Monday, April 2, 2012
Comparison table of Geiger Counters
http://www.geigercounters.com/CompareModels.htm
Youtube comparison of 3 Geigers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQLbUaE6CB0
Youtube comparison of 3 Geigers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQLbUaE6CB0
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Geiger Readings in Oahu, Hawaii
Just got my rad alert inspector set up.
Oahu, Hawaii
.05 to .11 microSv per hour, that is roughly .4 to .9 millSv per year (for simplicity I use an 8 multiplier), which is really low, checked the low lying areas where water would collect, no discernible difference
Wiped windshield, the whole thing, and reading went from .06 up to .1
2 HEPA filters, very dirty, been running over 30 days 24/7, readings went up to around .2, which is still only 1.6mSv per year.
This is really good, at this moment Hawaii looks "safe"
Now the hard part....sending my inspector to Japan to a family that needs one. Buying another......another long wait, but I guess it takes Japanese people 9 month wait list to get a geiger.
From Ray Masalas on Nuclear Hot Seat
Ray Masalas
Oahu, Hawaii
.05 to .11 microSv per hour, that is roughly .4 to .9 millSv per year (for simplicity I use an 8 multiplier), which is really low, checked the low lying areas where water would collect, no discernible difference
Wiped windshield, the whole thing, and reading went from .06 up to .1
2 HEPA filters, very dirty, been running over 30 days 24/7, readings went up to around .2, which is still only 1.6mSv per year.
This is really good, at this moment Hawaii looks "safe"
Now the hard part....sending my inspector to Japan to a family that needs one. Buying another......another long wait, but I guess it takes Japanese people 9 month wait list to get a geiger.
From Ray Masalas on Nuclear Hot Seat
Ray Masalas
I'm still learning myself. My readings are always in micro-sieverts, but simplify this very confusing subject (9 X background} says it all. No matter what system you use. My normal background is around 0.12 micro-sieverts so..... What they call natural raydon can be up tp triple background. I have no raydon. My stome basement is 130 years old and reads 0.12. But to save arguing with sceptics, {And uploadind to u-tube is a big pain in the ass} I only film and upload when our rain is above 4X background. At 0.40 the lower screen turns yellow. {radiation alert} At 1.20 micro-sieverts it's turns red {Get outta Dodge} Sometimes the rain is hot for 10 minutes, sometimes for hours. The plume has to intersect the weather. If you were in the US system and your normal background was 25 CPM {Counts per minute} your geiger would read 225. At 100 CPM and 0.40 microsieverts the watch dogs are suppose to warn us. This was more than double the warning level. Hope this helps.
German Report on Fukushima, Interview with ex PM Kan
HEY, if you like this stuff, sign up as a follower! Its easy and free. And keep in mind this is a sponsor supported blog.
============================================================
Excellent video, German reporters in Japan, investigating Fukushima.
For anyone doubting how the Nuke Cartel operates, this is the smoking gun.
The whole lies, report fabrications, regulatory capture, are laid bare in this sub-titled report. At minutes 11 and 16 ex Prime Minister Kan details in no uncertain terms how the Nuclear Village operates through lies, extortion, personnel insertions into government and then back into TEPCO.
This is coming right from the top. This has been reviewed by a Japanese national who is also fluent in English and they agree that the translation is absolutely correct.
============================================================
Excellent video, German reporters in Japan, investigating Fukushima.
For anyone doubting how the Nuke Cartel operates, this is the smoking gun.
The whole lies, report fabrications, regulatory capture, are laid bare in this sub-titled report. At minutes 11 and 16 ex Prime Minister Kan details in no uncertain terms how the Nuclear Village operates through lies, extortion, personnel insertions into government and then back into TEPCO.
This is coming right from the top. This has been reviewed by a Japanese national who is also fluent in English and they agree that the translation is absolutely correct.
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Solar Power at Night
Solar
Hey If you have to have molten salts to provide 24/7 electricity, wouldn't you rather have them at a solar power plant rather than a Nuke power plant?
Solar power at night
Pro Nuke Trolls keep harping on the "baseload" as if baseload is a catch phrase that will knock renewable out of competition, and make make Nuke the only thing that can save the world. BULLSHIT. With a little bit of steady power from solar plants like this, and with diversity by interconnected grid so that various areas producing solar and wind energy share with those that are currently short on wind and PV energy.
Click here for a wind map of the whole US
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LUCDmWTVlGo
Hey If you have to have molten salts to provide 24/7 electricity, wouldn't you rather have them at a solar power plant rather than a Nuke power plant?
