Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Thursday, November 28, 2013

West Coast Pelted with Radiation AGAIN on Thanksgiving!

The 600 to 800 mEV range is likely to be Cesium and Strontium, 2 of the most prevalent and most dangerous from Fukushima.

Bottom line - get a Geiger or you have no ability to assess your risk.   And there are occasional high risks.   

San Francisco, Olympia Washington, and Richland Washington are under high ALARM today.

San Francisco is around 300 CPM (Clicks per Minute), and Richland WA is over 500 CPM!

Honolulu is at 96 CPM as Flotsam from Fukushima is detected in a 2 mile stretch of debris, see story here

Honolulu is at ALERT Conditions today

Milwaukee direct read on 8 hour run, 12730 clicks with an Inspector Pancake type Geiger.   This is not bad and close to baseline, and after a light snow.   Usually the rain and snow bring down the airborne radiation.      So Milwaukee is a 26 CPM, that is not bad.   Use this Radiation Chart for interpretation.

Here is the source website for the Rad Charts above

Monday, November 25, 2013

Large Mass of Possibly Radioactive Flotsam Spotted in Hawaii, aka We Killed the Pacific

Read the article below.   They have found massive amounts of debris like this in Hawaiian waters, stretching in lines for miles.  From the Kauai Newspaper Article--"the line was between 10 and 20 yards wide, up to two miles long"

What is AMAZING is that no one has even put forth the idea of testing the debris for radiation, it is very possibly radioactive.   And reading below, even more amazing that Coast Guard, the DLNR (natural resources), the Whale Foundation.....absolutely everyone has taken a "not my job" approach.

The fast moving stuff, floating high above the water was coming as early as 2012, the "high floaters" had a big windage area and was blown quickly by the wind.    The new debris, a far larger mass than then high floaters, nets and such, don't get blown by the wind, they move with the water itself.
It has also clearly been shown by boats that have taken radiation samples at different depths at multiple places off the US West Coast, that 95% of the radiation stays in the top 200 feet of the water column. That fact is VERY important. The "experts" have been stating that even though it will be bad, it won't be that bad because the radiation will dilute throughout the entire Pacific. The whole depth of the Pacific.

NOW we find empirical data that shows that "dilution" is not true. Almost all the radiation stays in the main biosphere, the top 200 feet of water, EVEN after getting blown and drifted across thousands of miles. So the bioaccumulation effect is HUGE, and dilution is found to be a BIG LIE. Perhaps some of these experts don't even know they are lying.    Let me say that again....95% of the radiation stays in the zone that 95% of the life is.   

But Hawaii would "need to" cover up any radiation, 90% of ALL their GDP comes from tourists.   If the tourists stop coming, Hawaii will implode.    They did the coverup when local milk was testing positive for Strontium.    They were trying to cover up again in an article titled....

Hawaii Scientists Seek to Calm U.S. Fears About Fukushima Radiation

“This is a bad disaster,” said Henrieta Dulaiova, an assistant professor in UH’s Department of Geology and Geophysics.    “By now, the plume is so diffused that even if it makes it here, it will be really low levels,” ... 

Hh, huh, how about testing the ocean plume that was just spotted?

Lets call this "PLUME GATE"!

University of Hawaii did a pretty good job of predicting the Fuku Plume hitting the islands, they right chart is 2.5 years laters, which is now, and shows Hawaii being surrounded. 


HOWEVER this is the takeaway.    Everyone who did modeling of the expected radiation plume, did their models based upon a one time, point source of radiation from the week of the initial meltdowns, and explosions.    Those who followed Fuku closely have always assumed that radiation releases were never in "cold shutdown" as Abe lied through his teeth about.    And that "conspiracy theory" about continuous radiation has now been confirmed by TEPCO admission to be true.     

So the takeaway --everyone's models could be understated by 130 times, since the releases have occurred for 130 weeks, not just 1 week.     And the releases continue daily.    But Abe tells us that the radiation all stays in the harbor, yeah the open harbor.    And Abe states "let me reassure you, there will be no effect on the Olympics from the radiation".   



Debris--- Swath of debris spotted off Na Pali Coast (Hawaii)

Posted: Monday, November 25, 2013 1:00 am
LIHUE — Passengers aboard Makana Charters’ Na Pali Kai II received a bit of an unwelcome surprise during their lunch break Friday afternoon.

Capt. Mike Birchett said he was about one mile off the coast of Kalalau Beach when he spotted a large buoy — not uncommon by itself. However, the buoy proved to be just the beginning of what he described as a massive amount of marine debris.

“You had to be there to see it,” he said.

The ribbon-like debris line was between 10 and 20 yards wide, up to two miles long and contained everything from car-sized bundles of commercial fishing nets to buoys, entangled ropes, large plastic fuel cans and buckets, according to Birchett.
Finding trash out on the water is no unusual thing. But Friday’s incident was different.
“It just kept going and going,” he said of the rubbish. “The most amount of trash I’ve ever seen. And it was just so odd that it was in this straight line.”
While he couldn’t be certain, Birchett estimated the debris, if combined, would likely weigh two tons.
After cruising alongside it for half an hour, Birchett reported the mess, which appeared to be heading toward Niihau, to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Oahu.

And on the Big Island the "Experts" say the decline in fish is "spooky" and can't put their finger on any reason for it.

How bad is the situation? Recently released data from Hawaii’s Department of Aquatic Resources indicates that the overall number of reef fish off the coast of Puako has fallen by between 43 percent and 69 percent
The Big Island had some of the best reefs and fish populations.

Huh, do you think all the pelting with uranium, plutonium, cesium from airborne sources, and now direct impact from the moving water mass, well do you think that could account for part of it?

Article here


And speaking of "nuclear safety" this report regarding the  tragedy of atomic testing in the Pacific.

‘We’re going to just wait for these people to die’

Bad faith negotiations by the U.S. government produced a flawed nuclear compensation settlement in the Marshalls, writes Giff Johnson

From day one, the U.S. government covered up the actual fallout impact not only of the Bravo shot but of all six of the large bombs tested at Bikini in 1954. The cover up went like this:
• The massive dose of radioactive fallout delivered to Rongelap Islanders, and to a lesser extent to those living on Utrik was the result of an ‘unexpected wind shift.’
• At 15 megatons, Bravo was two-to-three times greater than the anticipated power of the explosion. The power of Bravo, as shown in recently declassified documents, was known in advance.
• Only Rongelap and Utrik were exposed to Bravo (or any other) test fallout.
All of these statements have been proven false by the release of formerly ‘secret’ and ‘classified’ U.S. government documents. Most significantly is the fact that 18 other inhabited atolls or single islands around the country were contaminated by a minimum of three and most by all six of the bombs tested in Operation Castle, which included Bravo, in 1954.
But the myth of only four ‘exposed’ atolls (Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap and Utrik) has shaped U.S. nuclear policy toward the Marshall Islands since 1954, limiting medical and scientific follow up, and compensation programs.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Kennedy was Killed for Trying to Expose the New World Order, the Economic Hitman

What does Kennedy have to do with an anti nuclear website?    Simple.   Kennedy thought that he could "get away with" exposing the Economic Hitman, and the overall Power Factions (aka Bilderbergs, Rotshchilds, Masons and Illuninati types).   The Economic Hitmen are the ones who create the lies about nuclear, and they create the nuclear plants themselves.    

If you havent read this book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, you need to.    It describes how large projects are sold to foreign countries, after a "study" that distorts the economics, and the project is built, creating a large debt to the host country.    This is how nuclear is sold.     GE and Babcox and Wilcox were some of the original Economic Hitmen.

This is why nuclear exists.    The truth has long been apparent--nuclear makes no sense, is far too dangerous, but these big complicated projects are the perfect incubator for the Hitman.    Lots of bribes and kickbacks always accompany these huge projects.

