Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Friday, May 13, 2016

Another Nuclear Plant Bites The Dust, Fort Calhoun To Be Closed This Year

And good Riddance!  Fort Calhoun Nuke Plant Is To Be Closed

Aloha!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/oppd-looks-to-shut-down-fort-calhoun-nuclear-plant/article_9b559bec-a087-5c3a-a9bc-c187d66322ea.html

Continued operation of Fort Calhoun Station is not in the long-term financial interests of Omaha Public Power District or its customer-owners, President and CEO Tim Burke told the OPPD board Thursday.
Senior OPPD management is recommending engineers split their last atom by the end of this year and begin the decommissioning process.
“Overall this was a financial decision. The bottom line was that it is just not economically viable to continue operations there,” OPPD spokesman Mike Jones said in an interview following the meeting.

And here is a longer article
http://www.omaha.com/money/oppd-ceo-shut-down-fort-calhoun-nuclear-plant-by-end/article_f8b86658-184e-11e6-b852-8f5144170b67.html
OPPD ratepayer Mark Welsch, who attended Thursday’s meeting, commended the utility’s management team and board for taking up the issue. Welsch is the head of the Omaha chapter of the advocacy group Nebraskans for Peace. He said the utility should be tilting toward renewable sources of energy, like wind.
“I’m very proud to be a customer-owner of OPPD right now,” he said. “The board is taking a hard look at a very hard potential decision it will have to make.”
If the board follows through on the recommendation, OPPD’s wind and renewable generation will make up 49 percent of its energy portfolio by 2020, up from 38 percent that is currently forecast.
============================
The reality....no company has set aside enough money to decomission these plants.....

OPPD in its 2015 annual report estimated that the costs to decommission Fort Calhoun would be about $884 million. The utility has socked away about $373 million for those costs.

============================================
And the NRC is headed by weasels.....
http://tdworld.com/news/rejuvenating-aging-fleet-jumpstarting-modulars-0


Stephen Burns, chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, recently sat down with The Energy Times for a broad discussion about nuclear power in America. This is the last of a two-part series.
ENERGY TIMES: For existing nuclear plants, will there be universal attempts to extend license goings for another 20 years, up to a total of 60 years or more?
BURNS: For 60 years - certainly yes. About 80 percent of the existing fleet has received initial license renewal for 40 to 60 years.  For a plant that came online in the mid-1980’s, 0 years gets you to 2025 and another 20 gets you potentially 2045.  The industry is looking at the possibility of moving from 60 to 80 years.
ENERGY TIMES: To get from 60 to 80 years - will it require massive capital investment?
BURNS: I don’t probably have any particulars on the investment.  There’s going to be some costs with that.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per reader comment below, see the link

TY, yes I lived in Illinois, I know how incredibly corrupt it is.   No coincidence with all the race bating and the emergence of Obama from that area.

Illinois exports equivalent of 3 nuke plants to other states.   Illinois considering handing citizen money to bolster corporate profits to "bailout" three nuke plants.

hmmmmmmmm

http://www.noexelonbailout.com/news/2016/5/2/043016-crains-exelon-tells-wall-st-one-thing-about-profits-while-peddling-a-different-tale-in-springfield

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Would an Earth Magnetic Reversal Result in Earth Being Stripped of Its Oxygen?

stock here--saw this interesting discussion at Suspicious Observers.
The author "CindyDiesintheEnd" is kind of a taunting arsehole, but does finally provide some decent links, and some degree of interpretation, but not in any impressive, helpful, or convincing way.  
I think I can sum up the "Cindy" take as this...the Earth is going to be stripped of all its oxygen and
that it will happen in the next few generations of humans. 

I have personally been looking at the pole shift issue for many years.    Here is one article I wrote:


I believe a "pole shift" occurred about 40,000 years ago, and with it, of course, came reduced magnetic field (aka shield) and much higher gamma radiation from space and sun.    It also marked a massive uptick in human "cave art" indicating quite possibly that the increased gamma had caused a successful human mutation.   We got lucky on that one.

Oxygen was not stripped and there was not a mass extinction.    We have plenty of black swans, we don't need to take white ones and paint them black.

Sure appreciate any and all comments!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
CindyDiesintheEnd
December 8, 2014 at 5:55 pm #11768
 
I am very pressed for time, but between FOTW, and the serendipity of the following addition to the riddle.

Briefly, I digress to Tony’s wild goose chase with Einstein and Velikovsky. True, he was one of the last to have Einstein reviewing his manuscript, but it had much more to do with common cultural ties and perhaps nostalgia, more than anything else.

Einstein spent most of his time with Velikovsky trying to talk him out if some of his ideas that challenged “conventional science”. This was ironic given his views on censorship. However he felt Velikovsky’s ideas would be more “palatable” if they were a bit “toned down”.

Towards the end of his life Einstein had grown a bit cynical of the Establishment, and a bit bored with relativity.

And that brings the Gift of Fire, to make his Unified Field Theory work, he decided he had to “get around relativity”.  In the 1700 or so manuscript pages that were “found” behind Dukas’ archival office in Princeton’s filing cabinet just shortly before the whole batch was shipped to Jerusalem in the 80s, is your answer to defeating the answer to the riddle.

Its very unlikely those pages accidentally ended up there. Dukas was devoted to her rask, detail oriented, and fastidious. (they were found after she passed, i believe) I don t believe much progress has been made working with those pages.

Which perhaps is fortuitous, because the fact our increasingly weakening magnetosphere, is probably going to make your glorious paper as useful as a paperweight. Ok, we’ll maybe less so.
It was not mentioned before, but there is lag time between what is happening with the sun, and the effects on Earth, here. So I wonder what else happens? Well, if you get past the lousy weather, the Earth wooziness of a excursion or reversal, breathing is going to become a real problem. That’s gonna leave a mark.  Winner of the intergalactic lottery, remember?
Ben, that is all I can get on that, at this time.
Now, I am finding translations or doing them myself on some articles that of are substantial interest.  In the meantime, I would ask you to reconsider this article you discussed previously in light of what’s going on now.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X14001629#br0220
this may help you further flesh out some aspects. Be aware that always, what happens at the Sun, affects here.

this article does not consider more recent developments such as the “oceans” under the surface, nor does it consider abrupt scenarios, but its quite juicy. I don’t believe you have read it previously.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1029/2011GL048784/asset/grl28454.pdf?v=1&t=i3fwl7so&s=580efe7ef72ecf11d92297a30a329d31c5e77320
here is the abstract,

[1] The discovery of the reversals of Earth’s magnetic field and the description of plate tectonics are two of the main breakthroughs in geophysics in the 20th century. We claim that these two phenomena are correlated and that plate tectonics controls long-term changes in geomagnetic reversal frequency. More precisely, geological intervals characterized by an asymmetrical distribution of the continents with respect to the equator are followed by intervals of high reversal frequency. We speculate that the distribution and symmetry of mantle structures driving continental motions at the surface influence the equatorial symmetry of the flow within the core and thus change the coupling between the dipolar and quadrupolar modes which controls the occurrence of reversals.

See also:

http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140606/ncomms5014/full/ncomms5014.html
Momentum transport in the solar wind erosion of the Mars ionosphere (Article)
(As u know, Mars and Venus do not have a strong magnetic field, but we do know at some point, their atmosphere got sucked into space, so to speak)
So um, like, at what point does our weakening fields cause an acute increase of atmospheric loss of oxygen ions from earth through magnetospheric processes?
And my personal doomy fave:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JA020549/abstract
Abstract
The Earth’s dipole moment has been decaying over the past 1.5 centuries. The magnetosphere thus has been shrinking and the chance of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings has been increasing. We quantitatively evaluate the increasing exposure of geosynchronous orbit in the solar wind caused by the decay of dipole moment and the variation of solar wind condition, and study the possible situation if such decay persists for several more centuries. The results show that the average subsolar magnetopause distance would move earthward by ~0.3 RE per century, assuming the linear decreasing of the Earth’s dipole moment at present rate. The minimum solar wind dynamic pressure required for geosynchronous magnetopause crossings will decrease by ~4 nPa (2 nPa) in the next 100 years under northward (southward) interplanetary magnetic field. Under normal solar wind conditions, the noon region of the geosynchronous orbit will be exposed to the solar wind in the next few centuries. These results suggest that the secular variations of geomagnetic field are of paramount importance for our understanding of space climate

Well somebody starting to get it. Too bad their assumption are a bit wrong and timing is off.
But see,

http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035831319&origin=inward&txGid=7592DD3789A790EC9FE88090BB7C188D.53bsOu7mi7A1NSY7fPJf1g%3a6

(Avoids catastrophic or acute scenarios, but informative)

So now might be a good time to get around that whole relativity thing. Be glad you have some resources available you can talk to. That guy that helped build the space shuttle might be useful.
Good Times.

