Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Saturday, May 23, 2020

Oregon States "In Order to Avoid Anarchy....We Need to Tolerate Anarchy"

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/2020/05/16/oregon-coast-reopening-coronavirus-fear-tourists-covid-outbreak/5190980002/

a lot of crap but i found the following in this article ...
Their definition of Essential Travel :

"Few state parks are open. People still can't stay overnight. And a phase one reopening means people are still supposed to avoid non-essential travel — meaning not traveling from the valley to the coast.
 
Their ADMISSION of guilt

"We understand that cabin fever is very real, but please wait just a little bit longer," Hall said. "Let us get through this safely. The beach isn't going anywhere."

Their fear of us :

"We have seven miles of open sand. We're not lacking in space," he said. "My only concern is that if we get completely inundated and had to shut down again, that would be anarchy.

the rational logical sounding answer to justify their taking away the Constitution :

"The reason the Oregon Coast was shut down in the first place was the fear of people from population centers spreading the virus, without knowing it, into a community with an older and more vulnerable population, and limited medical facilities. There are just 25 hospital beds each in Lincoln City and Newport. That fear hasn't really changed.
 
Their Control of the blind and deaf :

There remains no vaccine and limited treatment. And a spike in cases could be calamitous. "

Admission Nothing happened ,and (is this a threat / or fear inducing words ) if we fail to keep complying :

"The challenging thing is that we took all these measures and nothing happened, but that's really the point, that's a good thing," Lincoln County commissioner Kaety Jacobson said. "After all this sacrifice, you'd really hate to have a big uptick. We have to stay vigilant."

This is their own words... they themselves printed

Friday, May 22, 2020

We need a national day of remembrance for the reputations of journalists that died while in the line of the Press Secretary’s fire

There Will Be No Vaccine -- Test Vaccine on 15 Humans Put 20% of Those In The Hospital Within Weeks

And only half derived antibodies.

So it's really dangerous, and wouldn't even achieve herd immunity if EVERY single person took it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
“Despite Moderna’s cheery press release yesterday morning, the clinical trial results for its groundbreaking COVID vaccine could not be much worse. The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental MRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump’s ambitions “warp speed” time line. 

Dr Fauci was so confident of his shot’s safety that he waved animal studies. That appears to have been a mistake. Three of the 15 human guinea pigs in the high dose cohort (250 mcg) suffered a “serious adverse event” within 43 days of receiving Moderna’s jab. 

Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data, but its press release, which was freighted with inconsistencies acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention. “ Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study. 

A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if administered to “every person on earth”. That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown.Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants.

These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead;challenging participants with wild COVID infection. Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and animals achieved robust antibody response then sickened and died when exposed to the wild virus.

Moderna’s press announcement heralded “Positive Interim Phase 1 findings”. I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys.”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

How to Sue Your Governor

It may come to throwing lead, but we sure hope it doesn't get there.
Saw on QRV

--------------------------------------------------------------------
How To Sue Your Governor

Over the past month of advocating for civil disobedience against the corona ban, I’ve received many requests on how a person goes about suing the government.

A wonderful and fitting article about being civilly disobedient ran at the American Institute for Economic Research entitled “Why Aren’t Americans Suing Their Way Out Of Lockdown?”
That article, by Robert E. Wright, presents a legal framework for why more lawsuits should take place. Below, I’m going to offer a framework for HOW to make that happen. If the courts were inundated with 30 million lawsuits tomorrow, it would be a great thing. I once had the joy of suing the government in a manner similar to this one. Alternately, if even just one key test case is brought before the courts successfully, as Wright describes in his piece, it could have a tremendous impact that ripples through the country.

I’m not deluding myself into thinking that the government judiciary will free America from government tyranny, but once in a while they require a tyrant to explain himself, allow a citizen to redress grievances, and occasionally act as a tool to help right wrongs.
If you think you have been harmed by the corona bans, below are some first steps that can be taken to help set that lawsuit into motion.

Step 1: Decide: Pro Se, Public Interest & Pro Bono, Or Your Own Private Attorney
“Pro se” means you represent yourself. A lot of people have a lot of fun doing that. You learn a lot about the process. Though I think it’s a great education, I’m not convinced it is right for this pressing, emergency topic.

If you decide you’d like to do this pro se, the rest of the article is irrelevant, so please get to work on that and Godspeed. May you have the greatest of success. For the rest of you, I’ll continue.
Public interest lawyers seek cases that have a benefit that goes beyond just one person. They tend to seek a grave government injustice that needs overturning. Sometimes they work free of charge to their client, or “pro bono.” I believe on this topic, there are many lawyers out there who will take a case pro bono if asked.
Many more attorneys will take this case for money. There may be a lower level of philosophical commitment in that situation and a higher level of economic commitment.
I would suggest starting by seeking a pro bono attorney and keeping track of the paid attorneys you encounter along the way with a noted interest in your specific case, in case you decide to reach back out to them and fund the case yourself.

