Pages
- Climate, Earthquake, and Vulcanism Resources
- 2018 Update On Actual Global Warming Data -- HadCRUT Data from the UK Charted
- Videos, Fukshima Blew Up in a Prompt Criticality
- Why Shut Down Nuke?
- Radiation Removal
- Rad Prep Shelter in Place Checklist
- Uranium Aerosolized Into Atmosphere
- Gundersen Email / Theories
- Largest Lies of Nuke
- Alternative Resources to the Big Tech Big Media
- Nuke Accidents 101
- Hormesis Is a Lie
- Renewable Energy PV
- Carrington Event and Space Weather Resources
- Rad Maps, Earthquakes, Nuke Bombs, High Quality Pictures
- Chernobyl Documentary 500K
- Home
- Conversions / Safety Limits
- 2020 Corona Virus Resources
- Prepper/Survival Resources And Protection from Radiation
Please share far and wide!
Search This Blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Its good he responded. You might not like the final answer.
ReplyDeleteSo Sarah was like "Wow this guy is emailing some non politically correct viewpoints, what should I do Jay?"
ReplyDeleteI think its Loosy who might not like the final answer... like he doesnt like that we remember facts he denied for so long.. "no meltdowns occurred", "there are no ongoing criticalities", and "No one has been injured by Fukushima radiation"... The final answer is this: there were at least three meltdowns, they cannot stop the coriums from fissioning, and there are at least 7 dead US sailors with more to come and MANY MANY excess thyroid cancers... Love (to hate) u loosy, keepin the trollin ball rollin on the same path of lies no matter what facts come your way.
ReplyDeleteI never said no meltdowns. Criticality is keff > or equal to 1. If you have to ask whats keff, you dont understand basic nuclear chain reactions. I think you confuse subcritical fission, which happens in the earth, with criticality.
ReplyDeleteThere is no specific evidence without confounders. Could have been chemical.
I think you realize Fukushima, if thats about as worse as it gets, still didnt kill anyone
Keep the tye dyed shirt on.
Lucey "those dirty hippies will be in the cold and dark"
DeleteI know the final answer. Diehard antinukes will never accept the proper science. They are too much entrenched in the no safe dose meme, while mans contribution to the radiation budget is only 0.1% of all radiation sources.
ReplyDeleteBetter not breathe the air.