Was the Great Japan Earthquake Set Off Intentionally?

You know by using your brain and intuition, many problems can be satisfactorily solved via a simple thought experiment.

ENE was talking about the "human caused earthquake".

I have kept an open mind on this, until yesterday. I have become a bit of an earthquake statistician, intuitive pattern recognition, type guy.

I reviewed the "swarm" of largish 5 to 6 earth quakes in the NE area above Japan in the days prior to the "big one". 

 It doesn't make sense that this swarm of largish earthquakes would just be a coincidence, that this very unusual swarm occurred, just prior to a man made nuke or HAARP set off "the big one"

Does anyone need more evidence than that to throw out the highly unlikely conspiracy theory that the Big One was caused on purpose?

All thoughts appreciated.
I would like to see "proof" of shoppers milling around, etc.

BTW roads were split, travel was impeded for sure. 

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
irhologram

February 23, 2016 at 2:08 pm · Reply

Stock, allegedly screenshots show (which I have seen) 5s and 6s in the moments preceding the nine, allegedly not occurring a day before…but even if the day previous, the logic was that precursor EQs would have been a cue for setting off "events." So, your logic may not have included using these EQs as a predictive "cover"?
Pix of the incoming tsunami show buildings in tact, shoppers milling about…after no tsunami warning (which was in place) sounded… And a 9 should have flattened buildings, split roads, dismantled bridges, and set fires from there to Tokeyo. There's that.

stock

February 23, 2016 at 2:20 pm · Reply

Ir, indeed, that would sure be fortunate to the "diabolical scheme" that an extremely rate swarm of earthquakes occurred, after they had snook a large ship in, drilled a deep hole, inserted a nuclear device and then ran wires to at least sea bottom, to receive a patterned coded set off code from sub communication audio equipment on another nearby ship, just waiting around in case we got cover to set off the nuke.
Motive, opportunity, ability, and execution. All of these together make the chances of it being real, vanishingly small.
Indeed, I had considered that chance that it was perfect timing and cover….but so vanishingly small that it needs to be thrown out. In my opinion.
That said, what would be our benefit to proving this truth multiplied by the likelihood that it actually occurred, and multiplied by the chance that we can prove it true and get traction….what is that net expected benefit in relation to using our time in a more productive way….. 

Well, Stock, just one thing. If malevolence is of this ilk, it better serves to know history than allow it to be repeated. Opportunity, ability, and execution are no brainers after all, aren't they Stock?
As to motive, within days, Japan was on track to initiate an entirely electric car system, which DID in fact, then bite the dust, and Japan had just th bed is nose about buying into the international monetary policy…which HAS turned out, after all, to be mandatory.
I do not go to the mat for this, but in my mind, it's prerty dysfunctional to ignore the Undamaged coastline as the tsunami rolls in.