Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Tell the Oversight of the NRC How You Think the NRC is Doing, Sept 9 Briefing


The Subcommittee on Energy and Power, chaired by U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.), and the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy, chaired by U.S. Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.), have scheduled a 10 a.m. hearing in room 2123 of the Rayburn House Office Building on Sept. 9.
The hearing is entitled, “Oversight of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.”
The hearing will examine NRC's long-term budget development and resource planning. Additionally, members will examine the proposed rule-making associated with the Near Term Task Force (NTTF), which was established in response to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident in Japan. The NTTF is tasked with evaluating the incident and developing recommendations for reactors throughout the United States. Ongoing activities related to storage, transportation and disposal of high-level nuclear waste will be examined as well.
———————————————-
Can we get even 30 people to send both of these chairs a short letter indicating disatisfaction with NRC?
1) They are considering adopting the "hormesis: radiation is good for you" and throwing out the fairly conservation LNT model.
2) They refuse to take disciplinary action against those who break the rules, they never impose fines, instead they write "because you have put it in an action plan, we will not fine you"
3) They are not pro-active enough. Regulation shouldn't be just about what is brought to your attention. The San Onofre debacle should not have been accepted as like for like, that should have been obvious to a high school student and NRC should have been on that like a big dog.
4) They have refused to require nuclear operators to have a REAL PLAN in the case of a serious accident
5) They do not update their website promptly, even though they are asking for public comment. Comments can take weeks to appear. Why do comments even need to be reviewed (aka censored) in the first place. By taking forever to put comments up, and by having a vast divide between the number of comments received and the number of comments showing….it demoralizes people. Then they won't take the time to comment. We have lives to live, we can't spend our time hawking over whether the NRC has finally posted our comment or not. It's "pretend" participation.



  • Looks like Ed has no direct email, and won't accept an email unless you are in "his district", hmmm, seems like a call may be in order.
    Actually calling people has way more effect than you might think
    DC Address: The Honorable Ed Whitfield
    United States House of Representatives
    2184 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, D.C. 20515-1701
    DC Phone: 202-225-3115
    DC Fax: 202-225-3547
    Contact Representative Whitfield: https://whitfield.house.gov/contact/email-me
    WWW Homepage: http://whitfield.house.gov/
    Twitter: @RepEdWhitfield


    John Shimkus
    Also will not only not reply to an email, unless you live in his district, you can't even send him an email.
    Hmmmmm….Seems like our government is getting even less accessible.
    Washington, DC Office
    2217 Rayburn House Office Building
    Washington, DC 20515
    Phone: (202) 225-5271
    Fax: (202) 225-5880


    Here is Whitfields FB page
    https://www.facebook.com/RepEdWhitfield/timeline


National Academy of Sciences Study of Radiation Around Nuke Plants is Halted by NRC When Preliminary Data Show Excess Cancers

 National Academy of Sciences Study of Radiation Around Nuke Plants is Halted by NRC When Preliminary Data Show Excess Cancers
stock here: amazingly this occurs whilst NRC is pushing through a "docket" to prove that radiation is good for us (hormesis) and allowing 10 to 100 times the radiation to the public.   All in support of a bloated nuclear industry that is dying under its own weight!
The NRC is ceasing work on a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) pilot study (Phase 1 and Phase 2 ) of cancer risks in populations near U.S. nuclear power facilities. The NRC determined that continuing the work was impractical, given the significant amount of time and resources needed and the agency’s current budget constraints.
stock here, from P 26 of the report---
A third report from France showed that children living within 5 kilometers of nuclear plants are twice as likely to develop leukemia compared to those living 20 kilometers or farther away from the plants. 
but then instead of using the actual data, they created a computer model of dose from the self reported releases of the nuclear plant, and they found amazingly that any extra risk of leukemia just "went away".     Wow, this is the playbook of the neo-governmental lying facilities....use models rather than actual data.     
 "However, analysis of the same population of children using a dose-based geographic zoning approach, instead of distance, did not support the findings."   Wow, just wow.
The NRC continues to find U.S. nuclear power plants comply with strict requirements that limit radiation releases from routine operations. The NRC and state agencies regularly analyze environmental samples from near the plants. These analyses show the releases, when they occur, are
too small to cause observable increases in cancer risk near the facilities.
“We’re balancing the desire to provide updated answers on cancer risk with our responsibility to use Congressionally-provided funds
as wisely as possible,” said Brian Sheron, director of the NRC’s
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. 
“The NAS estimates it would be at least the end of the decade
before they would possibly have answers for us, and the costs of completing the study were prohibitively high.

Page 25 of the report (linked above in the article) states
a positive association between living in proximity to a nuclear facility Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States and cancer risk. However, studies have been unable to attribute positive associations to radioactive releases from the facilities.

In other words they are pulling the "you can't prove it argument".     You can't prove it was "our radiation" that did it.  

And after spending significant money on this report that used over 20 pHD level researchers to compile, the NRC just throws in the towel.     They are not fooling anyone.     The NRC is captured and they are doing everything they can to protect a dying industry.    It's criminal.

In 2012 they were talking about launching this study, with San Onofre in  the spotlight.   If they could should little to no effect, they could save San Onofre, maybe even justify leaking steam generators.

Now that San O is shut down, this study is the next casualty in the war of nuclear versus humanity. 

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/18/local/la-me-0818-sanonofre-cancer-20120819
Now, in response to growing concerns that using uranium in the production of electrical energy may be dangerous even without accidents, the NRC is trying to decide if it should launch one of the largest epidemiological studies ever conducted to determine if it is a health risk to live near a nuclear facility — such as the San Onofre plant in north San Diego County.
For all the Sham and Corruption in the World, it is still a beautiful place, let's hope the human race wakes up before we exterminate ourselves.    


Monday, September 7, 2015

Evacuation from a Nuclear Diasater is Horrific, The Reality, Not the Emotions

By TOSHIHIDE UEDA/ Senior Staff Writer
KAGOSHIMA--Onions, carrots, garlic and peas were among the crops seen planted carefully on small patches of farmland that lay by the side and at the back of a detached house in this city near the southern end of Kyushu.
Takako Endo, who lives in the house, is a native of Futaba, Fukushima Prefecture, one of the two towns that host the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant. The 71-year-old had to leave her hometown after the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami triggered meltdowns at the plant four years ago.
“I feel composed when I am tending the earth,” she told me when I visited her place in mid-March.
I wrote about Takako and her husband, Shoei, 72, in an article that appeared in the March 24 morning edition of The Asahi Shimbun. In the article, I noted that the couple’s current dwelling amounted to their eighth evacuation shelter. But there is much more to the journey that brought them here than what that terse statement could ever convey.
It is about 1,200 kilometers in linear distance from Futaba to the Endos’ current residence. I suppose it was probably affection for the “earth” that guided the couple through their long itinerary.

1,200 KILOMETERS AWAY

Shoei has kept records of the couple’s successive evacuation shelters in a notebook. Their journey began when they went to take shelter in a community center in Futaba on the night of March 11, 2011, the day the disaster broke out.
They moved the following day to the gymnasium of Iizaka Elementary School in Kawamata, Fukushima Prefecture, some 40 km to the northwest. They subsequently relocated to the Saitama Super Arena multipurpose complex in Saitama, the capital of Saitama Prefecture, on March 19, 2011, and to the former Kisai High School in Kazo, Saitama Prefecture, on March 30, 2011.
One day, during the Endos’ stay in the building that had once housed Kisai High School classrooms, a woman they happened to encounter on coming out of a supermarket invited them to have tea at her home.
“I was moved to tears,” Shoei said of the experience. “ 'Gosh, she is really kindhearted,' I thought to myself.”
When the couple found the courage to ask the woman if she knew of any place where they could tend the earth and farm, the woman took them to one plot of farmland.
“Nobody could have remained in their right mind after being forced to evacuate in a disaster like that,” Shoei said. “We were psychologically down.”
The couple took to frequenting the farmland.
Both Shoei and Takako were born and raised in Futaba. Shoei began using a hoe in his childhood to help his father clear farmland. He and his wife grew crops on the fields that had thus been expanded. They raised three children, partly on the income that Shoei earned from construction work.
Once the nuclear disaster had begun, however, the couple was no longer even able to “tend the earth.”
They rented an apartment in Shirakawa, Fukushima Prefecture, on May 16, 2011, because, in the couple’s words, they were “so desperate to come closer” to their hometown. They again rented farmland near their new residence.
The Endos moved on to a rented house in Sukagawa, Fukushima Prefecture, on Sept. 30, 2011, to live with Harry, their pet dog. They had left Harry in the care of a neighbor when they evacuated to Kawamata.
Shoei and Takako moved farther to Kagoshima, the capital of Kagoshima Prefecture, on March 17, 2012. They decided to do so partly because their eldest son’s family had evacuated to Kagoshima and was living there, but Shoei cited another reason.
“It was like as if we were looking for a new settlement,” the husband explained. “We could no longer go back to Futaba. Given that, we thought we would live as we wanted to live.”
The Endos had their current dwelling built, and moved in there with Harry on Feb. 10, 2013.
I asked the couple what they enjoyed doing.
“Well, having fun.”
Doing what?
“Ground golf, at the moment.”
The Endos joined neighbors whom they had spotted playing ground golf, a sport invented in Japan. They said they participate in training sessions and games three to four days a week.
“Cold and rain never stop us,” Shoei said. “That helps us forget about everything.”