Solar power at night
Pro Nuke Trolls keep harping on the "baseload" as if baseload is a catch phrase that will knock renewable out of competition, and make make Nuke the only thing that can save the world. BULLSHIT. With a little bit of steady power from solar plants like this, and with diversity by interconnected grid so that various areas producing solar and wind energy share with those that are currently short on wind and PV energy.
Click here for a wind map of the whole US
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LUCDmWTVlGo
Friday, March 30, 2012
Some links found on ENENEWS
Plutonium info
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,188.0.html
Current Jet Stream, EQ, Weather, Fuku Debris Tracking Links
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.msg263.html#msg263
Low/High Internal/External Effects on Children and All Living Things
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,9.0.html
How bad is it? Fukushima vs. Chernobyl
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.msg332.html#msg332
What you and your loved ones can do .. remediating rads from the body
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,9.0.html
Aloha All … please tell everybody
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,132.0.html
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,188.0.html
Current Jet Stream, EQ, Weather, Fuku Debris Tracking Links
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.msg263.html#msg263
Low/High Internal/External Effects on Children and All Living Things
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,9.0.html
How bad is it? Fukushima vs. Chernobyl
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.msg332.html#msg332
What you and your loved ones can do .. remediating rads from the body
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,9.0.html
Aloha All … please tell everybody
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,132.0.html
Troll Jousting
Thanks for your definition of Troll Jousting!
Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to publish it on urbandictionary.com.
It should appear on this page in the next few days:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Troll%20Jousting
Urban Dictionary
-----
Troll Jousting
Troll Jousting is the act of retorting comments on blogs that have been placed by trolls, or paid commentators who place comments to support a particular vested interest. The
Troll Jouster places comments that show the falseness of the Troll
Wow nice Troll Jousting dude, you really bitch slapped that Troll.
Yeah, thanks eh brah! I couldn't believe that Pro Nuke Troll was actually saying that radiation can be beneficial to your health. I had to slap 'em back in case some innocent
bystander saw that Troll comment and believed it.
Well, good work dude, keep up the Troll jousting on that blog, and remember, there are NO innocent bystanders.
Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to publish it on urbandictionary.com.
It should appear on this page in the next few days:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Troll%20Jousting
Urban Dictionary
-----
Troll Jousting
Troll Jousting is the act of retorting comments on blogs that have been placed by trolls, or paid commentators who place comments to support a particular vested interest. The
Troll Jouster places comments that show the falseness of the Troll
Wow nice Troll Jousting dude, you really bitch slapped that Troll.
Yeah, thanks eh brah! I couldn't believe that Pro Nuke Troll was actually saying that radiation can be beneficial to your health. I had to slap 'em back in case some innocent
bystander saw that Troll comment and believed it.
Well, good work dude, keep up the Troll jousting on that blog, and remember, there are NO innocent bystanders.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Nuke Makes No Economic Sense
Nuke makes no sense from an economic viewpoint.
It costs around $15B to build a modern nuke plant, and takes about 10 years.
Investors want a 10% or even 20% annual rate of return in general, maybe on something super safe and reliable they would be willing to receive 7%.
But with nuke, picture that at year 5 you have the heavy infrastructure in place, much of the big money spent, say $10B,
At that point investors would want at least $1B minimum a year, and yet you have to wait 5 more years to get anything.
Typical nuke plants generate around $250M per year in profits.
At completion----if they are not shut down by protests and shoddy workmanship-----the investors money has been tied up for ten years and with $15B invested
So now they can make $250M per year if all goes well.
$250M / 15B = 1.66% Annual Rate of Return ---which is a total joke, no investor would want this deal, so why are nuke plants being built?
The military /industrial nuke cartel doesn't go down easily, they keep chasing after their cheese in the same old places they always found it, even though it makes no sense.
I can easily get 25% annual rate of return on a solar electric investment. That means that solar is a 15 times better investment, and no evacuation zone and no eternal vigilance over the waste products.
Shut Them All Down!
It costs around $15B to build a modern nuke plant, and takes about 10 years.
Investors want a 10% or even 20% annual rate of return in general, maybe on something super safe and reliable they would be willing to receive 7%.
But with nuke, picture that at year 5 you have the heavy infrastructure in place, much of the big money spent, say $10B,
At that point investors would want at least $1B minimum a year, and yet you have to wait 5 more years to get anything.
Typical nuke plants generate around $250M per year in profits.
