stock here: I think this is a good time to review the leaders of our Democracy, and how they lie and actually kill Americans. In particular, Obama and Hillary Clinton. Clinton I dealt with in this research article, gleaned from watching her in real time and just this month a review of the emails that she did release.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/02/clintons-emails-released-clearly-show.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And then he left with his family on an unplanned trip to South
America, with GE CEO Geoffrey Emmelt. Proof is at the bottom, please
read this whole thing.
Oh yeah, and sign up as a follower, so I actually might believe that people read my articles.
Hmmmmmmmm. Watch this video.
we
are bringing all available resources to bear....our 50 mile evacuation
is based on careful scientific evaluation". Jackzo was later sacked
in his job. 10 to 1 he got a pension from US.
On April 8th, 2011, 4 weeks after GE's reactors blow up in Fukushima, this article in Forbes RE
The Unholy Marriage Of GE And President Obama At The Altar Of Industrial Policy
Note--there
are only 2 comments on this story that is 4 years old. Americans
have no interest in this humdrum boring industrial political
story....even though it pervades their life in dozens of ways, and feeds
the governmental corruption and the .1%
http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2011/04/08/the-unholy-marriage-of-ge-and-president-obama-at-the-altar-of-industrial-policy/
Link to the video
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-japan-nuclear-crisis-harmful-radiation-us/story?id=13158789
In
July 2010, Jeffrey Immelt was harshly critical of Obama, and of "The
Bernank". Funny, I have been harshly critical of both of them, and
they never handed me a sweet gig with great benefits.
Business doesn’t like the president, and he feels the same way about
business, Immelt said. He contrasted Obama’s attitude to that of German
Chancellor Angela Merkel, who defends German industry, Immelt said.
“I am not sure that in the end they want any of us to win, or any of us to be successful.”
So Obama silences the criticism by handing him a government high office.
On March 15th the Government announced Obama and family going to Brazil and Chile:
http://photos.state.gov/libraries/burma/895/pdf/ANV20110315.pdf
White House press secretary Jay Carney said the president and first lady Michelle Obama will meet with the leaders and speak to the people of these countries (Brazil and Chile)
to discuss a broad range of issues including economic
prosperity and job creation through increased trade and
partnerships, energy and security cooperation, shared values
and other regional and global concerns
Obama's Travel Companions in Brazil
MichaelSavage.com ^
| 3/19/2011
Posted on 3/19/2011, 3:52:59 PM by GVnana
U.S. CEOs IN BRAZIL WITH OBAMA
JEFFREY R. IMMELT - CEO, GENERAL ELECTRIC
Jeffrey Robert Immelt.. Immelt will retain his post at G.E. while becoming
"chairman of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, a newly named panel that President Obama is creating by executive order."
ARIS CANDRIS - CEO, WESTINGHOUSE
Prior to this appointment, Dr. Candris served as senior vice
president, Nuclear Fuel, providing fuel fabrication, components and
services to commercial nuclear power plants worldwide.
JAMES T. HACKETT – CEO, ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP
He currently serves as
a director of Fluor Corporation, Halliburton Company and The Welch Foundation.
JOHN V. FARACI – CEO, INTERNATIONAL PAPER
John V. Faraci, 60, is ... a trustee of Denison University and a
member of the Citigroup International Advisory Board. ... He is a trustee of the American Enterprise Institute.
ANTHONY S. HARRINGTON – CEO, ALBRIGHT STONEBRIDGE GROUP
Anthony S. Harrington is President and CEO of Albright Stonebridge Group, a global st
In case you don't trust Michael Savage, here is the "program" from the Brazil Council
http://www.brazilcouncil.org/sites/default/files/2013%20Program%20of%20Work_FINAL.pdf
LOL,
just a bonus...there are great posters at physicsforums, but the head
moderators like astronuc having really swallowed the blue pill
And a great perspective on "why did things play out like they did" from PhillipUpNorth, ya der eh?
PhilipUpNorth
just a matter of money:
Suppose you are the President of the US towards the end of March, 2011.
Oval Office meeting about Fukushima.
-
The CDC calculates 10,000 Fukushima Cancers in CA, OR, HI, and WA.
-
Some others in other states.
-
Over next 20 years.
-
Somebody asks the question: Should we recommend western states keep kids inside for recess as plume passes over?
-
Sure, but how many of those 10,000 Fukushima Cancers do we avoid by doing this?
-
Answer: Maybe 1,000. Folks will get dosed at home, eating food, riding in vehicles, drinking water, and in classrooms anyway.
-
And, the sight of kids wearing masks in the US to avoid radiation from
Japan, will almost certainly kill the nuclear power industry, here and
around the world.
-
What are we talking about?
-
Retail value of US nuclear power was $793 million in 2010. stock here--see below I think this number is more like $93 B
-
And cost to decommission 104 commercial reactors would be ruinous to the nuclear utilities.
-
Public panic, once that genie is out of the bottle.
-
When do you say it's safe to be outside?
-
What are we going to say?
-
"Very tiny amounts of Fukushima radiation detected. No immediate harm to human health."
-
So let's go with that.
Gotta run. Family going on vacation to South America for a couple weeks.
PUN: Sorry, nuclear industry, but the videos of Unit 1 & 3
explosions may have already accomplished the death of the nuclear
industry. As for the rest, history will be the judge. In about 50
years, the full extent of Fukushima Cancers in US will…
yep, added that to my article. You are probably striking close to the truth.
That said, I think your "value" of nuclear in US is way off. But to the industry, they peg their 2015 value at
$93 Billion annually, per the nukists
http://www.nuclearmatters.com/resources/reports-studies/overview-document/Nuclear-Matters-Report_Value-of-Nuclear_Highlights.pdf
Which is a big nest egg to protect, so spending $1.4 billion per year
in propaganda, false science studies, grants to control university and
"science" whores….is just a small fraction.
We do realize the Expected Value of nuclear is actually a net negative.