Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Fukushima Reactor 3, a News History Timeline. It's MSM But It's Useful

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit -3

Posting date
title
August 2, 2017 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor building Building installation cover for fuel removal (on-site release)
July 31, 2017 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Fuel removal cover etc. Installation work
July 27, 2017 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Measurement of Fuel Debris Position in Furnace by Muon Measurement Measurement Status (Interim Report)
July 22, 2017 Progress of PCV internal survey of Unit 3 ~ Disaster survey on 22nd ~
July 21, 2017 Progress of internal PCV survey of Unit 3 ~ Disaster survey on 21st ~
July 19, 2017 Unit 3 PCV internal survey progress ~ 19th bulletin survey ~
March 2, 2017 Cover etc. for installation of fuel for Unit 3 Installation Start of construction of FHM girder steel frame
February 22, 2017 Status of applicability test by multicopter "RISER" in Turbine Building Operational Fuel Unit 3
February 21, 2017 Status of applicability test by multicopter "RISER" in Unit 3 backwash valve pit
February 7, 2017 Cover installation of Unit 3 fuel takeout cover Installation of west side stopper
January 17, 2017 About the start of installation of cover for fuel removal at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
12th April 2016 About installation of shields on Unit 3 Reactor Building Operation Floor
February 23, 2016 About decontamination by high-density dry ice blast decontamination equipment
December 25, 2015 On the status of performance confirmation of dry ice blast decontamination equipment for altitude
November 27, 2015 Unit 3 containment vessel (PCV) equipment hatch survey using small research equipment (robot)
October 22, 2015 Results of internal survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Containment Vessel (PCV) (Preliminary Report: Execution on October 22)
20th October 2015 Result of the internal survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Containment Vessel (PCV) (preliminary report: implementation on October 20)
October 16, 2015 Survey result by underwater camera in spent fuel pool of Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
September 9, 2015 About the results of PCV equipment hatch survey by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 small camera
August 31, 2015 About cover construction for Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Fuel Removal
August 27, 2015 About completion of filling in the seawater piping trench of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
August 4, 2015 (2015/8/5 video addition) Internal survey in Unit 3 spent fuel pool
August 2, 2015 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 completion of removal of fuel exchanger from spent fuel pool
30th July 2015 Image of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Fuel Handling Machine Removal Operation
February 5, 2015 Unit 3 seawater piping trench filling work situation
October 16, 2014 Start of Fujishima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3 Seawater piping trench building connection section waterproof construction progress filling filling work
September 1, 2014 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Fall of the fuel exchanger operation console during the work of removing the gallekes in the spent fuel pool (Survey result)
30th August 2014 Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 On Fall of Operation Console of Fuel Exchanger during Rubble Removal Work in Spent Fuel Pool (Survey Results Using Underwater Camera)
August 29, 2014 Fukushima Daiichi Unit 3 Fall Switches During the removal of debris in the spent fuel pool Operation Console falling [9/1 video addition]
August 19, 2014 Progress of waterproof construction of Units 2 and 3 seawater piping trench building connection part
July 11, 2014 On the results of the investigation of the situation of the subordinate part of the Northwestern Collapse of Reactor Building No. 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
July 7, 2014 Progress status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3 Seawater piping trench building connection water stop construction
20th June 2014 Commencement of decontamination in the building by remote decontamination equipment on the 1st floor of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building
May 15, 2014 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Main Steam Isolation Valve (MSIV) Indoor Survey Result (3rd) <Breaking News>
April 24, 2014 About the preliminary survey of the Unit 3 main steam isolation valve (MSIV) (preliminary report of April 23)
February 14, 2014 About the results of the building framework survey after removing the upper garret in the reactor building of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
January 21, 2014 Water Leakage near Main Steam Isolation Valve Room on Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor (Situation on 21st January)
January 18, 2014 Water Leakage near Main Steam Isolation Valve Room on Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor
October 16, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Refueling of upper reactor debris About completion of removal of large-sized debris and implementation of dose reduction measures
September 24, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Remotely Controlled Large Crane About Tilting of the Jib Mast [Cause and Countermeasures]
September 10, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Remotely Controlled Large Crane Tip Jib Mast · Main Mast Landing Operation
September 5, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor removal work on the reactor building Large crane tip jib mast About occurrence of tilting
August 26, 2013 Withdrawal of obstacles such as garage in southwest area of ​​Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor
August 6, 2013 (Confirmation of steam: 8 o'clock on July 26, 2013) About confirmation of steam near the central part of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building 5 (equipment storage pool side)
August 6, 2013 (Confirmation of steam: 7:00 on July 25, 2013) About confirmation of steam near the central part of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building 5 (equipment storage pool side)
August 6, 2013 (Confirmation of steam: 12 o'clock on July 24, 2013) About confirmation of steam at the central part of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building 5 (equipment storage pool side)
August 6, 2013 (Confirmation of steam: 9 o'clock on July 23, 2013) About confirmation of steam at the central part of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building 5 (the equipment storage pool side)
July 26, 2013 About removal work of obstacles such as garage etc. on Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor
July 24, 2013 About upper infrared thermography measurement of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building
July 24, 2013 About atmospheric dosimetry around the shield plug of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 5, 5 th Floor
July 22, 2013 About upper infrared thermography measurement of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building
July 18, 2013 Confirmation of steaming at the central part of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building 5 (the equipment storage pool side)
May 27, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Refueling of upper reactor debris About renewal of spent fuel storage pool and updating of the skimmer surge tank hatch
April 22, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor building removal work at the reactor building
April 19, 2013 On the situation of the skimmer surge tank hatch at the time of removing debris from the upper part of the nuclear reactor building at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
April 15, 2013 Factory analysis and countermeasures for suspension of spent fuel pool circulation cooling facility at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
5th April 2013 About stop of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 spent fuel pool alternative cooling system
March 4, 2013 About completion of water stop construction work on the water inlet part to the underground storage building of Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
February 21, 2013 Survey result by underwater camera in spent fuel pool of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 (February 14, 15, 16, 18)
February 13, 2013 Survey of spent fuel pool by underwater camera in construction of upper rubble of Reactor Building No. 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
February 8, 2013 On the possibility of submergence of debris that seems to be a fuel exchanger mast in the construction work of the upper debris of reactor building Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
February 6, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Rubble Removal Work of Reactor Building About Removal of Steel Truss Debris
February 1, 2013 Picture of grasping the situation of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (released February 1, 2013)
January 28, 2013 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 PCV Gas Management System Part of piping Steel tubing · System shutdown due to remodeling of control panel
20th December 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor for removing upper rubble of reactor building With regard to removal of rubble of submerged steel frame
December 19, 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor for removing the upper rubble of the reactor building About the removal of the debris from the submerged steel
12th December 2012 About leakage occurrence situation in the turbine building of Unit 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
5th December 2012 About the completion of waterproofing construction of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 control building
November 28, 2012 About the result of checking the status of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor containment vessel (PCV) gas management system duct
November 27, 2012 On the Increase of Water Injection Volume at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
November 27, 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Survey results on sputter fuel pool salt removal equipment (Mobile RO) stoppage and hydrochloric acid leakage
November 26, 2012 About confirming the status of the PCV gas management system duct Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
November 14, 2012 About the contents of "Report on the facility management plan based on the concept of" securing medium-term security "for Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant No. 1 to 4
October 24, 2012 About the leakage of hydrochloric acid from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 spent fuel pool salt removal device (mobile RO)
15th October 2012 About water leakage in turbine building of Unit 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
15th October 2012 Survey status by underwater camera in spent fuel pool of Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit (October 11 and 12)
October 3, 2012 Report on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to the instruction document on the fall of steel scraps in the spent fuel storage pool of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
September 26, 2012 Survey status by underwater camera in spent fuel pool of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 3 (for September 26)
September 25, 2012 Survey status by underwater camera in spent fuel pool of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS 3
September 24, 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 spent fuel pool debris removal work
September 13, 2012 On the internal investigation of the spent fuel pool towards the removal of the upper galleki of reactor building No. 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
September 11, 2012 On the decrease of the water injection volume of Units 1 to 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (2nd report)
September 11, 2012 (32) Ultra high pressure switchgear area 3 and 4 (indoor)
September 11, 2012 (31) Ultra high pressure switchgear area 3 and 4 (outdoor)
September 11, 2012 (15) Damaged condition in the premises after the explosion of Units 1, 3, 4
September 11, 2012 (8) Exterior of Unit 3 after Explosion and Appearance of Unit 4 before Explosion as seen from Unit 3
September 10, 2012 Present status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station shown in the photograph
September 5, 2012 About the decrease event of the water injection flow rate of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station No. 1 to 3
July 13, 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Expansion Waste Regarding the accumulated water confirmed in the underground storage building
July 13, 2012 【Motion picture】 Survey result of surrounding situation around Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS 3 Unit Reactor Building Operating Floor
July 12, 2012 On the results of the Torus Indoor Survey on the Basement Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Underground Floor
July 11, 2012 Survey results on surrounding conditions around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Operator Floor
July 5, 2012 "Development of Remote Decontamination Technique in Building" On the Results of Robot Survey of Unit 2 and 3 Reactor Buildings
June 26, 2012 Present status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station shown in the photograph
25th June 2012 About construction of water stop part water stop to underground storage building of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Unit 3
19th June 2012 Duct damage of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor containment gas gas management system
7th June 2012 Water level measurement result of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station 2, 3 Torus Room
May 30, 2012 On Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Waste In-situ Survey Results of Pumped Water in Underground Storage Building (May 28 - 29)
May 24, 2012 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor TIP Indoor Environmental Survey Result (conducted May 23, 2012)
20th April 2012 Nitrogen gas separation device (PSA-3 PSA-4) cause investigation early response policy at failure
20th April 2012 [Video] About investigation of Unit 3 Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Nuclear Containment Equipment Hatch
April 19, 2012 About investigation of Unit 3 reactor containment vessel equipment hatch of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
April 16, 2012 About stop of nitrogen gas separator (PSA)
April 16, 2012 [Video] Internal survey aimed at removing rubble from spent fuel pool at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
April 13, 2012 On the internal investigation towards the removal of the spare fuel pool of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Unit 3
March 16, 2012 About the preliminary survey of Fukushima Daiichi 2, 3 torus room (2)
March 15, 2012 Access survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3 Torus Room (Movie)
March 14, 2012 About the preliminary survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nos. 2 and 3 torus room
February 24, 2012 TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Preparation for Fuel Debris Entry Preparation for Decommissioning Measures etc. Technical Catalog Related to the Development of Devices, etc. Explanation Materials in Workshop
January 29, 2012 On the 29th of January on the water leak condition at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
January 26, 2012 Response training on occurrence of abnormal spent fuel pool based on safety preservation
20th January 2012 Present status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station shown in the photograph
January 16, 2012 Lifting landscape Implementation work for removing obstructions of Units 1 to 4 by taking a watercraft
December 24, 2011 On the swelling of the reactor water injection hose of Unit 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
December 17, 2011 Current status of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
November 30, 2011 About establishing a nitrogen inclusion route into the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 1 to 3
November 22, 2011 Measurement of ambient dose by reactor nuclear reactor robot Unit 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS
November 16, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Building Investigation · Cleaning
November 8, 2011 Situation on the south side of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building building opening
November 5, 2011 Measurement of dose after movement of interfering substances on the passage and movement of interfering substances by robot at Unit 3 Reactor Building 1st Floor
October 22, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Equipment Hatch opening
15th October 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Temperature measurement result directly above the nuclear reactor by infrared camera
October 8, 2011 Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station No. 3 Reactor Building Top
October 8, 2011 Present status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station shown in the photograph
October 1, 2011 About the outline of the dust collector system
October 1, 2011 Present status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station shown in the photograph
September 28, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 JAEA-3 entrance scenery inside reactor building Landscape in Unit 3 Reactor Building
September 24, 2011 Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station No. 3 Reactor Building Top
September 13, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Opening Dust sampling scenery
September 10, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station No.1, Unit 3 Reactor Building Opening Dust Sampling Equipment
September 9, 2011 Photo of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
August 25, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building Opening Dust sampling scenery
August 1, 2011 Small glasses on the west side of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building, Gravel near the large-sized entrance of Unit 2 Reactor Building Building
July 28, 2011 Video of Quince entry area at Unit 3 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant reactor building
July 27, 2011 Field survey by Quince of Unit 3 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit
July 18, 2011 Work situation of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 turbine building roof installation work
July 17, 2011 Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Roofscape with rainwater countermeasure
July 4, 2011 Status of iron plate laying on the 1st floor of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building
July 2, 2011 Cleaning work by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building robot
30th June 2011 Cleaning system of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3, 1st floor
15th June 2011 Dose Survey Results in Unit 3 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Reactor Building
14th June 2011 Sampling situation of radioactive materials in the air at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant upper part of the reactor building (Unit 3)
11th June 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Reactor Building
5th June 2011 High dose of debris on the west side of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 reactor building
May 27, 2011 IAEA visit Fukushima
May 21, 2011 Status of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Near the reactor building (rubble)
May 17, 2011 Recovery situation of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
May 11, 2011 Status of water stop in the vicinity of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 intake port
May 11, 2011 Inflow situation in the pit near the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 intake port
May 10, 2011 Status of the Spent Fuel Pool at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
20th April 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Photographed image (packed image) by pack bot in reactor building
April 19, 2011 Photo taken by pack bot in Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station reactor building (photo)
April 17, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Pak Bot Work in Nuclear Power Building
April 16, 2011 Photographed images from T-Hawk (No. 1, No. 3, No. 4)
15th April 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Spent fuel pool Concrete pump car photographed image
12th April 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station discharge port sampling Building fire, water intake port pre-installation plate work situation, sampling of spent fuel pool water
11th April 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Aerial shooting and equipment / work
March 23rd, 2011 Central control office of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
March 21, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
March 17, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 3 and 4 (Aerial shooting)

Monday, August 21, 2017

2 of 5 Destroyers Involved In Fukushima, Now Almost Sunk, With Large Life Losses

Conspiracy theory anyone?

Some have speculated that the US Navy is intentionally trying to sink these ships that they cannot decontaminate.

It sure is statistically improbable that this is just coincident.

I suggest the cognitive abilities are affected by long term exposure to radiation, and this is increasing rate of accidents.

also noted the this new accident, the John McCain, had just challenged China last week by sailing close to one of China's newly built military islands.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-southchinasea-exclusive-idUSKBN1AQ0YK

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/347297-uss-mccain-collides-with-merchant-vessel


"10 US Navy sailors missing after destroyer collides with merchant ship"
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/20/asia/us-navy-destroyer-collision-singapore/index.html?adkey=bn

On June 17, the USS Fitzgerald collided with a container ship off the coast of Japan. That collision resulted in the deaths of seven US sailors. The Fitzgerald will be transported to the US for repairs. 
On May 9, the guided-missile cruiser USS Lake Champlain was struck by a small fishing boat off the Korean Peninsula.
And in late January, the guided-missile cruiser USS Antietam ran aground while trying to anchor in Tokyo Bay. Authorities at Yokosuka Naval Base said the Antietam remains out of action.
The official contingent of Operation Tomodachi,    The US Navy participation in radiation polluted air and water off of Fukushima immediately after the Triple Melt Down. 
stock here -- in a quick internet search, I could not find evidence that Lake Champlain or Antietam participating directly in Tomodachii, Although all 4 ships with accidents were reported to have been based at Yokosuka Japan.

A summary of Destroyers in Japan, Fukushima, and Accidents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military experts said the latest incident calls into question the Navy's training and will likely lead to a serious shake-up among the Navy's leadership.
"I can almost guarantee you that there will be a tumultuous shake up in the senior leadership of at least the 7th Fleet and maybe the Navy in general," CNN military analyst Rick Francona said.
"The Navy is not looking good about now, especially when we need those ... Aegis-equipped ships for possible ballistic missile defense in a North Korean scenario," he added.
In a report on the Fitzgerald collision released just last week, the Navy said it would review its training and qualification procedures.
"The collision was avoidable and both ships demonstrated poor seamanship. Within Fitzgerald, flawed watch stander teamwork and inadequate leadership contributed to the collision," a 7th Fleet statement said.

Oil tanker 'three times bigger'

Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, said the oil tanker would have been at least three times bigger than the USS John S. McCain.
"Oil tankers are huge and it takes miles for them to change course," he said.
"When you're going into a congested channel, you're supposed to be very alert, track ships around you to a very meticulous degree."
The Malacca Strait, which runs between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, is the world's second busiest waterway according to the World Economic Forum. The collision took place in waters to the east of the Malacca Strait, US authorities said.
At a press conference Monday afternoon, Malaysian authorities said both ships were heading toward Singapore from the South China Sea when the collision occurred. They described the area as very busy, with some 80,000 ships passing through it every year.
Both ships should have reported in to what the Malaysian authorities called a maritime "traffic separation scheme," essentially air traffic control for ships.
The tanker Alnic MC
Francona said no matter what the tanker did, the faster, more-nimble US destroyer should have been able to avoid a collision.
"How does a state-of-the-art Navy destroyer equipped with multiple radar systems and communications gear with a full bridge watch not see, detect and evade a 30,000 ton slow-moving (10 knots) behemoth?" Francona asked.

Search and rescue

A US Navy official told CNN the McCain had experienced a loss of steering before the collision, but that steering had been regained.
Merchant marine websites describe the Alnic MC as a 30,000-ton, 600-foot-long oil tanker flying a Liberian flag.
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore said the Alnic sustained damage to a tank at its bow, about seven meters (23 feet) above the waterline. No one was injured on the tanker, it said, and no oil spill was reported.
The McCain is named for the father and grandfather of US Sen. John McCain. Both of McCain's relatives were US Navy admirals. The senator was a captain in the US Navy.
The vessel is 505 feet long and displaces about 9,000 tons.

Guess what the USS Fitzgerald and the USS Mcstain have in common????? Anybody anybody????
They were both part of operation Tomodachi. Coincidense????
Google US navy aims to sink radioactive fleet and see if you can connect the dots.

  PlowboyGrownUp






  • laconic93 laconic93
    Well Surprise Surprise Surprise , all four ships were part of operation Tomodachi.
    For all of you who think the Navy doesn't know those ships are turning our sailors into hot pockets I suggest you research Navy atomic test during the 50s and the. Of course there's this little BIG ASS HINT from KOMO news in Seattle.
    Even sailors who joined the 7th Fleet immediately after Operation Tomodachi say they were affected. "I was on board the USS Germantown," said former sailor Thomas McCants, who joined the 7th Fleet as a gunner's mate right after the Japanese mission of mercy.
    http://komonews.com/archive/fukushima-fallout-whats-next-for-sailors-who-were-exposed

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    An earlier article by 

    http://rense.com/general96/USnavysink.html

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/06/something_is_fishy_about_uss_fitzgerald_story_we_are_getting_from_the_media.html

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Will the fourth "crash" be considered an unlucky accident or coinicidence as well?"
    FIFY - maybe?
    Ran across another collision reference on Breitbart which sounds similar but may just be "accidental". Anyone hear about the USS Lake Champlain collision in May near South Korea?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Champlain_(CG-57)
    https://news.usni.org/2017/05/09/cruiser
    It's a Ticonderoga-class cruiser instead of a Arleigh Burke-class destroyer but still uses Aegis. Interestingly from the USNI article it was hit on the port side amid ship.
     
     
     


     

  • Friday, August 18, 2017

    Canada Refuses to Test Nuclear Plant Workers for Drugs or Alcohol

    Canada, you know, where they want to store nuclear waste underground on a peninsula on Lake Huron, is fighting against drug testing for Nuclear workers....

    Proving once again that a country can be more stupid that the USA

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/canadian-nuclear-safety-omission-random-drug-and-alcohol-testing-1.4251339

    David Shier, national director of the CNWC, calls the testing "discriminatory." He says there is already an "exhaustive screening process" in place to make sure workers are fit to work. 
    Compromising further to political correctness, you can show up drunk for work at a Nuke plant, and they will just counsel you.   No penalties.

    According to CNSC director general Greg Lamarre, the Canadian Human Rights Commission said drug and alcohol "testing is permissible for workers in safety-sensitive positions," as long as workers are aware it's part of their condition to work, and it's non-punitive. 
    In other words, workers would not be penalized if they test positive, but rather, would be given support programs to get help.
     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    But abuse of substances even at plants were drug testing is required, shows that abuse continues

    Today, 2 Different Nuclear Plants Had Workers Busted For Being Drunk on the Job

    Palo Verde (AZ) 1;2;3 all @ 100 % FITNESS-FOR-DUTY

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2016/20160831en.html#en52209
    A non-licensed employee supervisor had a confirmed positive for alcohol during a random fitness-for-duty test. The employee's access to the plant has been suspended.
    Vogtle 3;4 (GA) Under Construction FITNESS-FOR-DUTY

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2016/20160831en.html#en52208
    A non-licensed employee supervisor had a confirmed positive for alcohol during a random fitness-for-duty test. The employee's access to the plant has been terminated.
    [ hard to determine what the job function of these people are. ' non-licensed employee supervisor ' could be the supervisor of the secretarial pool, gardeners or janitors. ]

    Charlottesville And The Higgin's Memo, aka Deep State Attack

    New Info here--A great analysis showing that some reporters were staged down the corner from the "accident".   You can skim through this video, he only makes 4 or 5 key points, and then reinforces those with repetition.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2017/08/analyzing-charlottesvilles-zapruder-film-the-ford-fischer-livestream-video-2493639.html

    And here it is direct on YouTube



    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    I had to weigh in on Charlottesville, at least quickly.

    At 4:04 to 4:07 a 400 pound woman is receiving CPR and also having a baby. That seems unlikely, especially since it never made any "news" that would certainly be newsworthy.

    And multiple citizens, shouting, "medic", that also seems very unlikely, like something out of Mash. Looks like a drill to me.




    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Rich Higgins, while working for the National Security Council, penned a 7 page "memo" that described the Deep State attack against America, but first via a Trump Takedown.

    here is Page 1 through 7
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p1-large.gif
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p2-large.gif 
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p3-large.gif
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p4-large.gif
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p5-large.gif
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p6-large.gif
    https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3922874/pages/Political-Warfare-p7-large.gif

    here is a printed, then scanned copy of the above 7 pages
    https://app.box.com/s/zs2veld023pcom2jd8sqmwsljwvbh3dq



    Admittedly, the author, Higgins (who was fired and no one is denying that he was fired because he
    wrote that memo), does "juice it" a bit.   

    Amazing how the WaPo (owned by Jeff Bezos) picks up expose' of the narrative, and constructs it to mean that Trump is:

    Paranoid
    In an alternate reality
    Insane
    Terrifying combination of delusions

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/08/11/this-nsc-ex-staffers-memo-is-crazy-trumps-reaction-is-more-disturbing/?utm_term=.883fde1a0540

    Then they compare him to Nixon, who incidentally was also "not to be trusted with nuclear launch codes", and WaPo concludes with their end game, after dismissing every thing else as conspiracy "the end of this <presidency> cannot come soon enough."
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    stock here-- and "Business Insider" well now you can see how things lean over there....

    http://www.businessinsider.com/senior-nsc-official-ousted-after-writing-controversial-memo-about-trump-2017-8

    Of course, an American deep state does not, in fact, exist. And in places where it does exist — like Turkey, Egypt, and Pakistan — it typically results in bloody outcomes like mass killings, pogroms, and bombings. 

    Wednesday, August 16, 2017

    The Nuclear Industry Is Based On a Series of Lies Out Of the Gate -- And They Don't Give a Damn About You

    From an article at WUWT, regarding "Climate Cash" there were a number of pro-nuclear comments in the comment section, in particular, pushing Pakistan of all places, towards more nuclear.   I found it particularly disgusting and wrote of the article below.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/08/15/pakistan-give-us-climate-cash-or-well-keep-burning-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-2582836


    The pro-nuclear sentiment here is disturbing, from a bunch of people who are otherwise pretty free thinking.    I am MSME thermal fluids and material science with specialties is radiation, probability and statistics.    Around 2005 I started hearing how nuclear was now being considered "green".   This is shortly before I started catching on to the scams related to the entire financial system, including the lies and intended massive wealth transfer related to CO2 and "Global warming".    So I thought it was "cool" that nuclear was being called green, it was high tech, and from a young lad being exposed to Cook Nuclear plant and all the great lies of "too cheap to meter"....I did not look further.    

    After Fukushima, I started studying the industry and what they have been doing, and was rather appalled at the highly risky ways they handled their most dangerous product, spent fuel, and their superficial focus on "safety" in stupid ways.   A welder friend who does work at nuke plants states how they go through advanced safety training on vacuous type things as "if you are using a cart on a sloped floor stand behind it or it will run you over".   And they ignore the elephant in the room, storing spent fuel, often hundreds of tons, in water pools that are often located at the top of the reactors.   In fact, they do calculations, to "prove" that tighter packing densities are possible if they use boron sheets to separate them.   And then ignore the fact that these boron sheets degrade with time. 

    The direct costs of an accident at a nuke plant, will more than wipe out any long term financial benefits of even a fleet of nuclear plants.    Fukushima will see direct costs of over $1 Trillion, and the indirect costs of pain, suffering, loss of productivity, loss of life will also be enormous.   Chernobyl was "not as bad" it was just one reactor, and they took effective action, although it put hundreds of thousands of people at risk in the mitigation effort, it was the right thing to do.   

    But when you get to studying the industry, you see that the whole thing, from the bottom up, is built upon a stack of lies.   Starting with "background" which they pretend is around 6 mSv, even though in reality it is less than 1 mSv.    Then the ICRP dose model, which models the human body as a bag of water with energy being "deposited" by ionizations.   This dose model makes a mockery of science and epidemiological studies that clearly show that even low dose radiation causes cancers and contributes to many other diseases / morbidity.    

    But it's big money projects, and when those happen, money can be siphoned off for bribes, kickbacks, and so industry and politicians love them.    And it has the entire backing of the Military/Industrial complex.   

    But to see those who don't even buy into the CO2 lies, support nuclear on "other grounds" that I find hard to even establish, is disappointing.    Study it with an open mind, and it is very likely you will come to the same conclusions that I have, it is time to phase out all civilian nuclear power plants.

    Each running nuclear plant produces the equivalent of 3 nuclear bombs of radiation, EACH DAY.    And there is no solid, safe way to store it for the tens of thousands of years that it needs to be stored.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    We shall see if I get past moderation.   This is the first time in years a comment at WUWT has been sent to moderation.  <note it did get through moderation>

    • Fukushima was an inept design putting standby generators where they were susceptible to flood. Had the standby generators been above the flood there would have been no problems with any of the plants. Putting generators in a secure position above floods with sufficient fuel to run for 150% of the expected worse case is a sensible approach but one that is beyond architects to understand. This was not a problem with nuclear power – in the same way that Chernobyl was not a problem with nuclear power.
      • Incorrect, the pipes with irradiated water from the reactor that goes directly to the turbine buildings were broke as radiation alarms were going off even before the tsunami hit. Fukushima was placed at sea level because GE didn’t want to have to design with high head pumps. The fuel tanks were placed right at waters edge for “convenience”.
        They also realized before the earthquake that potential of a tsunami to swamp the plant, and they did nothing about it. This is the whole industry, secretive and greedy. In 2015 Pilgrim in Boston was one step away from a massive release of radiation, the torus heat exchanger worked and they were able to reject heat. That was the last step of their “defense in depth”. Think MSM covered how close that was? No way.
        It’s a systemic problem in what is basically the most dangerous thing on earth. In an EMP or CME was percent of plants wouldn’t shut down correctly, say 10% (note 440 running nuke plants on earth, not all would be effected by the CME or EMP, but you get the drift).
        It is nothing short of insane, chasing after the most expensive free lunch we could conjure up.
        Ian said “This was not a problem with nuclear power – in the same way that Chernobyl was not a problem with nuclear power.
        uh, yeah, I think when nuclear power plants blow up and create vast sacrifice zones, I would yes, that is in fact a problem with nuclear power.
    • stock that is one of the worst bits of layman science ever. This bit I really love
      quote => Each running nuclear plant produces the equivalent of 3 nuclear bombs of radiation, EACH DAY.
      So lets explain this radiation is an emission of electromagnetic waves or subatomic particles and a percentage of that emission will be used to sustain the reaction (you extract heat to make the electricity) but the process irradiates materials in the reactor and cooling water etc which is the waste.
      Once you close the reactor the radiation stops. The problem is the materials that got irradiated along the way which are waste continue to emit radiation. So how long your run the process and your 3 nuclear bombs per day garbage is of little importance, what is important is what got irradiated. The fuel rods and much of the steel in the reactor itself are the main worries. There is a complete list of decommissioned plants on wiki
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_decommissioning
      You will note many of those closed ran for 25-30 years and several are now greenfield with only the fuel rods and close reactor structure stored. They produced your 3 nuclear bombs of radiation per day and it doesn’t really mean a dam thing it’s a layman nonsense statistic.
      The moment you have to start using emotive nonsense to try and validate an argument you have already lost.
      • Its not a “laymans nonsense statistic” it is a way to make the amount of dangerous materials created very real. Say in 30 years, some of that radioactive material has half lifed away, but most haven’t. It’s being stored, usually in water pools that require circulation for cooling. Very little is dry casked (safer but only a can kick down the road for 50 to 100 years).
        Once you close the reactor, the radiation does not stop, the fission stops. The used fuel is not as you say irradiated, new radioactive elements have been created by the splitting of the atom which occurs in a controlled by somewhat random way called the double hump.
        http://www.nukepro.net/2015/09/radiation-education-how-fission-works.html
        My 3 bombs worth of radiation per day, IS WHAT IS STILL in the used fuel. If you are going to support “nuclear science” you ought to man up on facts.