will be back to read comments eventually, and will be posting more tools needed, in the meantime, happy hunting guys and gals

PSS-brilliant albeit probably unreliable and a bullshitter, but check out Eric Dollard’s lectures, especially on the History of electromagnetism. Probably gonna need to grasp some of that, for starters

CindyDiesintheEnd
December 9, 2014 at 2:30 pm #11784
Drat! This is what happens when one can’t use their secretary for “Internet stuff”. Mea culpa, some of the above links are frakked, so lets try a different way.
Google this, u guys already have a link
Oxygen escape from the Earth during geomagnetic reversals: Implications to mass extinction. Yong Weia, b, c, , ,; Zuyin Pub,; Qiugang Zongb,; Weixing Wana, …
Plate tectonics may control geomagnetic reversal frequency
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011GL048784/full
Pétrélis, F., J. Besse, and J.-P. Valet (2011), Plate tectonics may control geomagnetic reversal frequency, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19303, doi:10.1029/2011GL048784.
http://gsabulletin.gsapubs.org/content/82/9/2433.abstract
Faunal Extinctions and Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field
JAMES D HAYS (oldie but goodie)
(Party in the House for AGWs followed by terrible, horrible extinction–yay, well food for thought)
A Model of Correlated Episodicity in Magnetic-Field Reversals, Climate, and Mass Extinctions
David E. Loper, Kevin McCartney and George Buzyna
The Journal of Geology
Vol. 96, No. 1 (Jan., 1988), pp. 1-15
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/30064982?uid=2460338175&uid=2460337935&uid=2&uid=4&uid=83&uid=63&sid=21104804690611
Enhanced atmospheric oxygen outflow on Earth and Mars driven by a corotating interaction region Wei
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011JA017340/full
Increasing exposure of geosynchronous orbit in solar wind due to decay of Earth’s dipole field zhong
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JA020549/abstract
Before I forget, consider the fact that as of 2014 the Holocene is roughly 11,750 years old
Timing, is everything.
Fuller (Fuller, M., Geomagnetic field intensity, excursions, reversals and the 41,000-yr obliquity signal, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 245 (2006) 605–615
Testing the relationship between timing of geomagnetic reversals/excursions and phase of orbital cycles using circular statistics and Monte Carlo simulations Xuan
obliquity signal, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 245 (2006) 605–615.) pointed out that, for 9 reversals over the last 3 Myr, reversal age has a non-random relationship to the phase of orbital obliquity.
(There are articles for and against Fuller out there, btw)
For extra points, guess what phase of orbital eccentricity we are in/ heading for?
Glacial Inception anyone?
Since Mccenny does it so well, brush up on the end of the Holocene
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/29/glacial-inception/
We have a lot of things coalescing roughly close in time. This is the ghost story of our children’s children, and this is After the other stuff. If we are also truly close to the end of the interglacial, I think we are so f$&@ked we can’t even take a bus, back to f$&@ked. Even if its by degrees of severity, its still gonna leave a huge mark.
The rough , and I mean rough estimate is two generations, + /- 30 years.
So, are we having fun yet, kids?

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Chelation, a Panacea to Our Toxic World? Or a Threat to Our Health and Pocketbook?

Those who are "selling" Chelation seem to have a one sided "good" or "great" view on chelation.

Then there are those who spend massive efforts trying to show how chelation is not a panacea.

I would like to hear your opinion, or send links to your own research, I will post them into the article.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personally, I like chelation through basic and cheap means like Miso soup with dandelion leafs.   I think that form is useful and not harmful.   First, do no harm.   How far the medical industry has drifted.

http://ecowatch.com/2016/04/27/states-blocking-rooftop-solar/#comment-2671420426



Reddler

Why have I never been diagnosed with accumulation of mercury from medical personnel? My dad was a coal miner for 40 years he was never diagnosed with an accumulation of mercury, nor was my grandfather who was miner for over 50 years? There should be multiple people with accumulation of mercury built up in their system in the area where I live. Coal has been mined here since the 1880s.
 Here is the anti-chelation crowd

http://www.chelationwatch.org/reg/fda.shtml







Breaking the Code: Radiation is Not Evenly Distributed, So Damage to Nearby Areas Can be Greater Than Predicted by "Calculation"



From Codeshutdown
-------------------------------------------------------------
Stock

