From Codeshutdown
-------------------------------------------------------------
Stock
I noticed a poster on your site said we should prove
bioaccumulation by testing some chitin.
But uneven distribution means the average rad level may not tell the
story. Also, last week we visited the
morphogenesis regulators. Field
gradients are key. Both chemical and electrical. Ionic and voltage gradients will definitely
warp the bioelectric field. This is a
non genetic type of deformation process...it would perhaps be called
epigenetic. Or more to the point bioelectric morphogenesis. Check out this site
http://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/levin/research/spatial.htm
“We’ve found that cells communicate, even across long distances in the embryo, using bioelectrical signals, and they use this information to know where to form a brain and how big that brain should be,” says the paper’s corresponding author Michael Levin, Ph.D
Galvanotactic control of collective cell migration in
epithelial monolayers http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v13/n4/abs/nmat3891.html
=============
Radionuclides are not evenly distributed. The usual
measurements of radiation wont show these point sources and the average
radiation dose may seem low level.
A lobster claw showing point source distribution of
radioactive calcium and strontium.
from
uneven distribution of nuclear fallout in trees shown by
autoradiographs. Point source ionic and voltage fields disturb the bioelectric
field which is a regulator of morphogenesis. Measuring bulk becquerels and
using the ICRP sievert system will not show this
=====================
Scientists are blinded by nuclear science! Theyve all
been hoodwinked by the ICRP model! Its as simple as that.
Radiation testing wont reveal death and illness due to
fallout.
Radioactive iodine has damaged thyroids but is no longer
detectable.
Other short lived isotopes have also done their damage
and are no longer detectable. Cesium has been shown to be dangerous 50 bq/kg,
even 10 bq/kg and this will be totally dismissed by science as one hundredth
the level of concern.
Radiographs show that nuclear fallout forms point sources
in living beings. High 'specific activity' radioisotopes dont remain evenly
dispersed, and are not diluted at the atomic or nanoparticle level. Thus
radioactivity measurements averaged over any significant quantity of tissue may
be misleading.
photo showing natural compositional sorting…in this case
magnetite.
radiographs showing point source radionuclide deposition
and biological sorting http://www.haa.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/MorizumiFlier%20image.jpg
strontium lung scan
from
This is a good paper to show to marine scientists who are
blinded by the ICRP model. Chiyo Nohara died doing research, showing an LD50
for a butterfly larva of 2 becquerels
The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident
on the pale grass blue butterfly Atsuki Hiyama, Chiyo Nohara deterioration is
due to artificial radionuclides from Fukushima
=================
point source bioaccumulation and a possible link to the
photoelectron theory by Busby and Schmug Chris Busby of the Institute of Plant
Nutrition and Soil Science (IPNSS) in Braunschweig, Germany, and the University
of Ulster, UK, and Ewald Schnug, director of the IPNSS, claim that uranium
atoms in the body could act as "radiation antennas". They argue that
uranium atoms could be capturing photons of background gamma radiation and then
re-emitting their energy as fast-moving electrons that act on the surrounding
tissue in the same way as beta radiation. This "phantom radiation"
could be over 1000 times more damaging than the alpha particles released by
depleted uranium's slow nuclear decay, according to their preliminary
calculations.
Their theory invokes a well-known process called the
photoelectric effect. This is the main mechanism by which gamma photons with
energies of about 100 kiloelectronvolts (keV) or less are blocked by matter:
the photon transfers its energy to an electron in the atom's electron cloud,
which is ejected into the surroundings.
An atom's ability to stop photons by this mechanism
depends on the fourth power of its atomic number - the number of protons in its
nucleus
Busby ECRR is a sham propaganda organization. They have no legitimacy from the EU. Clever use of acronyms doesn't change the fact that ICRP is the recognized international body for professional work. There is a reason the ICRP model has been used and refined over the years. It is highly predictive for future outcomes and conservative. 60 million Mr Busby is not credible. No validation. We don't live in a petri dish. It's called an immune system for a reason.
ReplyDeleteYou are right for once, they have been using it (ICRP) for a reason. It IS conservative... of the Nuclear Cartel lies.
ReplyDeletePoint sources are not what gets you. It's the aggregate dose. Didn't you take basic radiation effects in school? Apparently not.
ReplyDeletePoint sources are not what gets you. It's the aggregate dose. Didn't you take basic radiation effects in school? Apparently not.
ReplyDeleteThanks for explaining another of the main precepts, lies of nuclear.
DeleteWhat you learned and what you promote are lies. Wakey