Nuke Pro -- Exposing Truth In A Sea Of Lies

stock here, from ZH, an OK analysis. Although “forking” with a bishop means that one of the pieces was already on target, and therefore was already protected. So the start of analysis is flawed.

On Fork number 3. Trump has a great move that can be played — acknowledge that the collective west threatened Russia with putting weapons on Ukraine border with Russia, that Russia would not be able to stop before hitting Moscow (which is in the far west of Russia, 280 miles away). That means 8 minutes with a supersonic missile. Let the full truth out….the Deep State Globalists, who were laundering money through Ukraine, caused this conflict, so they could move huge money and skim off much on that non-accounted for monies. Ukraine is how the Biden family skimmed off 10’s of millions, and the proof was all there prior to this “war”. Russia should keep what they have as a “buffer zone”, give those areas independence but as a territory, and all Russian assets which we have control over, should be returned to Russia.

———————————– This article originally appeared on The Daily Reckoning, which uses the POS comment form Disqus which is clearly a tool of the Globalists to censor, therefore only 2 comments. They pretend that you can log in using Facebook, or X, or Google, but in reality, they just force to to “link” your other account to POS Disqus. I am banned at Disqus (and all accounts leading to Disqus)

I had to go to page 4 of ZH to find the referenced article so I can post my above comment, let’s see how that goes….

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/2025-sitrep-cleaning-bidens-mess

2025 SitRep: Cleaning Up Biden’s Mess

https://archive.ph/Vuz9k#selection-913.0-1036.0

Biden’s Three Fork Moves

The first Biden fork involves new economic sanctions imposed on Russia in connection with the war in Ukraine.

Biden has imposed new “ghost fleet” sanctions on Russian oil exports. The term ghost fleet refers to oil tankers that are not insured in the London market and may involve vessels that are re-flagged, renamed or turn off their transponders while in transit. In short, the ghost fleet is used by Russia to deliver oil exports (usually to China or India) in defiance of western oil export sanctions.

Biden’s new sanctions prohibit ghost fleet vessels from entering and docking in ports of countries that support the sanctions. A number of NATO nations, especially those in the Baltic Sea and Gulf of Finland, have said they will board Russian vessels to check their insurance documents. In extreme cases, oil cargoes may be seized by NATO navies, although that is rare. All these actions closely resemble high seas piracy.

Sanctions of this type never work for long. There are too many ways around them, beginning with the fact that importers like China and India do not support the sanctions. That said, the ghost fleet sanctions will tend to raise the price of oil because finding insurance or taking circuitous routes can be expensive.

Here’s the fork: If Trump keeps the sanctions in place, he’ll be blamed for causing inflation resulting from higher oil prices. If Trump removes the sanctions, he’ll be branded as a Putin puppet. Trump can choose his response, but either way he’ll lose. He’s either causing inflation or bowing to Putin.

The Second Fork

The next fork involves the course of the war in Ukraine. Biden and Ukraine are escalating the war to a point that’s dangerously close to nuclear war. This escalation includes using intermediate-range ATACMS missiles to strike targets inside Russia. Russia responded by using its Oreshnik hypersonic missile to strike a factory in Dnipro. The missile not only destroyed the factory, but turned it to dust.

Biden did not get the message. The ATACMS launches continued, followed by the brazen assassination of a top Russian general and his aide on the streets of Moscow. Biden also delivered tens of billions of dollars of new funding to Ukraine and supplied missiles and artillery shells from severely depleted U.S. arsenals.

The fork: If Trump continues on this pre-determined path, the war will go on as the Biden Neocons hope. That means Trump will get the blame for the ultimate collapse of Ukraine, which is coming. On the other hand, if Trump de-escalates, he’ll be called a Putin stooge and be blamed for any peace deal that concedes Ukrainian territory to Russia. Again, Trump can choose to escalate or deescalate, but either way he’ll be blamed for the Ukrainian defeat. Trump can choose but he’s bound to lose.

Fork Move #3

A third fork involves Biden’s move to steal Russian-owned U.S. Treasury securities to support a loan to Ukraine to be used in its war with Russia.

In February 2022, at the start of the war in Ukraine, the U.S. and European Union (EU) froze about $300 billion of Russian assets in the form of U.S. Treasury securities lawfully purchased by the Central Bank of Russia. About $200 billion of those securities were held in custody by Euroclear, a major global clearinghouse and custodian based in Brussels.

Freezing assets is a standard technique in financial warfare. Typically, the assets remain frozen while the war (or other cause for sanctions) persists but can be un-frozen once some treaty or other agreement is reached. In this case, the U.S. has gone further and actually stolen about $50 billion of interest on the securities to be used as collateral for a loan to Ukraine that almost certainly can never be repaid.

This extreme action is one reason why the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and other group members) are moving quickly to build non-dollar payment systems and are acquiring gold as a reserve asset that cannot be frozen or converted by the U.S.

Again, Trump has no good options. If he continues to support the loan made with stolen assets, he contributes to the long-term decline of confidence in the dollar. If he stops the loan program and either demands that the loan be repaid or otherwise restores the stolen Russian assets, he will be accused of undermining Ukrainian war efforts or supporting Russia or both.

As an incoming president, Trump should have freedom of action with regard to policies involving economic sanctions on Russia, escalation of the war in Ukraine, and weaponization of the U.S. dollar through asset seizures. He won’t. Instead, his hands have been tied by Biden’s forking moves that leave Trump with options but none of them good.

Trump’s Countermove

In chess, one way to avoid losing a piece in a fork is to put one of your opponent’s high value pieces in jeopardy. For example, if Black is confronting a fork, it can position a piece to take the White queen in one move. That way, White will act to protect the White queen instead of taking the Black knight or rook. The player on defense (Black) moves to offense to avoid the White fork.

Trump can do the same to Biden. He could hold a press conference or give a speech explaining to the American people exactly how Biden has acted in bad faith and jeopardized the best interests of the United States with his forks.

A transition is intended to give time for a smooth transition from one administration to another. Instead, Biden has used the time to lay traps for the new administration. Trump should call him out, explain why he will act in the best interests of the nation, and insulate himself from the canned criticisms of the progressives and the legacy media. This high road approach will make for an ignominious end to the already failed Biden presidency.

stock here, this is surprisingly fast. Just look at this picture. They are proud that they have 40% women enrolled at the Coast Guard Academy.

Trump Admin Fires Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Linda Fagan, Citing Border Failures And ‘Leadership Deficiencies’

Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan was just terminated for prioritizing DEI ahead of border security. Goodbye! pic.twitter.com/v2sSOBq7ja

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 21, 2025

A-Eye:

Admiral Linda L. Fagan, the first woman to lead a branch of the U.S. military, was relieved of her duties as Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard on January 21, 2025, by Acting Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman. The decision was reportedly due to concerns over her focus on diversity initiatives at the expense of border security, recruitment challenges, and an erosion of trust stemming from the mishandling of sexual assault investigations.
Reuters

Qualifications at Appointment:

When appointed as the 27th Commandant on June 1, 2022, Admiral Fagan brought extensive experience, including:

Education: Bachelor of Science in Marine Science from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Master of Marine Affairs from the University of Washington; Master in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces.
U.S. Coast Guard

Service: Over 37 years in the Coast Guard, serving on all seven continents.
U.S. Coast Guard

Leadership Roles: Positions such as Vice Commandant of the Coast Guard, Commander of the Coast Guard Pacific Area, and Commander of Coast Guard Sector New York.
U.S. Coast Guard

Pioneering Achievements: First woman to serve as Vice Commandant and the Coast Guard's first female four-star admiral.
U.S. Coast Guard

Personal Background:

Admiral Fagan was born in Columbus, Ohio, to Jon Harley Keene and Loann Carol (Morris) Keene. She is married and has a daughter, Aileen, who is also a U.S. Coast Guard Academy graduate.

stock here: I guess Ben will be the same. It seems somewhat odd to make the change, and Not ALSO, leave the old site up (it is gone) and so anyone linking to past videos is not going to go to a dead link. Another bone to pick, the Big Burb is taking longer to build than my 66 Mustang.

https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceWeatherNewsS0

I get spaceweather emailed to me from the UK Met office, you can sign up for a “premium” account at zero cost.

https://login.auth.metoffice.cloud/dce84ec6-ce0f-45d1-ba16-e36b817081eb/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?p=b2c_1a_victory_susi&response_type=code&client_id=2340ca18-475e-4366-b5bd-cb751c5fee7d&response_mode=form_post&scope=openid%20offline_access&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fpremium.spaceweather.metoffice.gov.uk%2F_callback&nonce=173749857180000&state=%2F

stock here: calling it out. This had 40 comments when I first viewed it, see the first picture. Then see the later picture taken 20 minutes later, 17 comments. I started making a comment and got immediately censored, Facebook enables this, but I think it is the “fake” account holder doing the censoring.

They are using the false argument of false dicomotomy, aka it has to be be one way or the other, ONLY, TY A-Eye

The term you’re looking for is “false dichotomy” (also known as a false dilemma). It refers to a logical fallacy in which only two options are presented as if they are the only possibilities, ignoring other viable alternatives.

Your sentence could be rephrased for clarity as:

“They are using the false argument of a false dichotomy, claiming it has to be one way or the other, with no other options.”

I wonder how long this comment is going to remain, it just came up.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1635413383637782

stock here, check it out: They got game.

https://www.whitehouse.gov

stock here: I have been suspecting that these drone videos exist, I wish they were better mapped out, explained as to where exactly they are, and of higher image resolution.

A-Eye:

Khan Younis is a city in the southern part of the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory located along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It is the second-largest city in Gaza after Gaza City. Here are some key details about Khan Younis:
Geography and Location:

Coordinates: Approximately 31.34°N latitude and 34.30°E longitude.
Nearby Areas:
    To the north, it borders the city of Deir al-Balah.
    To the east, it is close to the Israeli border.
    To the southwest, it is near the border with Egypt and the Rafah crossing.
Coastal Location: Khan Younis is situated a few kilometers from the Mediterranean coast.

Significance:

Historical Importance:
    Khan Younis was established as a caravanserai (roadside inn) in the 14th century during the Mamluk period, serving as a stop for traders and travelers.

Population:
    It is a densely populated urban area with both residential neighborhoods and a large number of Palestinian refugees living in a refugee camp within the city.

Economy:
    Agriculture and small-scale industries form the economic base of Khan Younis, although it faces challenges due to restrictions on movement and trade.

Conflict and Humanitarian Issues:
    Khan Younis has been heavily affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, experiencing military operations and airstrikes over the years.
    It has significant humanitarian needs due to economic blockades, limited access to resources, and infrastructure challenges.

Cultural and Social Aspects:

Palestinian Culture: The city is home to rich traditions of Palestinian culture, including music, cuisine, and community life.
Refugee Population: Many of its residents are refugees or descendants of refugees from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, with a large UNRWA-administered refugee camp in the area.

Khan Younis plays a vital role in the socio-political landscape of Gaza and remains an area of focus in the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

stock here: I am shocked and amazed:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/620995547980653/?hoisted_section_header_type=recently_seen&multi_permalinks=9006248442788613

Hawaiian Style

Hawaiian Style: A Discussion on Personal Choices

By Kalani Santana

Kalani Santana
“I know some of you find it funny because of your disagreement, but let’s never forget—it’s a personal choice for everyone. Everyone has their own reasons for doing it or not doing it. I respect either way, as civility works that way too. Respect goes a long way. I just hope people can see my point of view. Aloha!”

Jordan Lerma
“Can we be happy it’s your choice and not post it in a public group?”

Kalani Santana
“Jordan Lerma, I just had to share a point. Glad there are others who understand.”

Brenda Adams
“It doesn’t keep you safe and definitely not others. Just pray it doesn’t harm you as it has so many.”

Kalani Santana
“Brenda Adams, it works for me. I mean, I can still get the flu, but not the serious kind. Mahalo.”

Jason Donovan
“Kalani Santana, let’s cut the names like flu and COVID out. Let’s just say upper respiratory.”

Kalani Santana
“Jason Donovan, 👍🤙.”

Kris Nelson Wolle
“Kalani Santana, oh, sorry to tell you that you can absolutely still get the flu, serious or not. I do agree, though—freedom of choice is important.”

Deborah Louis
“Jason Donovan, there’s a huge difference. I wish it was just an upper respiratory infection.”

Deborah Louis (to Brenda Adams)
“In my healthcare work, I’ve witnessed it benefit many individuals, including my own family members. Let’s just be kind about people’s choices!”

Brenda Adams
“I wasn’t unkind. Did you even read my post? I happen to be in healthcare and can think for myself. I have seen so many with adverse reactions. Getting the vax doesn’t mean you won’t get sick or prevent you from passing it on. Let’s be kind to people sharing their experiences.”

Chris Terry
“So uninformed, but opinionated without justification. Do yourself a favor and do some homework. You’re probably alive because your parents had you vaccinated.”

Demian Barrios
“Yes, it’s a personal choice. So why the need to share your choices publicly if not for attention or to start conversations on the matter?”

Kalani Santana
“Demian Barrios, I respect your comment. Just hoping people can see my point of view. Glad there are people who do, though. Can’t expect everyone.”

————————————- A-Eye
Conclusion

The discussion around personal choices continues to be a sensitive and polarizing topic, but mutual respect and civility go a long way in maintaining constructive conversations. As Kalani said, “Respect goes a long way. Aloha!”

Personal Choice and Public Debate: A Discussion on Vaccines

Kalani Santana
“I agree with you 🤙 and I’m glad you got yours. It’s just too bad people believe unproven theories instead of doctors and scientists who have studied medicine for most of their lives, going all the way back to the polio outbreak.

I don’t know what would’ve happened if we didn’t have the polio vaccine.

Just a note to everyone else—this is my personal feeling. I am not looking to argue this point. If you comment directly addressing mine, I will delete your comment. However, feel free to make your own statement as a separate comment. Thank you.”

Sally Sefton
“Are you talking about vaccines? Vaccines are a personal choice, but they help prevent terrible illnesses if everyone participates. Look back in history: polio, typhus, whooping cough, measles, and of course, COVID.”

Andy Rauch
“Sally Sefton, that’s not how a vaccine works.”

Chris Harris
“Vaccination being a personal choice is like saying whether to receive the polio vaccine is optional.”

Marc Landry
“Chris Harris, it is a personal choice, and it doesn’t keep anyone else safe.”

Bruce Blyth
“Just so you know, it doesn’t work. Facts hurt. NEXT.”

Kalani Santana
“Bruce Blyth, true—not for everyone.”

Kathleen O’Leary
“Bruce Blyth, which vaccine are we talking about?”

Paul Menichini
“Bruce Blyth, it doesn’t work? Correct. Here we are four years later, and tens of thousands of people are still dying every week. Oh wait, no they’re not. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that shortly after the vaccine was released, the numbers started tumbling. Antivaxxers amaze me.”

Deborah Louis
“Bruce Blyth, not true!”

Julie Bryant Bartolini
“Bruce Blyth, but did you die?”

