stock here. I was kind of thinking the timing of arresting Ghislaine Maxwell was curious. Especially after Berman was fired from the SDNY. SDNY is so notorious that everyone even knows what it means, Southern District of NY.
If something outrageous, stupid, is going to happen in the courts, it will be in the SDNY.
So it appears that the Cabal has Captured Ghislaine in order to free her while they still have near total control of SDNY. And let no "crisis" go to waste, or no avenue to create a crisis go to waste. Her mistrial will add fuel to riots, and the judge will of course order all records related to the case to be destroyed and the rest of the proceedings to be put "under seal"
Not sure why Trump has not cleaned house of these Obama judges, there will be no justice until they are gone.
Think late September and I really should be back in school.....I mean preparing for an election.....and Chauvin is freed on some technicality that outrages everyone.
The black Muslim Antifa fan, Keith Ellison is in charge of that trial.
What if Ghislaine Maxwell trial is "thrown out" about the same time? Everyone on both sides of the aisle will be ready to riot.
So how do 2 lesbians adopt baby boy twins? I thought adoptions were pretty hard to do, but how does one get "lucky enough" to adopt twins.
I pity those boys growing up with 2 Global Social Justice Warriors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alison Nathan apparently has 2 sons, one of which she named Nathan.
Got it? Nathan Nathan, nothing weird about that?
Her "husband" is literally a Global Social Justice Warrior. This Article wasn't going to be about her mate, but Margaret Satterhwaite is interesting in her own way.
Haiti --- why is it always Haiti? She is going to interview people in post disaster camps about food, water, and gender based violence. I would posit that her strange appearance might skew the results of such an interview all by itself, Haitians will be like "what is wrong with your hair"......
For her, it seems to always be about gender, which seems odd since she seems to be a gender bender.
Satterthwaite has served as a consultant to the United Nations Special
Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation, the
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights
while countering terrorism, the World Health Organization, and the World
Bank.
These people are not just misguided, they are dangerous in their inability to understand cause and effect. Here they are pretending that it wasn't the paid Antifa and BLM riots with pallets of bricks pre-staged, that caused NYC to be boarded up. They try the narrative that it was COVID.
Fauci and his wife. "She" is a full on leftist , Jesuit, imagine that.
Some people think the "virus" itself is a fraud, that it is simply the common cold. I think not and
here is why.
I believe that there is this new corona virus. The genetic sequence places "the virus" right next to SARS-1. They realized that releasing that information was a mistake, and so they then conjured up COVID-19 to make it seem like "something we have never seen before".
If they wanted pure fear factor out of the gate, they would have presented a genetic profile that truly was "like nothing we have ever seen before"
So many reasons to not just fire this guy, indict him.
Saw this at one of my blog roll sites. Guy describing a dream, he seems like a pretty cool cat. He often has lucid dreams in which you know you are in a dream and can even control the dream somewhat. But in this one, he has no idea he is in a dream and thinks this is real life.
I do follow Amazing Polly, maybe once a week, so I don't get all her material.
About a week ago, I had a daylight epiphany that what was being rolled out against the USA and broader world were being subject to MKUltra type abuse in order to create the infamous "Window of Opportunity" in which the MKUltra goal of creating a childlike state of complete acceptance.
And then they install the "program", whatever their goal is.
And so this virus narrative, and the Floyd event, a chronic stress state. Its were we are now, at least going down that road.
If you are not familiar with MKUltra, you need to be. Do your research.
I first put out that theory as a simple assertion on 7-5-20. And I got 2 immediate responses pointing to Amazing Polly, I just started watching so not sure if she is going to play the MKUltra card.
But she is looking at current events as an "Intentional Torture" with the goal of getting the victim to accept something......say like a communistic jack boot?
See how what is happening matches this chart to a T. Amazing Polly will break it down for you.
OK you made it this far and are not in a state of apathy from now knowing that your leaders are trying to break you, trying to brainwash you, trying to damage you just enough.
I have seen this guy before, he is hilarious, and points out many of the vast number of inconsistencies that have been foisted on us. Sorry lost the video, will post if I can find again.
stock here - I will admit, I am a bit dense. Until I saw USGS debris analysis data from 911 showing extreme amounts of ionizing radiation, I did not believe the 911 conspiracy.
But once I saw that data, and did a Deep Dive, the truth became clear, 911 was allowed to happen and they brought the building down by controlled explosions. It's all out there, and it is beyond the point of even arguing about.
I invite you to view and
listen to an interview (about 30 minutes) of Anna Von Reitz (AVR). Robert
David Steele (RDS), former spy with a cherubic face, interviewed her with a
humble posture, presenting as he did a grandmother who knows whereof she speaks!
Kathleen Stillwell
posted a piece authored by RDS on Truth Comes to Light, a welcoming INN
[information network node] along the Internet Highway.
Anna
von Reitz is one of a tiny handful of true experts on the Deep State’s use of
corrupted law and language to undermine the sovereignty and prosperity of We
the People of the land.
Anna
von Reitz discusses the fundamentals of the fraudulent variations of the US
Government actually controlled by the Vatican and Great Britain and announces
how State Assemblies have been called into session in each one of the 50
states.
The
bottom line is that We the People of the land, on the land, are the sovereign
individuals and title holders who are able to renounce, reject, and render null
and void all absentee landlord claims.
She
addresses the unlawful conversion that has taken place in the past – in effect
human trafficking – in which the individuals have been unlawfully converted
into “human capital."
The War
of Secession (the South seeking its lawful right to succeed) and Civil War (the
North illegally seeking to hold the South in bondage so as to loot it) are
discussed.
The
failure of the US Government to live up to the ends of the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution is discussed.
The
US Government is its present form is more like a prison guard and factory owner
harvesting wealth from the people rather than protecting the health and wealth
of the people.
This
is difficult, complex, stuff.
It
will not become clear in one seating.
This
is a starting point.
ACD COMMENT TO POST
ABOVE:
Thank you! As an
INN [information network node] along the Internet Highway, Truth Comes to Light
does great service to its readers passing on Mr. Steele's interview with Anna
Von Reitz. This site offers more data on topics discussed:
www[dot]annavonreitz[dot]com. The seeming "difficulty",
"complexity" are due to our ignorance and the fraud perpetrated on
us. We can rectify both deficiencies.
ACD NOTE:
Kathleen Stillwell,
mistress of Truth Comes to Light, had this editorial comment at the start of
her post.
TCTL editor’s note: Please understand that this is not legal
advice. Legal advice will never be given on this website. This is offered as a
potential tool for your use wherein you take full responsibility for the
outcome of your actions. This is a complex subject. This interview is just a
brief intro into the work of Anna and others on this subject. It will take
study to decide if this is a path you’ll want to engage in. Please do your own
research and trust yourself when reading and when giving consideration to anything
that appears here or anywhere else. Like many readers here, I’ve looked at this
material for years and explored many avenues. Personally, I’d rather just
reboot the entire world and free it of all entrenched systems.I’ll continue to share anything that supports
personal freedom and responsibility. ~ Kathleen
Kathleen's comment about "rebooting" the entire world,
thus to "free it of all entrenched systems" deserves attention and
much more thought than I can give here in passing. The analogy to (personal)
computers may suffice: You can reboot and free your machine of unwanted
glitches, snafus, and electronic miscreants in RAM, but you sure as hell will
not, and do not desire to, "free it of all entrenched systems"!
Unless, of course, you enjoy reinstalling entire operating systems, which I
understand those who run various LINUX distributions do [e.g., Ubuntu]!
For a deeper dive into this rabbit hole, I recommend your reading Miles
Mathis' papers dealing with Phoenicians and their strategy for
world dominance, which continues to unfold and demonstrably achieve success to
this, our day in the sun, FROM WITHIN SYSTEMS!
2.0 TO ASSUME OR NOT TO ASSUME [The Quest I on]
I insert here an edited communication I sent to some of you
previously. It serves, I think, as a useful predicate to 3.0, below.
[A PREFACATORY INTERJECTION: Simply, in logic and law --
you'll get the joke in a minute -- predicate means that which
is said concerning the subject. In a logical proposition; as, “The law is
the perfection of common sense.” “Perfection of common sense,” being affirmed
concerning the law, (the subject) is the predicate or thing predicated.
Wharton; Bourland v. Hildreth, 26 Cal. 232. ACD Q.: How often
do you see a LIE employed to define the meaning of a "simple" word
like predicate?]
I remember to this day an admonition, "To ASSUME can make
an ASS of U and ME." I later received a series of painful
lessons as a senior manager of professional staff from a man who lent his name,
to this day, to the dangerous habit of "assuming" (i.e., "Peter
Walsh Syndrome"). Therefore, revisiting the notion of
"assuming" in the context of COVID seems apropos and worthy of
repetition.
COVID remains a large
gem in the tiara of tyranny, still under development. AynRand
-- born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (February 2, [O.S. January 20] 1905 - March
6, 1982) and raised in Russia -- held me enthralled during late
adolescence, in particular, with the novels The Fountainhead and Atlas
Shrugged. Having arrived in the embryonic USSA in 1926, Ayn Rand
deeply impressed upon me, then an aspiring scientist, one admonition: CHECK YOUR PREMISES!
Here's a "list of
assumptions" useful in checking your premises as they may relate to COVID.
Assumption 1: The Method of Counting COVID
Deaths is Sensible and Accurate
Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate
Assumption 3: The Antibody Test for COVID is
Accurate
Assumption 4: The COVID Case Count is Rising
Assumption 5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID
is Effective
Assumption 6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the
Disease
Assumption 7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely
Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread
Assumption 8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to
Take|Abduct Kids from COVID-Positive Parents
Assumption 9: Social Distancing is Backed by
Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People
is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 11: We Live in a World of
Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
In discussing COVID and
derivative issues with another person, one might first compare (a) which
assumptions both agree hold and (b) which assumptions each agrees to
disagree. Any disagreement about assumptions deserves highest priority
for initial discussion! Otherwise, we can talk in circles forever,
never finding and taking tangents leading to better, mutual understanding, to
Truth of the matter, and to The American Way (so to write).
One might also bear in
mind distinctions between STRONG and WEAK assumptions. For any kind of
argument, a strong assumption is like a cornerstone or foundation. If a
strong assumption does not hold, or is shown invalid or unreliable (that
is, imprecise, degree of uncertainty substantial in application), then the
entirety of the argument FAILS. If a weak assumption proves so (invalid,
unreliable), then the argument may retain integrity, albeit sans the assumption
one now has to abandon. For example, that COVID actually exists, whether
man-made or natural, is a STRONG ASSUMPTION underlying Assumptions 1 through 3
above. Whether or not wearing a mask is healthy or unhealthy, effective
or ineffective, is a WEAK assumption, as are Assumptions 7 and 9.
As a scientist with a
basic medical education -- specifically, Pharmacology and related subjects
(e.g., vaccines as "drugs", virology, histochemistry, biochemistry,
immunology -- I myself call into question the existence of a "COVID-19
entity". Willing for the sake of argument to assume the existence of
the supposed "corona virus", I challenge Assumptions 1 through 3 as
listed above. If you and I, therefore, cannot agree on those foundational
assumptions, then we have no business wasting each other's time trying to argue
issues pertaining to subordinate assumptions!
Floyd lawyer wants the riots to continue. Purple tie noted.
This guy is weak, manipulatable. Pressing for 1st Degree Murder is stupid, and will likely result in a not guilty verdict, released in amazing speed by Black Muslim Antifa Fan Keith Ellison, say beginning of October, to prove that "Trump is racist".
Reporter: Do you have evidence that this was pre-meditated?
Knee on neck for over 8 minutes. Chauvin says no keep him in this position, it shows intent.
Reporter: Did they know each other?
They had to overlap and the club they worked at, and therefore we think this should be first degree murder.
OK, this started off on Twitter with one lawyer from DC offering to defend for free.
The goal here is to get lawyers in all 50+1 states who will defend for free related to abuse of power.
I think he should extend his offering too....sue them personally, the Governors, and sorry, even the stooges enforcing blatantly unconstitutional "orders" that are outside of Governors original and ONLY right to make emergency orders.
We played nice, ONCE. ONCE!
If you’re arrested or fined for opening your business, not wearing a mask, or going to church, DM me.
Republicans have been rather comically freaking out over the big bad gov’mint forcing them to wear masks, inventing various health reasons from their Facebook echo chamber to justify this stance (and of course Trumpbook Facebook is doing nothing to stop it, because Zukerberg is a Trump supporter hence why I don’t have a Facebook page).
First of all, no there is
nothing unusual about being asked to wear a mask in the middle of a
pandemic, such measures have been brought in during past pandemics, such
as the 1918 Spainsh flu. And yes there wear some hold outs (called mask slackers back in the 1918 pandemic) but perhaps not on the scale today (they didn’t have access to Facebook back then).
A “Mask Slacker” is accosted by police in San Franciso during the 1918 flu pandemic
Report this ad
Hospitals also use masks
to control the spread of infections.
And its quite common in many Asian
countries for people to wear a mask if ill. So if any of this anti-mask
BS was even remotely true, we’d know it for sure as there would be
known statistics from a century of data gathering to prove as much (I
particularly find it funny some of them claiming they have breathing
problems while yelling at people).
Unfortunately, masks aren’t hugely effective at stopping you getting infected, but they are very effective at stopping wearers spreading the virus.
Which of course means that if everyone wears them (when social
distancing isn’t possible), then you can greatly reduce the rates of
infection.
Studies have shown a 80% rate of mask wearing would reduce infection rates by 90%. So
in essence it means that we all trade the minor inconvenience of
wearing a mask (and yes I know, on a hot day its not nice to have one
on), in return for reducing all of our changes of getting the virus by a
factor of 10. Which seems a fair trade…..unless you are a conservative.
In a previous post, with regard to SUV drivers and road safety, I discussed how many republicans have a very selfish attitude. I quoted a report into their mindset which noted that many are:
“…..insecure and
vain…They often lack confidence….Above all, they are apt to be
self-centered and self-absorbed, with little interest in their neighbors
and communities…”
“….are very concerned
with how other people see them rather than with what’s practical, and
they tend to want to control or have control over the people around
them….”
Which kind of sums up the
problem. While to most of us, making a small sacrifice for the greater
good makes sense. But its not the same if you are an vain, insecure,
selfish person who doesn’t give a toss about anybody but yourself. Even
if you are ultimately endangering yourself and everybody else in the
process.
Report this ad
And
republicans are also very conscious of how they are viewed by their
peers. If you ever go on their discussion forums you’ll notice they way
they pressure one another to conform is often driven by how you will be
perceived and judged (if you wear a mask you’ll look like a liberal, if
you don’t carry a gun you’ll look like a pussy).
This not only explains
the opposition to masks, but also their opposition to other things.
In my previous article for
example I noted how the proliferation of SUV’s was driven by a
perception of them being safer, when in fact they lack crumple zones are
and are more prone to single vehicle rollover accidents. The end result
being a much higher rate of fatal accidents.
And we see much the same
with guns. You might feel safer with a gun in the house, but statistics
say the opposite is true.
Climate change also
represents another good example. We all make a few little sacrifices
(try to use less energy, recycle more, transition to less polluting
energy sources), for the greater good, noting that the longer you stretch out the transition, the lower the impact
(hence delaying action is not advised). But of course to a
conservative, no why should I use low-energy bulbs (which save money)
when I can instead waste energy (and my money) just so I can look good in front of my fellow inbreed control freaks conservatives.
And their desire to be
seen to be in control makes it difficult for them to change their minds.
As that could be perceived as a sign of weakness by their peer group.
This is made worse by the conservative propensity for self delusion.
I recall a psychiatrist once pointing out to me that the brain is wired
up to make decisions quickly and justify the decision afterwards.
This
makes sense from an evolutionary stand point. Something moves in the
bushes and jumps out, you want to react quickly. Of course if it turns
out to just be a rabbit (rather than a bobcat), well, your brain is
supposed to take those facts on board and remember not to be so jumpy
next time around.
However republican brains will twist the facts to justify the original decision. No they’ll argue rabbits are deadly animals
we should fear and run away from.
And nothing will persuade them
otherwise. And I assume they only survived evolution because no liberal
pointed out to them that while rabbits are safe, tigers are dangerous
and you should stay away from them (which would have led them to go and
hug a tiger just to prove them dems are wrong).
Report this ad
This explains how they will engage in such elaborate delusionary arguments,
twisting facts, logic, time and space to justify anything. Because in
their mind, they minute they admit they are wrong about something, they
are less of a rugged individual and their fragile ego just cannot take that sort of a hit.
And it also explains how republican leaders can make massive 180 degree pivots
without their supporters noticing or calling them out over it. When a
democrat is office, the deficit is the worse crime in history. Soon as
Trump took over, deficits?Who cares about those! lets
give the rich a tax cut. Within a month of a democrat taking over,
they’ll likely develop selective amnesia regarding Trump (I bet you they
will blame every bad that’s happened on Trump’s watch on Biden if he
wins).
They demanded that Obama and Hilary be locked up for Benghazi and 9-11 (yes really! they think its Obama’s fault!),
but they will completely ignore the 120,000 dead (and counting) thanks
to Trump’s incompetence.
Because their supporters subconsciously know
that if they ever admit to their leaders being lying, incompetent,
con-men (who are probably constantly laughing their asses off at these
morons as they count their ill-gotten gains), that’s going to make them
look likely total mugs for being fooled by them for so long.
That’s why
Trump is only 8-10 points behind in the polls (meaning a 4-5% swing
could win him the election). Its a classic feature of any con, get the
mark to emotionally commit to the con.
Report this ad
Certainly Trump and other leading republicans refusal to wear masks doesn’t help. It represents very poor leadership and adds fuel to the fire and has ensured the pandemic will last longer,
kill more people and do more damage to the economy . But they are
repeating what is coming out of the conservative echo chamber of
delusion rather than driving it.
But watch and wait and you’ll see
plenty of those screwed over by the Tories lining up to vote for them
again next election.
Every
year of the last labour government, healthcare spending went up, every
year of Tory government it went down, yet some Tory voters will shrug
their shoulders and not draw the obvious link
Given that it will take about 2-4 months for things to stabilise, this will make campaigning difficult.
And getting hundreds of thousands of your own supporters killed on the
eve of an election, is hardly a sensible election strategy. Even if a
further set of lockdowns is avoided, as many will chose to self isolate
to avoid infection, meaning the economic impact of the virus will be
extended. Hence the economic recovery Trump is hoping for might not
occur by the election day.
Republicans may find that
the ultimately cure to their delusionary mentality is a democratic
president, with democratic control of both houses. And maybe the
solution is for democrats to start acting like republicans.
I’d
recommend using every dirty mean underhand trick to win the election
(e.g. insist they wear masks at polling stations). And once in office,
ignore the constitution just as much as Trump did.
And use that power to
after Trump and his cronies as well as “Trump proofing” the
political system (so voting reform, judicial reform and ultimately
splinting the powers of president into a head of state and head of
government).
And take the opportunity to roll back everything the GOP
have worked for over the last few decades. There’s no point trying to
appeal to conservative voters better nature – they don’t have one.
stock here. I was kind of thinking the timing of arresting Ghislaine Maxwell was curious. Especially after Berman was fired from the SDNY. SDNY is so notorious that everyone even knows what it means, Southern District of NY.
The black Muslim Antifa fan, Keith Ellison is in charge of that trial.