At completion----if they are not shut down by protests and shoddy workmanship-----the investors money has been tied up for ten years and with $15B invested
So now they can make $250M per year if all goes well.
$250M / 15B = 1.66% Annual Rate of Return ---which is a total joke, no investor would want this deal, so why are nuke plants being built?
The military /industrial nuke cartel doesn't go down easily, they keep chasing after their cheese in the same old places they always found it, even though it makes no sense.
I can easily get 25% annual rate of return on a solar electric investment. That means that solar is a 15 times better investment, and no evacuation zone and no eternal vigilance over the waste products.
Shut Them All Down!
San Onofre to be Shutdown---Massive Community Support to shut down
Even the original architect came out stating the enormous dangers.
http://www.sanclementegreen.org/files/Agrans%20Speech.pdf
We first listened to Councilman Larry Agran give his opening remarks which turned out to be the best description ever, giving a total overview of nuclear power right down to why we need to shutdown San Onofre in a thoughtful and responsible manner as soon as we can. After a heartfelt standing ovation the meeting was opened to public comments. The first speaker was Dr. Nelson Mar, PhD., one of the original designers of the power plant who cited many reasons to be concerned. Doctors and experts in the fields of radiation spoke convincingly, mothers spoke compassionately, activists spoke informatively. Edison was left speechless and they declined to make any comments until they had a chance to figure out how to spin this one.
HT CaptD
http://www.sanclementegreen.org/files/Agrans%20Speech.pdf
We first listened to Councilman Larry Agran give his opening remarks which turned out to be the best description ever, giving a total overview of nuclear power right down to why we need to shutdown San Onofre in a thoughtful and responsible manner as soon as we can. After a heartfelt standing ovation the meeting was opened to public comments. The first speaker was Dr. Nelson Mar, PhD., one of the original designers of the power plant who cited many reasons to be concerned. Doctors and experts in the fields of radiation spoke convincingly, mothers spoke compassionately, activists spoke informatively. Edison was left speechless and they declined to make any comments until they had a chance to figure out how to spin this one.
HT CaptD
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Phone numbers for Cali senators, its a bad SONGs
07:35 PM on 03/27/2012
Who are California's Senators and what are they doing about this? 
24 hours ago ( 8:03 PM)
Senator Boxer, who happens to head the NRC Oversight Comm.(202) 224-3553
Senator Dianne Feinstein
(202) 224-3841
1 second ago ( 7:59 PM)
+1000000, they HATE phone calls!!!! Sunday, March 25, 2012
Solar Estimate for anti-radiation Fan
Luck bucket, our three tier system here is horrible. I live in the geothermal capital of the US and we pay 1.12 to 3.17 per kilowatt hr. Once you go over your baseline they literally rape us. I've got to go solar.
Most people don't know just how affordable solar is. So I had a pretty darn accurate cost and savings estimate done for him.
Here is an insolation map
Cali Insolation Data
There is a real easy way to calculate energy production by just knowing the isolation either in sun-hours or kWH/m2/day. It is not tricky at all, you can do all kind of calcs by day of year, time of day, tilt of panels, compass angle of panels, BUT all that is unnecessary in order to analyze solar as an investment and to get a good annual average.
Sunhours * # of PV Panels * Panel Rated DC Watts *.824 = kWH per day
VERY VERY simple
Fed has tax credit of 30%, very simple
Different areas and states have various incentives
Expected Performance-Based Buydowns for systems under 30 kW began in 2007 at $2.50/W AC for residential and commercial systems (adjusted based on expected performance) and $3.25/W AC for government entities and nonprofits (adjusted based on expected performance). The incentive levels decline as the aggregate capacity of PV installations increases. Incentives will be awarded as a one-time, up-front payment based on expected performance, which is calculated using equipment ratings and installation factors such as geographic location, tilt, orientation and shading. Click here for current incentive levels for each utility. Systems under 30 kW also have the option of opting for a performance-based incentive rather than the incentive based on expected performance.
At around 3.8kWAC for my proposed system, they could receive State incentive of
3800*2.5 = $9,680
See proposal, net cost around $7000
Annual Production around 7350 kWH
At his really high rates, that is a savings of $8,230 per year
Total Lifetime system production
$7000 system cost / 205230 = 3.4 cents per kWH
Annual rate of return on investment around 124% (compared that to 3% on a 10 year T bill)
And its an inflation hedge, against oil and nuke cost riders.
What part of no brainer does this take to understand? No evacuation zone.