Step 2: Keep Organized
Simple spreadsheets are good for this. Pads of paper are useful, but not great, because URLs can be long. You’ll want columns for the lawyer name, URL, phone number, dates you’ve reached out, and responses. Everything you learn during your search should end up in your spreadsheet, because having everything in one place will make the succeeding steps easier.

Step 3: Identify Potential Lawyers
During this next step, you are aiming to find a broad selection of lawyers. Like brainstorming, you are adding anyone who might take the case to your list, regardless of whatever downsides there might be to working with them. The longer the list made in this step, the better.

Are There Authors Or Legal Theorists You Like?

If you have a favorite author on this topic who has a law degree, chances are he knows other lawyers with a passion for this topic. Reach out. Ask for a referral.

Though the list is from 2011, Walter Block compiled a fantastic, exhaustive list of libertarian legal theorists toward the end of the linked post that can serve as a useful reference.

Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes has been active in the media on Covid-19 overreach. His firm may take an interest in representing you.

Are There Cases You Have Followed?

There might be notable public interest cases you’ve heard of. They may have taken place a few years back. See if you can find the lawyers who were involved with those cases. There could be a lawyer, whose work you respect, who knows how to use the courts to gets things done. Reach out.
Tap Your Network

You likely know lawyers personally. Tell them what you plan to do, ask them if they know anyone who might be interested. Send them a version of your letter from the step below. If you feel like a request to represent you is too bold, you can ask “Do you happen to know a lawyer who could represent me in a lawsuit against the lockdown orders” or “Might you be able to refer me to a lawyer who could represent me in a lawsuit against the lockdown orders.”

You likely know non-lawyers who know lawyers. Check with them too.
People who share your passion about this topic are probably going to be better to reach out to than those who have been on Next Door snitching on neighbors and calling for 18-month rolling lockdowns.

Try to make sure that anyone you reach out to goes into your spreadsheet. Using your network is probably forty to fifty times more effective, for the average person, than reaching out cold, but you can find available lawyers through a cold process as well.

Examples Of Public Interest Lawyers Who May Take An Interest In Your Corona Case
Institute for Justice has at least one member of their staff who has taken an interest in the topic of corona bans and invites people to submit details, like the letter above to their “report abuse,” section of their website, which is the page dedicated to asking IJ for legal assistance on a matter.
The Thomas Moore Law Center focuses on family values, life, religious freedom, and calls itself “the Christian response to the ACLU.”

Southeastern Legal Foundation is a public interest law firm and policy center that advocates for limited government, individual liberty, free enterprise.

Pacific Justice Institute advocates for the defense of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties.

The Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund seeks to make sure cases get heard not only at the local level, but also at the appellate level, a useful niche for helping to combat bad policy.
Landmark Legal Foundation is a national non-profit law firm preserving constitutional values such as limited government, separation of powers, and federalism.

American Civil Liberties Union has a network of staffed offices in every state, Washington DC, and Puerto Rico. Their local affiliates can be contacted directly to see if a case is of interest.

The ACLU has at least one lawsuit seeking to overturn a corona ban. Rather than a central office determining what cases they will take, if you contact your local ACLU chapter, you can find out if they would 1.) take your case or 2.) send a referral out to their referral network.
Judicial Watch mainly uses litigation to help uncover government malfeasance. In preparation for this piece, they notified me by phone that they were not presently interested in this topic.
The James Madison Center exists to protect free expression.

The First Amendment Lawyers Association will distribute your request to their membership from their contact page.

Liberty Counsel filed a lawsuit on behalf of Maryville Baptist Church in Louisville and its pastor Jack Roberts against Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear for the singling out of his church in a particularly brutal enforcement of the corona lockdown, as other businesses nearby had full parking lots and few restrictions. Liberty Counsel is currently representing pastors in more than 30 states.
The Alliance for Defending Freedom had a recent victory in Kansas with a federal judge ruling to protect churches from a corona ban and Tyson Langhofer of the organization pointing out “Public safety is important, but so is following the Constitution.”

The Center for American Liberty, is a legal advocacy organization, that is fighting the California lockdown orders on several front, including filing a lawsuit against Gov. Gavin Newsom last week for prohibiting in-person church services, as well as representing an organizer of a San Diego protest against the lockdown.

