The nuke industry paid this newspaper to publish a bunch of drivel such as
Story hereThough in 1986, the physical effects of the Chernobyl nuclear power accident were much worse on nearby residents, a 2006 study performed by the United Nations on the worldwide effects of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant determined that the accident’s “most serious public health issue” was adverse effects on the mental health of the public. The United Nations report said that poor communication about the health risks “associated with radiation levels made the problem worse.” Additionally, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and general depression remained at much higher than normal levels 20 years after the accident in the surrounding area.
http://www.inquisitr.com/2301716/nuclear-power-study-says-fear-of-energy-source-is-much-worse-than-any-possible-radiation-effects/
But they got more than they bargained for, since it is Sunday, the pro nuclear web/blog trolls aren't working, instead they got honesty from a lot of people.
They got bitchslapped
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Energy ·
nuke is not safe, not clean, not even cheap
http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/.../vogtle-nuclear.../
His 65B number is amazing because it matches my spreadsheet calculations I did a few weeks back at 64.8B cost to complete and operate for 30 years.
That results in a cost of 15 cents per kWH
Data is here, you can download the spreadsheet too if you wish....See More
http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/.../vogtle-nuclear.../
His 65B number is amazing because it matches my spreadsheet calculations I did a few weeks back at 64.8B cost to complete and operate for 30 years.
That results in a cost of 15 cents per kWH
Data is here, you can download the spreadsheet too if you wish....See More
Eileen Mahood-Jose ·
Increased
leukemia, breast cancer, thyroid cancer, infant mortality, birth
defect, miscarriage, and plant and animal mutation rates in the plumes
of Fukushima are not in our imaginings but in the data obtained by
health departments and analyzed by epidemiologists. Anyone who says
differently is profiting from the nuclear industry.
Erica Gray
Ask
these researches to go visit the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power
station and come back after personally taking radiation readings inside
each the three buildings where the melted cores have left the reactor
vessesl and then let us know what fear is all about.
Adrien Burke
http://www.sickchirpse.com/photos-chernobyl-today/ The pictures our media won't publish. . . . Frightening birth defects around Chernobyl.
Nuclear Hotseat
Total
propaganda. False assurances, because the impact takes years to show
up... but it does show up. Birth defects, cancers, infant mortality,
mutations -- it's not emotion that's causing the thyroid nodules, bloody
noses and weakened immunity in Fukushima children. This is nuclear
industry BS.
LYING bullshit from paid trolls, this "study" is propaganda from the nuke industry.
Face it these ☢ Infomercials are just more Nuclear "Pie in the $KY" talk which is really just more Nuclear Begging for ever more R&D funds....
ReplyDeleteGet serious, Solar (of all flavors) can be installed instead and it will produce PROVEN SAFE CLEAN NON Nuclear Energy for 3-5 decades with no RISK (did I forget to say that it will also cost much less?).
Indeed CaptD, the lies of nukists need to come to and end, with their failed technology.
Delete