Most people don't know just how affordable solar is. So I had a pretty darn accurate cost and savings estimate done for him.
Here is an insolation map
Cali Insolation Data
There is a real easy way to calculate energy production by just knowing the isolation either in sun-hours or kWH/m2/day. It is not tricky at all, you can do all kind of calcs by day of year, time of day, tilt of panels, compass angle of panels, BUT all that is unnecessary in order to analyze solar as an investment and to get a good annual average.
Sunhours * # of PV Panels * Panel Rated DC Watts *.824 = kWH per day
VERY VERY simple
Fed has tax credit of 30%, very simple
Different areas and states have various incentives
Expected Performance-Based Buydowns for systems under 30 kW began in 2007 at $2.50/W AC for residential and commercial systems (adjusted based on expected performance) and $3.25/W AC for government entities and nonprofits (adjusted based on expected performance). The incentive levels decline as the aggregate capacity of PV installations increases. Incentives will be awarded as a one-time, up-front payment based on expected performance, which is calculated using equipment ratings and installation factors such as geographic location, tilt, orientation and shading. Click here for current incentive levels for each utility. Systems under 30 kW also have the option of opting for a performance-based incentive rather than the incentive based on expected performance.
At around 3.8kWAC for my proposed system, they could receive State incentive of
3800*2.5 = $9,680
See proposal, net cost around $7000
Annual Production around 7350 kWH
At his really high rates, that is a savings of $8,230 per year
Total Lifetime system production
| 205230 | kwh total produced | |||||||||
$7000 system cost / 205230 = 3.4 cents per kWH
Annual rate of return on investment around 124% (compared that to 3% on a 10 year T bill)
What part of no brainer does this take to understand? No evacuation zone.
EIEA Project Decreasing Demand for Electricity
Even More of a Reason to Start Shutting Down the Nukes
Here is a link to their website, easy to make reports
http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/tablebrowser/#release=APA2010&subject=6-APA2010&table=10-APA2010®ion=0-0&cases=kgl_reference-d062910a
Here is a link to their website, easy to make reports
http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/tablebrowser/#release=APA2010&subject=6-APA2010&table=10-APA2010®ion=0-0&cases=kgl_reference-d062910a
Veterans Today
Veterans Today has some very independent articles, even radical if I may say so.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/19/the-nine-stages-of-civilization-were-in-the-seventh-apathy/
The United States is just over 230 years old and is now firmly entrenched in the seventh stage of all civilizations (Apathy) with only Dependence and eventually Bondage ahead of it. Apathy is the glove into which evil slips its eager hand
The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through a nine stage sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacence to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependency back again into bondage.
Toxicity of Plutonium, Chelation
I never did believe that "one speck of plutonium" will kill you
But it sure looks like bad stuff, real bad, read up.
http://www.ccnr.org/plute_tox.html
Even the EPA (credible or not) says it is serious:
Once in the bloodstream, plutonium moves throughout the body and into the bones, liver, or other body organs. Plutonium that reaches body organs generally stays in the body for decades and continues to expose the surrounding tissue to radiation.
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/plutonium.html
I did a few hours of research on Chelation via EDTA and others. Looks very effective if the Pu and Ur are just in your blood, way less effective once they bury into your bones and organs, but still somewhat effective.
There are oral intakes and supposedly stomach acid destroys much of the EDTA right away, and suppository, and IV. If I felt that I was severely contaminated, and I had no medical backup, I would self adminster this IF I also has access to all the replacement vitamins.
So what I am saying is that this is a serious thing, and there is only one scenario under which I would self-administer without medical backup.
We got dosed, no doubt, how badly, very hard to say. Don't expect much help---this problem is too big to solve.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/plutonium-admission-by-epa.html
But it sure looks like bad stuff, real bad, read up.
http://www.ccnr.org/plute_tox.html
Even the EPA (credible or not) says it is serious:
Once in the bloodstream, plutonium moves throughout the body and into the bones, liver, or other body organs. Plutonium that reaches body organs generally stays in the body for decades and continues to expose the surrounding tissue to radiation.
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/plutonium.html
I did a few hours of research on Chelation via EDTA and others. Looks very effective if the Pu and Ur are just in your blood, way less effective once they bury into your bones and organs, but still somewhat effective.
There are oral intakes and supposedly stomach acid destroys much of the EDTA right away, and suppository, and IV. If I felt that I was severely contaminated, and I had no medical backup, I would self adminster this IF I also has access to all the replacement vitamins.
So what I am saying is that this is a serious thing, and there is only one scenario under which I would self-administer without medical backup.
We got dosed, no doubt, how badly, very hard to say. Don't expect much help---this problem is too big to solve.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/plutonium-admission-by-epa.html
Nuke is High Cost of Departure
In response to a pro-nuker feigning support for solar at first, and then bringing out his real party line
“Splendid....kudos for your conservation but how realistic is solar? Last I checked the technology was still well behind making it a cost effective, "viable" alternative for the average user. Granted the technology has been in place to do conversions for decades, but not for what the average user could consider a reasonable cost.
____________________________________________________
Its extremely realistic, there has been a sea change in the last 2 years.
Solar at 3 cents per kWH, fixed price for 30 years. You could imagine paying $1.50 for a utility kWH in 30 years? Sheesh, its 35 cents per kWH in Hawaii now.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/renewable-and-energy-efficiency.html
Nukers are stuck in a rut, they have a very high cost of departure, so instead they keep running the clunker plants and they refuse to get new occupations
You heard of high cost to entry in a business model? Nuke is HIGH COST OF DEPARTURE.
“Splendid....kudos for your conservation but how realistic is solar? Last I checked the technology was still well behind making it a cost effective, "viable" alternative for the average user. Granted the technology has been in place to do conversions for decades, but not for what the average user could consider a reasonable cost.
____________________________________________________
Its extremely realistic, there has been a sea change in the last 2 years.
Solar at 3 cents per kWH, fixed price for 30 years. You could imagine paying $1.50 for a utility kWH in 30 years? Sheesh, its 35 cents per kWH in Hawaii now.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/renewable-and-energy-efficiency.html
Nukers are stuck in a rut, they have a very high cost of departure, so instead they keep running the clunker plants and they refuse to get new occupations
You heard of high cost to entry in a business model? Nuke is HIGH COST OF DEPARTURE.
Radnet Custom Search
The EPA Radnet Website is very confusing
Once you find something, it can be nearly impossible to back track and find it again
So here is a link to the custom search page, it is powerful
http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/radnet_adhoc_where.retrieval_list?table_1=dummy&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANALYTE_ID&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANA_NUM&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_AMOUNT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.CSU&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.MDC&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_UNIT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_DATE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANA_TYPE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.HALF_LIFE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.HALF_LIFE_TIME_UNIT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANALYTE_NAME
Once you find something, it can be nearly impossible to back track and find it again
So here is a link to the custom search page, it is powerful
http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/radnet_adhoc_where.retrieval_list?table_1=dummy&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANALYTE_ID&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANA_NUM&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_AMOUNT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.CSU&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.MDC&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_UNIT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.RESULT_DATE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANA_TYPE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.HALF_LIFE&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.HALF_LIFE_TIME_UNIT&table_1=V_ERAMS_RESULTS_ANALYTE.ANALYTE_NAME
Plutonium the biggest problem, and Chelation
http://voices.yahoo.com/is-plutonium-release-real-danger-8071658.html
Here is a link to a site documenting other EPA data that does show significant Plutonium contamination in Guam, Hawaii, California
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/04/27/plutonium-levels-california-43-times-hawaii-11-times-highest-levels-20-years-20549/
Chelation must be done quickly
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q4952.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16305471
WHAT! Nuke researchers lying?
http://books.google.com/books?id=kHHYOtogBEgC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=chelation+for+plutonium&source=bl&ots=wAJ0Lws_0j&sig=L7BDI6iMmdJg5Ws9_KQa_8ZdAVE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pdZuT97xJqSWiQLg0O3CAg&ved=0CG0Q6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=chelation%20for%20plutonium&f=false
Chelation of Uranium
http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/1/88.short
Here is a link to a site documenting other EPA data that does show significant Plutonium contamination in Guam, Hawaii, California
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/04/27/plutonium-levels-california-43-times-hawaii-11-times-highest-levels-20-years-20549/
Chelation must be done quickly
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q4952.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16305471
WHAT! Nuke researchers lying?
http://books.google.com/books?id=kHHYOtogBEgC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=chelation+for+plutonium&source=bl&ots=wAJ0Lws_0j&sig=L7BDI6iMmdJg5Ws9_KQa_8ZdAVE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pdZuT97xJqSWiQLg0O3CAg&ved=0CG0Q6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=chelation%20for%20plutonium&f=false
Chelation of Uranium
http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/1/88.short
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)