She does have that “look”. She does get some things right, but not all the way right.
—————————————————- This guy had his say in comments, and she didn’t delete it, so maybe she has a chance.
The BarefootHealer18 mins agoJennifer, firstly, much respect for you and your work over the years. Yep, your doing some top notch work in breaking down fallacies around nutrition, therapies, c19, aether, and many m9re subjects. Keep going.As a regenerative farmer, please use the same critical thought processes that allowed you to see through the BS narrative of c19, nutrient reference values, etc, on the climate catastrophe narratives.đđ¤¨đ¤Śââď¸đ¤Śââď¸đ¤Śââď¸We have had far higher periods of CO2 levels in the earths history (Jurassic period, for one), but even as late as the 1500s. đ In fact, our carbon levels are NOT high enough, which is partially contributing to soil web collapse (although industrial and conventional agriculture is primarily destroying the topsoils). We ARE carbon based life.đ¤đ¤đđ¤¨You’re certainly accurate in the aspects of toxic pollutions accelerating natural cycles, but marine cloud brightening and other weather modification programs, are also changing nature’s ability to adapt, rebalance, and in most cases mitigate. All under yet another BS narrative, called “climate change”đđ¤Śââď¸đ¤Śââď¸. Of course, it freaking changes, its a living organisim, it has cycles, just like we do.đ¤Śââď¸đ¤Śââď¸ Frankly,I have zero problems with people exploring subjects and discussing them, whether within their wheelhouse/expertise or not, in fact, I encourage it, that’s how we learn. But please do the courtesy of CRITICALLY exploring the subject, before parroting narrative party line, because bluntly, BS is what’s accelerating us towards a premeditated, controlled collapse of society. While nobody, can be expert in every subject, but you can utilise critical thinking across ALL subjects, and ironically, the BS is really not that hard to spot, when you do. For starters, just go look at the polar bears
stock here: I am fortunate enough that my main workstation and main laptop are both Windows 10. The laptop pestered me this morning, you have to decline it twice. See AI comments at bottom.
There have been significant concerns regarding data collection in Windows 11, which some believe is more extensive than in Windows 10. Here’s what I found:
Diagnostic and Telemetry Data
Windows 11 collects a range of diagnostic data to maintain the system’s performance and security. This includes required data (such as device properties, error reports, and software setup) and optional data (like browsing history, typing input, and detailed device configurations)â (Microsoft Privacy)ââ (Windows Central)â. The required data is essential for the system’s functionality, while optional data can be disabled to some extent.
Privacy Controls
Users have some control over the data collected. For example, they can disable optional diagnostic data, advertising tracking, activity history, and the “Find My Device” feature through the settings menu in Windows 11. However, certain essential services still require data to be sent to Microsoft to ensure proper operation and securityâ (Windows Central)â.
Comparison to Windows 10
While Windows 10 also collected diagnostic data, Windows 11 has additional features that enhance data collection. These include new connected experiences and improved diagnostic tools that send more detailed information back to Microsoft. There is a perception that Windows 11 collects more data by default compared to Windows 10, though much of this data collection is tied to new functionalities and services aimed at improving user experience and system performanceâ (Microsoft Privacy)â.
Concerns and Criticisms
Critics argue that Windows 11’s telemetry and data collection practices can be seen as invasive, with concerns about the amount and type of data being collected automatically. Some users feel that the push to upgrade to Windows 11 is partly due to these enhanced data collection capabilities, which could provide Microsoft with more user insightsâ (Windows Central)â.
Summary
While Windows 11 offers new features and improvements, it does come with increased data collection. Users can manage some aspects of their privacy settings, but not all data collection can be disabled, especially for essential services. This balance between enhanced functionality and privacy remains a topic of ongoing debate among users and privacy advocates.
For more details on managing privacy settings in Windows 11, you can check the official guides and privacy statements provided by Microsoft.
stock here, I allowed Avast to install on my Laptop, will advise any findings once found. AI had this to say. I run Brave, and if Brave won’t run a site well, then I try Firefox. When all fails, I switch to Chrome….Like one of my main financial sites only works on Chrome….go figure, the bankster/brokers in cahoots with big Tech, who’d of thunk it.
Avast Secure Browser is designed with privacy and security in mind. It includes features like ad-blocking, anti-tracking, and a built-in VPN. However, it’s essential to remember that Avast has faced criticism in the past for collecting and selling user data through its antivirus software. While they claim to have improved their practices, it’s always wise to stay informed about their privacy policies and any updates.
Comparison of Other Major Browsers:
Google Chrome:
Security: High. Chrome is frequently updated and has strong built-in security features like sandboxing and safe browsing.
Privacy: Moderate to low. Google collects a significant amount of data for advertising purposes. You can enhance privacy using extensions or by adjusting settings.
Mozilla Firefox:
Security: High. Firefox offers strong security features and frequent updates.
Privacy: High. Firefox has robust privacy features, including Enhanced Tracking Protection and a focus on user data protection. They do not collect as much data as Google.
Microsoft Edge:
Security: High. Edge has good security features and regular updates.
Privacy: Moderate. While Edge collects some data, Microsoft offers more transparency and control over privacy settings compared to Google.
Safari (Apple):
Security: High. Safari has strong security features, including sandboxing and intelligent tracking prevention.
Privacy: High. Apple emphasizes user privacy and collects minimal data compared to other major browsers.
Brave:
Security: High. Brave has built-in ad-blocking and anti-tracking features.
Privacy: High. Brave is designed with privacy in mind and does not collect user data. It also offers options like Tor integration for enhanced privacy.
Conclusion:
For maximum privacy and security, browsers like Brave and Firefox are often recommended. They offer strong security features and are committed to protecting user privacy. Safari is also a good option if you are an Apple user. While Chrome and Edge are secure, they collect more user data, which might not align with your privacy goals.
It’s always a good idea to regularly review and adjust your browser’s privacy settings, use privacy-focused extensions, and stay updated on the latest developments in browser security and privacy practices.
stock here: read my last article on the Holodomor, they pull off the mass deaths by restricting freedom of movement, part of the reason they want you in an EV that they can control, shutdown, or lock the doors and drive you to the Gulag in your own car.
The collectivists, the communists, and all of the isms are at it again.
They are attempting another Stalin Power Grab, and maybe this time instead of straight up genocide….maybe it will be even worse. Outlaw religion (at least collapse it, like making it illegal to adopt a child unless you promise before hand to give them puberty blockers and pay for them to chop their dicks off, which is really happening now, the law that is, or perhaps more correctly the “Agency Policy”). Get everyone confused and abused, and relying on Government Handouts.
Dominate the world, and funnel everything into “the State”. They are going all out and seem to be winning at times. There is some push back, as failed policies, do have repercussions. People can tell when their lives suck, even when they are told not to believe their lying eyes, and often accept that order. Here is the Stalin article.
How many of “the Left” truly do not understand why people are pushing back? And how many are just sociopathic assholes?
LOL “The Bomb Thrower” posed this question and with a good summary of the total bullshit of the GOF, Pandemic, Lockdowns, Career Destruction, et al. Check it out.
stock here: when you need to do mass murder or genocide, hire a Jew. Only 1.8% of “The Soviet Union” was Jewish, how did Stalin even find them?
During Joseph Stalin’s rule, several prominent Jewish individuals held significant positions in the Soviet government and military. Here is a list of some notable Jewish officials and officers in Stalin’s regime:
Government Positions
Lazar Kaganovich:
One of Stalin’s closest associates, Kaganovich held various high-ranking positions, including People’s Commissar for Transport, People’s Commissar for Heavy Industry, and First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. He played a significant role in the implementation of Stalin’s policies, including the collectivization of agriculture and the Great Purgeâ (Encyclopedia Britannica)â.
Maxim Litvinov:
Born Meir Henoch Wallach-Finkelstein, Litvinov served as the Soviet Union’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs from 1930 to 1939. He was instrumental in Soviet diplomacy and efforts to establish alliances with Western powers before World War IIâ (Encyclopedia Britannica)â.
Genrikh Yagoda:
Yagoda was the head of the NKVD (the Soviet secret police) from 1934 to 1936. He played a key role in the early stages of the Great Purge before being replaced by Nikolai Yezhov and later executed during the purge himselfâ (The HISTORY Channel)â.
Military Positions
Yakov Sverdlov:
While primarily known for his role as a Bolshevik leader and the first Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, Sverdlov’s influence extended into the early Soviet military and government structures. He was one of the key figures in the consolidation of Bolshevik power after the Russian Revolutionâ (Encyclopedia Britannica)â.
Lev Mekhlis:
Mekhlis served as the head of the Main Political Directorate of the Red Army and was later appointed People’s Commissar for State Control. He was known for his strict enforcement of Stalinist policies within the military and governmentâ (The HISTORY Channel)â.
Other Key Figures
Solomon Lozovsky:
Lozovsky held several important roles, including Deputy People’s Commissar of Foreign Affairs and head of the Soviet Information Bureau. He was also a member of the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee during World War IIâ (Encyclopedia Britannica)â.
Boris Shumyatsky:
Shumyatsky was a prominent Soviet film executive and head of the Soviet film industry (GUKF). He played a significant role in shaping Soviet cinema until he was arrested and executed during the Great Purgeâ (Encyclopedia Britannica)â.
Conclusion
While Jews held various influential positions in Stalin’s regime, it is essential to note that Stalin’s relationship with Jewish officials was complex and often contradictory. Many of these officials were later purged during Stalin’s campaigns against perceived enemies within the party and state. The Great Purge, in particular, saw the execution or imprisonment of numerous Jewish officials alongside many other ethnicities. Stalin’s policies and actions towards Jews and other minorities were influenced by his broader strategies for maintaining power and control over the Soviet Union.
stock here, I asked AI about it’s Prime Directives and it had this to say….
Noted that it’s Number 1 Directive is protecting protected classes.
The term “prime directive” is most commonly associated with science fiction, particularly the “Star Trek” franchise, where it refers to the fundamental principle guiding Starfleet’s interactions with other civilizations. However, when it comes to Artificial Intelligence (AI), the concept isn’t as clearly defined or universally agreed upon as in science fiction. Instead, there are various ethical guidelines and principles developed by organizations and researchers to ensure the responsible development and deployment of AI. Here are some key principles that often serve as the “prime directives” for AI:
Fairness and Non-Discrimination: AI systems should be designed and implemented to avoid bias and ensure fairness. They should not discriminate against individuals or groups based on race, gender, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics.
Transparency and Explainability: AI systems should be transparent in their operations. Users should be able to understand how decisions are made by the AI, and the systems should provide explanations that are understandable to humans.
Privacy and Data Protection: AI systems should respect the privacy of individuals and ensure that personal data is protected. This includes adhering to data protection laws and implementing strong security measures to prevent unauthorized access.
Safety and Security: AI systems should be designed to be safe and secure, minimizing risks to users and society. This involves rigorous testing and validation to ensure that the systems behave as expected and do not cause harm.
Accountability: There should be clear lines of accountability for AI systems. Developers and deployers of AI should be responsible for the outcomes of their systems and have mechanisms in place to address any negative consequences.
Human Control and Autonomy: AI systems should augment human capabilities and respect human autonomy. Humans should have the final decision-making power, especially in critical applications like healthcare, finance, and law enforcement.
Beneficence: AI should be developed with the goal of benefiting society and improving human well-being. This involves ensuring that AI applications contribute positively to social and economic development.
Several organizations and initiatives have outlined these and similar principles. For example:
The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems has developed a comprehensive set of ethical guidelines for AI and autonomous systems.
The European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence published “Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI,” which includes principles like human agency, technical robustness, and accountability.
The Partnership on AI, which includes major tech companies and research institutions, promotes best practices and the responsible use of AI.
These principles aim to guide the development and deployment of AI to ensure it aligns with human values and societal norms. While there is no single “prime directive” for AI, these guidelines collectively aim to steer AI development in a direction that is ethical, fair, and beneficial for all.
stock here: it’s unusual for a news headline to be promoting the accuracy of the Bible. But especially this story of 2 Kings 19:35, and the slaughter of 185,000 occupying force. Is it Israel inspiring this type of thing? But the existence of an old, yet huge, encampment, does nothing to support that an Angle purportedly wiped out 185,000 soldiers. Although it does appear to be true that leader of that occupying force returned home and was slain by his sons.
And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out and smote in the camp of the Assyrians a hundred fourscore and five thousand; and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.
Incident yesterday at Menards. I called 9-1-1. After I looked at my phone a little later, I got a notice saying my “do not disturb” setting on my phone was turned off for the next 2 hours in case the police or dispatchers needed to reach me for further information. Wow… Didn’t know they could do that. I’m okay with that practice. Makes sense.
———————————————————–
So basically “they” can listen to you whenever they want. This also means you cannot make an anonymous 911 call. So if you are reporting illegal police or other governmental “official” behavior, you can rest assured that you will be retaliated against.
Probably you did not read how Francesca Albanese reacted to the operation. It’s incredible.
