Strzok Put On Mueller "Probe", But Retaining His Clearance to Declassify Information, Creating a Get Out Of Jail Card for His Co-Conspirators

New emails obtained by Judicial Watch show that a key negotiating point that Strzok was told to push hard on, was that Strzok had a special clearance to declassify materials.   This was a key point "negotiated" with those seeming all too willing to go along with the request.   Normally, when someone with special clearances (not just secret or top secret) moves departments, they do not take along any other special clearances.

So the question is why?   Because leaking of secret or top secret information is a felony and punishable under Treason, which could be penalized by death or life in jail.

So "they" needed at least to be able to say....well Strzok said it was declassified.    Get it now?   It's key to the conspiracy, the coup on Trump


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://truepundit.com/exclusive-fbis-own-political-terror-plot-deputy-director-and-fbi-brass-secretly-conspired-to-wage-coup-against-flynn-trump-2/

Part of the plan hatched at that gathering was to make sure Flynn’s wiretapped conversations were leaked to the media, FBI and intelligence sources said.

They were. Did the FBI leak this classified intelligence to the news media? 

Isn’t that a question President Trump and Congress should be posing? If nothing else, McCabe and his FBI secret council are certainly now suspects of who possibly leaked the intelligence. Seems that a number of polygraphs should be in order.

--------------------------------------------------- All below from the Daily Caller

First, by his own words, he rushed the conclusion of the investigation to clear her in time for her to take on Mr. Trump.

Second, it was Strzok who “interviewed” Mrs. Clinton after it had long been decided she would be cleared. Remarkably, even Agent Strzok apparently believed she was lying in that interview. 

Third, it was Strzok who made sure Director Comey’s speech exonerated Mrs. Clinton. Strzok changed the language describing her conduct from “gross negligence”—the precise language in the Espionage Act — to “extremely careless” — which did not trigger the statute.

Fourth, and most damning, it was Strzok who buried the news and evidence of 675,000 Clinton emails — ten times the amount Clinton claimed to have. The New York agents found this “entire file” of Clinton emails on the laptop of infamous sexual predator Anthony Weiner in late September 2016 — about six weeks before the election.  

Aside from the obvious immediate danger of having so much government and secret correspondence in the hands of a now-convicted sex offender, Weiner is the husband of Hillary’s consigliere Huma Abedin. Obviously, these 675,000 emails were the real thing. The Weiner laptop held everything the FBI supposedly have been trying to find for ages. It even held the Blackberry backups that Comey himself called the “golden emails” that he anticipated might evidence Clinton’s intent.

Fifth, Strzok knew this treasure trove of evidence could implicate Clinton and countless other Obama administration officials who emailed either her or Huma — her known proxy — about classified and other information on what they knew was her unsecured server.  

They already knew that President Obama himself was using an alias to email her on that server while she was in Russia or in China where it could easily have been hacked. It would have been logical to think Robert Mueller, then-head of the FBI, then Attorney General Eric Holder, then White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, then NSA Lisa Monaco, and countless other high Obama Administration officials were also emailing Mrs. Clinton on her secret unsecured server.
Remember, the entire “Uranium One” deal happened while she was Secretary of State. This computer file went back to 2006.

Sixth, it was Strzok who made the first official trip initiating the “Russia-collusion lie, and then he prioritized it over reviewing the 675,000 Clinton emails and Blackberry backups that stunned the New York Agents and the thirty-nine agents on the secure video-conference in which this “bomb” of information was dropped on FBI headquarters.

Seventh, it was Strzok who was FBI point person with Bruce Ohr who ran the back-channel between the FBI, Department of Justice, FusionGPS and Christopher Steele after the FBI “fired” Steele from working on the dossier that served as the false basis to get the phony FISA warrants to conduct especially intrusive surveillance of former Trump campaign affiliate Carter Page. It may have been Strzok who signed those applications for the FBI, but the name of the agents who did that have been redacted.

Eighth, it was Strzok and an unnamed DOJ attorney who shut down FBI general counsel Jim Baker’s efforts to search the Weiner laptop for Huma’s emails and Clinton’s Blackberry emails which were absolutely crucial to any real investigation. The FBI knew many government officials emailed Huma to give emails to Mrs. Clinton.

Ninth, it was Strzok who was one of only three people who claimed to have reviewed all of the non-duplicative Clinton emails over the weekend before Comey declared for the second time — and just days before the election—there was nothing new there. Of course, there wasn’t — Mr. Strzok and Co. had made sure of it. 

Tenth, Strzok with his lies, coverups and concoctions personified everything wrong with the FBI and Department of Justice’s conduct of the Clinton email coverup, abuses of surveillance powers and data, creation of the Russia-collusion lie, and the Robert Mueller investigation.

------------------------------------------------------------------
 from
https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/economy/2018/2950379.html

William Binney, the U.S. National Security Agency’s former technical director for global analysis, has, for the past year, been globe-trotting to investigate the actual evidence regarding the official Russiagate investigations, and he finds that the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, who is prosecuting Russia’s Government, can only accuse Russian officials, not convict any of them on at least the important charges, because conclusive evidence exists and has already been made public online, making clear that the important accusations against those officials are false. However, Binney can’t get any of the U.S. major ‘news’media’s interest in this fact, nor even into openly discussing it with them. Apparently, they don’t want to know. Binney is knocking on their doors, and they refuse to answer.