Here where I am going with this article. 1) High school students are doing a much better job of Radiation testing and analysis A.
2) And prior to 2011 there were regular, detailed and pertinent scientific reports on sea life in Alaska with charts and graphs, 10000% better than the drivel that is dribbled out to us now, after Fukushima (an example is below).
Read on intrepid readers, and then pick up a phone and call your government reps and send them this link, and say why can't we get a report at least as good as a high school student on radiation in sea life
The total reporting on radiation from NOAA in this UME (Unusual Mortality Event) related to radiation is this:
Q: Is there any link to these large whale deaths to the Fukushima nuclear reactor meltdown?Source:
A: It is highly unlikely. From the one fin whale which was accessible to investigators, muscle samples were sent to the University of Alaska Fairbanks for radionuclide analysis, specifically cesium 134/137. Preliminary results do not suggest any unusual exposure to human-generated radionuclides, specifically cesium, that would be considered harmful to wildlife. Further testing is underway.
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/health/mmume/faqs_2015_large_whale.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So on this never occurred in history here mortality event, NOAA is doing one test, on one element, apparently from 1 piece of muscle undefined, and all we get are preliminary results, with not even a promise that we will be presented with further test results, just that they are doing some further testing, unspecified as to what an time frame.
My take is that they don't even consider that they should have some respect for the little people who are working their tales off to pay the grants that pay these "scientists".
Like the little people here at this high school who put together a far better report using 700 samples and wrote it up in a way that made sense. Check it out....how come NOAA (see picture of their headquarters at bottom, with their vast resources) how come NOAA can't beat a high school student?Here is a report chart from the "High School Student"
http://www.metronews.ca/news/calgary/2014/03/24/alberta-students-science-project-finds-high-radiation-levels-in-grocery-store-seafood.html
And here is her whole report which you can view or download if you wish.
Here are some screen caps from an Alaska 2007 report, its high quality and very detailed. It is unfathomable that they have not repeated this testing. Methinks they have, but the results would be too disgusting to release. We need a science whistle-blower, send out those reports to the general public. We need to know.
here is the report is full, you can review or download as a PDF if you wish
And here is another report detailing Fukushima sea ice theory of dispersion

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warren of ENENEWS has become expert at digging up people's emails.
Tonight after work, I am going to send each a letter, and ask for a response.
Emails of Scientists referred to in lead articles:
vera.l.trainer@noaa.gov (Dr. Vera Trainer, Research Oceanographer with the Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Washington State)
Teri.Rowles@noaa.gov (Dr. Teri Rowles Coordinator, Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Program (MMHSRP)
National Marine Fisheries Service
paul.cottrell@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Paul Cottrell, Marine Mammals Coordinator, Pacific Region Fisheries and Oceans Canada)
bree.witteveen@alaska.edu (Bree Witteveen Marine Mammal Specialist. Research Assistant Professor, Univ. of Alaska)
Prof. Kate Wynne
Marine Mammal Specialist
Professor, Univ. of Alaska at Fairbanks.
E-mail: kate.wynne@alaska.edu






