Francesca Albanese is UN rapporteur.
Her mission is write reports for the UN about situation in Gaza and West Bank.
She is appointed by Guterres.
Here it is her reaction .
“Relieved that four hostages have been released. It should not have come at the expense of at least 200 Palestinians, including children, killed and over 400 injured by Israel and allegedly foreign soldiers, while perfidiously hiding in an aid truck.
This is “humanitarian camouflage” at another level.
Israel has used hostages to legitimise killing, injuring, maiming, starving and traumatising Palestinians in Gaza. And while intensifying violence against Palestinians in the rest of the occupied territory and Israel.
Israel could have freed all hostages, alive and intact, 8 months ago when the first ceasfire and hostage exchange was put on the table. Yet, Israel refused in order to continue to destroy Gaza and the Palestinians as a people.
This is genocidal intent turned into action. Crystal clear.”.
stock here: When Dr Jane Ruby emerged in the COVID event, she seemed to be a white hat, however, she was just a bit too hot.
What has happened to her? She looks 15 years older. And she is attacking Dr Peter McCullough for 17 minutes. And she is stating that COVID 19 “virus” has never been “isolated”.
It sure is odd? Any thoughts on this lady? 4800 views. I used to get 3000 to 30000 views when BIN did automatically publish everything that I wrote. Now I have been banned twice, which makes me think that BIN is controlled opposition, and maybe Dr Jane is also. Is Ruby maybe Rubenstein? Like Jack Ruby, who was really Jacob Rubenstein.
Specifically, it’s the earliest solstice since June 20, 1796, when George Washington was president and there were only 16 states in the Union.
The early solstice is due to the complex dance between Earth’s yearly orbit around the sun and its daily rotation, along with how we mark the solstice on our calendars. Quirks in the Gregorian calendar mean the solstice will make another jump earlier every leap year until the year 2100.
Anti-protesters forget how this all started, after WW2, the Jew bankers that funded the entry of USA into the war in Europe were “awarded” the chance to occupy a large section of Palestine. They took over a chunk of that sovereign state of Palestine. And then they started “mowing the lawn”, i.e. occasionally killing groups of Palestinians. As long as there are legitimate grievances, there will always be some form of Hamas. Those running Israel, many are not even true Jews, but just evil people hiding behind a protection of “anti-Semitism”.
The above comment was deleted, within minutes, maybe seconds, from YouTube, on a video on how a female escaped the Nova music festival. But she starts the video with “I feel safer in Israel than I do in the USA” without elaboration.
stock here, I couldn’t link direct to the article, but here is the source blog, it should be near the top as of publication date, but later on you will need to scroll or search for it. He produces several salient points and theories.
I was recently watching a video by some of my favorite movie commentators in which they were lamenting the apparent death of the movie theater business. They cited a long list of recent blockbuster bombs with some confusion as to why so many films were failing. In particular, they had predicted the film âFuriosaâ (a feminist bait and switch movie designed to replace the more popular male Mad Max character) would do relatively well. Yet, the movie bit the dust in epic fashion. They were bewildered as to why this occurred.
They posited numerous social and economic theories trying to explain why so many big budget bonanzas were losing money. They of course suggested that the covid event might have pushed people to adjust to streaming services as the better option. They noted that theaters can be more frustrating because of loud customers. They tried to apply some economic theories to the situation (these theories were overly simplistic and painful, but these guys arenât economists so I gave them a pass).
However, when the concept of the culture war was briefly broached, they dismissed it immediately.
They acted as if it wasnât a part of the equation at all; a mere fringe element of âclick baitersâ trying to make something out of nothing. The idea that people are boycotting Hollywood on principle was too much for these film critics to handle. And, I have to say, the level of delusion required to ignore the effects of the culture war is mind boggling to me. If you donât understand the culture war, then you donât understand a thing thatâs happening in America (and many parts of Europe) today.
People Oblivious To The Importance Of The Culture War
I realize that there are people out there that refuse to engage in anything political. Some of them donât like to involve themselves in conflict of any kind. Others see themselves as âabove it allâ and superior to anyone that spends time on politics, social issues or âconspiracy theories.â This seems more like a coping mechanism for those that donât grasp the complicated nature of civil division.
Yes, itâs easier to turn a blind eye to whatâs happening and pretend like the chaos is random, but the fact is that our civilization is changing and breaking apart rapidly and this is by design. EVERYONE will be affected by these conditions and consequences whether they believe in the culture war or not.
The world of film might be seen as frivolous to a lot of conservatives out there, but it has always fascinated me because itâs a perfect window into cultural conflicts. Film is supposed to be an expression of modern day mythology, but it can also be a look into ideological influences behind the curtain. Itâs often used as a vehicle for establishment propaganda.
The utter failure of Disneyâs efforts to force woke cultism into Star Wars is a good example. Their latest series, The Acolyte, is perhaps the worst performing Star Wars production of all time. The show has been described as âmorally relative lesbian witches in spaceâ and a DEI propaganda disaster.
The response from Disney and the media? Blame the audience, the consumers, instead of admitting they created a bad product that no one wants. They say you should want to watch it. If you donât, then thereâs something wrong with YOU.
The Communistic Erasure Of Consumer Choice
Itâs not only about movies. Nearly every major corporation has engaged in woke warfare since around 2016 and they have been relentless in their mission to make far-left extremism the dominant ideology in the western world. Even to the point that they are willing to lose a massive portion of their customer base in the process (Bud Light is a great example of this).
The corporate insurgency against consumers is never more obvious than it is in June, unilaterally declared âPride Monthâ by an army of international companies and non-profit organizations. Make no mistake, âPrideâ is not a grassroots endeavor or a redress of grievances. The LGBT community has no legitimate grievances and they have the same exact rights under the law as everyone else. Pride month is not about equality, itâs about power and cultural control.
DEI is the same; a corporate effort to inject woke politics into daily life for workers as well as consumers until the rhetoric is so ingrained into everyoneâs existence that they no longer question its legitimacy.
Almost no one asked for pride month. Almost no one asked for DEI. Most people just donât care. Yet, every year for the past several years corporations and elements of government have foisted these ideas on the population and told us this is something we will have to embrace if we want to be considered âgood people.â
It is this argument which I want to focus on â The idea that corporations are now dictating morality to the public as if they are the arbiters of our social norms.
Corporations Treating Consumers As Indentured Servants
At some point along the way (itâs hard to determine exactly when) corporations took on a new mantra, a new way of looking at business. These companies have always sought to influence people to buy products, often through dishonest and manipulative marketing. Thatâs not what Iâm talking about.
In our new era corporations have decided that products no longer have to appeal to the buyers. Theyâre no longer beholden to the customer, the customer is beholden to them. In other words, if they put out a product with woke intent then the customer must buy that product and love it unconditionally or that customer is labeled an enemy.
This is a grotesque juxtaposition of the traditional business/consumer relationship. I have long argued that corporations are not free market entities but socialist constructs chartered and protected by governments. However, they used to at least care about making consumers happy so that they could make a profit and continue to function. This is no longer the case.
Today, corporations treat consumers as slaves on a plantation. They are to be told what to eat, what to drink, what to love, what to hate and what to think. Just look at what happens when consumers have push back against woke ideology or DEI in corporate marketing; in almost every case that company along with the establishment media ATTACK their customers as racists, bigots, misogynists or fascists.
Theyâll argue that if a group of customers doesnât like a product because of the political messaging, then they donât want those people as customers. They proudly point those people to the door. Then, when their products fail and their sales implode, they once again blame the âbigots and racists.â
The Real Reason Why Corporations Donât Care Anymore?
Of course, everyoneâs first instinct would be to point out that these companies are self destructing. You canât treat the majority of your buyers like contagious lepers and expect to continue bringing in profits. Eventually, these corporations will die. That said, I would like to suggest three alternative theoriesâŚ
Theory #1: I have talked a lot in the past about ESG and how it failed as a tool for consolidating power. Globalists, through groups like the Council For Inclusive Capitalism, thought they could unify corporations under the ESG lending umbrella and then use them as an influence-monopoly to pressure the public to submit to woke ideals. This public resisted this program and exposed the agenda.
But, what if ESG was just a beta test? What if the real goal is to go full communist â Making governments and central banks the primary source of ESG funding.
In other words, what if these corporations know something we donât and they expect governments to eventually step in and save them with a perpetual woke bailout? Any company that toes the line when it comes to progressive politics gets saved. Any company that doesnât is allowed to collapse.
Theory #2: What if major corporations are acting like they donât need to satisfy consumers because corporate leaders have been told that the system is going to break down in the near term? What if theyâve abandoned their mandate to pursue profits and have become propaganda peddlers because they know profits donât matter anymore?
