Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Saturday, May 21, 2016

Fluoride - Part Of Our Toxic Environment

TY to Plowboy for this post idea and link.

I have taken a bit of a shift away from just nuclear and radiation related subjects.   It's a big world, lots of very interesting things to dig into.  My real focus in on how to live healthy and how to understand, and mitigate where possible, the toxins around us.

For instance, the "theory" about passing through the galactic plane and being subject to more asteroids....I did some due diligence, and learned a hella lot in the process, including information on the Oort cloud, good stuff, check it out here----

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/08/meterorite-attack-oort-cloud-and-we.html

So I wanted at least a place holder for an important toxin -- Fluoride

Fluoride is a nuclear and industrial byproduct, very hazardous.    So what do sociopathic greedy corporate and governmental leaders do?   Figure out how to instead, sell it as a product.

Fund some studies that show Fluoride can prevent cavities.      And then put the toxic chemical into municipal drinking water systems to "get rid of it", or even sell it at a profit.

This site below has compiled an excellent amount of resources to understand fluoride.    Please check it out.

http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/health_database/



http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/05/21/our-daily-dose-fluoride-documentary.aspx?et_cid=DM105855&et_rid=1494978429



FROM a reader Dan GermouseMay 21, 2016 at 9:24 PM I have asked many forced-fluoridation fanatics to tell me how much accumulated fluoride in the body they think is safe. So far not a single one of them has been able to answer the question. http://forcedfluoridationfreedomfighters.com/a-preliminary-investigation-into-fluoride-accumulation-in-bone/ -

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A reader emailed me with this information RE fluoride, he is a FFF Fluoride Freedom Fighter with notches on his sword.



Pleased to see you branching out...the water fluoridation issue in Alaska is still in flux. Juneau, Fairbanks and Palmer used science to inform policy. [But it wasn't always pretty.] All three cities stopped fluoridation. It had been added to Fairbanks water since 1961. It was stopped in June 2011. It took 10 tens of determined and persistent activism. I wrote op/eds and LtE in multiple newspapers; appeared on talk radio; in front of the city council; invited experts to meet with local influence leaders; distributed copies of The Fluoride Deception to city council members...and learned the background of the decision makers - the council - and tailored special-interest email to them. Leukemia in the family? Osteo-cancer? Family member with dementia? These and many more common issues in people's lives can be traced to F but until you point it out to them [they are blind].

One of the best things was the creation of a localized web site resource presentation. Give it a name that rings for the locals then fill it up with data. As in:


Then promote it in the community; get the URL published in a letter to the editor [multiple times]; say it on talk radio; biz cards with URL left in cafes, laundromats, etc.

Of course, everything on the FFF site is open domain. Crib, borrow and steal at will.
------------------------------------------------------ lots of people chimed in on the fluoride debacle/mass murder

PlowboyGrownUp
Stock, here's some more on how fluoride got it's start http://www.ourinterestingworld.com/conspiracies/fluoride-scam


Report comment

  • PlowboyGrownUp
    I can't copy anything from the article itself.
  •  PlowboyGrownUp
    'before 1940 the only known use of fluoride was a rat and cockroach poison'
    • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
      “…fluoride was used in Nazi Concentration camps and the gulags in Siberia to make prisoners docile and easier to control. It is also absorbed through the skin when bathing, showering, or swimming in fluoridated water. You absorb through the tissues of your mouth when brushing your teeth. You don't have to swallow it. Cooking with fluoride in water concentrates it in food and beverages. You can't cook it out. Only 50% of it can be excretes by the body so it is a cumulative toxin leading to many health problems. Twenty-four studies have also shown it lowers IQ's in children.
      “In Kentucky, despite a 1977 fluoridation state-wide mandate, preschoolers cavity rates went from 28% in 1987 to 47% in 2001, according to the July/August 2003 journal, Pediatric Dentistry,
      “According to an 11/27/2011 news article, “In recent years, Northern Kentucky health officials have encountered more children with cavities in a state known for some of the worst teeth in the nation. Kentucky has the second highest rate of toothlessness in the U.S. The national average is 20.5 percent, while 38 percent of Kentuckians have lost their teeth.”
      http://fluoridedangers.blogspot.com/
      “What is put in tap water isn't pharmaceutical grade nor is it natural "calcium fluoride". It's a by-product of the fertilizer industry. Here's what is added to tap water. It is toxic. See below PDF's:
      http://www.wku.edu/msds/docs/6254.pdf
      http://www.mosaicco.com/images/Hydrofluo
      • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
        “It's nothing more than toxic waste or pollution.
        “Studies by Drs. H.S. Brown, D.R. Bishop and C.A. Rowan in the early 1980s demonstrated that an average of 64% of the total dose of waterborne contaminants, such as fluoride, are absorbed through the skin. (American Journal of Public Health 1984; 74: 479-84) —Fluoride: Drinking Ourselves to Death, Barry Groves, pp. 275-265
        “A study by Professor Julian Andelman, Professor of Water Chemistry at the University of Pittsburg's Graduate School of Public Health, "found less chemical exposure from drinking the water than from using it to wash clothes or take a shower or a dip in the swimming pool". Every time you take a shower or go for a swim, you will be soaking it up. The percentage for skin absorption are as follows: Scalp – 32%, Ear Canal – 46%, Forehead – 36%, Plant of Foot – 13%, Forearm – 9%, Palm – 12%, Male Scrotum – 100%.
        “Dr. Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus of the National Cancer Institute published a paper in 1975 that detailed an increase in cancer deaths in fluoridated areas. According to Burk, "In point of fact, fluoride causes more cancer, and causes it faster, than any other chemical".
        “Fluoride is NOT essential. In 1979, the FDA required the deletion of all government references previously classifying fluoride as "essential or probably essential", (Federal Register, March 16, 1979, page 16006).
        • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
          “Robert Carton, PhD formerly President of the union of Government Scientists working at the US Environmental Protection Agency said: "Water fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time." In 1997, more than 1,000 members of this union working at USEPA HQ in Washington DC, who are directly responsible for the US Safe Drinking Water Act, voted UNANIMOUSLY to ban water fluoridation. Their bosses are not listening.
          “There is not a single scientific or laboratory study from anywhere in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth decay in humans. There are, however, hundreds of published scientific papers which show that water fluoridation is dangerous to human, animal, plant and aquatic life, which is no surprise, since fluoride is more toxic than lead and only marginally less so than arsenic. (Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed., Gosselin, et al, 1984.).
          "Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting certain enzyme systems … The sources of fluorine intoxication are drinking water containing 1 ppm or more of fluorine, fluorine compounds used as insecticidal sprays for fruits and vegetables (cryolite and barium fluosilicate) and the mining and conversion of phosphate rock to superphosphate, which is used as fertilizer.
      • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
        I think they are using hydrogen fluoride to put out fires.
        CSB Issues Urgent Recommendations to CITGO; Finds Inadequate Hydrogen Fluoride Water Mitigation System during Corpus Christi Refinery Fire Last July
        http://www.csb.gov/csb-issues-urgent-recommendations-to-citgo-finds-inadequate-hydrogen-fluoride-water-mitigation-system-during-corpus-christi-refinery-fire-last-july/
      • aunavoz
        Besides a blog site .. you got any peer reviewed sources for.the.Nazi reference Anne?
        I think it's a crock concocted by wild conspiracy theorists.
        http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/dec/08/jesse-ventura/jesse-ventura-says-nazis-pioneered-use-fluoridated/
        • aunavoz
          http://m.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk
          .. I don't even know what to say when this forum gets off on some of the wildest conspiracy theories I have ever heard ..
          I suppose that is the breadwinner now ..
          • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
            "…’I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine–any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.’ CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954….”
            http://rense.com/general79/hd3.htm
            • aunavoz
              Anne .. your peer reviewed evidence of a Nazi connection is .. Rense.
              Ok .. I feel like I am in a twilight zone script.
              You can stop flooding the thread .. it makes me feel nauseous to continue this course here.
              • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                The Germans didn't publish their inhumane medical experiments in peer reviewed scientific articles in the 1920s and 1930s. Rense is merely repeating what is reported elsewhere. The Germans also experimented with radar, nuclear fission, and the use of gas to exterminate millions.
                • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                  For use of chemical weapons used in WWI, see:
                  “…The most widely reported and, perhaps, the most effective gas of the First World War was mustard gas. It was a vesicant that was introduced by Germany in July 1917 prior to the Third Battle of Ypres.[6] The Germans marked their shells yellow for mustard gas and green for chlorine and phosgene; hence they called the new gas Yellow Cross. It was known to the British as HS (Hun Stuff), while the French called it Yperite (named after Ypres).[33]…”
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_weapons_in_World_War_I

                   PraisingJesus
                • FLUORIDE, TEETH, AND THE ATOMIC BOMB
                  By Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson
                  http://www.fluoridation.com/atomicbomb.htm
              • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                Fluoridation: Mind Control of the Masses
                “Extracted from his self-published booklet "The Dickinson Statement: A Mind-Boggling Thesis" published in NEXUS magazine August-September 1995 issue….
                “…In a letter abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness (published by the Committee for Mental Health and National Security) to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 2nd October 1954, a Charles Eliot Perkins, scientist and author of Washington DC, and one must assume, that same Charles Eliot Perkins of the "Dickinson Statement" to the Victorian Parliament, said this (and the words of the last two lines of the second paragraph cannot be overemphasized):
                "’We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and the cupidity of public officials that is responsible for the present spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country.
                "’However – and I want to make this very definite and positive – the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective.

                • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                  The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty…
                  "’When the Nazis, under Hitler, decided to go into Poland… the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to Communize the world…
                  "’I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, bio-chemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine: any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.’…"
                  http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_fluor06.htm

                • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                  "…At the end of World War II, Charles Elliot Perkins, a researcher in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology, and pathology, was sent to Germany to take charge of their chemical plants. He later wrote in response to what he had seen and heard while there…
                  http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/08/22/fluoride-affects-consciousness-will-act/
              • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
                Chemical Weapons and/or their Precursors
                Fluorinated and Fluoride Pesticides
                “Chemical Weapons Precursors for the production of sarin-family nerve agents
                “List (Precursors):
                Hydrogen fluoride (7664-39-3)
                Potassium fluoride (7789-23-3)
                Ammonium bifluoride (1341-49-7)
                Sodium bifluoride (1333-83-1)
                Sodium fluoride (7681-49-4)
                Potassium bifluoride (7789-29-9)
                Fluorine (7782-41-4)
                https://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/pesticides/effects.chem.weapon.precurs.htm
                For fluoride derived from fluorine see:
                http://chemistry.about.com/b/2013/12/29/the-difference-between-fluorine-and-fluoride.htm

            • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
              FLUORIDE "amounts to public murder on a grand scale" Dr Dean Burk National Cancer Institute
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzgKA5zMitQ
          • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
            The Fluoride Deception: How a Nuclear Waste Byproduct Made Its Way Into the Nation's Drinking Water
            http://www.democracynow.org/2004/6/17/the_fluoride_deception_how_a_nuclear

          • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
            Nazi Connections To Flouride In America’s Drinking Water
            “Tell a lie loud enough and long enough and people will believe it.”
            – Adolf Hitler
            “Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century.”
            – Robert Carlton, Ph.D, former EPA scientist, 1992
            “The history of forcing fluoride on humans through the fluoridation of drinking water is wrought with lies, greed and deception. Governments that add fluoride to drinking water supplies insist that it is safe, beneficial and necessary, however, scientific evidence shows that fluoride is not safe to ingest and areas that fluoridate their drinking water supplies have higher rates of cavities, cancer, dental fluorosis, osteoporosis and other health problems. Because of the push from the aluminum industry, pharmaceutical companies and weapons manufacturers, fluoride continues to be added to water supplies all over North America and due to recent legal actions against water companies that fluoridate drinking water supplies, precedent has been set that will make it impossible for suits to be filed against water suppliers that fluoridate. There is a growing resistance against adding toxic fluoride to our water supplies, but unfortunately, because fluoride has become “the lifeblood of the modern industrial economy”(Bryson 2004), there is too much money at stake for those who endorse water fluoridation .

            • PraisingJesus PraisingJesus
              The lies of the benefits of water fluoridation will continue to be fed to the public, not to encourage health benefits to a large number of people, but to profit the military-industrial complex.
              “The story begins in 1924, when Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben (I.G. Farben), a German chemical manufacturing company, began receiving loans from American bankers, gradually leading to the creation of the huge I.G. Farben cartel. In 1928 Henry Ford and American Standard Oil Company (The Rockefellers) merged their assets with I.G. Farben, and by the early thirties, there were more than a hundred American corporations which had subsidiaries and co-operative understandings in Germany. The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding Company, American I.G. Farben, which listed on it’s board of directors: Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company, Chas. E. Mitchell, President of Rockerfeller’s National City Bank of New York, Walter Teagle, President of Standard Oil New York, Paul Warburg, Chairman of the federal reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany’s War effort, Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs, and a number of other members, three of which were tried and convicted as German war criminals for their crimes against humanity.

          • DUD DUD
            If you would go back in time and show them what we done to the planet and say..write a explanation to get there from where you are now..i doubt they could envision the inventions we made to gain so much destructive power..and the absolute insanity we demonstrated by actually using it/attacking nature and its precious balance with it..but every step of the way those that warned and objected were called alarmist and conspiracist amongst many other things..hmm

          • Other research resurfaced by Dr. Dean Burk, former chief of cytochemistry at the National Cancer Institute for 30 years, also shows that fluoride increases the cancer death rate. Dr Burk refers to a study conducted which compares the 10 largest U.S. cities with fluoridation and the 10 largest without. What researchers found was that following fluoridation, deaths from cancer went up immediately- in as little as a year.
            Video; https://youtu.be/ClqK7XvfLg0 7 min.
  • Dr. Joey Hensley MD Calls Flouride A Harmful Toxin, Calls For Removal From Drinking Water
    http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/05/flouride-harmful-toxin-or-healthy.html
  • PlowboyGrownUp
    'Before 1940, health people were trying to remove fluoride from water because it was destroying teeth…the fewer cavities in high fluoride areas was due to there being fewer teeth' not verbatim but U get the idea :)
PlowboyGrownUp
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fluoridegate+an+american+tragedy


Friday, May 20, 2016

US Corporations Are Now Talking About Fukushima and the Death of the Pacific

stock here, see near bottom, this publicily held US corporation goes on record as stating that Fukushima killing the Pacific is part of their business strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MT. PLEASANT, UT–(Marketwired – May 19, 2016) –  Green PolkaDot Box (OTC PINK: GPDB) (or “the Company”) announced today the execution of Purchase Agreement for Day Boat Seafood LLC. Day Boat is a Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certified fishery and PRIMARY PRODUCER of wild caught seafood in the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea, specializing in swordfish. Additional boats harvest yellowfin tuna, big eye tuna, mahi-mahi, snapper, grouper, golden tilefish, pompano, mackerel, golden crabs, shrimp, stone crabs, and lobster.

Day Boat profitably operates 14 “long line” vessels and manages six more, providing a year-round supply of millions of pounds of fresh wild caught seafood to customers such as, Gorton’s Seafood, Fulton Market (NY), Whole Foods Markets Global, Wegmans, Seattle Fish, Wakefern Grocery, and other national grocery stores chains through its network of wholesale distributors.
The Day Boat acquisition is the first of many contemplated by GPDB in essential CLEAN food production and processing categories; the first step in the Company’s plan to become vertically integrated in sourcing and processing of CLEAN foods.

“The anticipated purchase of Day Boat will give our Company several competitive advantages,” says GPDB CEO Rod Smith. “First, it gives us the ability to control our supply, to source millions of pounds of wild caught seafood in the most popular varieties. Second, direct sourcing will allow for improved margins on sales. Third, and most importantly, our online Health Merchants™ and the 45 million consumers they serve will enjoy the highest quality se
afood at special value pricing, including free home delivery anywhere in the continental U.S.”

Controlling the supply of seafood for millions of potential GPDB customers is a strategic necessity, afforded only through vertical integration. The average adult over 45 years old and living in the United States consumes seafood 3-4 times, monthly. Yet, because of the nuclear disasters in Japan and radioactive contamination spreading through the Pacific Ocean, vast species of fish and plant life are being adversely affected and are undesirable for human consumption. The best quality, wild caught seafood from the Atlantic and Caribbean is part of a well-managed sustainable but limited supply. This acquisition by GPDB is a critical move to ensure consistent access to popular high quality, sustainable-sourced seafood at the very best value for its customers.