‘OUT OF THE LAND WE CAME’

“Fiction is something rooted in locality,” Masatsugu Ono told a news conference when the 44-year-old writer was awarded the prestigious Akutagawa Prize for literature in January. “Portraying specific localities and individuals and delving deep down do help you arrive at something universal.”
Those words keep reverberating in my ears.
What Ono said probably does not apply only to fiction. The lives of the Endos were certainly rooted in the locality of Futaba.
“I do have lingering affection (for my hometown),” Shoei said in a way that tugged at my heartstrings.
In “The Good Earth,” a 1931 novel by Pearl Buck that won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, Wang Lung, the protagonist who rises from the life of a poor peasant to the height of wealth, is an old man in an ending scene, where he tells two of his sons: “Out of the land we came and into it we must go--and if you will hold your land you can live--no one can rob you of land.”
In real life, however, land is easily uprooted and taken away. Both the house and the farmland the Endos left behind in Futaba lie on the site of a planned interim storage facility for radioactive waste from cleanup efforts.

* * *

The author, based in Fukushima, wrote on other issues.
‘Wishful thinking’ of nuclear insiders must not be allowed to be reborn
Depopulated areas in Fukushima learned bitter lessons from dams
Utilities running a shell game in relying on nuclear power over renewable energy
Fukushima battling utilities' 'no more green energy' decision
In age of LEDs, utilities thinking in incandescent-bulb mode
Fukushima's micro-hydropower ambitions face challenges
Fukushima alive with seeds of industrial innovation
Radioactive pollution endangers cultures of Tohoku mountain communities
Abnormal changes in small birds and the role of science
Disaster-hit Tohoku communities search for a renewable way

LOOKING AT WHAT I SHOULD LOOK AT

LOOKING AT WHAT I SHOULD LOOK AT

--------------------------------
Are you frittering your time away with senseless stuff.   

Do you watch too much TV, or really any for that matter.    

If you bombard your consciousness with endless propaganda, it will damage you.    

-------------------------------------------------

Are you looking at what you should look at?

Anti Nuclear One Liners, Tag Lines, and Jingles

stock here--they don't have to rhyme, but they should flow well, limerics also accepted for fun.

Good to see that Fukushima and the 61 pages of death are getting air play across the world, scroll down

 http://verschwoerer.soup.io/


CodeShutdown: Ask not what Nuclear can do for you, but what it's done for your oncologist

Dr G:  Nuclear plants are dumb, and nuclear weapons are even dumber.

stock:  Nuclear plants are dumb, but nuclear weapons are just bat shit crazy [sorry Doc, had to try the kicked up version too]

Big Al: It's a HELL of a way to boil water

Oppy: I have become death killer of worlds


CodeShutdown
Nuke kooks sell hell.
He is a sellout who compares natural body fluid to nuke fallout
"They are radioactive heavy metal super poisons we know full well, so its time to rise up and get mad as hell"
Warning; he is a dangerous man who says 10,000 Hiroshima bombs is no danger. Fukushima = 10,000 atom bombs

stock
Truth is not the friend of nuke
Nuclear: Too Expensive to Shut Down, too Dangerous to Keep Running

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Nuclear "Trust Us, the Next Generation Nuclear Will Be Safe", and "No One Has Died Yet"

"We have had nuclear power for seventy years and no one died."
This is from Jebus at ENENEWS, doing some great work lately.

Cancer is just the tip of the Iceberg

We went through the fifties and nothing bad happened.

Mayak
Sellafield
Santa Susana

We went through the sixties and nothing bad happened.

Idaho fallls
Fermi

We went through the seventies and nothing bad happened.

Oblast
TMI

We went through the eighties and nothing bad happened.

Chernobyl

We went through the nineties and nothing bad happened.

Tokaimura

We made it through to 2010 and nothing bad happened.

Fukushima
Pilgrim (one step away from a massive radiation release in 2015)


Just to name a few massive releases of toxic nuclear waste.

And most of it went into the sea. The Ocean.       Fukushima still is…

400+ nuclear power plants.
We've already taken the risk.

Someday, there is going to be a lot of environmental contamination from nuclear waste…

Cancer


"Someday", something bad is going to happen with/from nuclear power…

Cesium 137. The flag. 30 year half life.
The most prolific actinide.
Repeat before you rinse. Again…

Delirious
Disorientated
Nightmare
Enter Strontium…
Why are we saying so many goodbye's…

--------------------------------------------------

stock here:
And the nuclear cartel tells us "trust us" the next generation will be safe.   They don't even pretend anymore that it will be "cheap"

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Reflections on Death of the Pacific, and KAT's 61 Page Report of Article Summaries on Same

Fukushima is not your run of the mill nuclear accident.

Instead of a wakeup call for many, it's a coverup call for the corporate interests that be.

Yet we shall try to inform-----------

Kelly Ann Thomas compiled a list of headlines since 2011 detailing the ongoing death of the Pacific. Its 61 pages long.

I posted it as an article for ease of tweeting, FB sharing and the like, Kelly Ann has it on her FB page also.

I put the Kelly Ann Tomas KAT Post here
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/09/61-pages-of-stories-of-death-of-pacific.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dick Shenary had this to say



Most of us for most of our lives have held the belief that the primary responsibility of our government is to protect the welfare of American citizens. We assume this includes our well-being and health. 

During the last thirty-five years this concept has changed as the government became much more interested in protecting the economy and large corporations. Our trade agreements have benefited big business at the expense of the middle class. Manufacturing in this country is disappearing and so is the once vibrant middle class. 

The energy sector including oil, gas, coal, and nuclear power have been protected and subsidized. The US military primarily fights to protect these gigantic corporations so that we have access to “our oil under their sand”. Nuclear power has been heavily protected with ever increasing loan guarantees and the infamous Price Anderson insurance limits. 

Do you really think that the government would step off that speeding train and be honest with west coast citizens as to the peril they now face completely on their own? Not a chance. In support of the erroneous concept of dilution is the solution, Woods Hole continues to count Becquerels in ocean water when what is really needed is to test for contamination in plankton, kelp and fish. 

All life forms have adapted quite well to most external radiation whether natural or to a certain extent man-made. Where we get into trouble is with internal contamination from food, water, and air. A single hot particle inhaled or ingested can create enormous health problems. A good example of this difference is the airline industry. 

Pilots and cabin crew spend a lot of time at high altitude and are regularly exposed to CPMs greater than 1,000. Most of this exposure is gamma and x-ray. There probably are some deleterious effects but for the most part airline employees are not dropping like flies – no pun intended. 

Let us examine the other side of the coin. If the government were to examine the effects of internal contamination and publish their actual results, the fishing industry would collapse, followed by the surfing and tourist industries. Who would buy an ocean front home on the edge of a dying ocean? 

The impact to the national economy would be devastating. What corporation such as GE or Toshiba/Westinghouse who’s poorly designed reactors led to this disaster will step forward to accept financial responsibility? So the scientific confusion and deception continues. 

