If all of these were true, and we could solve
climate change with nuclear, wouldn't we still be totally bat shite
crazy to accept nuclear if it could kill countries and destroy the human
genome.
If even one of those 5 is not fully true, then the argument never even gets started.
A remarkable
lack of vision: Only the past can determine the future.
No progress if that would have been the guidance of our ancestors!
You even forgot that those early NPP's were very unsafe.
The
policy change of Sweden and France, away from nuclear, shows that both
countries realized that they were on the wrong path with nuclear:
- Sweden decided for a ban on new nuclear and to expand renewable.
Not strange considering the damaging effects of NPP's on the genes of our next generations:
http://www.helmholtz-muenchen....
-
France installed recently a law to implement a reduction of the nuclear
share in its electricity supply from ~75% toward <50% within
10years!
Replacing it with more renewable.
http://oilprice.com/Alternativ...
A much faster demolition of nuclear than the German Energiewende scenario!
Also
motivated since it is shown that such nuclear waste storages damage the
genes of newborn within a radius of ~50km in their surrounding:
http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.....
Recent French governmental scenario study concluded that migrating towards
80% renewable in 2050 would be cheapest! Such result could be predicted considering earlier publications such as:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/s...
. . . . ',|;-,.¸ .¸¸ . . ¸,.,¸.
. . . . ¸,' ¸,. . ¸ `-,"~-~',¸,.¹-~-._¸,
. . . . ) . '"¨ . .):. .`-,;:.`,';;'¸,.¹¯¸¸,.-
. . .,-' , , , , ,-';:.. . .`-¸;:.`,'–~'`,¯-.,¸_,
. . ( ,•¸,-~'¨|;;;::.. .. . "-,;:/,`,-~-~¬¯. . . . . . .¸,..,¸ . . . . .¸,.-~–.¸_
. . . ¨`" . . . |;;;:::.. . .. . ¯¯`*¬~—¬¬"“~-,;:;;`"~–~":;;::,-"''“¯¨`
. . . . . . . . . ;;;::… . … , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¨`-,;;:;;::;;::;:;:`¬~-.¸
…'“““ /;;;:;::… ,, ..:;, . . . . . . . . . . ., ¸ . . . .`,;;:;:::;:;:;;-~"`¨¨`¬~
, . . . . . . . |;;::;:.. .:; .:;;¸ . . . . . . . . . ..:' . . . . . |;;::;;:;:;;"-~¬~-.,¸.-~'
. . . . . . . . . ;;::.. . “ .:;;;, . . . . . . . . . .::: . . . . . ,'`"~-,;;:;:;;.¸.,~–"`¨
. . . . . .¸.-~¬"`,-';:. . ..:;;::… .. .. . .. … ..:;;. . . . .,' . . . .`"*"`¯
. . . . l':,~-¬`;;:¸.-~¬"“`"¬~–~¬, ..:;;¸-'¨¯`;:.. ./
. … . . |`|/`",-'¯ . . . . . . . . . . . . .`,.::;; . . . `,;:.
. . . . . .l,/`/,.¸ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ).::;; . . . .`¸;:`,
. . . . . ./ (-.¸ ) . . . . . . . . . . . . .¸.-".:,-"' . . . . . ;:./
. . . . . |-~ . ¨ . . . . . . . . . . .¸-' ¸.-`' . . . . . . . . | /
. . . . . '-"¨ . . . . . . . . . . . . ./¨`/` . . . . . . . . . . / |
Let me sum up some facts:
There has always been a lot of K40 in the ocean, it comes from rocks, 11,800 Bq/m3, or 11.8 Bq/Liter
There is nearly zero "man made" K40, like .0000000000000000000000000001 percent from nuclear reactions or bombs. When atoms go into fission, they break apart in known percentages but roughly the same size and this can be easily visualized by the double hump chart. K40 is not an option, although once in a great rare while, crazy stuff does happen and every element under the sun could be a result BUT to .000000000000000000000000000001 percent. See the chart here:
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/09/radiation-education-how-fission-works.html
So man made radioactive K40 is almost nothing.
True that in a neutron bombardment, some K40 might be created but only when K is present, so not in a reactor, but only in case of bombs. And just because a neutron occurs and K is nearby, does not mean that the neutron will be captured and a K40 will result. Regardless, I expect this amount to be quite small in relation to all the K in the world.
Finally, lets not call this "man made" but man released, K40 from burning coal. Maybe something like 40 Bq/kG released from coal….as if we need another reason to hate coal.
PPS If I had to make a snap decision, say Codeshutdown had a magical K40 removing frequency generator, and offered to remove all…
Report comment
OK and one more. This silliness about biological half life of Potassium…..it is several hours for the body to rid itself of excess K of any type.
Not weeks. Weeks would represent the Bio HL of any particular specific set of atoms of K40, but for the K40 as a group, its just hours.
OK back to productive work LOL
I never meant the subject to explode like it did
GOM
I'm starting to see a bigger picture here..
Beginning to see the bigger picture eh? Dont let the light in all at once
-------------------------------------