I noticed a poster on your site said we should prove bioaccumulation by testing  some chitin. But uneven distribution means the average rad level may not tell the story.  Also, last week we visited the morphogenesis regulators.  Field gradients are key. Both chemical and electrical.  Ionic and voltage gradients will definitely warp the bioelectric field.  This is a non genetic type of deformation process...it would perhaps be called epigenetic. Or more to the point bioelectric morphogenesis. Check out this site http://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/levin/research/spatial.htm


“We’ve found that cells communicate, even across long distances in the embryo, using bioelectrical signals, and they use this information to know where to form a brain and how big that brain should be,” says the paper’s corresponding author Michael Levin, Ph.D


Galvanotactic control of collective cell migration in epithelial monolayers http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v13/n4/abs/nmat3891.html
=============

Radionuclides are not evenly distributed. The usual measurements of radiation wont show these point sources and the average radiation dose may seem low level.

A lobster claw showing point source distribution of radioactive calcium and strontium.


from


uneven distribution of nuclear fallout in trees shown by autoradiographs. Point source ionic and voltage fields disturb the bioelectric field which is a regulator of morphogenesis. Measuring bulk becquerels and using the ICRP sievert system will not show this


=====================

Scientists are blinded by nuclear science! Theyve all been hoodwinked by the ICRP model! Its as simple as that.

Radiation testing wont reveal death and illness due to fallout.
Radioactive iodine has damaged thyroids but is no longer detectable.
Other short lived isotopes have also done their damage and are no longer detectable. Cesium has been shown to be dangerous 50 bq/kg, even 10 bq/kg and this will be totally dismissed by science as one hundredth the level of concern.

Radiographs show that nuclear fallout forms point sources in living beings. High 'specific activity' radioisotopes dont remain evenly dispersed, and are not diluted at the atomic or nanoparticle level. Thus radioactivity measurements averaged over any significant quantity of tissue may be misleading.

photo showing natural compositional sorting…in this case magnetite.

radiographs showing point source radionuclide deposition and biological sorting http://www.haa.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/MorizumiFlier%20image.jpg

strontium lung scan
from

This is a good paper to show to marine scientists who are blinded by the ICRP model. Chiyo Nohara died doing research, showing an LD50 for a butterfly larva of 2 becquerels

The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the pale grass blue butterfly Atsuki Hiyama, Chiyo Nohara deterioration is due to artificial radionuclides from Fukushima
=================

point source bioaccumulation and a possible link to the photoelectron theory by Busby and Schmug Chris Busby of the Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (IPNSS) in Braunschweig, Germany, and the University of Ulster, UK, and Ewald Schnug, director of the IPNSS, claim that uranium atoms in the body could act as "radiation antennas". They argue that uranium atoms could be capturing photons of background gamma radiation and then re-emitting their energy as fast-moving electrons that act on the surrounding tissue in the same way as beta radiation. This "phantom radiation" could be over 1000 times more damaging than the alpha particles released by depleted uranium's slow nuclear decay, according to their preliminary calculations.

Their theory invokes a well-known process called the photoelectric effect. This is the main mechanism by which gamma photons with energies of about 100 kiloelectronvolts (keV) or less are blocked by matter: the photon transfers its energy to an electron in the atom's electron cloud, which is ejected into the surroundings.

An atom's ability to stop photons by this mechanism depends on the fourth power of its atomic number - the number of protons in its nucleus

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

War on Solar -- Headed by the Nuclear Cartel

I have long wanted to do an extensive investigation and article on the "War on Solar".

Being in the business since 1995, the evolution of things is obvious to me.    As is the War on Solar.

When I have time (good luck on that) I will expand this War on Solar concept with my own observations.    For now, let it be known that it is real, and it is real damaging to society, to real people, the war on solar that is.   


http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/i-was-wrong-about-the-economic-limitations-of-solar-power#comment-2651349234

Over the last few years, solar PV has gotten cheap. Cheap enough to start impacting some commodity energy markets today. Cheap enough that with continued progress, but no breakthroughs, it might alter the global outlook for energy supply within a decade.

I have long been skeptical of solar hype. In 2008 we did an expert judgment exercise suggesting only even odds of getting to module prices of $0.30 per watt in 2030. In 2011 we did some analysis showing how the power-law learning curve for modules appeared to be flattening. That analysis was done at the end of a decade that saw big increases in installed capacity, with little corresponding change in module prices.

I worried that deployment incentives (the global total amounting to many hundreds of billions of dollars over the past decade) would simply lock in the current technologies and do little to drive the breakthroughs that were needed to get solar cheap enough to compete for commodity power.

I was wrong.