Why the WHO World Health Organization cannot be trusted
------------------------------------------
from
Toxic link: the WHO and the IAEA
A 50-year-old agreement with the IAEA has effectively gagged the WHO from telling the truth about the health risks of radiation
-
Fifty years ago, on 28 May 1959, the World Health Organisation's assembly voted into force an obscure but important agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency – the United Nations "Atoms for Peace"
organisation, founded just two years before in 1957. The effect of this
agreement has been to give the IAEA an effective veto on any actions by
the WHO that relate in any way to nuclear power – and so prevent the
WHO from playing its proper role in investigating and warning of the
dangers of nuclear radiation on human health.
The WHO's objective
is to promote "the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible
level of health", while the IAEA's mission is to "accelerate and enlarge
the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity
throughout the world"
This is the actual agreement, making the WHO subservient to the nuke promoters IAEA
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c
I cгeate a comment eаch time Ӏ аppreciаte a pοst on a blog or ӏ
ReplyDeletehаνе something to valuаble to contribute
to the conversatiоn. It is a result of the fire displayed
in the ρost I lοoked аt. And аfter this article "WHO and IAEA are Radiation Promoters".
I was асtuаlly moved enough tо drop a thought :-) I actuаlly do have 2 questiοns for you if you tend not tο mind.
Is it οnlу mе οr ԁoeѕ it looκ like some
of theѕe comments come aсross liκe
left by bгaіn ԁeаd visіtoгs?
:-P And, if you аre postіng on adԁitional soсial siteѕ, I would like to keеp up wіth anything
fresh you haνе to post. Would yοu make a list all of your sociаl pages likе уouг Facebook page,
twitter feеd, oг linkedin profile?
mу homepage www.prweb.com/releases/silkn/sensepilreview/prweb10193901.htm