stock here.
I sent this guy my information on the Mad Cow aspect of the Jabs
Interesting that he used
my data source at JAMA for getting the VAERS reporting percent
guesstimates. HINT 1%
-----------------------------------
18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid
Vaccine
Updated: 8 hours ago
A few friends have asked my
thoughts on the covid jab(s) so I thought it was time to write an article on
the topic.
All my friends had not heard
most of the details I shared, so I figured you might appreciate hearing some of
what I told them.
Knowing how contentious this
issue is, part of me would rather just write about something else, but I feel
like the discussion/news is so one-sided that I should speak up.
As I always strive to do, I
promise to do my best to be level-headed and non-hysterical.
I'm not here to pick a fight
with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I've read, my lingering
questions, and explain why I can't make sense of these covid vaccines.
THREE GROUND RULES FOR DISCUSSION
If you care to engage on this
topic with me, excellent.
Here are the rules...
I am more than happy to
correspond with you if...
1. You are respectful
and treat me the way you would want to be treated.
2. You ask genuinely
thoughtful questions about what makes sense to you.
3. You make your points
using sound logic and don't hide behind links or the word "science."
If you do respond, and you
break any of those rules, your comments will be ignored/deleted.
With that out of the way, let
me say this...
I don't know everything, but so
far no one has been able to answer the objections below.
So here are the reasons I'm
opting out of the covid vaccine.
#1: VACCINE MAKERS ARE IMMUNE FROM LIABILITY
The only industry in the world
that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products,
are vaccine makers.
First established in 1986 with
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the PREP Act,
vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent.
The covid-vaccine makers are
allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on
sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are
unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products
cause.
If a company is not willing to
stand behind their product as safe, especially one they rushed to market and
skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product.
No liability. No trust.
Here's why...
#2: THE CHECKERED PAST OF THE VACCINE COMPANIES
The four major companies who
are making these covid vaccines are/have either:
1. Never brought a
vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
2. Are serial felons
(Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).
3. Are both (Johnson
& Johnson).
Moderna had been trying to
"Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name)--for years, but had never
successfully brought ANY product to market--how nice for them to get a major
cash infusion from the government to keep trying.
In fact, all major vaccine
makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for
other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause
injuries and death--see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and Opioids as a
few examples.
If drug companies willfully
choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why
would we trust any product where they have NO liability?
In case it hasn't sunk in, let
me reiterate...3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued for products they
brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.
·
Johnson & Johnson
has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010,
2011, 2016, 2019 (For what it's worth,
J&J's vaccine also contains tissues from aborted fetal cells, perhaps a
topic for another discussion)
·
Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history.
They have lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here. Maybe that's why they
are demanding that countries where they don't have liability protection
put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.
·
Astra Zeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count.
Here's one. Here's another...you get the point. And in case you missed it,
the company had their covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and
they completely botched their meeting with the FDA with
numbers from their study that didn't match.
·
Oh, and apparently J&J (whose
vaccine is approved for "Emergency Use" in the US)
and Astrazenca (whose vaccine is not
approved for "Emergency Use" in the US), had a little mix up in their ingredients...in 15
million doses. Oops.
Let me reiterate this point:
Given the free pass from
liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that
all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?
Where else in life would we
trust someone with that kind of reputation?
To me that makes as much sense
as expecting a remorseless, abusive, unfaithful lover to become a different
person because a judge said deep down they are a good person.
No. I don't trust them.
No liability. No trust.
Here's another reason why I
don't trust them.
#3: THE UGLY HISTORY OF ATTEMPTS TO MAKE CORONAVIRUS VACCINES
There have been many attempts
to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we
did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020.
In the 1960's, scientists
attempted to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) vaccine for infants.
In that study, they skipped animal trials
because they weren't necessary back then.
In the end, the vaccinated
infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus
in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.
After 2000, scientists made
many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines.
For the past 20 years, all
ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and
many died, just like the children in the 1960's.
You can read a summary of this history/science here.
Or if you want to read the
individual studies you can check out these links:
·
In 2004 attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets
·
In 2005 mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to
coronaviruses after being vaccinated
·
In 2012 the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
·
In 2016 this study also produce lung disease in mice.
The typical pattern in the
studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful
antibody responses after being vaccinated.
The manufacturers thought they
hit the jackpot.
The problem came when the
children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.
When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon called Antibody
Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED)
occurred where the immune system produced a "cytokine storm" (i.e.
overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children/animals died.
Here's the lingering issue...
The vaccine makers have no data
to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem.
In other words, never before
has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the
gene-therapy technology that is mRNA "vaccines" been safely brought
to market, but hey, since they had billions of dollars in government funding,
I'm sure they figured that out.
Except they don't know if they
have...
#4: THE "DATA GAPS" SUBMITTED TO THE FDA BY THE VACCINE
MAKERS
When vaccine makers submitted
their papers to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorization (Note: An EUA is not
the same as a full FDA approval), among the many "Data Gaps" they
reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame
that pesky problem of Vaccine Enhanced Disease.
They simply don't know--i.e.
they have no idea if the vaccines they've made will also produce the same
cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.
As Joseph Mercola points out...
"Previous attempts to develop an mRNA-based
drug using lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be
abandoned because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when
dosed too high, the drug became too toxic. An obvious question is: What has
changed that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use?"
If that's not alarming enough,
here are other gaps in the data--i.e. there is no data to suggest safety or
efficacy regarding:
·
Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55
·
Pregnant or lactating mothers
·
Auto-immune conditions
·
Immunocompromised individuals
·
No data on transmission of covid
·
No data on preventing mortality from covid
·
No data on duration of protection from covid
Hard to believe right?
In case you think I'm making
this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and
Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found
starting with page 46 and 48 respectively.
For now let's turn our eyes to
the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization.
#5: NO ACCESS TO THE RAW DATA FROM THE TRIALS
Would you like to see the raw
data that produced the "90% and 95% effective" claims touted in the
news?
Me too...
But they won't let us see that
data.
As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the Pfizer and
Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny.
There were “3,410 total cases
of suspected, but unconfirmed covid-19 in the overall study population, 1,594
occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group.”
Wait...what?
Did they fail to do science in
their scientific study by not verifying a major variable?
Could they not test those
"suspected but unconfirmed" cases to find out if they had covid?
Apparently not.
Why not test all 3,410
participants for the sake of accuracy?
Can we only guess they didn't
test because it would mess up their "90-95% effective" claims?
Where's the FDA?
Would it not be prudent for the
FDA, to expect (demand) that the vaccine makers test people who have
"covid-like symptoms," and release their raw data so outside,
third-parties could examine how the manufacturers justified the numbers?
I mean it's only every citizen
of the world we're trying to get to take these experimental products...
Why did the FDA not require
that? Isn't that the entire purpose of the FDA anyway?
Good question.
Foxes guarding the hen house?
Seems like it.
No liability. No trust.
#6: NO LONG-TERM SAFETY TESTING
Obviously, with products that
have only been on the market a few months, we have no long-term safety data.
In other words, we have no idea
what this product will do in the body months or years from now--for ANY
population.
Given all the risks above
(risks that ALL pharmaceutical products have), would it not be prudent to wait
to see if the worst-case scenarios have indeed been avoided?
Would it not make sense to want
to fill those pesky "data gaps" before we try to give this to every
man, woman, and child on the planet?
Well...that would make sense,
but to have that data, they need to test it on people, which leads me to my
next point...
#7: NO INFORMED CONSENT
What most who are taking the
vaccine don't know is that because these products are still in clinical trials,
anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial.
They are part of the
experiment.
Those (like me) who do not take
it, are part of the control group.
Time will tell how this
experiment works out.
But, you may be asking, if the
vaccines are causing harm, wouldn't we be seeing that all over the news?
Surely the FDA would step in
and pause the distribution?
Well, if the adverse events
reporting system was working, maybe things would be different.
#8: UNDER-REPORTING OF ADVERSE REACTIONS AND DEATH
According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of
our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are
actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System
(VAERS) - read page 6 at the link above.
While the problems with VAERS
have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this
writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the
current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.
"VAERS data released today
showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including
2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26,
2021."
And those numbers don't include
(what is currently) 578 cases of Bell's Palsy.
If those numbers are still only
1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA
found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,00 to
220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse
reactions.
Bet you didn't see that on the
news.
That death number would
currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that
happen every year (which you probably also don't hear about), but we are not
even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.
If you want a deeper dive into
the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check this out, or check this out.
But then there's my next point,
which could be argued makes these covid vaccines seem pointless...
#9: THE VACCINES DO NOT STOP TRANSMISSION OR INFECTION
Wait, what?
Aren't these vaccines supposed
to be what we've been waiting for to "go back to normal"?
Nope.
Why do you think we're getting
all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and
wear masks AFTER we get a vaccine?
The reason is because these
vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection.
If you don't believe me, I
refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA I linked to above.
The primary endpoint (what the
vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms.
Sounds like just about every
other drug on the market right?
That's it...lowering your
symptoms is the big payoff we've been waiting for.
Does that seem completely
pointless to anyone but me?
1. It can't stop us from
spreading the virus.
2. It can't stop the
virus from infecting us once we have it.
3. To get the vaccine is
to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do
is lower symptoms?
Heck, there are plenty of other
things I can do to lower my symptoms that don't involve taking what appears to
be a really risky product.
Now for the next logical
question:
If we're worried about
asymptomatic spreaders, would the vaccine not make it more likely that
we are creating asymptomatic spread?
If it indeed reduces symptoms,
anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick and thus they are more
likely to spread the virus, right?
For what it's worth, I've heard
many people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose)
are worse than catching covid.
I can't make sense of that
either.
Take the risk.
Get no protection.
Suffer through the vaccine
side-effects.
Keep wearing your mask and
social distancing...
And continue to be able to
spread the virus.
What?
It gets worse.
#10: PEOPLE ARE CATCHING COVID AFTER BEING FULLY VACCINATED
Talk about a bummer.
You get vaccinated and you still
catch covid.
·
It's happening in Washington State
·
It's happening in New York
·
It's happening in Michigan
·
It's happening in Hawaii
·
It's happening in several other states too.
·
It happened to 80% of 35 nuns who got the vaccine in Kentucky. Two of
them died by the way.
In reality, this phenomenon is
probably happening everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.
Given the reasons above (and
what's below), maybe this doesn't surprise you, but bummer if you thought the
vaccine was a shield to keep you safe.
It's not.
That was never the point.
If 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the
vaccine...maybe they aren't wowed by the rushed science either.
Maybe they are watching the
shady way deaths and cases are being reported...
#11: THE OVERALL DEATH RATE FROM COVID
According to the CDC's own
numbers, covid has a 99.74% survival rate.
Why would I take a risk on a
product, that doesn't stop infection or transmission, to help me overcome a
cold that has a .26% chance of killing me--actually in my age range is has
about a .1% chance of killing me (and .01% chance of killing my kids), but
let's not split hairs here.
With a bar (death rate) that
low, we will be in lockdown every year...i.e. forever.
But wait, what about the
500,000 plus deaths, that's alarming right?
I'm glad you asked.
#12: THE BLOATED COVID DEATH NUMBERS
Something smells really funny
about this one.
Never before in the history of
death certificates has our own government changed how deaths are reported.
Why now, are we reporting
everyone who dies with covid in their body, as having died of
covid, rather than the co-morbidities that actually took their life?
Until covid, all coronaviruses
(common colds) were never listed as the primary cause of death when
someone died of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, auto-immune conditions, or any
other major co-morbidity.
The disease was listed
as the cause of death, and a confounding factor like flu or pneumonia was
listed on a separate line.
To bloat the number even more,
both the W.H.O. and the C.D.C. changed their guidelines such that those who are
suspected or probable (but were never
confirmed) of having died of covid, are also included in the death numbers.
Seriously?
If we are going to do that then
should we not go back and change the numbers of all past cold and flu seasons
so we can compare apples to apples when it comes to death rates?
