stock here - I will admit, I am a bit dense. Until I saw USGS debris analysis data from 911 showing extreme amounts of ionizing radiation, I did not believe the 911 conspiracy.
But once I saw that data, and did a Deep Dive, the truth became clear, 911 was allowed to happen and they brought the building down by controlled explosions. It's all out there, and it is beyond the point of even arguing about.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
So for half a decade now, I have been hearing from the USA in some tricky swap a roo, is effectively usurped by a Corporation in control.
The guest poster who provided the following guides......
This is difficult, complex, stuff.It will not become clear in one seating.This is a starting point.
Perhaps I shall start today.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear friends and
correspondents,
A triptych of topics
follow.
1.0 INTRODUCTORY
TOPIC
I invite you to view and
listen to an interview (about 30 minutes) of Anna Von Reitz (AVR). Robert
David Steele (RDS), former spy with a cherubic face, interviewed her with a
humble posture, presenting as he did a grandmother who knows whereof she speaks!
-----------------
Kathleen Stillwell
posted a piece authored by RDS on Truth Comes to Light, a welcoming INN
[information network node] along the Internet Highway.
Anna
von Reitz is one of a tiny handful of true experts on the Deep State’s use of
corrupted law and language to undermine the sovereignty and prosperity of We
the People of the land.
Anna
von Reitz discusses the fundamentals of the fraudulent variations of the US
Government actually controlled by the Vatican and Great Britain and announces
how State Assemblies have been called into session in each one of the 50
states.
The
bottom line is that We the People of the land, on the land, are the sovereign
individuals and title holders who are able to renounce, reject, and render null
and void all absentee landlord claims.
She
addresses the unlawful conversion that has taken place in the past – in effect
human trafficking – in which the individuals have been unlawfully converted
into “human capital."
The War
of Secession (the South seeking its lawful right to succeed) and Civil War (the
North illegally seeking to hold the South in bondage so as to loot it) are
discussed.
The
failure of the US Government to live up to the ends of the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution is discussed.
The
US Government is its present form is more like a prison guard and factory owner
harvesting wealth from the people rather than protecting the health and wealth
of the people.
This
is difficult, complex, stuff.
It
will not become clear in one seating.
This
is a starting point.
ACD COMMENT TO POST
ABOVE:
Thank you! As an
INN [information network node] along the Internet Highway, Truth Comes to Light
does great service to its readers passing on Mr. Steele's interview with Anna
Von Reitz. This site offers more data on topics discussed:
www[dot]annavonreitz[dot]com. The seeming "difficulty",
"complexity" are due to our ignorance and the fraud perpetrated on
us. We can rectify both deficiencies.
ACD NOTE:
Kathleen Stillwell,
mistress of Truth Comes to Light, had this editorial comment at the start of
her post.
TCTL editor’s note: Please understand that this is not legal
advice. Legal advice will never be given on this website. This is offered as a
potential tool for your use wherein you take full responsibility for the
outcome of your actions. This is a complex subject. This interview is just a
brief intro into the work of Anna and others on this subject. It will take
study to decide if this is a path you’ll want to engage in. Please do your own
research and trust yourself when reading and when giving consideration to anything
that appears here or anywhere else. Like many readers here, I’ve looked at this
material for years and explored many avenues. Personally, I’d rather just
reboot the entire world and free it of all entrenched systems. I’ll continue to share anything that supports
personal freedom and responsibility. ~ Kathleen
Kathleen's comment about "rebooting" the entire world,
thus to "free it of all entrenched systems" deserves attention and
much more thought than I can give here in passing. The analogy to (personal)
computers may suffice: You can reboot and free your machine of unwanted
glitches, snafus, and electronic miscreants in RAM, but you sure as hell will
not, and do not desire to, "free it of all entrenched systems"!
Unless, of course, you enjoy reinstalling entire operating systems, which I
understand those who run various LINUX distributions do [e.g., Ubuntu]!
For a deeper dive into this rabbit hole, I recommend your reading Miles
Mathis' papers dealing with Phoenicians and their strategy for
world dominance, which continues to unfold and demonstrably achieve success to
this, our day in the sun, FROM WITHIN SYSTEMS!
2.0 TO ASSUME OR NOT TO ASSUME [The Quest I on]
I insert here an edited communication I sent to some of you
previously. It serves, I think, as a useful predicate to 3.0, below.
[A PREFACATORY INTERJECTION: Simply, in logic and law --
you'll get the joke in a minute -- predicate means that which
is said concerning the subject. In a logical proposition; as, “The law is
the perfection of common sense.” “Perfection of common sense,” being affirmed
concerning the law, (the subject) is the predicate or thing predicated.
Wharton; Bourland v. Hildreth, 26 Cal. 232. ACD Q.: How often
do you see a LIE employed to define the meaning of a "simple" word
like predicate?]
I remember to this day an admonition, "To ASSUME can make
an ASS of U and ME." I later received a series of painful
lessons as a senior manager of professional staff from a man who lent his name,
to this day, to the dangerous habit of "assuming" (i.e., "Peter
Walsh Syndrome"). Therefore, revisiting the notion of
"assuming" in the context of COVID seems apropos and worthy of
repetition.
COVID remains a large
gem in the tiara of tyranny, still under development. Ayn Rand
-- born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (February 2, [O.S. January 20] 1905 - March
6, 1982) and raised in Russia -- held me enthralled during late
adolescence, in particular, with the novels The Fountainhead and Atlas
Shrugged. Having arrived in the embryonic USSA in 1926, Ayn Rand
deeply impressed upon me, then an aspiring scientist, one admonition: CHECK YOUR PREMISES!
Here's a "list of
assumptions" useful in checking your premises as they may relate to COVID.
Assumption 1: The Method of Counting COVID
Deaths is Sensible and Accurate
Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate
Assumption 3: The Antibody Test for COVID is
Accurate
Assumption 4: The COVID Case Count is Rising
Assumption 5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID
is Effective
Assumption 6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the
Disease
Assumption 7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely
Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread
Assumption 8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to
Take|Abduct Kids from COVID-Positive Parents
Assumption 9: Social Distancing is Backed by
Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People
is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
Assumption 11: We Live in a World of
Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
In discussing COVID and
derivative issues with another person, one might first compare (a) which
assumptions both agree hold and (b) which assumptions each agrees to
disagree. Any disagreement about assumptions deserves highest priority
for initial discussion! Otherwise, we can talk in circles forever,
never finding and taking tangents leading to better, mutual understanding, to
Truth of the matter, and to The American Way (so to write).
One might also bear in
mind distinctions between STRONG and WEAK assumptions. For any kind of
argument, a strong assumption is like a cornerstone or foundation. If a
strong assumption does not hold, or is shown invalid or unreliable (that
is, imprecise, degree of uncertainty substantial in application), then the
entirety of the argument FAILS. If a weak assumption proves so (invalid,
unreliable), then the argument may retain integrity, albeit sans the assumption
one now has to abandon. For example, that COVID actually exists, whether
man-made or natural, is a STRONG ASSUMPTION underlying Assumptions 1 through 3
above. Whether or not wearing a mask is healthy or unhealthy, effective
or ineffective, is a WEAK assumption, as are Assumptions 7 and 9.
As a scientist with a
basic medical education -- specifically, Pharmacology and related subjects
(e.g., vaccines as "drugs", virology, histochemistry, biochemistry,
immunology -- I myself call into question the existence of a "COVID-19
entity". Willing for the sake of argument to assume the existence of
the supposed "corona virus", I challenge Assumptions 1 through 3 as
listed above. If you and I, therefore, cannot agree on those foundational
assumptions, then we have no business wasting each other's time trying to argue
issues pertaining to subordinate assumptions!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments