Warren, you rock, I do find myself using your email 2 or 3 times a week.
I try to clean up my ranty demeanor and try to actually get a real response. She will get one from
me---
Keep in mind, this "lady" turned off the radiation monitors after Fukushima, and was promoted for that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mccarthy.gina@epa.gov
Gina, you keep stating that in the new energy efficiency and pollution targets that states get to choose how they plan on getting to those targets. But how can they plan on investments in solar PV or wind when they don't know whether federal tax credits will be around after 2016? How can they plan when the federal government waits until the last minute to extend a program or not.
And why would anyone want to invest in nuclear, with the huge usually 10 year wait time between financing, design, and first criticality? Besides Voglte themselves say they need to pull $65B in revenue from the plant or it won't make sense. That means that the kWH cost to consumers is going to double and maybe triple.
How does that mesh with your statement that these new rules are only going to cost a family the equivalent of a gallon of milk a month?
stock out
Pages
- Climate, Earthquake, and Vulcanism Resources
- 2018 Update On Actual Global Warming Data -- HadCRUT Data from the UK Charted
- Videos, Fukshima Blew Up in a Prompt Criticality
- Why Shut Down Nuke?
- Radiation Removal
- Rad Prep Shelter in Place Checklist
- Uranium Aerosolized Into Atmosphere
- Gundersen Email / Theories
- Largest Lies of Nuke
- Alternative Resources to the Big Tech Big Media
- Nuke Accidents 101
- Hormesis Is a Lie
- Renewable Energy PV
- Carrington Event and Space Weather Resources
- Rad Maps, Earthquakes, Nuke Bombs, High Quality Pictures
- Chernobyl Documentary 500K
- Home
- Conversions / Safety Limits
- 2020 Corona Virus Resources
- Prepper/Survival Resources And Protection from Radiation
No comments:
Post a Comment
Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments