In reference to the linked article right below
Lot's Wife ------not sure your take on this one, but here is mine, like it or not.
Methinks the last thing the Establishment wants is a bunch of free thinking people.
The
current round of addiction and pharma profit via opioids can be part of social
engineering. Those most disgusted,
most likely to take extreme actions of protest, are more readily controlled
when given an “out” that doesn’t require them to risk their lives or
freedom. Alcohol works similarly, and
of course alcoholism of the ‘target group” middle income white males has risen
quickly and at epidemic levels. Per the
article:
In
fact, it may be more convenient and perhaps even more economical to keep the
growing numbers of chronic drug users (especially of the hallucinogens) fairly
isolated and also out of the labor market, with its millions of unemployed.
To
society, the communards with their hallucinogenic drugs are probably less
bothersome - and less expensive - if they are living apart, than if they are
engaging in alternative modes of expressing their alienation, such as active, organized,
vigorous political protest and dissent.
Funny how, in making their point, they
make exactly the opposite point. I
strongly believe that magic mushrooms could be a tool to get people to think
outside the matrix and narrative that they want to play for us. Those who can think freely are a threat to the
powers that be. Ayahuasca is another one,
using 2 plants, the first one to remove the “gatekeeper” of our own minds and
the second one to show the reality of our ways (not always pleasant, especially
if one has been living in an unwoke state for a long time). Even marijuana is a mild form of thinking
outside the box. I am not so keen on LSD as a “vision increasing”
positive tool, hence it’s popularity in the MK-ULTRA memes.
Also curious, in their item 6
hallucingenic drugs, they amazingly state that the “gatekeeper” <my
words> “Though Bernays is not known to have overtly promoted LSD, he did
assit inesatblishing smoking tobacco as a socially desirable act, thereby
seeding the ground for other drug use.”
Curious 1: REALLY?! Tobacco as a “gateway drug”
Curious 2: Item 6 under hallucinogenic Drugs, admits
that LSD was not part of Bernay’s promotion, but then they jump into
Fluoridation as if that has anything to do with Hallucinogenic.
6. Psychedelic
drugs
Though Bernays is not
known to have overtly promoted LSD, as noted above, he did assist in
establishing smoking tobacco as a socially desirable act, thereby seeding the
ground for other drug use.
Moreover,
Bernays created the propaganda that enabled a destructive drug to be accepted
by the American public - the PR campaign that fooled the country into believing
that water fluoridation was safe and beneficial to human health.
As
Health Freedom News related:
The
wide-scale U.S. acceptance of fluoride-related compounds in drinking water and
a wide variety of consumer products over the past half century is a textbook
case of social engineering orchestrated by Sigmund Freud's nephew and the "father of public
relations" Edward L. Bernays.
The
episode is instructive, for it suggests that tremendous capacity of powerful
interests to reshape the social environment, thereby prompting individuals to
unwarily think and act in ways that are often harmful to themselves and their
loved ones. […]
In fact, sodium fluoride is a dangerous poison and has been a primary active
ingredient in a wide variety of insecticides and fungicides. The substance
bioaccumulates in mammals, has been linked to dulled intellect in children, and
is a cause of increased bone fractures and osteosarcoma.[…]
In the 1930s, Edward Bernays was public-relations adviser to the Aluminum
Company of America (Alcoa).
Alcoa's
principal attorney, Oscar Ewing, went on to serve in the Truman administration
from 1947 to 1952 as head of the Federal Security Agency, of which the Public
Health Service was a part.
In
that capacity, Ewing authorized water fluoridation for the entire country
in 1950 and enlisted Bernays' services to promote water fluoridation to the public.
Bernays recalled the fluoridation campaign in which he was involved as merely
another assignment.
"The
PR wizard specialized in promoting new ideas and products to the public by
stressing a claimed health benefit." […]
One
such approach to prompting public opinion involved correspondence from the
City's Health Department to the presidents of the NBC and CBS television
networks, informing them,
"that
debating fluoridation is like presenting two sides for anti-Catholicism or
anti-Semitism and therefore not in the public interest."
Another
method involved laying the ground work for making fluoridation a house-hold
term with a scientific patina.
He
advised his clients to send letters to the editors of leading publications
discussing what the specific aspects of fluoridation required.
"We
would put out the definition first to the editors of important
newspapers," Bernays recalled.
"Then we would send a letter to
publishers of dictionaries and encyclopedias. After six or eight months we would find
the world fluoridation was published and defined in the dictionaries and
encyclopedias."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As highlighted above, anyone “paying
attention” to Wikipedia should already that know that Wikipedia is a tool of
the establishment.
LOL – I wonder
why “they” need to have / create a “leader” of the so called movement to, as
they state, engineer the population through hallucinogens. I mean, posing Wasson as the “discoverer” of
magic mushrooms, and invoking the weasel words “so called” as an out, for what
is clearly an obvious lie…..I am sure that “magic mushrooms” were known to
humans even 10,000 years ago.
But the most direct connection between Bernays and the psychedelic movement is
that he was a close friend, adviser and promoter of the above-mentioned Gordon
Wasson - the so-called discoverer
of magic mushrooms.
They
state that there is some disagreement among authors, as shown, but then below
that issue some far too certain “conclusions”
Note the
gaslighting attempt highlighted in green
Conclusion
The authors are in disagreement about the use of mind-altering drugs.
One
believes that we do should not dismiss the potential of these substances as
biological tools to open doorways of the mind, and possibly spiritual
dimensions; but those who consider these substances as only spiritual tools
often ignore their dark side and never consider that they can be easily used as
much for control.
He
recommends they not be used without a prior thorough study in something such as
the trivium method, and suggests that, like a knife which may be used to cut
your food, and also used to kill; psychedelics can be used to empower or
control. It is important for people who use these substances to consider what
others think of them who don't use them for spiritual purposes.
The
other believes that given their provenance, they should not be taken under any
circumstances.
We must consider:
Does
the predator think that these substances are tools for spiritual awakening, or
for the control of others?
What the reader may believe is not
necessarily the whole truth.
And here
is their CONCLUSIONS
Though it seems incredible, Esalen, and Huxley,
McKenna, Bernays, Wasson and Dulles appear to have been part of a secret agenda within the U.S. government
that intends to usher in a post-modernist, neo-feudalism Dark Age and slavery
in America.
What
makes this particularly difficult to believe is the unanswered question of the
organization's motivation.
·
What
would motivate such a group?
·
Racism?
·
Classism?
·
Religious
fervor?
·
Power?
·
All
of the above?
·
And
how would it be able to maintain such secrecy, involving certainly hundreds, if
not thousands of individuals over such a long time?
On that
note, maybe I will meditate on all this after finding some Peyote (full
disclaimer, never tried Peyote, funny it did not make their lists in any way)
Stock out
