Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Friday, December 4, 2015

COP21 A Name Proving the Greddy Sociopaths Can Actually Have a Twisted Sense of Humor

Just noticed it today, the Paris-Site Climate Conference is abbreviated as COP21

A perfect play on words indicating the New World Order as the "COP" over the worlds energy systems, and then combining this with "Agenda 21".

If not familiar with agenda 21, Google it.

Cyrille Cormier of NGO Greenpeace France disagrees. He says that compared to renewables, nuclear is far more costly.
"Every megawatt-hour produced by nuclear energy from an EPR reactor costs about 100 euros. The cost of producing the same amount of renewable energy with wind turbines and solar is already less almost everywhere in the world. For example in France, it’s already 70 euros per MW-hour for big solar farms and wind turbines.”
Cormier remarks on Youth Day at the Cop21, that nuclear is a waste burden and financial drain on future generations.
 http://www.english.rfi.fr/general/20151203-Nuclear-not-so-much-dirty-word-Cop21-it-can-barely-be-heard




A Rare Whale Death In Alaska, "A Gift from God", Wow

Will nuclear energy someday be seen as the "Garden of Eden" moment for mankind, when our desire for conquest and destruction, and then our desire for a "free lunch" as Satan taunted us to "embrace destruction of the atom".

In the article, the president of a whaling association calls this dead whale a gift from God.

Any talk of testing for radiation or domoic acid?

Real life story in Hawaii.    Good friends, one in an oceanographer type girl, she works mainly with the ocean critters.   

I mentioned the Pacific UME's (unusual mortality events) and her pat answer was....there have always been UMEs

I mentioned the number of shark attacks attacks going up 5 to 10 times, and her pat answer was "there are more people in the water"

I mentioned Domoic acid, and she had never heard the word before.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our best and brightest are corrupted and brainwashed just from being in  "the system".    The easy lies are readily absorbed and the hard truths and intuitions never even get a speaking role.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scientists and whalers who examined the whale, a calf just over 25 feet long, say it was not killed by hunters. Two possible culprits are an attack by killer whales -- something that might be on the rise in Arctic waters as sea ice retreats -- or a ship strike.
stock here---either one seems quite remote, the first one absurd because the killer whales would have eaten large portions of the whale.    


Matkin said orcas usually eat the lips and tongue of dead whales first, a flesh-like “tenderloin” that may serve as an entire first course, with some orcas returning later to feed on other parts of the carcass.
The recovered calf’s tongue was not eaten, which is unusual for a killer whale attack, the release from the wildlife department said.
“That’s mysterious,” said George.
 Hmmmmm...they didn't even take the "tenderloin".

http://www.adn.com/article/20151008/barrow-whalers-haul-bonus-bowhead-killed-unknown-causes







Thursday, December 3, 2015

Greenhouse Gas? It is a heat blocker, a moderator, or a "greenhouse"

http://greenhouse.geologist-1011.net/

1.0 Introduction: What on Earth Is the "Greenhouse Effect"?

Confusion and Lack of Thermodynamic Definition

Although the "Greenhouse Effect" is of crucial importance to modern climatology and is the putative cornerstone of the Anthropogenic Global Warming hypothesis, it lacks clear thermodynamic definition. This forecasts the likelihood that the name is misapplied. Even general descriptions of the "Greenhouse Effect" may seem confused when compared to one another. In the first year university geology text by Press & Siever (1982, p. 312) we read:
"The atmosphere is relatively transparent to the incoming visible rays of the Sun. Much of that radiation is absorbed at the Earth's surface and then reemitted as infrared, invisible long-wave rays that radiate back away from the surface (Fig. 12-14). The atmosphere, however, is relatively opaque and impermeable to infrared rays because of the combined effect of clouds and carbon dioxide, which strongly absorbs the radiation instead of allowing it to escape into space. This absorbed radiation heats the atmosphere, which radiates heat back to the Earth's surface. This is called the 'greenhouse effect' by analogy to the warming of greenhouses, whose glass is the barrier to heat loss."
This explanation is fundamentally confusing because it is seemingly contradictory, as impermeable