According to the CDCs own numbers, (scroll down to the
section "Comorbidities and other conditions") only 6% of the deaths
being attributed to covid are instances where covid seems to be the only issue
at hand.
In other words, reduce the
death numbers you see on the news by 94% and you have what is likely the real
numbers of deaths from just covid.
Even if the former CDC director is correct and
covid-19 was a lab-enhanced virus (see Reason #14 below), a .26% death rate is
still in line with the viral death rate that circles the planet ever year.
Then there's this Fauci guy.
I'd really love to trust him,
but besides the fact that he hasn't treated one covid patient...you should
probably know...
#13: FAUCI AND SIX OTHERS AT NIAID OWN PATENTS IN THE MODERNA
VACCINE
Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act,
government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using
tax payer funding.
Tony Fauci owns over 1,000
patents (see this video for more details), including patents being used
on the Moderna vaccine...which he approved government funding for.
In fact, the NIH (which NIAID
is part of) claims joint ownership of Moderna's vaccine.
Does anyone else see this as a
MAJOR conflict of interest, or criminal even?
I say criminal because there's
also this pesky problem that makes me even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and
the NIH in general.
#14: FAUCI IS ON THE HOT SEAT FOR ILLEGAL GAIN-OF-FUNCTION
RESEARCH
What is
"Gain-of-Function" research?
It's where scientists attempt
to make viruses gain functions--i.e. make them more transmissible and
deadlier.
Sounds at least a touch
unethical, right?
How could that possibly be
helpful?
Our government agreed, and
banned the practice.
So what did the Fauci-led NIAID
do?
They pivoted and outsourced the gain-of-function research (in
coronaviruses no less) to China--to the tune of a $600K grant.
You can see more details,
including the important timeline of these events in this fantastically well-researched documentary.
Mr. Fauci, you have some
explaining to do...and I hope the cameras are recording when you have to defend
your actions.
For now, let's turn our
attention back to the virus...
#15: THE VIRUS CONTINUES TO MUTATE
Not only does the virus (like
all viruses) continue to mutate, but according to world-renowned vaccine
developer Geert Vanden Bossche (who you'll meet below if you don't know him)
it's mutating about every 10 hours.
How in the world are we going
to keep creating vaccines to keep up with that level of mutation?
We're not.
Might that also explain why
fully vaccinated people are continuing to catch covid?
Why, given that natural
immunity has never ultimately failed humanity, do we suddenly not trust it?
Why, if I ask questions like
the above, or post links like what you find above, will my thoughts be deleted
from all major social media platforms?
That brings me to the next
troubling problem I have with these vaccines.
#16: CENSORSHIP...AND THE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF SCIENTIFIC DEBATE
I can't help but get snarky
here, so humor me.
How did you enjoy all those
nationally and globally-televised, robust debates put on by public health
officials, and broadcast simultaneously on every major news station?
Wasn't it great hearing from
the best minds in medicine, virology, epidemiology, economics, and vaccinology
from all over the world as they vigorously and respectfully debated
things like:
·
Lockdowns
·
Mask wearing
·
Social-distancing
·
Vaccine efficacy and safety trials
·
How to screen for susceptibility to vaccine injury
·
Therapeutics, (i.e. non-vaccine treatment options)
Wasn't it great seeing public
health officials (who never treated anyone with covid) have their
"science" questioned.
Wasn't it great seeing the FDA
panel publicly grill the vaccine makers in prime time as they stood in the
hot-seat of tough questions about products of which they have no liability?
Oh, wait...you didn't see those
debates?
No, you didn't...because they never happened.
What happened instead was
heavy-handed censorship of all but one narrative.
Ironically, Mark Zuckerberg can question vaccine safety,
but I can't?
Hypocrite?
When did the first amendment
become a suggestion?
It's the FIRST amendment
Mark--the one our founders thought was most important.
With so much at stake, why are
we fed only one narrative...shouldn't many perspectives be heard and
professionally debated?
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO SCIENCE?
What has happened to the
scientific method of always challenging our assumptions?
What happened to lively debate
in this country, or at least in Western society?