In Ohio, 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, is bringing a lawsuit on behalf of bridal shop owner Tanya Rutner Hartman, against Ohio Health Director Dr. Amy Acton In US District Court, challenging the constitutionality of ordering her business closed for being non-essential.
The 1851 Center is “A non-profit, non-partisan law firm dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of Ohioans from government.” The state you live in may have a similar state-specific organization.

Arizona’s Goldwater Institute takes on litigation in Arizona and across the country and has a network of lawyers, the American Freedom Network, for cases that the Goldwater Institute does not take on.
If you are at a loss in identifying a state specific organization, the State Policy Network Membership Directory, may be a good starting place. In that directory, almost every organization designates a contact person as well as listing an email and phone number for reaching them. Keep in mind that not all members show a strong interest in litigating and, naturally, not all organizations who will take an interest in this topic are included in their membership list. Many other organizations exist, this is merely a subset.

Tap THEIR Referral Network

Every group on the list above has attorneys in their orbit who care deeply about the topics that those groups focus on. If they don’t have someone on staff who wants to work with you, they may be willing to send out information about your request to their network. That email to the network can be very effective in finding a lawyer. Keep this in mind.

If in response to a referral request, they say “Contact your local bar association,” that is lawyer speak for “Take a hike, we’re not interested.” Don’t take that personally.

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/how-to-sue-your-governor/

25 US States Deaths, Charted, Modeled, Where Is Your State At? Taking Requests

stock here.   heh, if you like this stuff, sign up as a follower, I might even think someone is paying attention or appreciates the work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


I charted a bunch of states yesterday, and have requests for 11 more, LOL 11 is my number.

As always blogger sucks, but click for a large clear image, easy to read the dates.    

But look at Massachusetts, and especially the weird 7 day moving average.    10 States participating in the Apr 29 Spikefest.   It was planned at least a week in advance and coordinated.    All by phone call?    Must almost for sure be a group phone call, unless one party is creating the plan and then just distributing "orders".   Maybe they did it on Zoom.

This looks treasonous to me, what could their excuse possible be?   "Oh, we did it in an over abundance of caution, we figured it was better for people to be scared than dead."

New Hampshire, Very few deaths

New Hampshire -- Toughest model I have ever done.   Data all over the board.   I had to model based on the 7 day MA In Red, Model in Orange.    Look at the tabular data, they have to under report, and borrow deaths from the future to show the scary spikes.


Florida, Gov Santos opened up very early.



stock here.    I have been catching up on my real life, and had to put the charts aside for awhile.

Taking requests....what States do you want to see with the "presented deaths" and the model.

 CLICK ON ALL CHARTS FOR A MUCH BETTER VIEW!

For about 10 states I have the models that were done around 4-26-20, almost a month ago.   They represent how a real virus would present data based upon a "declining exponent model".

This can change, I'll present my entire Pandemic Model theory someday, but let's sum it up quick.   There is a Measure called R-Naught, R sub 0, or looks like this, but a real pain to type



R0

It says how well the virus can jump from one human to another, how many other humans are likely to get the virus from one infected human.

For each virus there is an inherent R-naught, it the nature of the beast when presented to a totally unaware, never seen this virus before, population.     Now my science and modeling is based upon what I call the R-naught effective.    How well does the virus jump, how many other humans will one human infect given other variables, and in the models using data, it really doesn't matter what the other factors are.    The numbers speak for themselves and create the R-naught-effective



R0E
Any number of factors can be modeled, the most important being, the number of people in the community who are now immune, and the Social Distancing which is a very deceptive term.   It doesn't mean the number of feet away from the other people, which has become so popular at the magical 6 feet.    A much better measure is the amount of "spray" from one sick person to another, and this can come just from talking, especially talking forcefully.   Sneezing is worst, and coughing is second. 

So Wisconsin here....Model is from 6 weeks ago, and you can see ---
Once the "Gang of 10" Governors Crossed the RUBICON of the Apr 29 Spike Fest, they lost all fear of complete data fudging


Washington State, horrific citizen abuse

Washington State, one ridiculous final spike and then every day after that....one death per day.   
Sorry Cabal, Flu season is over.....
New Jersey completed, from almost 7 weeks ago, they lied, and they are out of ammunition!


Michigan!   Wretched Gretchen


Connecticut


California

Florida

Georgia on my Mind!   Good for them... bolstering herd immunity with a good infection rate and declining deaths...... and prospering economy.

Idaho
Oregon

Maryland



Alabama

Tennesee



Kansas


New York


Nevada

Pennsylvania

 






North Carolina











Colorado