the FDA, the newly licensed Comirnaty injection and the existing Pfizer shot, while “legally distinct,” are not any different in terms of their “safety or effectiveness.”
It’s odd that the FDA wants 55 years in order to release the data they used to “approve the Comirnaty”, maybe they will release the ingredients then also!
Even if the OSHA “Mandate” was legal and in effect….there is no “legal” product available in USA to Vax them with.