-------------------------------------------------------------
and here is a website to keep an eye on
http://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1019555/Online-Food-Retailer-Green-PolkaDot-Box-Buys-Wild-Caught-Seafood-Producer-Day-Boat-Seafood

--------------------------------------------------------------
Canada will allow GMO Salmon and NOT require any labelling
http://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1019586/Aquabounty-Wins-Approval-to-Sell-GMO-salmon-in-Canada
Health Canada said they would not require any labeling on GMO salmon.
Ruth Salmon, the executive director of the Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance, said because labelling is not required, consumers who oppose the genetically modified fish won't know what they are buying.
"It's a concern about confusing the consumer, for sure, because I think labelling allows that kind of clarity. So we'll look at other ways of trying to create that consumer information because that's important to us. ”
 


A Bubble In "BIG PHARMA" Detected Via Magazines



Around 2005 I was building houses and office buildings.    So I was receiving some Trade Magazines.   Then out of the blue, comes to my door, without asking for it, a magazine
called "Housing Giants".    

Just the arrogance of a group calling itself "Giants" was astounding.   But it alerted me to a very important fact.     This type of unsolicited advertising by an industry group, trying to increase their circulation numbers reported to advertisers by sending it to people who didn't ask, was the sign of an overheated, bubbly market.   Indeed it was.

I decided to sell a rental house that I owned, and that worked out very nicely on the timing.   I also decided to switch my business to 95% solar thermal and solar PV, which worked out very nicely.

Although I still do 2 to 3 months of work per year, I considered myself retired at the age of 49 three years ago.    The work I do now provides enough revenue that I do not need to touch retirement savings, which seems like a smart move, given the sheer number of black swans still circling the earth.

So some very good things came out of the simple perception of what a magazine really meant.

Now I have some hope that the magazine shown below is a foreboding for a bursting of the bubble that we call "Big Pharma".    Just recently the arrogant and narcissistic hedge fund manager who jacked up the price of critical medicines by 10s or hundreds of times their prior cost, being called into question, and sneering at the government officials, well....that about says it all.

Let's hope this bubble bursts, and hope that prices are brought down to earth, and that risky drugs are not brought to market.

Big Pharma is a sign of the times, it goes hand in hand with Financial Parasites that are killing the host.

------------------------------------
LOL then after writing this, the next day NYT writes an article on a drop in opiod use.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/21/health/opioid-prescriptions-drop-for-first-time-in-two-decades.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20160521&_r=0




Published on Mar 29, 2016
In this episode of Days of Revolt, Chris Hedges continues his discussion with UMKC economics professor Michael Hudson on his new book Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy. Hedges and Hudson expose the liberal class’ allegiance to the predatory creditors on Wall Street and their indifference to real economic justice


Earthquake/Volcano Alert Plays Out, Huge Earthquake in Australia, Massive Eruptions in Central America

A few days ago, I issued an Earthquake / Volcano Alert, primarily due to intense activity on the Atlantic ridge and an overall quiet period.      It didn't play out where I expected, but it sure did play out:

1) 3rd biggest earthquake in 100 years in middle Australia
2) Volcanos popping off like champagne in Central America
3) Large EQs in Ecuador (h/t flying cuttlefish) https://flyingcuttlefish.wordpress.com/2016/05/20/volcanoes/

https://www.rt.com/news/344016-indonesia-volcano-eruption-kills/






Wednesday, May 18, 2016

The European Union Pushes Hard For More Nuclear Power Plants All Over Europe, Germany Dissents

The "European Union" is an interesting construct.   The basic theory is that the primary purpose of the "Union" is to allow centralized control to the real powers that be, those who are pushing for a New World Order.    Basically it's the super rich, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bilderberg types.

Many of these types are sociopaths, which is a whole topic onto itself, of which I have several articles on the blog.    These are some of the most dangerous people on the planet.    Bottom line, they have no conscience, and power and manipulation over other people are very important to them.   Sociopaths will take unnecessary risks that are way out of proportion to the possible gain, especially when the risks can be primarily foisted onto other people.

Which brings us to our point.    Nuclear energy has so clearly failed at every level, but in a sales pitch it still looks like "a free lunch" to those driven by greed and power.


There are a few categories of people who are still motivated for nuclear, still fooled by nuclear power, to name a few:

1) The stupid who think they are smart (say readers of Popular Science, ruh roh, I used to be one)
2) The uninformed
3) The "true believers", perhaps smart people, Blinded By Science.
4) Profiteers of the Nuclear Industrial Complex /Cartel
The failures and dangers of nuclear are so obvious, so clear-cut, that rather than belabor them here, I simply refer you to this entire blog ---Nukepro

So, per the below, clearly the EU is not driven by altruistic motives in pushing for nuclear.   Europe is the worst place in the world for nuclear, nuclear disposal, and a nuclear reactor.   Not that there is a good place for any of that, just that is it the height on insanity to load Europe with nuclear.    

http://www.dw.com/en/european-union-to-publish-strategy-paper-on-nuclear-energy/a-19262144
Citing a strategy paper from the EU on Tuesday, "Spiegel Online" reported that the European Union plans to defend its technological dominance in the nuclear sector.

According to the document, the European Union's 28 member states should strengthen cooperation on researching, developing, financing and constructing innovative reactors.

The paper is reportedly the basis for the European Commission's future nuclear policy and is expected to be passed by the European commissioner for energy union on Wednesday. The report would then be presented to the European Parliament.

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

National ACademies of "$cience" is Now Promoting the Idea that GMO and GE Foods "Can't Be Proven To Be Bad For You"

This is a draft article, too busy finsihing my own totally non GMO, non GE, organic garden.  

-------------------------------------------
Hit the gym this morning for a good workout. I reflected that even at this pretty well healed gym, I saw only 1 or 2 people out of say 400 that I would consider "thin" or even "normal weight, in shape".

And they were trying hard, lots of cardio, weight training.

Its the food people. What else could it be? They are trying hard and still not even 1% can achieve "being in shape".

Its the food.

Then, after planting a heirloom crop of all non GMO products into the greenhouse and planning the direct plant for later today…..

I saw theNational Academies Press saying that GMO /GE crops are "pretty much OK". They also claim that they back up their assertions with DATA.

THEY DO NOT back up their assertions with data, nor with links to the referenced studies. They use weasel words to an amazing degree. They take pot shots at "natural methods".

They express concern and dismay that food testing is hard because it is complicated to increase the potential bad stuff in the food, to get quicker test results…and instead, OH MY GOD, they sometimes have to resort to feeding the actual GMO / Roundup treated food to the animal. The absurdity of it all!

Then they complain, that these "whole food" tests are kind of a joke, because you can't be sure who is funding them, and because we don't know how long of a test is good enough (90 days is a long test in their book)that we just maybe should use that type of "whole food testing"

Read it and weep
http://www.nap.edu/read/23395/chapter/2


 
I'll comment more as time allows.   For now I recommend you skim through it yourself.   Its looks like a massive sellout by the scientists who were given our public trust....BUT, and this is different, with so many obvious weasel words used in the report, that it would be hard to sue or convict any particular participant or group.  

As far as I can tell…you can't print it, but you can buy it for $80.

Also, it is still labelled as a "prepublication copy", another disgusting oversight or just intentional weasel method.

Aspects of DNA Damage from Internal Radionuclides --- Chris Busby

stock here--here is an introduction to an article by Busby.    He does a good job of putting information into a level that a "lay engineer" can wrap their head around.   

Bottom line--He says the existing radiation risk models are fully wrong.  I agree.

--------------------------------------------

http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-research-directions-in-dna-repair/aspects-of-dna-damage-from-internal-radionuclides

Aspects of DNA Damage from Internal Radionuclides

Christopher Busby1

1. Introduction

In this chapter, there is insufficient space to exhaustively review the research which has been carried out on internal radionuclide effects. I hope only to highlight evidence which shows that internal radionuclides cannot be assessed by the current radiation risk model, and to suggest some research directions that may enable a new model to be developed, one which more accurately quantifies the real effects of such exposures. The biological effects of exposure to ionizing radiation have been studied extensively in the last 70 years and yet very little effort has gone into examining the health effects of exposure to internal incorporated radionuclides. This is curious, since the biosphere has been increasingly contaminated with novel man-made radioactive versions of naturally occurring elements which living creatures have adapted to over evolutionary timescales, and intuition might suggest that these substances could represent a significant hazard to health, one not easily or accurately modelled by analogy with external photon radiation (X-rays and gamma rays).
The question of the health effects of internal radionuclide exposures began to be asked in the early 1950s when there was widespread fallout contamination of food and milk from atmospheric nuclear tests. It quickly became the subject of disagreements between two committees of the newly formed International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)[1]. The questions of the equivalence of internal and external radiation exposure, which were the basis of these disagreements, have still not been resolved. In the West, up to very recently, the whole spectrum of health effects from internal incorporated radionuclides has focused on animal studies of Radium, Plutonium and Strontium-90 and human retrospective studies of those individuals exposed to Radium-226 and Thorium-232 in the contrast medium “Thorotrast”. These studies suffer from a number of problems which will be discussed.
Soviet scientists were more interested in internal radiation effects from fission-product radionuclides, but unfortunately their valuable studies have been difficult to access since they are published in Russian. In 1977 Gracheva and Korolev published a book summarising work in this area which was translated in India in 1980 as Genetic Effects of the Decay of Radionuclides in Cells [2]. This presented a wealth of interesting data relating to beta emitter genetic effects in various systems and drew attention to the distinction that must be made between external and internal radiation. This is important since the whole assessment of radiation in terms of health has been through the quantity “absorbed dose” and what can be called the bag-of-water model.
In this bag of water model, illustrated in Fig 1, the total energy transferred by the radiation to living tissue is diluted into a large mass, greater than a kilogram, as if the effects were uniform throughout the tissue being considered. In Fig 1 the tissue mass A represents an external irradiation by X-rays or gamma rays and here the effects are uniform across the tissue. But in the case B, for internal irradiation, it is clear that it is possible, for certain kinds of exposure, for tissue local to the source to receive very large amounts of radiation energy at the same overall energy transfer to the tissue mass.

Monday, May 16, 2016

Blast Data From Fukushima -- To Shred 18" Reinforced Concrete Walls, C4 Explosive Not Enough, Hydrogen -- No Way

Certainly in calculating damage from an explosive blast, we would need to consider not just peak pressure achieved, but also the "impulse" the rate of pressure change.    From C4 or TNT, peak pressures are achieved very quickly, say 1 to 3 milliseconds.

I used a study by the US Military on an 18" reinforced concrete wall, in which they ran explosive tests with documentation.

Their bombs were roughly 220 lbs of explosive material, placed 7 feet away from a wall.

Basically, even after 5 large bombs were set off, the damage seen was still less than the damage seen at Fukushima.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwjv_vX53d_MAhXEx4MKHbJ9A1AQFggmMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dtic.mil%2Fcgi-bin%2FGetTRDoc%3FAD%3DADA171947&usg=AFQjCNGcen5-USChXBXuEuGlf7jOQUvKSw&sig2=iW2KJxnsEMn9HHd_w6eZ1w&cad=rja

Fukushima 3 and 4 were NOT hydrogen explosions, they were a type of nuclear explosion. 

Hydrogen is good at making a very high temperature blast, but not a very high energy blast.

The flame from burning hydrogen has a very high heat content — its flame temperature is 3,700 degrees Fahrenheit. Hydrogen burns with an almost invisible flame, converting all energy into heat energy
 

from the reference above









Here is the RE, Relative Effectiveness of various explosive materials.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_effectiveness_factor


Here is another course of blast research material, less technical, more for management types

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0ahUKEwjv_vX53d_MAhXEx4MKHbJ9A1AQFgg4MAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fema.gov%2Fmedia-library-data%2F20130726-1455-20490-7465%2Ffema426_ch4.pdf&usg=AFQjCNE5LiQVJvzAyNhQyc8jzGmdoXkPDg&sig2=NCHEk752RWGSYNikj4NT3Q&cad=rja

--------------------------------------------
Now some data on the explosive power of hydrogen




 stock here, calculations by the NRC based on a reactor building full of hydrogen.

An equivalent amount of TNT is calculated, it is roughly equal to 61 bombs of the 220 lbs size the US Military used in trying to blow up a 18" reinforced concrete wall.

The damages from those 220lb bombs was minor in relation to the damages suffered at Fukushima.


 Source--
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=14&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjGusn479_MAhVn_4MKHYxDAh84ChAWCDAwAw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrc.gov%2Fdocs%2FML0906%2FML090630278.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFecskX03KfmbrKV4wTWbV9ABdgBA&sig2=655sQvBx2tcQ6JMHODetow&bvm=bv.122129774,d.amc
Add caption

 
And additional support for the "Hell No Hydrogen Explosion"
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2016/05/how-and-why-hydrogen-explosions-could.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=276651



(OP)

Hi

I am a physical security consultant, i have a client who is concerned about a hydrogen / air explosion in his factory. I would like to know the pressures that could be attained using the following scenario

room size - 40m3
explosive - equivalent to 5kg TNT (is that possible for calculations)

what would pressure and impulse be on the walls of the room?

  


I have not done the calculation for hydrogen but for most hydrocarbons the maximum adiabatic combustion pressure is very close to 150 psi, or 10 times the initial pressure. This assumes all of the chemical energy goes into heating and expanding the mixture. The pressure rise is mainly limited by the available oxygen in air. I'm not sure if the shock wave pressure would go much above that. It won't be less than that.
According to the volume of the room and UEL and LEL of hydrogen, the volume released of hydrogen that will cause an explosion will be between 2.08 and 39 kilograms and with an overpressure wave of 8.0 psi the buiding will be completely destroyed.

Overpressure (psi)        Expected Damage
   0.50-1.0                    Windows usually shattered.
   1.0-8.0                      Range for slight to serious injuries from flying glass and other missiles.
   2.0                             Partial collapse of walls and roofs of houses.

   2.4-12.2                    Range for 1-90% eardrum rupture among exposed populations.
   5.0                             Wooden utility poles snapped.
   5.0-7.0                       Nearly complete destruction of houses.
   7.0                             Loaded train cars overturned.
   10.0                           Probable total building destruction.
   14.5-29.0                   Range for 1-99% fatalities among exposed populations due to direct blast effects.
With the values of UEL and LEL you will achieve more than 5 kilograms of TNT. An explosion in LEL value, the room will be destroyed.
ajs1972   How did you figure out the pressure wave of 8.0 psi?

Regards
StoneCold
Hello StoneCold:

We have a 40 m3 room= 1.3 kg/m3 (density of air)*40 m3=52 kg of air. The LEL of hydrogen is 40000 ppm (weight)=0.04*52=2.08 kg. of hydrogen in leaks will reach the LEL.

The combustion heat of hydrogen is 33 859 kcal/kg, so 2.08 kg will produce 70426.72 kcal.

The combustion heat of TNT is 1080 kcal, so 2.08 kg of hydrogen are equal to 65.21 kg of TNT and 1 kg of TNT produces 0.73 m3 of gas, then 2.08 kg of hydrogen will produce 47.6 m3 of gas.

In a room of 40 m3, the pressure will increase by double, so the wave pressure will be 15 psi.

But if you review the table of wave overpressures, is necessary only 8 psi to destroy the building.
AJS I've checked very little of your math, but one mistake you make is that the combustion products are not at room temperature, they will be at thousands of degrees.
The peak pressures in a high explosive detonations are on the order of a million psi (at zero distance). As I said earlier, the peak pressure in a fuel-air deflagration is about 150 psi.  
Hello Compositero:

You are right, a deflagration will produce, in a closed system, a maximum of 10 times the initial pressure.

Like you say a peak or maximum pressure could be 150 psi in atmospheric initial conditions. I said, overpressure waves 150 psi or 15 psi, twice are dangerous.

According to EPA tables, from 8 psi and more, the damages will be catastrophic.

Regards.
ajs1972
Careful!  Your concepts are flawed.

The use of ppm in the context of gases means parts per million - a concentration by volume - not a concentration by weight.

40,000ppm = 4%.

4% of a 40m3 volume of gas air/hydrogen mixture = 1.6m3 of hydrogen.

1.6m3 x 0.08375kg/m3 (mass of H2 at NTP) = 0.134kg of H2

Also, there is a difference in the lower flammable level and lower explosive level (LEL) for hydrogen.  A hydrogen air mixture explosion is most powerful at a stoichiometric mixture ~30% H2.
 
Hardly a proper forum for such a calculation especially without a complete set of drawings describing the building, leak sources and ventilation methods.

my own limited experience is that hydrogen generally goes off as a burning process (significant and distructive in its own right) and is difficult to get it to detonate except in very special circumstances.

you really need a specialist to answer you questions, good luck

Radioactive Cesium 137 Is Being Intentionally Placed Into Our Environment

Cesium 137 (and its shorter lived cousin Cesium 134 with a 2 year half life) is one of the most dangerous nuclear power plant "fission products".

It goes into muscles, like the heart and does lots of damage quickly.

But the nucleo apes with their 3 pound monkey brains figure, hey this stuff is really cool!   Rather than finding another way to track oil shipments, we can add Cesium 137 to oil and use it to track shipments.   Then when the oil is burned, the radiation will be spread all over the atmosphere.   But is sure is "cool".

As an example, cesium-137 can be used to monitor the flow of oil in a pipeline. In many cases, more than one oil company may use the same pipeline. How does a receiving station know whose oil is coming through the pipeline? One way to solve that problem is to add a little cesium-137 when a new batch of oil is being sent. The cesium-137 gives off radiation. That radiation can be detected easily by holding a detector at the end of the pipeline. When the detector shows the presence of radiation, a new batch of oil has arrived.
 And in true Ape Like form, mankind's deems is smart to put Cesium 137 into the dirt so that we can measure erosion-----
Cesium-137 is often used in scientific research also. For example, cesium tends to stick to particles of sand and gravel. This fact can be used to measure the speed of erosion in an area. Cesium-137 is injected into the ground at some point. Some time later, a detector is used to see how far the isotope has moved. The distance moved tells a scientist how fast soil is being carried away. In other words, it tells how fast erosion is taking place.
Stock here-- this reads more like a death wish than science.   

Oyster Creek, A Dangerous Old Nuke Plant, Now Guilty of Gross Negligence in Maintenance on Key Safety Systems

stock here: We are living on borrowed time.   As the nuclear industry gets more and more desperate, as solar drinks its milkshake, nuclear becomes more and more dangerous.

The negligent operators of Oyster Creek failed to inspect or replace a cooling hose for their Diesel Genset.
http://patch.com/new-jersey/lacey/nrc-oyster-creek-emergency-diesel-generator-cooling-system-failed-during-test-due-aging-hose
Oyster Creek is the oldest nuclear plant in the United States. It went online on Dec. 23, 1969.

The Diesel Gensets is a key safety feature.    In event of local utility outage, the nuke plant will melt down unless it has emergency power to allow a structured shut down and cool down.  

Any mechanic / handy type knows that when dealing with old cars, at around 10 years max, one would simply replace all the cooling hoses, even if they don't look bad.

Exelon just ignored this key cooling component, and IT DID result in a failure of the emergency backup system on Jan 4, 2016.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When was the last time they changed the cooling hose?

22 years ago.  

---------------------------------
http://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/contributors/2016/05/16/christine-todd-whitman-indian-point/84341902/

And above is the former head of EPA, pimping for nuclear at Indian Point

--------------------------------
And when it comes to construction and transportation, you never, never, never, never, drop a load.

PlowboyGrownUp
France, steam generator dropped (measuring 22 meters in height and weighing 465 tonnes) came to rest on top of the reactor cavity
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS-Steam-generator-dropped-at-French-reactor-0404165.html



State of Morro Bay, California; 4.6 years into the Fukushima meltdown



When this nuclear facility first got damaged and went kapoof it sent a huge amount of radiation directly towards us. In less than a month's time it covered our entire country. The west coast got the most and continues to receive it daily. Combine this with the methane and now helium 3 leaking and blowing all over out there. Fukushima is lost people it cannot be contained I believe it even worse than they've admitted to. I believe all the reactors there have melted down and are rapidly burning their way through the earth. I saw a video where they are saying that in protective gear the best we have if you stand there it will kill you in 45 minutes or less. Indian point in New York state leaking radiation into the ground water one well showed a 65,000% increase over the acceptable allowed amount of radiation in a water supply that's for public use. Down south underground fire burning its way towards a nuclear waste dump with nothing in between to block its path. An underground fire with a little explosion at a nuclear waste dump site in Nevada not far from Vegas they don't know what's burning due to bad record keeping they say. I ask you this they attacked the coal burning power plants shutting them down sighting its bad for us and environment right? They say for some reason nuclear energy is cleaner and safer for us but it produces highly toxic by products that take hundreds if not thousands of years to be safe to handle. These plants produce many tons of this waste yearly and we have over 100 in operation that's a lot of glow in the dark shit to get rid of. They have the nerve to call us crazy and label us domestic terrorists if we question any government narrative or policy they adopt. We are screwed, chewed and irradiated bbq'd. God help us all.

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Earthquake/Volcano Alert Issued by Nukepro for Japan, Indonesia, Taiwan, Papua New Guinea, Possibly Northern Russian Area

Update, a sizable 6.7 to 6.9 hit Ecuador overnight.   Keep in mind that EQ "bounce" back in forth across the Pacific, its not just a movement phenomenon, there is also momentum involved, on a VERY slow but very grand scale. 





So I am keeping the large EQ forecast open for a while.   See below.

Also trying out Earthquake 3D, the free version.   The upgraded version is only $20 and a likely purchase.   Here is what it looks like.





Bristol Island and the Atlantic Ridge are fairly unusual places for large earthquakes.   The whole North AND South American plates have slide over to the east.   This fact AND the 22 EQ/D1.5 are now very quiet and now a bigger move on the Pacific Plate is now expected.


