When Does Agenda Driven News Become Treason, and Not Expressing An Opinion / Free Speech

stock here: I see to be the first one to state what should be obvious.

Now many recognize that most of America's "news agencies" are owned by an unbroken tribe which has an agenda that is primarily anti-American.

But few have called this out as an issue that needs to be dealt with at the same time as discussing the First Amendment (Freedom of Speech).  And the risk of this, is that the Second Amendment could also be called into question.

But we need to recognize the tribe owned Media which is blatantly promoting their agenda.   The video below should be obvious that an "agenda" is being pushed.
==============================
 A reader submitted this resource on "the law and mass media".    Keep in mind, just because a "body of work" describes a relation between media and society, does not eliminate the more basic laws regarding slanderous actions that are detrimental to the United States of America and any of it's people, and by this I mean fully legal citizens or green card holders.    Even dual citizenship holders, when that creates both a conflict of interest and an "easy escape" need to be treated more cautiously, especially when they also hold government office.

https://open.lib.umn.edu/mediaandculture/chapter/15-3-the-law-and-mass-media-messages/

So what I am saying is that even though there is "case law", as some we just need to go back to formula, go back to the basic law.
stock out
==========================================

As BI notes, these are all owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group, which over the last few days has seemingly required dozens of new anchors on its roughly 200 local TV stations in the US to read the dark message about "members of the media [who] use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control 'exactly what people think'," concluding that "This is extremely dangerous to a democracy."

At the other end of the spctrum is Q Anon https://youtu.be/U1GOoEoYLy8?t=340