materials cannot absorb on the minute to minute timescale that applies to the "Greenhouse Effect", even if such an impermeable material has a very high fluid storage capacity or porosity. According to Press & Siever's explanation above, the atmosphere is relatively impermeable due to the presence of clouds and carbon dioxide, which are part of the atmosphere. How then, can the part of the atmosphere that makes it impermeable to infrared, simultaneously facilitate infrared absorption? Moreover, the idea of thermal permeability is a product of the 19th century pseudoscientific notion that heat was actually a fluid (called "caloric"). This led to a great deal of misunderstanding amongst the scientifically illiterate when it came to the findings of Fourier (e.g. Kelland, 1837). We may compare this description of the "Greenhouse Effect" with that of Whitaker (2007, pp. 17-18), which lacks the misplaced 19th century usage:
"The incoming solar radiation that the earth absorbs is re-emitted in the form of so-called infra-red radiation - this is where the vital 'greenhouse effect' begins. Because of the chemical structure of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, they absorb the infra-red radiation from the Earth, and then emit it, into space and back into the atmosphere. The atmospheric re-emission helps heat the surface of the Earth - as well as the lower atmosphere - and keeps us warm."
This explanation describes the "Greenhouse Effect" as "vital", perhaps because, as Whitaker points out, it warms the earth's surface. Wishart (2009, p. 24) explains that this "Greenhouse Effect" is useful for a completely different reason:
"The Moon is another excellent example of what happens with no greenhouse effect. During the lunar day, average surface temperatures reach 107ÂșC, while the lunar night sees temperatures drop from boiling point to 153 degrees below zero. No greenhouse gases mean there's no way to smooth out temperatures on the moon. On Earth, greenhouse gases filter some of the sunlight hitting the surface and reflect some of the heat back out into space, meaning the days are cooler, but conversely the gases insulate the planet at night, preventing a lot of the heat from escaping."
In Wishart's explanation above, the Greenhouse Effect" is no longer a warming mechanism but a thermal buffer that moderates the extremes of temperature.

Typical Progression of a Nuclear Project

The discussion below concerns the typical function of radiation industries during emergencies, then I added this list, stock out.

Don't forget the next steps....
  1. denials, 
  2. coverups, 
  3. lies, 
  4. propaganda, 
  5. more lies, 
  6. minimizations, 
  7. distractions, 
  8. false science, 
  9. promises,
  10. lies,
  11. poorly thought out plans, 
  12. corruptly bid solutions, 
  13. lies, 
  14. inept management, 
  15. "you can't prove it", 
  16. lies, 
  17. falsified reports,
  18. attempt to convince it's OK, 
  19. attempt to convince that doing something is more dangerous than doing nothing, 
  20. run out of money, 
  21. let some bigger disaster take center stage for while, 
  22. payoff some victims with an accompanying hush order, 
  23. lies, 
  24. lies, 
  25. lies.  

----------------------------------------------------
THIS is why the power outage and accident are of concern:
Columbia (nuclear) Generating Station:
http://www.energy-northwest.com/ourenergyprojects/Columbia/Pages/default.aspx
DOE's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Northwest_National_Laboratory
http://www.pnnl.gov/about/facilities.asp
Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL)
RPL
"The RPL is a scientific facility funded by DOE to create and implement innovative processes for environmental clean-up and the beneficial use of radioactive materials. These processes include those to advance the cleanup of radiological and hazardous wastes, the processing and disposal of nuclear fuels, and the production and delivery of medical isotopes."
Yes, "beneficial use of radioactive materials…." such as medicine, and ???????
It takes energy and water to run/cool these projects as needed.

HoTaters HoTaters
Sooooo, what happens when the Columbia Generating Station and the Pacific Northwest Laboratory have no power? Would anyone who is more well versed on this subject than I care to venture a guess?


AirSepTech AirSepTech
HA HA Ha, people were wondering about connect the dots…those were the dots in my mind.
My best guess is protocol/panic/boom,,,hopefully in that order, and get it right before the boom.
I have an ex-coworker at CGS, one at Coulee, sisters in Portland.
Eventually, another 'natural event' will bring about yet another fiasco. Earthquake, wave, wind, snow, ice, fire,,,to name a few. Plenty more.
Knock out the power, FUBAR the grid, game over.

Global Warming Scam Indicted at the Paris-Site


Some first clips of new film “Climate Hustle” air on Fox News

While some 40,000 climate advocates are in Paris to try to reach some sort of agreement on wealth redistribution in the name of stopping climate change, there is a small contingent of climate skeptics, including people from the Heartland Institute and CFACT. Marc Morano of Climate depot is about to unveil a film “Climate Hustle” (which I’m also in) that looks to dial back some of the hype by showing the history of the claims and how they keep changing.
CFACT writes via a short email press release:
Watch Sean Hannity feature the first clips of CFACT’s ground-breaking new film “Climate Hustle.”  Warm, cold, more snow, less snow, dry, wet, you name it, the global warming crowd attributes it to “climate change.”  They’ve gotten away with this double talk long enough.  It’s time to take them down.

Paris-Site Climate Conference Ongoing, The New Face of the New World Order

Folks, quick thoughts here.

The Paris-site Climate Convention is underway.   

In lieu of rolling out the scary sounding "new world order" the Rothchilds and Bilderbergs have decided that control of all world energy sources and distribution via a "climate agreement" and control of all buying and selling of all products including food, via a "trade agreement" is a more workable substitute for any central government new world order.

Got it?    Global warming, sure it would happen, but has been stalled for 19 years.    Will the El Nino give this year a kick, probably.   

Is man-made "global warming" really a problem?   Is CO2 really a problem.   

Can anyone accurately predict the amount of CO2 coming from volcanoes, including undersea volcanoes?

CO2 is partly an "indicator" gas.   It can indicate that other actual toxins are present as created by fossil burning.    But CO2 itself is not a "toxin", in fact it is very necessary to life and plant growth.

Has it been higher in the past, for sure, even at times when the planet was cooler.   At some level, can it function as a global insulator?   Catching sun energy as it comes in, and radiating half of that caught energy into space?   

Are you aware of all the lies you are being bombarded with?    Do you ever look at actual data?    Or do you use opinions to reinforce your existing opinion?

Do you say take the red pill, but have you really?

The Paris-Site climate convention, including the Popes trip to USA should be viewed with deep suspicion.   
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments appreciated.

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Big Business, Big Gov, is Killing Small Business and "Entrpreneurs"

Sallie Krawcheck wrote a great article here, with one exception I will bring up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-you-should-leave-your-job-become-entrepreneur-sallie-krawcheck

Why You Should NOT Leave Your Job to Become an Entrepreneur

-------------------------------------------

stock here: I suggest you read some of the comments in her article also, almost 600.   

It is funny how she define "entrpreneur" as a very limited "innovative  product manufacturer funded by venture capitalists".    Any small business owner needs to have the skills sets to do all the things that she mentions.

I would "venture" to say, that a small business owner needs to be proficient in 100 to 200 separate types of skills, and not in any SMALL WAY, dealing with government bureaucracy, paperwork, and people who just don't give a shit.    Industry entry and continuation blockades are also common and are true barriers that suck up resources to overcome.  

But let's reign it back in to the topic at hand.....Large Military Industrial Complex cartels, like the nuclear cartel, and Big Lob, Big Gov.       These things are crushing to the real wealth creators of the world....small business and entrepreneurs.      Add in Big Data, Big Propaganda, and you have the perfect mix for a disasterous whimpering papered over shameful demise of empires.    

It's one piece of the puzzle.   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I went to a recent Ellevate Network event, at which we hosted a pretty prominent entrepreneur, who runs a VC-funded start-up that’s gaining some real traction. In other words, she’s “living the dream.” Someone in the audience asked her whether it was fun to be an entrepreneur.
She paused.

Her answer? “No. Not really.”

I can relate. In addition to owning the Ellevate Network, I’ve recently announced a Series A raise for a new business, Ellevest. This is a to-be-launched digital investment platform for women. These after a career at big companies. And not a handful of days goes by that someone doesn’t ask me “Aren’t you having so much fun?”

The truth is that being an entrepreneur is harder than running Merrill Lynch. (And I’m not just saying that; I actually ran Merrill Lynch.) It’s the hardest thing I’ve ever done.

Sure, it’s great not to have to attend the Operational Risk Committee meeting and sit through the page-by-page review of the 226-page deck. I can’t tell you how great.
But for those of you thinking of leaving your big-company job to be an entrepreneur, here’s why you shouldn’t:

Raising money can be humbling. Really humbling. None of us likes being told our baby is ugly…..again and again and again. “But, hey, keep in touch.”
B2B sales are humbling….and take longer than you can imagine. No, your phone calls aren’t returned as quickly as when you worked in your big company job. You expect that. The more interesting insight to me has been how often people try to be nice and end up stringing you along. They don’t recognize that a “fast no” is ok; it’s the “slow no” that kills you.
And even a “slow yes” can put you out of business. I worked with one guy at a big bank who loved a start-up so much…and encouraged them so much…that the start-up ran out of money and shut its doors as all of the approvals for doing business with them were working their way through the system.
So sometimes a “fast no” can even trump a “slow yes.”
Hiring people is hard. Hiring people is always hard. But at a start-up, the stakes are so much higher. That’s in part because there are simply fewer people, so one has to be more thoughtful about making sure there aren’t any holes in the start-up team’s skillsets (and that includes filling in the founder’s “flat sides”). That’s why, for me, team diversity is so important.
And is it just me?? Because I’ve found, amongst entrepreneurs, some of the most talented people I’ve ever worked with, by good measure; they love the rush of entrepreneurialism and would never thrive in the constraints of a big company.
And then there have been some others. I’ve come across a couple of screamers. By that I mean, people who scream. At work. A lot. The screamers are filtered out of big companies pretty quickly. So watch for people who’ve bounced around a lot, and particularly watch for people who receive less-than-effusive recommendations. And always, always do back-channel reference checks.
Hiring people is hard, Part 2. If you come from a corporate background, many of your contacts won’t fit your job descriptions and needs: the jobs pay less cash than what big company folks are making, the jobs may be broader than what they are doing , and parts of the jobs can be more junior.
(An example: I’m copyediting and have been building earnings models. Not something I would have thought I would be doing at this stage of my career. I happen to love both of those things and find them relaxing. But that may be a personal quirk.)
 I had this issue at Ellevest. As we began to hire, you would have thought I would have known a lot of Chief Investment Officers….and I do. But it took me the better part of a year to find our Chief Investment Officer because I wanted one who had the experience and analytical grounding….but then was able to, and wanted to, approach the puzzle of women and investing in a creative way.
Office space. When I speak to young-entrepreneur-hopefuls, I hear what they think the office environment will be like. Start with a bit of time in a shared workspace; then move into your own offices with exposed brick walls, a foosball table and beer on tap; and then you’re a billionaire.
For some, perhaps. Right now, at my start-up, we’re in a space that’s so small I can’t get out of my chair without slamming into the back of our lead designer. At some point, we may fuse into the same person.
And everybody’s a critic. If your idea is truly innovative, you’re going to hear from the naysayers. After all, if it were such a good idea, someone would have already done it, right??
Oh, and it’s terrifying. Something I never thought about in my big-company job: cash flow. When your business has billions of dollars in revenue, you can make a lot of mistakes and still have a viable business. But in a start-up, make a few hiring mistakes (it takes several months to find the right person, a couple of months to figure out they’re not the right person, a couple of more months when you try to coach them and give them the opportunity to become the right person, then another couple of months after you part ways to find the next right person)….oh, and the work they’re supposed to be doing doesn’t get done in that period of time….well, do that a few times and you’re out of money.
Being an entrepreneur is the only time in my career that I’ve lost sleep (and I was on Wall Street during the financial crisis.)
There is a lot of paperwork…and taxes….and regulations…. I can’t tell you the number of people who tell me they slipped up on some of the paperwork needed for their company. It’s one of the no-fun parts of being an entrepreneur that nobody talks about.
You can’t coast. You know those days at the office when you used to come in and didn’t really do that much? You don’t have those days as entrepreneur. If you don’t do much, then not much happens. And remember what I said about cash flow? Yeah….that.
This last paragraph is the one in which I am supposed to say that, even with all of this, I wouldn’t trade being an entrepreneur for anything. And, for me, that’s right. But the failure rate for entrepreneurs is high, so I had to be very, very honest with myself about my, and my family’s, willingness to take on this professional risk.

Monday, November 23, 2015

Ginna Nuclear Ripping Off Customers, But We Can Help Mitigate Their Damage to the People



Ginna Bailout Update

Greetings from Alliance for a Green Economy (AGREE). We are writing with an important update about our fight against the consumer bailout of the Ginna nuclear reactor near Rochester, NY.

We have good news and we have bad news... and we need your help with a final round of comments in the case.

AGREE has been fighting the proposed bailout of the Ginna reactor for almost a year now. We are a scrappy little non-profit going up against huge monied interests who have a lot at stake. Only because of participation from people like you have we been able to make a difference.

When the case began, the utility company (RG&E), the nuclear owners, and the Public Service Commission were ready to rush approval of a 3.5-year subsidy with a possibility of easily extending another year and a half. The initial proposed term, through October 2018, was estimated back in April 2015 to cost RG&E consumers about $175 million. Over time, estimated costs of the bailout have risen, because market rates for electricity keep declining, creating an even larger gap between what Ginna can earn in the market and what it needs to stay open. The last cost estimate we got from RG&E was an estimated $254 million!

The good news is that there is now a proposed settlement in the case that will cut the length of the subsidy down to two years, with no easy extension. If all goes as planned, the subsidy would end in the Spring of 2017. The new agreement will save RG&E customers about $90 million. Additionally, RG&E has caved to demands that it use its hoard of customer credits to pay for a large portion of the bailout, which means that RG&E customers will not see their bills go up as much as originally proposed.

The bad news is that RG&E will get away scot-free under the proposed agreement without having to pay any of its shareholders' money toward the subsidy. Those credits mentioned above represent customer money that RG&E owes back to its rate-payers. The credits used for the bailout will not be available in the future to give back to customers. We have argued all along that RG&E failed to plan properly for the potential retirement of the Ginna reactor and that customers should not have to pay for the utility's bad planning.

The settling parties also did not address what will happen when Ginna closes, and have set up a situation in which Ginna's owners could walk away from their mess for decades before maybe someday cleaning up the reactor. We have been calling for an agreement that would make Ginna's owners begin the decommissioning process right away, in order to best protect the local community and preserve as many jobs at the site as possible.

AGREE's intervention in this case was instrumental in winning the gains that have happened so far, and we participated heavily in the negotiations of this agreement. Over 1,000 people have commented in the case in support of our position, including you. But we still have a ways to go before the deal is truly fair to consumers and good for the environment. Though the agreement represents a real improvement over the original proposal, we have not signed on to support it because we don't think it goes far enough. We are continuing to fight for an even better outcome, and we need your help to win more.

We need you to raise your voice to hold RG&E and Ginna's owners accountable:
  • RG&E's shareholders (not the public) should pay for the subsidy because the company failed to plan properly.
     
  • Ginna's owners should commit to cleaning up their radioactive mess, not walk away from the site for decades.
The Public Service Commission will decide whether to accept the proposed settlement early next year. The Commission has the power to impose additional terms, including making RG&E pay and making sure a safe and immediate decommissioning plan is in place. We urge you to submit a comment today.

Click here to submit a comment.

Sincerely,
Jessica Azulay
Alliance for a Green Economy


P.S. Help us spread the word by using the icons below to share this message.

P.P.S. If you appreciate our work in this case, please consider making a donation so that we can continue to fight for consumers and the environment.

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Comment on NRC hormesis

I have a Master Degree from U of Michigan in Material Science and am very well versed in nuclear and radiation.

It is beyond reckoning that the "medical industry" supposedly based at the most basic "Hippocratic Oath" level of "Do No Harm".   

Radiologist "Doctors" are some of the highest paid in the industry.    They probably think it is cool to treat cancer with radiation.   For the most part that is just short of insane.

Carol Marcus should be ashamed, especially as a woman" to insist that women, girls, and even fetuses be allowed to be blasted with up to 100mSV per year.     "remove any differential treatment" is the nice way of saying "blast them just the same as a nuclear plant worker during an accident.

Although LNT itself is rather "silly" to use as a standard, if you are looking for something that is correct per science.    I mean, LNT is based upon nuclear bomb exposure in Japan, extrapolated down to zero.    Although it sets a somewhat conservative safety level, It just doesn't make sense out of the gate compared to the numerous different isotopes and radiation related heavy metals humans and animals are now exposed to.   

That said, tossing out LNT because it is not perfect, and replacing it with "hormesis, radiation is good for you, is absurd, i am kind of shocked that the NRC would even consider this. 

Now we know the nuclear industry is shutting plants left and right, and Vogtle, if it ever goes critical will double or triple the electric cost.    And we know the NRC, if not captured, surely promotes and tries to protect the nuclear industry.   After all...no nuclear industry, no need for the highly paid salaries at the NRC.  

Miller, Doss, and Marcus are in cahoots in writing their letters all about the same time...strategically staggered.   To create the appearance that "a lot of people are supporting hormesis".     In fact, Miller and Marcus used almost exactly the same letter....with the exception that the woman Dr Marcus added "Why deprive them of the benefits of radiation"  without presenting a bit of evidence of the "benefits"

These letters are quite sloppy in fact, like the sloppy thinking that radiation is good for you.    Per Miller and marcus "Worker doses should remain at present levels, with allowance up to 100mSV effective dose per year if the doses are chronic".   2 points here:
1)  The ploy of "remain at present levels" while at the same time suggesting an increase of 100 fold is almost sociopathic in the nature of saying things that are completely contradictory as a way to through people off their game.  
2) and then saying "allow up to 100mSV if doses are chronic".    Were they in their right mind while writing this?    Chronic means recurring, so they are saying 100mSV is OK is it keep occuring year after year.   

Even the staunchest of hormesis supporting papers (submitted with effecitvely no proof of test results), neverthless states that any hormesis benefit goes away about 200 mSV cumulative.   

I am insulted the NRC published these papers, and am ashamed of being part of the USA scientific community when I see this obvious support for radiation in medicine and less controls on radiation releases at nuclear plant.

Once again, I am appalled that the apparently low empathy Dr Carol Marcus insists that women, children, and fetuses be cut no slack in terms of immensely high doses of 100 mSV per year.     I am disgusted, and concerned that a medical doctor could feel this way or make this statement.   It appears to be sadistic.

NRC Deadline, Comment On the NRC's Absurd Hypotehesis That up to 100 Times more Radiation Is Good For You.

Not a single comment here RE this is the last day to comment to the NRC on the monsters who propose hormesis to replace LNT

DEADLINE IS TODAY

If you have already commented, let me know. Otherwise let me know if you are commenting today.

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NRC-2015-0057-0086

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Dana Durnford, A Steadfast Protector of the Ocean, Is Attacked By Nuke Industry While In A Wheel Chair, Here is a Defense

this is from Rense, getting some very good airplay.   Written by

Yoichi Shimatsu, former editor of The Japan Times Weekly, is a science journalist who has conducted extensive radiation studies inside the Fukushima nuclear exclusion zone since April 2011. He shares a weekly online radio program at rense.com with Dana Durnford.


Dana Durnford, a former commercial diver who plies a rubber dinghy along the Canadian Pacific coast to study the effects of Fukushima radiation on marine life, has been arrested for making alleged death threats against a chemistry professor at University of Victoria in British Columbia. Mr. Durnford is facing trial on two counts of harassment related to his comments on video at his webpage, the Nuclear Proctologist. The video clips in question have been removed by YouTube at the request of unnamed complainants. 

Whatever the substance those controversial statements, Canadians should realize his frustration arises in response to the official campaign of denial of Fukushima’s lethal effects. I have often enjoyed dialogues with Dana on the rense.com radio program on Monday nights, especially stories of his harrowing experiences at sea amid 15-foot swells. After a career of diving for shellfish, he developed a passion for coastal research two years ago after discovering that the once-lush seafloor and tidal pools of British Columbia have been denuded of vegetation and are now devoid of marine-animal life. A burning curiosity prompted him to obtain geiger counters, a microscope and underwater cameras to search for the root cause of this unprecedented natural catastrophe along North America’s Pacific coast.........click for full article

 http://www.rense.com/general96/fukupolitical.html

from the article
Do scientists who sell out their ethics for pieces of silver when millions of civilian lives are at stake “deserve to be executed”? According to the highest standard of international law on criminal abuse by scientific researcher, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, the answer is an emphatic affirmative: Scientists involved in genocide should be put to death. There are no ifs, buts or maybes about it. You, Professor Cullen and Dr. Buesseler, are guilty, and Dana Durnford is innocent. The defense rests. 