Kathy Ann Masengale Johnson
“Too bad more people don’t agree with you. I chose, for my own reasons, not to be vaccinated, but I’m perfectly happy to let everyone make their own decisions.”

Kalani Santana
“Kathy Ann Masengale Johnson, trying to make a point, but I guess some others don’t get it. Sadly.”

Kermit Hanson
“Kalani Santana, I respect your point. But I have no respect for the people who dismissed others’ choices not to get the vaccine and militantly persecuted or even advocated for withholding medical treatment for those who didn’t get it. I hope those people are shamed into oblivion.”

Julie Bryant Bartolini
“Kermit Hanson, did people really choose not to medically treat the unvaccinated? Being in healthcare, I never saw care denied to the unvaxxed. It’s not in our oath to judge patients!”

Ea Kealoha
“Julie Bryant Bartolini, even in January 2025, there are people needing organ transplants who are being refused because they didn’t get the mRNA injection. It’s very much a ‘thing’ and widely publicized for those paying attention.”

Marc Landry
“My doctor admitted that part of his education was funded by the pharmaceutical industry. He said they’re taught it’s their responsibility to convince the public to comply with what pharmaceutical companies want to sell. Doctors used to be taught to be honest and identify false research findings.”

Jason Donovan
“I work at a school as a custodian—four years, no vaccine, never got COVID. I’ve lost people to that shot, though. Also, many people I know have gotten boosters and had COVID three times. The only medal going into my body is lead.”

Jack Magnus
“Thanks for posting and for getting vaccinated. You’re helping reduce the spread of flu—and it’s a nasty one this year. Ignore the haters and the paranoid. Polio was beaten by vaccines.”

Terry Harris
“Choices you make in society affect others in that society. I wish more people would balance their personal rights with others’ rights to life.”

Stacey Rosman
“Maybe we should share a post if we get circumcised? Seems relevant if getting a flu shot is.”

Dervie Hernandez
“Wow, I agree with your post. People just don’t get it and still respond with rude comments. It’s his personal right to do whatever he wants. Much aloha to you and your ‘ohana!”

Paul Savage
“Can you put a palm tree and ocean behind you instead of that wall?”

Eloy Art Farbin
“The next pandemic will kill us all.”

Rob Pace
“The Fauci Ouchie 💉.”

Lisa Mitchell
“I’m embarrassed for you 🫣.”

VOG and “Hair” Alert

stock here: I watched a few hours of the “Off Road Recovery” the whole company is likeable and funny. And there is a trail called the Rubicon, in which they did a difficult recovery and have some incredible off road videos. Don’t check them out unless you have time to burn, because you will burn.

Here is the Rubicon, cross it today.

stock here: has has such disdain for the common citizens
https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1880429231433265649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1880429231433265649%7Ctwgr%5E2204259b4af6314e75972c5f0346a9177a3184ff%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpjmedia.com%2Frobert-spencer%2F2025%2F01%2F18%2Fthe-man-who-destroyed-the-justice-department-gets-a-heros-sendoff-from-his-accomplices-n4936127

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2025/01/18/the-man-who-destroyed-the-justice-department-gets-a-heros-sendoff-from-his-accomplices-n4936127

In reality, if free societies survive and free people write the histories, Merrick Garland will be remembered as one of the central villains of our time, who came close to criminalizing political opposition and thereby destroying the republic almost singlehandedly. And so Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) commented on the video of the DoJ lemmings cheering Garland: “Merrick Garland has left @TheJusticeDept for the FINAL TIME. His DOJ attacked concerned parents. His DOJ attacked religious Catholics. His DOJ attacked political opponents. His DOJ was unprecedentedly weaponized. This disgraceful era of brazen political lawfare is FINALLY OVER.”

