The Photo of the Strap Top Copper Blond Hottie acting as Hawkings "guide" all day and night, has been trending as a top post on my site lately.
I wonder who she is? Anyone know?
It seems she is the same one in Picture 2, tending to Hawkings at night. Note the couple on the right....they really hate to be in this picture, now why is that?
Why is this important? Academia and Science have been corrupted just as badly as the DOJ and our local and district judges and prosecutors. And why has tuition gone up 400%? Partly to enslave the graduates with debt, and no out through bankruptcy. This make them also "eligible" for persuasion into a certain attitude and actions. I mean you can't honey trap the entire country.
So is the DOJ moving into a phase of 4D Chess? They have indicted 9 high level professors from top academia, who were getting payments directly from China, not reported the relationship with an outside country (a crime in itself) and not reporting the income (tax evasion). The average payment (or shall I say bribe) was $700,000 a year!
Thats a boat load of money. Enough to get neo-liberal America hating academia to turn over the top research funded with USA tax dollars, direct to China under their "1000 Talents" program.
https://www.sott.net/article/439231-Stephen-Hawking-named-in-Epstein-files-as-court-asks-for-photos-videos-with-Virginia-Giuffre
Oops! Maybe I should have stuck with Science |
more espionage revealed, with American's complicit in the actions. The 2 offenses above serious crimes.
But when the motivation is treason, these weak professors will likely sing to high heaven to "just" plea bargain a 10 to 20 year sentence, and not death.
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/hawk4.pdf
read to the bottom here from hawk4.pdf where they literally jump the shark.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First published April 4, 2018
I won this one. I
have won a lot of them, but this is the first one where they have pretty much
admitted defeat. And the funny thing is,
I won it several months ago, but just found out today. I became aware of an article from The Daily
Mail in London, published January 12, 2018, entitled “Has Hawking Been
Replaced by a Puppet?” Just so you
know, The Daily Mail is the second
largest newspaper in the UK, bested only by The
Sun. Although I am not mentioned by
name, the article is clearly based on research I did in April of 2015 in this paper called “Stephen Hawking has Died and been
Replaced”. They simply repeat many of my
points there, and don't even bother to rebut them. They end by basically admitting I am right:
The
motive is there. The pictures speak louder than words. So could it be that the
conspiracy theorists are right this time?
Yeah. Right this time
and every other time, as people are figuring out. Do you think it is a coincidence that this
article came out in a major newspaper and Hawking “died” two months later? I will tell you: it isn't a coincidence. They realised the game was up and ended the
project. It's that simple.
However, they are still trying to cover their tracks. I wanted to add this information to my
original paper as an addendum. But I
couldn't do that. Do you know why? Because I published a pdf, but you can't edit
a pdf. To make changes, I have to go
into my OpenOffice odt document, and when I did that I found that all the
images were gone. Strange, since they
link to my own local files. All those
files were listed as being in my Downloads file, but they weren't there. So how did they get into my Downloads
files? You tell me. I am not a computer geek. Maybe they hacked in when I forgot to close
FileZilla? Seems like they would have
deleted the pdf as well, but maybe access to downloads is easier than access to
documents?
Impossible for me to say. Some will just say I deleted the files myself
by mistake. OK, did I also delete the
same pics all over the web? I just ran a
search for pics of Hawking, and most of the ones I used have been deleted. But I did find a few new ones, like the one
under title above. Is that the worst
fake you have ever seen?
Look at that guy! He
looks like an actor from MadTV trying to impersonate the Hawking impostor.
You can see right through him. He is even younger than the Hawking impostor. I think the original Hawking impostor was
someone who was actually suffering from ALS or something similar. He wasn't Hawking but he wasn't faking his
illness, whatever it was. But that guy
above isn't fooling anyone. He's just screwing up his face.
Best guess is their impostor finally died and they couldn't
risk a second substitute after The Daily
Mail piece. They realized the guy
above wasn't going to fool people who were now on the lookout for a con.
So what is the next subject where they are going to admit I
was right? Place your bets now. Manson? Kennedy? Pi=4?
