Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Susan Rosenberg -- Bomber of US Capital 11-7-1983 Now Running Financing of BLM

 stock here -- I have not personally verified this information yet. 

Anyone with time for due diligence, greatly appreciated.



4 comments:

  1. Yes nd No

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blm-terrorist-rosenberg/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Snopes is not a reliable de-bunker, just saying. They were dirty out of the gate.

      Delete
  2. What would serve thy king? I know any link must have right wing attached to it or else. Prove to me "Snopes" is NOT a reliable source. Otherwise, do your own research that matches your bias's!

    Snopes is a fact checker not a debunker.
    A fact checker is;
    "Fact-checking is a process that seeks to verify factual information, in order to promote the veracity and correctness of reporting. Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text
    is published or otherwise disseminated. Wikipedia

    Synonyms for Fact Checker:
    inquiring
    Socratic.
    analytical.
    catechistic.
    doubtful.
    examining.
    fact-finding.
    heuristic.
    inquisitive.
    DEBUNK is NOT shown in the above, because these two words have nothing in common, they are completely differing thought processes.

    Debunked; is a completely different word;
    " to show that something is less important, less good, or less true than it has been made to appear:"
    "The writer's aim was to debunk the myth that had grown up around the actress."

    Meanings of debunk;
    abnegate, abnegationan, answer (sb) back, burst someone's bubble, idiom, contradiction, contradictory, deniabled, enial, disabuse fly, fly in the face of sth, idiom, hell, make (a) nonsense of sth, idiom, plead, recant, self-contradictory, speak, stand, stand sth on its head, idiom."

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/debunk
    Debunk
    verb [ T ] informal
    US /ˌdiːˈbʌŋk/ UK /ˌdiːˈbʌŋk/

    expose

    Snopes stands as legitimate "fact checker," no matter what the king says. A sad day indeed when the words you speak are irrelevant. What you say and what you mean are two different things or do you just like to screw with peoples minds and mislead them or alas your just not that well educated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats hilarious, to use Wikipedia to try to debunk my use of the word debunk.

      Snopes and Wikipedia are both horribly compromised.

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments