Did you also notice they are doing high altitude
chemtrails, with barium, strontium, copper.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this article, they portend to be covering high upper atmosphere research, and end up trying to scare people, pretend bafflement, and blame everything on CO2.
stock here--stick around to the end of this article, I put a link to a useful site on sunspots, and some charts. Keep in mind that often an 11 year sunspot cycle is mentioned, but it is really 22 years from bottom to top and back to bottom.
In this article, they portend to be covering high upper atmosphere research, and end up trying to scare people, pretend bafflement, and blame everything on CO2.
stock here--stick around to the end of this article, I put a link to a useful site on sunspots, and some charts. Keep in mind that often an 11 year sunspot cycle is mentioned, but it is really 22 years from bottom to top and back to bottom.
https://www.seeker.com/earths-shrinking-atmosphere-baffles-scientists-discovery-news-1766491731.html
The thermosphere usually expands
and contracts in line with the sun's 11-year solar cycle. During solar maximum
when solar activity increases, it causes the thermosphere to heat up --
reaching temperatures of 1100°C -- and expand like a marshmallow in a camp
fire. The opposite happens during solar minimum.
They go on to state---
Currently, the sun is
experiencing its longest solar minimum on record, with little sunspot activity
and few solar flares or coronal mass ejections.
2 points----They are completely incorrect about this
being the longest solar minimum “on record” and, second, why are they baffled, and why do they use the temp “collapse”
when the operant effect is a simple contraction due to falling
temperature? They should not be
baffled (unless it is a request for more grant money) as the effect they are
seeing is related to what they already know in relation to the sun’s 11 year
cycle which is a sun-spot and thus magnetism cycle.
Also in the upper quote, they completely ignore the
magnetism, and just trot out “when solar activity increases” which most people
will mistakenly take to mean “gets hotter”.
And back to the line of thinking of grubbing for grant
money, what better way to do it, then to trot out the scary old CO2. Sheesh, I think they can blame every natural
effect in the universe, that is bad at least, on my favorite plant food,
CO2. They had to get this one in the
first sentence, lol, even before
defining the “problem”…….can’t blame them to “hook” the reader with scary CO2.
An increase in CO2 could be one
reason why a layer of Earth's upper atmosphere went through its biggest
contraction in 43 years.
First, they go on record as saying this zone is a shield
from extreme ultra violet radiation….
The collapse occurred in a region known as the thermosphere, a rarefied layer of the planet's upper atmosphere between 90 and 600 kilometers (56 to 373 miles) above the surface, which shields us from the sun's far and extreme ultra violet (EUV) radiation.
But then at the end, they contradict that scary shield
effect by saying:
Wilkinson says the only real
impact of the thermosphere collapse is in space, where less atmospheric drag
will keep spacecraft in orbit longer.
This is all you get from NASA, its not nearly enough to make any |
It is instructive to review a longer term look at solar
cycles. The best source I found was a
guy who retired from government work.
Interesting enough, The NASA site, updated 3-15-2017, shows such a small
record, that nothing useful can be gleaned by reviewing what they are
offering. A would go
against the official narrative that is being pushed, the narrative that humans
are warming the climate, or at least “changing the climate”, and there
will be catastrophes unless trillions of dollars are transferred, and a world
wide control of all energy sources be granted to the UN or a centralized world
government.
“conspiracist” might say
they intentionally show just the most recent data, because a better review of
long term data--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Must view website
http://solarcyclescience.com/solarcycle.html
Links the more pages about the Sun
The Sun Today Link
Solar Dynamics Observatory: SDO Link
Total Solar Eclipse 2017 Link
High Altitude Observatory Link
Links the pages about Astronomy in General
Astronomy Picture of the Day Link
Cassini: The Grand Finale Link
Juno | NASA Link
Hubble Space Telescope | NASA Link
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
And from WUWT website, they do some great work, but in Orwellian disbelief, they seem to be a high majority of participants that are fully Pro-Nuclear and Anti-Solar. Even though they are on the right side of the CO2 discussion. I have attempted to straighten them out, and I tend to get a limited response without agreement or a full on attack like a Zerohedge discussion/rant.
This was written in 2012, 5 years ago, and is playing out exactly as they predicted.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/01/25/first-estimate-of-solar-cycle-25-amplitudesmallest-in-over-300-years/#more-55458
From 2006 NASA Article on Predictions. It is not that they are ignorant, it's more like they are overconfident but without understanding their limitations. It's kind of like being a Leo without also having some humility of ones own limitations and the benefit of intuition.
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/10may_longrange/
stock here---these charts speak for themselves
First used with sounding rockets flown in the 1950’s, scientific research with experiments which inject vapor tracers in the upper atmosphere have greatly aided our understanding of our planet’s near-space environment. These materials make visible the naturally occurring flows of ionized and neutral particles either by luminescing at distinct wavelengths in the visible and infrared part of the spectrum or by scattering sunlight.
The type of vapor selected to create these colorful clouds and trails depends on the purpose of the investigation, the local time, and the altitude under study. Commonly used vapors that are released in space are:
Tri-methyl aluminum (TMA),
Lithium, and
Barium.
Tri-methyl aluminum (TMA)
Tri-methyl aluminum reacts with oxygen and produces chemi-luminescence when exposed to the atmosphere. The products of the reaction are aluminum oxide, carbon dioxide, and water vapor, which also occur naturally in the atmosphere. TMA releases are most often used to study the neutral winds in the lower ionosphere at night at altitudes of 100 miles (160 kilometers) or less."
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sounding-rockets/tracers/metals.html