Following the VERY unusual monster earthquake in Kumamoto Japan last month, my intuition tell me some 7.5 to 8.5 EQ along with deadly Volcanic Eruptions is expected in Japan, Taiwan, Papua New Guinea/Fiji, and least likely--- Indonesia


 




Friday, May 13, 2016

Real Data on Fukushima Contamination of Japan







  • Sediment erosion revealed by study of Cs isotopes derived from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident
    Yutaka Kanai, Yoshiki Saito, Toru Tamura, Van Lap Nguyen, Thi Kim Oanh Ta and Akio Sato
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 47 (No. 1), pp. 79-82, 2013
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 964 KB)
  • Preface: Migration of radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident
    Mitsuru Ebihara, Naohiro Yoshida and Yoshio Takahashi
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 267-270, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 93 KB) | Supplementary Materials (PDF 50 KB)
  • One-year monitoring of airborne radionuclides in Wako, Japan, after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident in 2011
    H. Haba, J. Kanaya, H. Mukai, T. Kambara and M. Kase
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 271-278, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 363 KB) | Supplementary Materials (PDF 72 KB)
  • Distribution of artificial radionuclides (110mAg, 129mTe, 134Cs, 137Cs) in surface soils from Miyagi Prefecture, northeast Japan, following the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident
    Takahiro Watanabe, Noriyoshi Tsuchiya, Yasuji Oura, Mitsuru Ebihara, Chihiro Inoue, Nobuo Hirano, Ryoichi Yamada, Shin-ichi Yamasaki, Atsushi Okamoto, Fumiko Watanabe Nara and Keishi Nunohara
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 279-285, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 1.2 MB)
  • Depth profiles of radioactive cesium and iodine released from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in different agricultural fields and forests
    Takeshi Ohno, Yasuyuki Muramatsu, Yoshinori Miura, Kazumasa Oda, Naoya Inagawa, Hiromu Ogawa, Atsuko Yamazaki, Chiaki Toyama and Mutsuto Sato
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 287-295, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 107 KB)
  • Investigation of cesium adsorption on soil and sediment samples from Fukushima Prefecture by sequential extraction and EXAFS technique
    Haibo Qin, Yuka Yokoyama, Qiaohui Fan, Hokuto Iwatani, Kazuya Tanaka, Aya Sakaguchi, Yutaka Kanai, Jianming Zhu, Yuichi Onda and Yoshio Takahashi
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 297-302, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 162 KB)
  • Radioactivity concentrations of 131I, 134Cs and 137Cs in river water in the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan area after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
    Yasuji Oura and Mitsuru Ebihara
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 303-309, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 453 KB)
  • Low levels of 134Cs and 137Cs in surface seawaters around the Japanese Archipelago after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011
    Mutsuo Inoue, Hisaki Kofuji, Seiya Nagao, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Yasunori Hamajima, Ken Fujimoto, Keisuke Yoshida, Atsuo Suzuki, Hideaki Takashiro, Kazuichi Hayakawa, Kazuhito Hamataka, Shota Yoshida, Masayuki Kunugi and Masayuki Minakawa
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 311-320, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 864 KB)
  • Temporal variation of 134Cs and 137Cs activities in surface water at stations along the coastline near the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident site, Japan
    Michio Aoyama, Daisuke Tsumune, Mitsuo Uematsu, Fumiyoshi Kondo and Yasunori Hamajima
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 321-325, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 456 KB)
  • Isotopic ratio of radioactive iodine (129I/131I) released from Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident
    Yasuto Miyake, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Takeshi Fujiwara, Takumi Saito, Takeyasu Yamagata, Maki Honda and Yasuyuki Muramatsu
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 327-333, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 163 KB)
  • An estimation of the radioactive 35S emitted into the atmospheric from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant by using a numerical simulation global transport
    Sebastian O. Danielache, Chisato Yoshikawa, Antra Priyadarshi, Toshihiko Takemura, Yuichiro Ueno, Mark H. Thiemens and Naohiro Yoshida
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 335-339, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 1017 KB)
  • An early survey of the radioactive contamination of soil due to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, with emphasis on plutonium analysis
    M. Yamamoto, T. Takada, S. Nagao, T. Koike, K. Shimada, M. Hoshi, K. Zhumadilov, T. Shima, M. Fukuoka, T. Imanaka, S. Endo, A. Sakaguchi and S. Kimura
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 341-353, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 5.8 MB) | Supplementary Materials (PDF 102 KB)
  • Isotopic determination of U, Pu and Cs in environmental waters following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident
    Aya Sakaguchi, Akinobu Kadokura, Peter Steier, Kazuya Tanaka, Yoshio Takahashi, Haruka Chiga, Akihito Matsushima, Satoru Nakashima and Yuichi Onda
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 355-360, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 172 KB)
  • Distribution of Pu isotopes in marine sediments in the Pacific 30 km off Fukushima after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident
    Jian Zheng, Tatsuo Aono, Shigeo Uchida, Jing Zhang and Makio C. Honda
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 4), pp. 361-369, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 1.6 MB)
  • Note
    Vertical profiles of Iodine-131 and Cesium-137 in soils in Fukushima Prefecture related to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident
    Kazuya Tanaka, Yoshio Takahashi, Aya Sakaguchi, Miyuki Umeo, Shinjiro Hayakawa, Hajime Tanida, Takashi Saito and Yutaka Kanai
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 1), pp. 73-76, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 128 KB)
  • EXPRESS LETTER
    Dispersion of artificial caesium-134 and -137 in the western North Pacific one month after the Fukushima accident
    Makio C. Honda, Tatsuo Aono, Michio Aoyama, Yasunori Hamajima, Hajime Kawakami, Minoru Kitamura, Yukio Masumoto, Yasumasa Miyazawa, Masayuki Takigawa and Toshiro Saino
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 46 (No. 1), pp. e1-e9, 2012
    [Abstract] | [Full text] (PDF 2.2 MB)