After all they have been telling us for sixty three years how SAFE this technology has been while concealing ongoing radiation leaks and meltdowns. All of the above may happen regardless of what the government wants but right now normalcy bias rules. 

The few humans who are concerned are labeled as conspiracy nuts and our mental health is questioned. I am sure most of us have faced this normalcy bias with family, friends and coworkers. Remember - All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. (A. Schopenhauer)


Thanks Stephen - aka Dick Shenary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
stock here: Strontium got out, lots of it!

Jebus, another important thing. In normal meltdowns, strontium is not as volatile as Cesium, it doesn't out of the corium so easy.
So if the corium is at the bottom of reactor vessel, the strontium will not get out like the cesium.
Cesium and strontium are about the same quantities in used fuel. So strontium is not focused on
1) because most of it stays in the reactor vessel
2) its just too damn scary for authorities to talk about
HOWEVER, when corium burns on concrete, as happened at Fuku, almost all of the strontium gets out.
My estimates are that in the wild, strontium is about 100 time more dangerous than cesium.
Just a perspective on things.

Some people are surprised there are 12 Bq/Liter in sea water Potassium K40.

But the "low level" waste that they put into WIPP mine dump, is allowed up to 7 curies per liter. A curie is a very large number.

Per the former WIPP lab manager, James Conca, they have stuff in WIPP way hotter than anything at Hanford, 7 Curies per liter. That is enough to bring 1,000,000,000 Costco size chickens up to 200 Bq/lb. – See more at: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-radiation-still-to-go-into-wipp-can.html#sthash.W28rLRwM.dpuf

A curie is 37 bIllion Bq.

So 1 Liter is 259,000,000,000 Bq/Liter.

Compare that to seawater at 12 Bq/liter K40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------




 

Friday, September 4, 2015

61 Pages of Stories of the Death Of The Pacific



This List Compiled by Kelly Ann Thomas 
61 pages describing news aggregation on the death of the largest ocean on earth
Picture of poor little seal, crawling the streets of a city, with pneumonia, because there is no food in the ocean. 




Scientists are “baffled”, “befuddled”, concerned”, and “curious” about the die-off of the Pacific Ocean. Almost no one mentions the F word, Fukushima. I put together a list of links from Enenews.com thatshow a direct correlation between the Fukushima and the die-off, even if scientists refuse to admit it. Every story comes from a major publication. These stories have been out since the beginning of themeltdowns. There is not one scientist studying this who does not have access to this information. Either they chose to look the other way or they are incompetent researchers who don’t really want to know thetruth.
There are a thousand links here, all in chronological order. If you are pressed for time, skip to the back and read backwards to see how bad it really is. I put this file together so that when someone says proveit, at least there are 50 plus pages of links that prove that Fukushima is killing the North Pacific Ocean.Humans are next.
Radioactivity is being “released directly into the atmosphere” – IAEA at 12:15 am EST - March 15th, 2011
monitoring system broken - March 26th, 2011
Nuclear physicist March 28, 2011
Nuclear physicist - March 28th, 2011
-March 29th, 2011
March 30th, 2011
… Kai Vetter, UC Berkeley professor of nuclear engineering [said] “Many people realize this is the only source of hard data out there — which was a surprise to me.” …
It’s not that government agencies aren’t tracking the spread of radioactive materials. But they have so far released very little actual data on isotopes of concern to human health, including iodine-131 andcesium-137.
The Washington Department of Health posts only gross radiation levels, with no information on specific isotopes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which operates a nationwide network of air,rainwater and milk monitoring stations, has released a few batches of data, including two results from milktesting: a sample from Des Moines that showed no detectable radiation and one from Spokane with traceamounts of iodine-131. Scientists from the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Pacific Northwest NationalLaboratory (PNNL) in Richland shared some of the initial data from ultrasensitive instruments designed todetect fallout from nuclear tests, but have since declined to make other results public. …
“If a university professor and his students can collect samples and turn them around in a reasonableamount of time and report it, you would think government officials could do the same,” said RobertAlvarez, senior scholar at the liberal think tank Institute for Policy Studies and a former DOE deputy assistant secretary for national security. …
April 10th, 2011 Note the government withheld this information for a week and a half before reporting it Vietnam finds Uranium-238 in sample of pine needles — 4,000 km away from Fukushima - April 11th,
2011
Nuclear expert says Americium has been found in New England - April 28th, 2011 “I cannot allow this”… government not protecting public from radiation — “Highly unusual” for anacademic to quit in protest - April 30th, 2011
[A Japanese government] adviser resigned during a tearful news conference in which he charged that the
government was not adequately protecting the population from radiation. [...] “I cannot allow this as a scholar,” said Mr. Kosako, an expert on radiation safety at the University of Tokyo.[...]
He also blasted the government for what he said was a lack of transparency in releasing radiation levels around the Fukushima Daiichi plant [...]
Government advisory positions are considered prestigious, and it is highly unusual for an academic toquit one in protest. [...]
The U.S. government has abandoned efforts to monitor elevated levels of radiation that infiltrated thenation’s water and milk in the wake of a nuclear catastrophe in Japan. [...]
“I really am horrified,” said Daniel Hirsch, a nuclear policy lecturer at the University of California, SantaCruz. “It’s quite staggering and it seems to be part of the pattern of the EPA trying to make sure that thereare no measurements that could cause people to be concerned.”
“The agency will return to testing radiation levels in rainwater, drinking water and milk every three months.The next such tests are planned in August.”
(This lady should be charged with war crimes for her asinine statements.)
strategy for Fukushima - May 27th, 2011
(So if you die of cancer, it is because you are depressed and weak-spirited.) “Remember the number 100. Compared to that, the Soviet Union required a mandatory evacuation duringChernobyl at five millisieverts.”
-June 13th, 2011
americium (AUDIO) - June 29th, 2011

called Red Forest (VIDEO) - August 12th, 2011
September 13th, 2011
[...] Matsumoto confirms the prime minister at the time – Naoto Kan – also contemplated evacuating tens of millions of people from in and around Tokyo. [...] “There was no clue about the amount of radiation coming from the Fukushima plant or if it was spreading
over 100 or 200 kilometres.
“If that was the case, Tokyo would be in danger. And prime minister Kan actually said that eastern Japanmight not be able to keep functioning; that it might collapse.” Professor Matsumoto says in the end, talk of tens of millions ["30 million people"] being evacuated was
dismissed, with fears it would cause mass panic and chaos worse than the nuclear crisis itself. [...]
British physicist Wade Allison calls for radical increase in radiation exposure limits - October 6th, 2011 Someone who should be charged with crimes against humanity.
Imagine a government agency lying to the public! What a shock!
- September 19th, 2012
- January 31st, 2013
(But they did not start testing according to NOAA officials in Alaska - or they have not released theresults.)
-August 30th, 2013
This is really important!!!
-September 29th, 2013
-October 6th, 2013
-November 16th, 2013
Clear signs of radiation poisoning.
-December 5th, 2013
Clear evidence ignored by the rest of the scientific community.
So it is okay to lie to the people?
This should be a very scary headline for those living on the West coast
February 5th, 2014
But there is always money for a bloated “defense” budget, Wall Street bailouts, etc.
An extremely important story buried by the press.
Too bad this is not an April Fool’s joke
He is the enemy.
TEPCO, come claim your coriums!
So much for scientific integrity!
All signs of radiation.
May 22nd, 2014
Hug your children closely.
Potato chips!!! These people should be trie for crimes against humanity for these blatant lies.
-August 6th, 2014
Viruses become weaker when they jut to other species. The virus claim doesn’t hold up.
This is war and the government is the enemy.
Another official who should worry when SHTF.
-October 17th, 2014
No more whales.
More denial with the lame virus theory.
Guess we found some of the missing coriums!!!
Like they haven’t been doing this from the beginning.
U.S. - February 3rd, 2015
And still kept secret by the press.
-April 22nd, 2015
So the ocean is dead and the US government thinks we don’t have a right to know? How scientific is that?
All this documentation and they are “at a loss..Maybe the whales ran into a toxin” Sure.
“Quite literally, there isn’t any fish.”