Increasing Number of "Birth Defects" and Mutations Is Apparent After Fukushima, 2 Heads on One Human Baby

“Except for having two heads, the newborn has the rest of her organs and limbs like a normal newborn,” Kawsar told the news site. Their father, Jamal Mia, reportedly said he was “awestruck” when he saw his newborn daughter.

 “Still, I thank Allah that she and the mother are now okay," Mia told AFP. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/11/13/bangladeshi-baby-reportedly-born-with-2-heads.html?intcmp=trending#
 

Corruption and Greed Pervade the Nuclear Industry and It's Captured "Regulators"

Read it all at this Google Doc sent by Captain D
  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndXLQeOdySh2qaIvyxG0sS7tkftLCSuv2vgbqMKFns4/edit#

In 2009, both Unit 2 RSGs were installed, tested, officially accepted and brought online. SCE was so pleased with how well their new RSG design performed that they immediately started talking about extending their lifespan to 60 years or more. Slight manufacturing changes were made when both of Unit 3 RSGs were manufactured. SCE believed these changes made them “better” (than Unit 2’s RSG’s) at converting reactor heat into the steam that drives the turbines connected to the generators that produce electricity.

SCE also installed new turbines, with newly designed higher efficiency TURBINE blades, to take advantage of the expected higher steam output of the new “like for like” RSGs. In 2010, Unit 3 RSG’s were installed, tested, officially accepted and brought online.

 SCE issued a press release on October 8, 2010, which stated, “We decided to replace the San Onofre plant’s steam generators when a cost-benefit assessment revealed the plan could save customers approximately $1 billion during the plant’s current license period, which runs through 2022, when power generated by the plant was compared to the likely cost of replacement power,” said SCE Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alan Fohrer

........... ............................

Note: This analysis was performed during a 3½-year period by DAB Safety Team using “critical questioning and an investigative attitude” with the help of Global Experts based in USA/India pertaining to the Root Cause of in-plane fluid elastic instability (IPFEI) in San Onofre Unit 3 RSGs. Parts of these analyses have been shared with the NRC Commission, SCE, MHI and ALJ Melanie Darling’s appointed CPUC Safety Engineer. The NRC Commission, SCE, MHI and the CPUC have been unable to refute the findings of the DAB Safety Team.

 The DAB Safety Team: Don, Ace and a BATTERY of safety ­conscious San Onofre insiders plus industry experts from around the world who wish to remain anonymous. These volunteers assist the DAB Safety Team by sharing knowledge, opinions and insight but are not responsible for the contents of the DAB Safety Team's documents.

Our Mission: To prevent a Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster like Fukushima, happening in the USA.

Written by Don Leichtling and Ace Hoffman Copyright November 13, 2015

by The DAB Safety Team. All rights reserved. #SanOnofreGate — Hashtag summary of the investigation into the multi-billion $ SCE-CPUC ripoff.

Friday, November 13, 2015

Alaska Bears Just Keel Over and Die, Amazingly On Camera

The embedded video in this article is quirky, so if it doesn't play, go directly to this link where it was found http://www.ktuu.com/news/news/national-park-service-investigating-bear-deaths-caught-on-web-cam/36397120

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player And here is a video from Hawaii, it's called the stairway to heaven hike And here is another film of people having fun in "outdoor Hawaii", still a lot of beauty there. Too bad we are destroying the ecosystem at an every accelerating pace.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Example of Nuclear Propaganda, This One In Illinois, Where 6 Plants are on Life Support

They pretend its an "article"

They mistate the EPA

They have a $1.4B budget to protect the profits from their failing industry.   These old plants are breaking all the time, almost every day a plant "trips offline" due to a maintenance and age issue.

This same critically important cooling pump broke last Sunday, and then BROKE AGAIN today, Thursday, and it's not the same break although they do not give details.


