Just days behind in important knowledge can make a huge difference.
I was always concerned the the mass Vaxxing would result in increase COVID
cases even if nothing nefarious was going on. But I didn't understand just how bad it could be. See this exert below.
Peak vaccines per day is in the past, shedding (transmittance) should peak at 12 to 20 days out. Some lasting as long as 60 days, a few percentages
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=64842
‘vaccine’ is a fundamental problem to begin with. These ‘vaccine’ induced (long-lived) antibodies have high specificity, of course; they out-compete our natural antibodies.!! Our natural antibodies provide us with broad protection – this protection is variant non-specific. It does not matter what virus or COVID spread virus it is, our immune system will protect you – unless you suppress this innate sort of immunity. Or unless it is out-competed by long lived specific antibodies. Vaccine induced antibodies are permanent – you just can’t erase them; this is very serious. ***[0:38:52] Video Graphics… Geert uses the term ‘Long Lived Antibodies.’ In our natural immune system we have what is called ‘Non-Specific Antibodies.’ Our system of Non-Specific NK Cells will attack and eliminate any variant of the COVID virus that they find. This is how our natural immune system works – it is fantastic.!! … Now this is what happens when we are given a COVID Experimental ‘vaccine.’ This Experimental COVID ‘vaccine’ gives us only Irreversible Specific-Antibodies. The antibody created is for the Spike Protein of the original COVID virus. The Experimental ‘vaccine’ will fight off this COVID Spike Protein very well… The problem Geert talks about is that this ‘vaccine’ can only respond to the (original) targeted Spike Protein – it is antibody specific to the original COVID Spike Protein – but NOT to ANY of the subsequent mutations of the Spike Protein in the COVID virus.
So it looks like unless you beg for the "new Vax" every summer, you will not be protect against new variants. And at that point of "inject me with whatever, every year" it sure looks like a slippery slope.
We have seen it in Chickens, were the Vaxxed chickens get the disease, without the symptoms, and kill off the rest of the flock. Story HERE
--------------------------------------------------------
From
I have a great concern for this, family members and life long friends have taken the SHOT. To find the data on end results of the 3 trial study, you have to file with Pfizer, will consider requests from qualified researchers for access to Pfizer clinical data.
Then be directed to Vivli – here's the form:
https://vivli.org/vivliwp/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2020_07_15_Vivli-DUA-1.2.pdf
Vivli Platform - https://vivli.org/resources/vivli-secure-research-environment-2-2/
Now for the Build: Pfizer pdf -
https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/pfizer-vax.pdf
BioNTech (Mainz-Germany) has developed RNA-based vaccine candidates using a platform approach that enables the rapid development of vaccines against emerging viral diseases, including SARS-CoV-2.
Each vaccine candidate is based on a platform of nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA, BNT162b).
Each vaccine candidate expresses 1 of 2 antigens: the SARS-CoV-2 full-length, P2 mutant, prefusion spike glycoprotein (P2 S) (version 9) or a trimerized SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) (version 5).
The 2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates that will be tested in this study are therefore:
BNT162b1 (variant RBP020.3): a modRNA encoding the RBD;
BNT162b2 (variant RBP020.2): a modRNA encoding P2 S.
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy
This proves the Shedding Effect: From Pfizer pdf
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
• A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
• A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
• A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Also from the study we can find what was being hunted - Bleeding diathesis or condition associated with prolonged bleeding that would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate intramuscular injection.
In all cases, study results are reported by Pfizer in an objective, accurate, balanced, and complete manner and are reported regardless of the outcome of the study or the country in which the study was conducted. (link) www.clinicaltrials.gov
Some real science to this build and what you've been talking about:
SARS-CoV-2, similar to other previously identified Coronaviridae family members, encodes several structural proteins, such as spike, envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid, that are responsible for host penetration, binding, recycling, and pathogenesis. Structural biology has been a key player in understanding the viral infection mechanism and in developing intervention strategies against the new coronavirus. The spike glycoprotein has drawn considerable attention as a means to block viral entry owing to its interactions with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which acts as a receptor. Here, we review the current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 and its interactions with ACE2 and antibodies. Structural information of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and its complexes with ACE2 and antibodies can provide key input for the development of therapies and vaccines against the new coronavirus.
Full text can be found here: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/11/2343
I'll help kick this off with - Trial record 3 of 3 for: BNT162b1 (no stats but what is being studied)
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04368728?term=BNT162b1&draw=2&rank=3
The Ship: This will be in two parts.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Stock, but my goal here is to overcome a bad outcome if the mRNA goes haywire in vaxed people. In the article you posted above, this phrase is in which we can create a build to slow the mRNA. “Vaccine-induced antibodies are permanent – you just can’t erase them; this is very serious. Geert uses the term ‘Long Lived Antibodies.” That right there has us dumbfounded, it reminds me of Tritiated water, chemically identical to normal water where it replaces itself in exchange for a hydrogen atom from water and becomes water. At which point Tritium cannot be filtered out of the water. (ultiment element hacker) But let's look at what Monderna had to overcome to get the jean therapy to pass our immune system.
Overcoming Key Challenges
“Using mRNA to create medicines is a complex undertaking and requires overcoming novel scientific and technical challenges. We need to get the mRNA into the targeted tissue and cells while evading the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the resultant response may limit protein production and, thus, limit the therapeutic benefit of mRNA medicines. We also need ribosomes to think the mRNA was produced naturally, so they can accurately read the instructions to produce the right protein. And we need to ensure the cells express enough of the protein to have the desired therapeutic effect.”
The Ship Continued:
Delete3 very important factors are reviled from this challenge and calls for some reverse engineering.
1. Monderna had to create a shield around the mRNA not only to fool the immune system but enter the cell for coding from ribosomes. Through a process known as transcription, an RNA copy of a DNA sequence for creating a given protein. mRNA travels from the nucleus of the cell to the part of the cell known as the cytoplasm, which houses ribosomes. This is the operating system. If that shield around the mRNA is broken down like a hack the immune system won't let it near the ribosomes, hell it won't allow it to enter the cell.
2. Triggering the immune system before the mRNA can start protein production or removing the code from the mRNA. Through another process known as translation, ribosomes ‘read’ the mRNA, and follow the instructions, creating the protein step by step.
3. If the cells are slowed, no runaway effect can take place. Also if the artificial intelligence is removed from the mRNA the ribosomes cannot be read and no protein will be manufactured artificially, noted in 2 above.
Final note: This operating system is synthetic, man-made where Moderna knows how to update and/or turn off. If you got to pass the cell, you can get out or make the little monster go dormant. Also in the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, could we filter the little buggers out of our system using magnetisum? Like a blood transfusion that would pass through a magnetic “nano-filter field?” yeah, I just made that up LOL, but we have to start somewhere.
It also occurred to me this AM that since they are using iron, and blood loves iron, this is one of the reasons that there are so many blood and circulatory system problems.
Delete