Probably not.* Maybe something to
do with Elvis or the Beatles. Or
possibly something to do with charge or light.
They have been admitting I was right about charge and light for several
years, though again they don't bother to give me credit or mention me by
name. I expect the admissions to become
even clearer and more prevalent as the months and years pass. Maybe someday they will recognize we will all
get along much faster if they quit trying to bury me and just hire me.
You will say I am making that hard for them to do. Why would they hire someone who keeps blowing
all their top projects? Um, maybe to
keep me from blowing all their top projects?
At some point they will realize it is more profitable (and far less
risky) to do real science than fake science.
Now that I have given them a unified field equation and corrected all
their math for them, they can get back to business.
I will be told that is overly optimistic, and maybe it
is. If I were really a betting man
(which I'm not), I would bet on the
paper of mine that is most likely to be used by one arm of Intelligence against
another arm. That is what happened here,
you know. The Daily Mail obviously wasn't trying to prove me right or do me
any favors. They simply used my
research to destroy the faux-Hawking.
Faux-Hawking was being used by entityA to achieve goalX, and their rival
entityB wished for goalX to fail. So
look for another DHS-type project that CIA wants to fail, where one of my
papers would help them do that. Plus, it needs to be a project the outing of
which won't bring down the whole house of cards. Maybe Ligo?
The LHC? The FPP? The Kavli Foundation? As I said, I am not a betting man, and I like
to be surprised, so I will leave it. We
will just keep our ears open.
Addendum
July 4, 2018: A reader just sent me
another picture of Hawking number 3, showing us again why they had to end the
project.
That's the same guy as in the pic under title, but it isn't
the real Hawking or Hawking #2. He is
way younger. Look closely at his mouth,
noting that we can't see the bottom teeth like we should. This is just an actor who somewhat resembles
Hawking #2, and who learned to screw up his face in the right way. But it is obvious he is just screwing up his
face. Also notice they have dressed him
in that huge bomber jacket, so you can't see his body, neck, or hands.
Who are these people?
They are the Garriots, alleged “owners of the Luna 21 lander and the Lunokhod 2 rover making them the
world’s only private owners of an object on a foreign celestial body”. Since this photo is a fake, we may assume
that story is fake as well. Laetitia
Garriot was an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, which is more evidence in
the same direction. She then became a
principal at hedge fund TPG-Axon. She
later founded Escape Dynamics, the spaceplane company. So she already looks like another Elon Musk,
fronting a lot of fake companies and fake projects. Richard Garriot is a vidgame honcho who
allegedly spent time on the International Space Station, indicating that was
also a fake.
That's supposed to be Laetitia again, but she is now with
Hawking #2, not #3. However, that is
obviously a paste-up. What is she
looking at? Her eyes aren't focused on
Hawking, are they? That's because she
and Hawking aren't really there together.
It is a composite photo with the older Hawking. They realized Hawking #3
wasn't passing muster, so they had to go back to Hawking #2 and paste up a
photo. Since they were already in
Photoshop, they figured why not paste in one of Damien Hirst's sharks in the
background. They figured anyone buying
this story would buy anything, so they could have pasted in the Loch Ness
monster in the background, swimming by smoking a cigarette and wearing a bra
and panties.
In other words, don't believe anything you read about the
Garriots.
*Although I do expect them to admit pi=4 in my lifetime—in kinematic
situations, you know—I don't see it happening this year or next. Insiders already know I am right, and have
already corrected their equations, but it may take years for them to admit this
to the public. I don't expect to see a
report in the mainstream media this decade.
Oh, dear, from a fake King (Joseph Greg Hallett) to an imposter "genius".
ReplyDeleteThis time, it's Miles Mathis who first noticed that S. Hawking had been replaced by a series of imposters.
http://milesmathis.com/hawking.pdf
http://milesmathis.com/hawk2.pdf
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/hawk4.pdf
Worthy of a HorrorWorld movie, you think?
I wonder which imposter got the grand tour of Epstein's Island.
Added in, very curious, MM "kills" Hawking, LOL
Delete