strong enough and that can be applied to low dose exposure from any other source as well
having said that there is at least 1 study following those exposed in Chernobyl who did not get cancer to see why they did not when those living around them did
cognitive ability is needed for both example s
either way exposure to any ionizing radiation can never be considered a health benefit under any circumstance including when it is used as an alleged treatment for cancer
Its not a strong case. You are exposed to ionizing radiation just for being on this planet. This " no safe exposure" or "any exposure is dangerous" meme is without substance for low doses. Why do you think there has been much activity? Its because over half a century plus 20 yrs has occured since the first real documented exposure that can be quantified as a matter of risk determination, and people have lived. Frankly, with this scientific evidence, it doesnt surprise me that those without science would believe that dogma.
Its not a strong case.
ReplyDeletestrong enough
ReplyDeleteand that can be applied to low dose exposure from
any other source as well
having said that
there is at least 1 study following those exposed in Chernobyl who did not get cancer to see why they did not when those living around them did
cognitive ability is needed for both example s
either way
exposure to any ionizing radiation can never be considered a health benefit
under any circumstance
including when it is used as an alleged treatment for cancer
see
" the quest for the cures "
mike
Its not a strong case. You are exposed to ionizing radiation just for being on this planet. This " no safe exposure" or "any exposure is dangerous" meme is without substance for low doses. Why do you think there has been much activity? Its because over half a century plus 20 yrs has occured since the first real documented exposure that can be quantified as a matter of risk determination, and people have lived. Frankly, with this scientific evidence, it doesnt surprise me that those without science would believe that dogma.
ReplyDeleteYou are running out of time, atoms
Deletein or around august 6 1945
Deletethere was no other source of ionizing radiation present
until
3 days later
on august 9th 1945
so those test subjects were tested against a very large control group
which was
most of the humans living at the time in the rest of the world
so
that particular study does indeed use valid test protocol with documented data sources
and the conclusions are credible
always operate in KISS format
do not make things that are easy to see into complex puzzles designed to confuse
the regular
mortals