Kennedy was exposing more than JUST the Economic Hitman.    He thought that as President, the Hitman and Gang wouldn't have the guts or the capability to kill him, especially if he partly exposed them.

From the Author himself

“Economic hit men,” John Perkins writes in his controversial new book, “are highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. Their tools include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and murder. They play a game as old as Empire but one that has taken on terrifying dimensions during this time of globalization.”
John Perkins should know about economic hit men—he was covertly recruited by the U.S. National Security Agency to be one. For years, he worked for an international consulting firm where his job was to convince underdeveloped countries to accept enormous loans, much larger than what was really needed, for infrastructure development—and to make sure that the development projects were then contracted to U. S. multinationals.

Partial Text of the Famous Kennedy Secret Society Speech

"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."

The file continues .....

"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."

End at 2:28 - This is a solid piece in the transcript but ends mid paragraph.

Several more paragraphs of the transcript are skipped and the file continues.......

"No President should fear public scrutinity of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers-- I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security...

This part ends at 4:52. mid sentence. It left out "--and we intend to do it." It also skips a paragraph and then the file continues ...

"And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Plutonium admission by the EPA

A lot of the paid shrills for the nuke industry have been very vocal about stating how there was No Plutonium released from Fukushima.

Well, lets see, 3 reactors blew up, the one that blow up the most was a MOX reactor which is like 5% to 10% plutonium, and all reactors produce plutonium as a natural part of the process.   And of course all of the "fuel transfer pools" had used fuel which of course had plutonium.

I made a spreadsheet direct download from US EPA Radnet computers.   It shows in the weeks after the accident, plutonium detecting in the US at levels 2900% to 3500% over background.

So there is the proof.    We been inhaling Plutonium, that's not good.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Lying is not good for ACA credibility

From a comment on Huffpost


Democrats insist the president didn't lie:

“If somebody has insurance they like, they should be able to keep that insurance. If they have a doctor that they like, they should be able to keep their doctor.” Barack Obama, YouTube, March 6, 2009

“The plans you are discussing embody my core belief that Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it, …” Barack Obama, Letter to Senate Democrat Leaders, June 2, 2009

“Americans must have the freedom to keep whatever doctor and health care plan they have…” Barack Obama, Remarks on Health Care, Washington, D.C., June 11, 2009

"From this day forward, all of the cynics, all the naysayers — they're going to have to confront the reality of what this reform is and what it isn't. They'll have to finally acknowledge this isn't a government takeover of our health care system. They'll see that if Americans like their doctor, they'll be keeping their doctor. You like your plan? You'll be keeping your plan. No one is taking that away from you." President Obama, March 25, 2010

"First, if you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance — this law will only make it more secure and more affordable." President Obama, June 28, 2012

Friday, November 15, 2013

ACA Obamacare Fiasco, real data from the real website

I tried the website, and it technically functioned OK at 1AM.

Some issues:

1) Massive invasion of privacy even before you can get a somewhat customized budget estimate.

2) You sign away all your rights and privacy for yourself and your family, and actually authorize the Department of Homeland Security to investigate yourself and your family. And this is BEFORE you can get an actual quote.

3) One area of the website stated that with a $34,000 income that "my policy" would get over 50% of the annual fee refunded as a tax credit. And then further on in the budget quoting process, that tax credit was reduced to $285, or less 3% of the annual insurance cost for 2 people.

4) They have a "chat" function, but the federal worker responding takes FOREVER to respond, like they are looking in books on the other side. AND you have to agree to yet ANOTHER onerous giving away of your rights just to talk to them via chat. WAY too many lawyers worked on this site.

5) There is NO WAY to compare the 60 or so health choices presented for my County of my State. You have no idea the deductible, the copays, the items covered and percentages, and you can't find that anywhere on the website. Sheesh, average buying sites for commercial products let you do side by side table comparisons of various products that you checklist. This facilitates an informed decision making process, where you can eliminate the chaff quickly so you can focus your due diligence on items that really matter.

Please review the following screen captures, some are annotated by me

Highly personal information, the same information types that could be used to allow a bad person to access your financial accounts and move money.    They can't even run a website, do you think they can protect your data?

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Proof from Argonne National Lab and the US EPA that Fukushima 3 could and did blow up in a nuclear type explosion

This is important, I found this video after it had been "disappeared". It shows video of testing by Argonne National Lab that a standard nuclear reactor can blow sky high in a type of nuclear explosion. 14 minutes into the video is the biggest bang This proves that Fuku 3 can and did blow up in a nuclear explosion, and that is the only way the force could be created to get underneath the nuclear fuels to launch them and aerosolized them into the atmosphere.

Which is proven in the second link from EPA data that I data mined.

Monday, November 11, 2013

CPM of Gamma in energy range 600-800keV

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We
appreciate your concern. It’s important to know that the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission has said we do not expect to see radiation at
harmful levels reaching the U.S. from damaged Japanese nuclear power

The Environmental Protection Agency maintains a nationwide radiation
monitoring system known as RadNet. This system continuously monitors the
nation's air and regularly monitors drinking water, milk and
precipitation for environmental radiation. As of 3:00pm (EDT) April 19,
2011, EPA's RadNet radiation air monitors across the U.S. show typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern.
Data from each fixed RadNet monitor are transmitted to EPA’s National
Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory hourly. These data include
the gamma radiation measured during that hour. The data are screened
against pre-set values for each monitor to identify unusual readings,
particularly elevated radiation levels. In order to increase sensitivity
for screening the spectrum for small increases in gamma radiation, EPA
divides the gamma radiation measurement data into nine different gamma
energy ranges that collectively cover the energy spectrum where
essentially all of the nuclides of concern will be detected by our
When the RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is
outside the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor,
those data are flagged to be reviewed by a trained EPA scientist. The
review includes obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and
evaluating that spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.
EPA scientists use a science called gamma spectrometry to evaluate the
complete spectrum of the monitor’s specific calibration to detect the
type and amount of gamma emitting radioactive material at that location.
In this way, EPA scientists are able to determine what specific isotopes
are present in the air at any given time.
For information on the energy ranges for the gamma charts:
The following table shows the energy ranges that correspond with the
gamma charts on our website. Radioactive material from Japan could be
seen in various energy ranges, depending on the specific radionuclide.
Iodine-131 and cesium-137 would primarily be seen in ranges 3 and 5,
respectively, along with other naturally occurring radioactive
Please note that fluctuations in the gamma readings may be caused by a
number of factors, primarily naturally occurring radioactivity in the
environment. Two of the most prominent naturally-occurring radionuclides
in air are lead-214 and bismuth-214. Natural levels of these nuclides
fluctuate significantly in the environment and their primary gamma
energies are similar to those of cesium-137 and iodine-131. When the
RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is outside
the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor, those
data are flagged to be reviewed by an EPA scientist. The review includes
obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and evaluating that
spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.
Energy Ranges
Energy | Gamma Energies
Range | (keV)
Number |
1 | Reserved by
| software for
| instrument
| stabilization
2 | 100-200
3 | 200-400
4 | 400-600
5 | 600-800
6 | 800-1000
7 | 1000-1400
8 | 1400-1800
9 | 1800-2200
10 | 2200-2800
As part of the federal government's continuing effort to make our
activities and science transparent and available to the public, the
Environmental Protection Agency will continue to keep all RadNet data
available in the current online database. Please see for more information.

additional information

Iodine-131 with a physical half-life of 8.05 days and an effective half-life in the whole body of 7.6 days possesses its greatest energy peak at 360 keV, a second-ranking peak at 280 keV, a third peak at 638 keV and a fourth peak at 724 keV (Arena, 1971). The lower couple fall into range 3 (200-400 keV) , whereas the higher couple fall into range 5 (600-800 keV) in the RadNet graph.

Gamma spectrum of cesium-137 (Arena, 1971). Counts/channel are plotted on a logarithmic scale versus energy [keV]. Peaks are labelled in MeV
By contrast, cesium-137 with a physical half-life of 30.17 years and an effective half-life in the whole body of 70 days emits gamma radiation at 662 keV, falling into range 5 of the RadNet graph. However, backscatter (Compton effect), that is low-energy detector counts produced by incomplete energy transfer between the ionizing radiation and the detector material, contributes a considerable fraction of the total count rate to range 3. Although the precise shape of the spectral curves shown above depends on the radioactivity of the sources and the instruments used for the measurement, the energy peaks remain invariable and representative. Therefore, the spectra may can be employed for the demonstration of principles.

Partial integration of the areas under the spectral curves taking the logarithmic scale of the counts/channel into account suggests that the iodine-131 decay contributes about 91 percent of the total count rate summed over both ranges to range 3, whereas cesium-137 decay will contribute about one third to this range. Therefore, if both isotopes are present in the sample, the count rate measured in range 3 does not exclusively reflect iodine-131 decay, and iodine-131 will also contribute to the count rate measured in range 5, though to a smaller degree than cesium-137. Despite this cross-contamination, a prominent increase in range 3 suggests the presence of iodine-131 and in range 5 that of cesium-137. Furthermore, the EPA provides offline post-hoc data for identified radioisotopes.

Regardless of its low spectral resolution, the real-time RadNet graph may potentially have its uses for the identification of a radiological incident. An increase above the average counts per minute (CPM) measured in ranges 3 and 5 beyond three standard errors of the mean can be considered statistically significant with 95 percent confidence. Mean count rates measured in the past can be queried in the RadNet database. Sequences of up to 400 measurements can be downloaded in a batch.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Proof of Nuclear Explosion at Fukushima

Folks, glad to see this is going mainstream on the Telegraph.    We engineers who have followed closely have been aware of all of this for years.

As an MSME, and using data mining of EPA air sampling data shortly after the explosions, it is undeniable that at least tens of tons of uranium and plutonium were aerosolized and ended up in reporting stations from Saipan to Guam to Honolulu to San Francisco.    Let me show you why this PROVEs beyond any doubt that the explosions were a minor nuclear explosion.   

They were using MOX fuel which is enriched in plutonium (the stuff bombs are made of).    Reactor 3 exploded the most, it was the MOX reactor building.   All the fuel is either in a deep vessel called the reactor vessel, or the spent fuel pool which is a huge pool with 80 foot tall walls.     If the explosion was hydrogen as "they" claim, then the explosion would have s tarted from the highest points as hydrogen is the LIGHTEST element and floats up.   Even if the hydrogen fills the reactor building, it still wouldn't have gotten underneath the fuel rods in the pool or the vessel in order to Launch a huge percentage of them into the air.    And by the EPA observed densities in air showing uranium and plutonium dispersed all over the Pacific, we know for a fact that at least ten of tons of nuclear material was launched, maybe even 100 tons.
So the explosions came from within the bottom of the fuel pool and/or explosion from bottom of reactor vessel where the melted rods had amassed.     

Also consider that in all the pictures and videos of TEPCO pumping water to cool reactor buildings, they were never trying to pump anything into reactor 3.     Very simple....there was nothing left to cool.     We breathed that stuff in.

So your powers that be are trying to sell you on the New Nuclear Renaissance, and even this week launching major Propaganda as a movie called Pandoras Promise.      Don't fall for it.  Protest, show up at meetings, write letters and emails.   Show disgust.

Here is the proof of the EPA air density data showing the extreme aerosolization of nuclear materials.

A video showing Unit 3 Explosion, note the massive chunk of concrete which goes to the top of the plume and then falls out to the left.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Waves of Radiation Passing Over USA

NETC has been showing some high radiation CPM, some getting into full Alert basis.

This is about 10 days after the Fukushima Typhoon.

Stay out of the rain, unless you have a Geiger and can prove it safe.

(IF you like this cutting edge reporting, sign up as a follower!)

Here is a chart I made to help quickly understand CPM and mSv radiation readings.