Dominion's Millstone-2 nuclear power unit shuts due to coolant pump leak

 http://www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/washington/dominions-millstone-2-nuclear-power-unit-shuts-21456132

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



here is the Paid Advertisement

EPA Official Encourages State Action to Preserve Nuclear Thursday, Nov 12, 2015

During a recent summit convened by the White House on the importance of nuclear energy to addressing climate change, the EPA’s top air official encouraged action at the state level to preserve existing nuclear energy facilities.
Janet McCabe who heads the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation stated that:
    • “The Clean Power Plan is not all-powerful . . . . [w]e can’t, on our own, through this policy, change the trajectory for power plants that are affected by many, many factors.
    • It is clear that if a . . . nuclear plant closes down, that is zero carbon generation that a state will need to accommodate in its plan. That’s definitely an incentive built in to keep those clean resources going.
    • [S]tates can choose policies that incentivize those activities . . . .”
    Illinois Policymakers need to act to preserve its leading source of zero carbon generation.
According to a State of Illinois report, the premature closure of at-risk plants in Illinois would have severe consequences for Illinois carbon emissions at a cost of up to $1.1 billion per year.
We need policy reforms like the Low Carbon Portfolio Standard that properly recognize and value the significant amount of carbon-free electricity that comes from Illinois’ nuclear fleet to level the playing field for all forms of clean energy and best position our state to meet EPA’s new carbon reduction rules.
Learn more about the benefits of nuclear energy at www.NuclearPowersIllinois.com



http://capitolfax.com/2015/11/12/epa-official-encourages-state-action-to-preserve-nuclear/
 

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Wisdom from 20,000 feet as We Discuss The Corrupt and Bureaucratic NRC Hormesis Gambit

oldster
On nuclear/radiation standards, safety, risks, etc, both scientific/professional attitudes and mythology, and general public opinion, public attitudes – public mythology –

have been inundated by disinformation, and maintained by being kept in the dark, for going on three generations.

When Chernobyl happened, with catastrophic results, the recourse was to continue the lies, cover-up, etc.

The more general culture of deception, PR, etc, the marginalization of integrity, and the ascendancy of institutional 'man', submissive widgets all, pretty well, accommodated the nuclear scam/crime scene.

And, the 'end of oil' meme, the carbon/ greenhouse meme, gave nuclear the halo of saviour, or a kind of free pass, even as its pernicious implications for physical and social health became more and more obvious to more and more people.

Sprouting everywhere roof top solar panels etc look pretty benign and sensible in comparison.

The real 'paradigm shift', the 'tipping point', comes when the mythology changes. That is the great task, as I see it, and Fukushima and Durnford and the demise life in the Pacific tidal zones of Western N America, are important bits and pieces in the demise of the psychological fundament of heretofore institutional and public loyalty to nuclear reactors.

How many rads can dance on the head of a radioactive pin is comparatively a marginal matter.

CodeShutdown CodeShutdown
well written Oldster. The ascendancy of institutional man. I see a comic bell curve of the evolution-devolution of homo sapiens. How strange and banal it should come down to office chairs and politics. I think all politicians should wear beggars clothes and all scientists should wear propeller top beanie caps. When will we admit we are all children before nature and the cosmos?

oldster
Tsars, Kings, Emperors,
sovereigns of all the earth,
have commanded many a parade,
but they could not command humor.
When Aesop, the tramp, came visiting
the palaces of eminent personages
ensconced in sleek comfort all day,
they struck him as paupers.
In houses, where hypocrites have
left the smear of their puny feet,
there Hodja-Nasr-ed-Din, with his jests,
swept clean all meanness
like a board of chessmen!
They tried to commission humor-
but humor is not to be bought!
They tried to murder humor,
but humor thumbed his nose at them!
It’s hard to fight humor.
They executed him time and again.
His hacked-off head
was stuck on the point of a pike.
But as soon as the mummer’s pipes
began their quipping tale,
humor defiantly cried:
'I’m back, I’m here! ',
and started to foot a dance.
in an overcoat, shabby and short,
with eyes cast down and a mask of repentance,
he, a political criminal,
now under arrest, walked to his execution.
He appeared to submit in every way,
accepting the life-beyond,
but of a sudden he wriggled out of his coat,
and, waving his hand, did a bolt.
Humor was shoved into cells,
but much good that did.
Humor went straight through
prison bars and walls of stone.
Coughing from the lungs
like any man in the ranks,
he marched singing a popular ditty,
rifle in hand upon the Winter Palace.
He’s accustomed to frowning looks,
but they do him no harm;
and humor at times with humor
glances at himself…


Report comment

oldster
Nimble and quick,
he’ll slip through anything, through everyone.
So- glory be to humor.
He- is a valiant man.
Translated by George Reavey
Yevgeny Yevtushenko