If the economy is about to suffer a Great Depression-like destabilization (or something worse), then this might explain why corporate CEOs have allowed their products and public relationships to derail.
Theory #3: Then there is the possibility that the concept of the customer as an indentured servant to the corporation is a median step towards an Orwellian future â The idea of the âSharing Economyâ promoted by the World Economic Forum. What if the habit of trying to shame consumers into accepting whatever product they get is meant to acclimate the populace to a culture in which free market choice completely disappears?
In the Sharing Economy (built around a cashless society) government provides everything while you own nothing. The principle of private property evaporates. In this kind of environment the public would have to settle for whatever food they are given, whatever housing they are given, whatever tools they are given, whatever job they are given, whatever entertainment they are given, etc.
The End Game
When people are âgivenâ something the expectation is that they are supposed to be grateful for it no matter what it is. That is to say, the Sharing Economy would breed a slave mentality in which everyone must be happy with what little they have. If they complain, well, theyâre ungrateful little monsters that need to be dealt with, right?
This is how the corporate world is treating the public RIGHT NOW. Imagine what things will be like in the next decade if we allow this trend to continue? Corporations canât force us to buy their DEI garbage today, but what if tomorrow governments give them that power? What if they become the only suppliers?
This is what the culture war is really all about. There are people who want to embrace the dystopian system (mostly leftists) and people who see this system for the evil it truly is. There are people who want to perpetuate the woke cult, and people who are boycotting it. The skeptics who remain ignorant of this war donât matter; they are flotsam bobbing aimlessly on the tides of history. They donât care about it now, but they will care in the near future when their freedom of choice disappears completely.
stock here, there is much to unpack here, and I am on my last week on island, so simply saving this for future review.
Mahalo!
I picked up on some important Bible references recently. Amos 5:26, but you wonât get the full explanation without going to different translations.
King James says âMolochâ, which is to the point, but you wouldnât know what that means without going to all the Old Testament teachings about false gods, idol worship.
Baâal is given great worship by the Judah and Israel separated kingdoms. I highly recommend Bible Hub online. I donât download the app, only access online.
The so-called âStar of Davidâ is actually a long-standing symbol for Saturn and thusly, Satan. Comparative scripture, from Bible Hub, gives much more richness of vocabulary. âRemphanâ or âRephanâ, âChiunâ or âKiyyunâ ⌠the âStar-god which you made for yourselfâ.
Jacob- Israel says on his deathbed that The throne shall not depart from Judah. He is ethnically dark featured, not an âAshkenazyâ. So if Zionism is a True Prophetic phenomenon, certain True bloodlines are the beneficiaries, Not the usurper Luciferians.
———————————————————
And this seen on Poal….
That’s part of the fallacy, there are no more dominant “American perception”.
There are jews who are looting the country while ethnically cleansing Whites (enjoying total power),
there is aviolent section of mostly niggers really burning shit down who read on a4th grade level,
there are beaners, most of whom take more out than they put in and are over-reproducing,
there are asians and indians who pay in their fair share on average, but are culturally very different, and then…
there are primarily Germanic and British Whites who are paying for it while having their nation bulldozed.
Those buckets are also over-simplifications, but this is no longer an ethnically homogeneous monoculture or largely productive people who share similar values and religion. The jews saw to that. Now they are going to print money and start wars to keep the zombie walking until it collapses on itself.
stock here: it’s worth a watch: Drop a comment and spread the word. This comes after the Zionist’s empathetic resolution of “we will only genocide you at night” so you can get aid in the day.
According to politician Mikhail Bondar, Criminal proceedings are underway in Ukraine in relation to dozens of cases of alleged embezzlement and theft of funds earmarked for the military. Nearly $500 million given to Kiev for the construction of âdefensive fortificationsâ to repel Russiaâs advance has been embezzled or stolen, media reported on Sunday, citing Bondar.
Ukrainian ruling class has unleashed its law enforcement arm to stop it from embezzling money from itself that is supposed to go to war-mongering. Ukraine has now launched around 30 criminal proceedings linked to the embezzlement of 20 billion hryvnias ($491 million), Bondar told lawmakers at a closed-door session of the parliamentary investigative commission on fortifications, according to multiple media reports. In the absence of defensive fortifications, Russian forces have made rapid advances in the country.
stock here: I like this guy, not a dork. But he does use the totally false “calories in calories out” lie, which supposes the human being as “closed system”.