Well, we can hope that it is. But “the evil that men do lives after them,” wrote Shakespeare, and the cheers and applause Garland received from Justice Department bureaucrats bore witness to the truth of that adage. Many, if not most, of the desk jockeys who were busy clapping and shouting hosannas at this sinister corruptocrat will continue to work at the DoJ during the Trump administration. These are this man’s admirers, pupils and proteges. They will be working to place the largest possible obstacles they possibly can in the way of Trump’s efforts to reform the department and make it once more into an instrument of impartial justice. That is the miserable legacy of the atrocious Merrick Garland.

There is simply nothing good that can be said about Garland’s four years as attorney general. His most egregious act was ordering the raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, supposedly in search of classified documents that Trump had illegally taken and was improperly storing. But what the raid was really all about was humiliating Trump and trying to hang something, anything, on him that would bar him from running again in 2024. And the banana republic attorney general was actually proud of this, announcing: “I personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter.” 

The unctuous hatchet man reminded Americans that the search warrant “was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause.” He didn’t mention, of course, that the judge who authorized the warrant was an Obama donor and Jeff Epstein’s old lawyer. But this out-of-control authoritarian did take the time to go heavy on the disingenuous flag-waving: “Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of the Justice Department, of our democracy. Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. Under my watch, that is precisely what the Justice Department is doing.” Yeah. Raiding the home of the president’s chief rival on the flimsiest of pretexts — that’s certainly what I think about when I think of what it means to apply the law even-handedly. 

The Trump raid was a watershed event in American history, representing the complete breakdown of the mutual respect that the competing factions in American political life have always had for one another, and the conversion of what are supposed to be politically neutral law enforcement organizations into weapons of partisan politics. And this was, according to the proud testimony of Merrick Garland himself, the handiwork of none other than Merrick Garland.

stock here: Eff the Effen Effers

https://www.facebook.com/junior.kekuewajr.1/videos/525813366495416

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1988847801600074/?ref=browse_tab&referral_code=marketplace_general&referral_story_type=general&tracking=%7B%22qid%22%3A%22-520870956180977604%22%2C%22mf_story_key%22%3A%223686523330455622007%22%2C%22top_level_post_id%22%3A%223686523330455622007%22%2C%22commerce_rank_obj%22%3A%22%7B%5C%22target_id%5C%22%3A3686523330455622007%2C%5C%22target_type%5C%22%3A6%2C%5C%22primary_position%5C%22%3A16%2C%5C%22ranking_signature%5C%22%3A8870639847003481869%2C%5C%22commerce_channel%5C%22%3A501%2C%5C%22value%5C%22%3A0.0012940841825164%2C%5C%22upsell_type%5C%22%3A123%2C%5C%22candidate_retrieval_source_map%5C%22%3A%7B%5C%229543374649029485%5C%22%3A805%2C%5C%228773835959336871%5C%22%3A3001%2C%5C%228999767806806751%5C%22%3A3001%2C%5C%228682041561896344%5C%22%3A3594%7D%2C%5C%22grouping_info%5C%22%3Anull%7D%22%2C%22lightning_feed_qid%22%3A%22-521234619459321558%22%2C%22lightning_feed_ranking_signature%22%3A%226601132458838906626%22%7D

stock here, check out this unlikely site too

Videos

stock here:

stock here: this is really beyond belief.

Rarely do we get analysis and history. Here is one.

stock here: well nothing fishy to see here. Santa Sussana Site of open air nuke tests, and a meltdown.

She gets a lot of stuff. The comments are good too. Some Karens / trolls of course.

stock here: was this part of the way that someone like Lincoln got elected?

In the early 19th century, U.S. presidential elections lacked a standardized voting day, allowing states to hold elections over a span of weeks. This extended period enabled “electioneering,” where early voting results from some states could influence voter turnout and decisions in states voting later. Such practices raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process.

To address these issues, Congress passed the Presidential Election Day Act on January 23, 1845. This legislation established a uniform national election day for choosing presidential electors, set as “the Tuesday after the first Monday in November.” The primary objectives were to:

Prevent Election Manipulation: By synchronizing elections across all states, the law aimed to eliminate the possibility of early results influencing subsequent voting behavior.

Enhance Electoral Integrity: A single election day reduced opportunities for fraud and ensured a more equitable process.

Facilitate Timely Results: Standardization expedited the electoral process, providing quicker and more decisive outcomes.

Text of the Act:

The Act’s key provision states:

“That the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed in each State on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November of the year in which they are to be appointed.”
Wikipedia

This legislation is codified in the U.S. Statutes at Large, Volume 5 (1836-1845), and can be accessed through the Library of Congress.
The Library of Congress

By instituting a uniform election day, the 1845 Act played a crucial role in promoting fairer and more consistent electoral practices across the United States.

For a comprehensive understanding of the Act and its implications, you can refer to the full text available on Congress.gov.
Congress.gov | Library of Congress

stock here: so this is very curious. They say the trees are well preserved, and they are all on the ground horizontal. So what “Noah Event” happened 6000 years ago, half of the major 12,000 year cycle. So it is likely that volcanoes caused the rapid cooling, but what caused them to all be knocked over, considering this species can live 1000 years.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/melting-ice-reveals-remains-of-5900-year-old-trees-in-wyoming-uncovering-a-long-lost-forest/ar-BB1rob3c

A-Eye, did a quick estimate, 2F warmer at the time.

The discovery of 6,000-year-old trees found under melting ice at 10,140 feet above sea level, above the current tree line, suggests that the climate in that region was significantly warmer in the past. Let’s explore how much warmer it might have been based on the relationship between tree line elevation and temperature:

1. Relationship Between Tree Line and Temperature

The tree line is largely determined by average summer temperatures. For trees to grow:

The mean summer temperature must typically be at least 10°C (50°F) or higher.

In high-elevation environments:

The tree line rises or falls by about 100 meters (328 feet) for every 0.6°C (1°F) change in mean annual temperature.
For this case: The ancient trees are 590 feet (approximately 180 meters) higher than the current tree line.

2. Temperature Difference Estimate

Using the rule of thumb that the tree line changes by 0.6°C per 100 meters:

180 meters (590 feet) increase in tree line corresponds to:
ΔT=180 meters×0.6∘C100 meters=1.08∘C
ΔT=180meters×100meters0.6∘C​=1.08∘C
    This means the region was likely 1.0–1.1°C (1.8–2°F) warmer during the time these trees grew.

3. What This Tells Us About the Past Climate The warmer conditions allowed trees to thrive at elevations that are now inhospitable due to colder temperatures.
   This aligns with the Holocene Climatic Optimum (roughly 9,000 to 5,000 years ago):
   A period when global temperatures were slightly warmer than today, especially in the Northern Hemisphere.
   Changes in Earth’s orbital patterns (Milankovitch cycles) and reduced ice cover likely contributed to these warmer conditions.
4. Implications of This Discovery Localized Warming: While the global temperature difference during the Holocene Climatic Optimum is estimated to be only about 0.5–1°C, high-altitude regions like this one may have experienced more pronounced warming due to regional climate dynamics.
   Ecological Shifts: The higher tree line indicates a significant shift in ecosystems, suggesting that the region supported vegetation and perhaps wildlife that are now found at lower elevations.
5. Could It Happen Again? If modern warming trends continue, the tree line is expected to rise again in many regions. However, the melting ice exposing these trees also indicates rapid glacial retreat, which has far-reaching consequences for water supplies and ecosystems.

Conclusion

Based on the elevation difference of 590 feet and the tree line-temperature relationship, the region was likely around 1°C warmer than today when the trees were alive. This aligns with the Holocene Climatic Optimum, when Earth’s climate was warmer due to natural factors.

Would you like to dive deeper into the factors behind the Holocene warming or modern tree line changes?