    Tuesday, August 15, 2017

    The Pacific Ocean Is Dying and You Don't Even Know?

    from a reader / contributor.   They have made a new site, and it is outstanding!

    http://www.art-in-portland.mysite.com/



    Table of Contents
    .

    A Rant On The Absurd State of the Union

    AirSepTech
     
    Like a bunch of rats on tainted cheese we are. We wouldn't know crap if we were neck deep in it. Much less buried in it.

    And I must include myself in this pile, I am here, participating in this madhouse chaos ridden country.

    On the one hand, we have pointy hat spooks, running mad, 'exposing' their loony BS, and even themselves, saying 'look at me, this is who I am !!'

    What do we do?

    Become fearful, scream, cry, demand it stop.

    On the other hand, we have no border, are willing to import any/all, support them if needed.

    We are $20 trillion in debt. We are OK with this. We know little about it, who/what/why, seems secrets do not matter.

    What do we do?

    Embrace it, make excuses for it, demand it continue.

    We are embracing a nuclear war. We believe much of what we are told. It is a lot of bs. We know it is.

    What do we do?

    Stock up, get ready, seems we don't know what else toooo do.

    We live in one of the most 'food' productive nations on earth, not to mention 'other stuff'. We cheer on 'no fossil fuel', its gotta go!! We are literally obsessed by it, like a religious chant.

    What do we do?

    Import 25-30% of our food, placing us strategically dependent on others, enjoy 'cheap' goods at others expense, ignore the dependence on fuel, shine on the pollution it creates, fumble around like fools.

    Others will..will build nuke plants to accommodate our demand. Like Japan did.

    Like you have said obe, cattle.

    A confused, lost, herd.

    Free Speech and Paid Corruption, We Need to Draw The Line, But It's a Slippery Slope

    PlowboyGrownUp
    "Monsanto Shill Fired by Forbes"

    Story at-a-glance

    A common corporate tactic is to hire “third-party experts” to bring the industry’s message to the public, cloaked as independent opinion or expertise

    Henry Miller has been repeatedly outed as a shill for the chemical technology industry. Forbes has now fired him for publishing material under his own name that turned out to be ghostwritten by Monsanto

    Internal emails reveal Monsanto pressured a journal editor to retract a damning animal study showing Roundup and genetically engineered corn caused cancer and early death"

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/08/15/forbes-fired-corporate-industry-shill.aspx?et_cid=DM154684&et_rid=16040184


    "Faced with evidence they’d published material under Miller’s name that was in fact ghostwritten by Monsanto, Forbes not only fired Miller but also removed all of his work from their site. …"
    ""…When it came to our attention that Mr. Miller violated these terms, we removed his blog from Forbes.com and ended our relationship with him.”"

    • Fired after the publicity and evidence? How many articles and what did they say and what was his "job"?
    • Plenty more where that came from.
    • What are they waitin' for? "Evidence"?
    • How many of the paid "relationships" are ghost-written?
    • If you can't see, hear or taste nuclear waste and pollution, why is it so apparent in the "work" 
    • displayed on Forbes site?
    • Junk journalism, much?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/quote-of-the-week-krugmans-lol-on-skeptics/





    The Science and Public Policy Institute issued a report on the money involved in funding the global warming debate in August concluding, “Over the last two decades, US taxpayers have subsidized the American climate change industry to the tune of $79 billion.”

    By contrast, the same study found that the media bogeyman “Exxon Mobil gave a mere $23 million, spread over ten years, to climate skeptics.”

    ------------------------------




    Monday, August 14, 2017

    The Awan Brothers, A Symptom of the Incredible Corruption at the Top

    stock
    way OT, but this is worth getting on your radar.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/08/what-is-the-awan-brother-doing-behind-trey-gowdy-3541629.html

    Just wow….one of the Awan brothers is seen here at a House Committee hearing sitting directly behind Trey Gowdy, seemingly coaching the measured and scripted responses out of Jeh Johnson (who was Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary). He also appears to be making threatening faces at Jeh Johnson. It’s obvious Jeh Johnson is being blackmailed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Friday, August 11, 2017

    Poll -- Would It Be Right to Outlaw Islam in The USA?

    FMR U.S. Border Patrol | New Mexico SWAT Operator | Legend Who Lives Rent Free In The Minds of Liberals World Wide.

    https://twitter.com/crusher614

    He put up a poll which went way beyond just border control, nation ban, or extreme vetting.

      TAKE MY SAME POLL HERE -- Voice Your Opinion


    survey solutions