Why did anyone who disagrees
with the WHO, or the CDC get censored so heavily?
Is the science of public health
a religion now, or is science supposed to be about debate?
If someone says "the
science is settled" that's how I know I'm dealing with someone who is
closed minded.
By definition science
(especially biological science) is never settled.
If it was, it would be dogma,
not science.
OK, before I get too worked up,
let me say this...
I WANT TO BE A GOOD CITIZEN
I really do.
If lockdowns work, I want to do
my part and stay home.
If masks work, I want to wear
them.
If social distancing is
effective, I want to comply.
But, if there is evidence they
don't (masks for example), I want to hear that
evidence too.
If highly-credentialed
scientists have different opinions, I want to know what they think.
I want a chance to hear their
arguments and make up my own mind.
I don't think I'm the smartest
person in the world, but I think I can think.
Maybe I'm weird, but if someone
is censored, then I REALLY want to hear what they think.
Don't you?
To all my friends who don't
have a problem with censorship, will you have the same opinion when what you
think is censored?
Is censorship not the technique
of dictators, tyrants, and greedy, power-hungry people?
Is it not a sign that those who
are doing the censoring know it's the only way they can win?
What if a man who spent his
entire life developing vaccines was willing to put his entire reputation on the
line and call on all global leaders to immediately stop the covid vaccines
because of problems with the science?
What if he pleaded for an
open-scientific debate on a global stage?
Would you want to hear what he
has to say?
Would you want to see the
debate he's asking for?
#17: THE WORLD'S LEADING VACCINOLOGIST IS SOUNDING THE ALARM...
Here is what may be the biggest
reason this covid vaccine doesn't make sense to me.
When someone who is very
pro-vaccine, who has spent his entire professional career overseeing the
development of vaccines, is shouting from the mountaintops that we have a major
problem, I think the man should be heard.
In case you missed it, and in
case you care to watch it, here is Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining:
1. Why the covid vaccine
may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it's
ability to mutate and become more deadly.
2. Why the covid
vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic
resistant bacteria).
3. Why, because of
previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a
mass casualty event in the next few months/years.
If you want to see/read about a
second, and longer, interview with Vanden Bossche, where he was asked some
tough questions, you can check this out.
If half of what he says comes
true, these vaccines could be the worst invention of all time.
If you don't like his science,
take it up with him.
I'm just the messenger.
But I can also speak to covid
personally.
#18: I ALREADY HAD COVID
I didn't enjoy it.
It was a nasty cold for two
days:
·
Unrelenting butt/low-back aches
·
Very low energy.
·
Low-grade fever.
It was weird not being able to
smell anything for a couple days.
A week later, coffee still
tasted a little "off."
But I survived.
Now it appears (as it always
has) that I have beautiful, natural, life-long immunity...
...not something likely to wear
off in a few months if I get the vaccine.
In my body, and my household, covid is over.
In fact, now that I've had it,
there is evidence the covid vaccine might actually be more dangerous for me.
That is not a risk I'm willing
to take.
IN SUMMARY
The above are just my reasons
for not wanting the vaccine.
Maybe my reasons make sense to
you, maybe they don't.
Whatever does makes sense to
you, hopefully we can still be friends.
I for one think there's a lot
more that we have in common than what separates us.
·
We all want to live in a world of freedom.
·
We all want to do our part to help others and to live well.
·
We all want the right to express our opinions without fearing
we'll be censored or viciously attacked.
·
We all deserve to have the access to the facts so we can make
informed decisions.
Agree or disagree with me; I'll treat you no differently.
You're a human just as worthy
of love and respect as anyone else.
For that I salute you, and I
truly wish you all the best.
I hope you found this helpful.
If so, feel free to share.
If not, feel free to (kindly)
let me know what didn't make sense to you and I'd be happy to hear your
thoughts too.
Stay curious and stay humble.
Until next time,
Christian
PS. If you think I studied this
topic well, think about how much thought I would put into helping you with your health. Helping people
with their health is what I do all day, every day.
PPS. Health can't be injected,
but it can be earned.