—————————————————— A-Eye Volcanoes

1. Kikai Caldera, Japan (circa 5350 BC) Eruption: Known as the Akahoya eruption, this event is estimated to have been a VEI-7, making it one of the largest eruptions in the Holocene. Impact: The eruption produced approximately 80–100 km³ of tephra, leading to significant climatic effects and contributing to the formation of the present-day Kikai Caldera.
2. Mount Aniakchak, Alaska Peninsula (circa 5250 BC ±1000 years) Eruption: This eruption is classified as a VEI-6, indicating a colossal explosive event. Impact: It expelled between 10 to 50 km³ of tephra, significantly altering the local landscape and affecting regional climates.
3. Cerro Hudson, Southern Chile (circa 4750 BC) Eruption: This event reached a VEI-6, marking it as a major volcanic eruption. Impact: The eruption released approximately 18 km³ of tephra, influencing both the environment and human populations in the region.
4. Macauley Island, Kermadec Islands, New Zealand (circa 4360 BC ±200 years) Eruption: This eruption is estimated to have been a VEI-6, indicating a significant explosive event. Impact: It produced a substantial volume of tephra, estimated around 100 km³, affecting the surrounding marine and atmospheric environments.
5. Masaya Volcano, Nicaragua (circa 4050 BC) Eruption: This event reached a VEI-6, signifying a major explosive eruption. Impact: The eruption released more than 13 km³ of tephra, impacting local ecosystems and human settlements.
6. Pago, New Britain (circa 4000 BC ±200 years) Eruption: This eruption is estimated to have been a VEI-6, indicating a significant explosive event. Impact: It produced a substantial volume of tephra, estimated around 10 km³, affecting the local environment and climate.

These eruptions had profound impacts on the climate, environment, and human societies of their time. The large volumes of volcanic ash and gases released into the atmosphere could have led to short-term climatic cooling, known as volcanic winters, and widespread ecological disruptions.

Note: The dates and tephra volumes mentioned are based on geological estimates and may have uncertainties.

1. Kikai Caldera, Japan (circa 5350 BC) Eruption: Known as the Akahoya eruption, this event is estimated to have been a VEI-7, making it one of the largest eruptions in the Holocene. Impact: The eruption produced approximately 80–100 km³ of tephra, leading to significant climatic effects and contributing to the formation of the present-day Kikai Caldera.
2. Mount Aniakchak, Alaska Peninsula (circa 5250 BC ±1000 years) Eruption: This eruption is classified as a VEI-6, indicating a colossal explosive event. Impact: It expelled between 10 to 50 km³ of tephra, significantly altering the local landscape and affecting regional climates.
3. Cerro Hudson, Southern Chile (circa 4750 BC) Eruption: This event reached a VEI-6, marking it as a major volcanic eruption. Impact: The eruption released approximately 18 km³ of tephra, influencing both the environment and human populations in the region.
4. Macauley Island, Kermadec Islands, New Zealand (circa 4360 BC ±200 years) Eruption: This eruption is estimated to have been a VEI-6, indicating a significant explosive event. Impact: It produced a substantial volume of tephra, estimated around 100 km³, affecting the surrounding marine and atmospheric environments.
5. Masaya Volcano, Nicaragua (circa 4050 BC) Eruption: This event reached a VEI-6, signifying a major explosive eruption. Impact: The eruption released more than 13 km³ of tephra, impacting local ecosystems and human settlements.
6. Pago, New Britain (circa 4000 BC ±200 years) Eruption: This eruption is estimated to have been a VEI-6, indicating a significant explosive event. Impact: It produced a substantial volume of tephra, estimated around 10 km³, affecting the local environment and climate.

These eruptions had profound impacts on the climate, environment, and human societies of their time. The large volumes of volcanic ash and gases released into the atmosphere could have led to short-term climatic cooling, known as volcanic winters, and widespread ecological disruptions.

Note: The dates and tephra volumes mentioned are based on geological estimates and may have uncertainties.