In response to my article on how the Nova Film Festival (no go) looked scripted at least in part.

They were set up that is for sure, even the Army did not want to give the permits for the concert/ rave but were over ruled by the highest commanders. I don’t think they cared if Hamas did kill them. Israel dispatched multiple “Taquila teams” ( quick reaction commando teams) 4 hours before the attack and finally got off their duff to do something…but young conscripts were not warned and many slaughtered in their bunks while sleeping…. 2 army bases were over run. To say it was Mossad that did all this is to under estimate Arabs, exactly one of the “mistakes” Israel’s otherwise “smart” Intelligence services did. OF COURSE they knew it ( an attack) was coming…female IDF spotters told them, Egypt Told them, and I am sure Human intelligence in Gaza told them… Quite a bit of southern 1948 Israel was a mele. Some elements of Hamas were using cars marked up as Israeli police cars, and set up armed checkpoints with ATGM’s…22 towns in 1948 Israel were over run with Hamas fighters, and in areas closer to the border just regular opportunist looters from Gaza. Even farther out cities like Ofakim had incursions and many disarmed Israelis were killed. The Tequila teams were mostly mopped up by Hamas armed with Tandem charge and Thermobaric RPG’s, and sheer numbers at first….and yes some Hamas were dressed like IDF….so everything that moved got shot by some people just trying to survive the onslaught. Friendly fire killed a lot of people…how many of us could tell friend from foe under such circumstances? Israel will have a very hard time eliminating Hamas…in fact under the current circumstances it will be nigh impossible. Motives for letting the attack happen are not 100% clear to me. Either the the “top brass” in Israel under estimated Hamas, or they are idiots who work for a different goal… ( likely a bit of both). Israel allowed funding to Gaza ( and by extension to Hamas Civil Servants) from multiple sources. Israel agreed for Hamas to develop the 1 Trillion TCF “Gaza Marine” gas field ( the only one totally inside Gaza’s Ocean zone). All was for “extending the ceasefire” with Hamas, in fact for a while good for Likud / Netanyahoo that Hamas ruled Gaza, it prevented a Palestinian state, and Netanyahoo is on record saying so. One glaring fact is Qatar ended it funding for Gaza a few months before the attack…they must have gotten a whiff of the plan from the leaders exiled there, at least that is how it appears to me. Don’t forget Qatar is where CENTCOM is based. I don’t think Qatar wanted the attack, but certain elements did… Netanyahoo was a “persona non Grata” in D.C. before the attack, and protests were conducted to topple him in the months before…as well at the corruption trials. Even when he tried to fire his Defense Minister Gallant, the Prime Minister could not do so, re-instating the defense minister after protests from the security establishment. ( please look it up!) But IMHO this is not just about Netanyahoo, this about creating A Palestinian State…and guess who was in the way…it’s a game with Human lives as pawns ( as always). Israel will take Hamas down a couple of notches, the USA/ U.K. / EU will set up a Palestinian ( Arab) state that is supposedly not run by Hamas but run by the same people raised under their “education” system. Israel might well implode as 600,000 + Israelis who live in Judea and Shomron are expelled from the center of Israel….at least that is the plan announced recently by the USA. Truing to stuff people who mostly live in houses and Mobile homes into overpriced and over taxed Apartments they will have to pay for would cause massive unrest. Anyone who knows what happened to the 10,000 Jews of Gaza ( and 4 towns in the Shomron) in the “disengagement” of 2005, knows Israel did not take very good care of them after dozing their homes…pawns on a chessboard. They had to continue paying for their mortgages on their old homes, while trying on their own dime to resettle somewhere else.

stock here: A bible Maven left some comments that ChatGDP expanded on, here they are.

AI generated indeed…

Philistines were strong way before the Exodus, that is why the newly released Hebrew slaves were not led by that way…and had little to nothing to do with Amaleq. ( Exodous 13:17)

Mount Zion ( aka “Zion”, Mt. Moriah, later the Temple Mount) is in Ir David , the old Jebusite city. It was a Jebusite threshing floor that was the spot for the alter King David and Natan built…after PAYING for it from the former Jebusite Lord ( Aruna) Tuned Convert.

It’s ( Zion) by the “Gihon” Spring or “Shiloach” ( two Hebrew names for the same spot. Silwan is what the Arabs call it. One MUST have a SPRING for purification in the Tabernacle and Temple alike…in fact it ( spring water) ran through the courtyard of the temple by the alter in a channel called the “amma”.

Both the Jebusites and Hebrews built many underground Qnats for the Gichon/ Shiloach/ Silwan Spring…it was the main water source for the Jebusites and for First Temple Jerusalem City inhabitants as well.

The comment provides interesting insights into the historical context of Mount Zion and its significance in the biblical narrative. Let’s add more detail and sources to support the information:

1. Philistines and the Exodus: The comment suggests that the Philistines were strong before the Exodus, influencing the route of the Hebrew slaves. While the comment doesn’t provide specific sources, historical records and archaeological findings support the existence of the Philistine civilization in the ancient Near East during the second millennium BCE. The Philistines were known as a seafaring people who settled along the southern coastal plain of present-day Israel. One can refer to archaeological studies and historical documents to explore the Philistine civilization’s strength during this period.
2. Mount Zion’s Origins: According to the comment, Mount Zion, also known as Mount Moriah and later the Temple Mount, is situated in Ir David, the old Jebusite city. The information aligns with biblical accounts, particularly in 2 Samuel 24:18-25, where King David purchases the threshing floor from Aruna, the Jebusite. This event is also mentioned in 1 Chronicles 21:18-30. The comment accurately points out that Mount Zion has historical ties to the Jebusites before it became a significant location for the Israelites.
3. Location of Mount Zion – Ir David: Ir David refers to the City of David, which is a historical and archaeological site just south of the Old City of Jerusalem. The information about Mount Zion being in Ir David corresponds with biblical narratives. The City of David has been extensively excavated, revealing layers of ancient structures that date back to the Bronze Age and Iron Age. Archaeological findings and studies by institutions like the Israel Antiquities Authority provide detailed insights into the historical layers of Ir David.
4. Gihon Spring and Silwan: The comment correctly identifies the Gihon Spring or Shiloach as a crucial water source near Mount Zion. The Gihon Spring is mentioned in the Bible, particularly in 1 Kings 1:33, where Solomon is anointed as king. Silwan, the Arab name for the area, is consistent with historical and contemporary toponyms. References to the Gihon Spring’s importance for purification in the Tabernacle and Temple can be found in biblical passages, such as 2 Chronicles 32:30.
5. Underground Qnats: Both the Jebusites and Hebrews building underground Qnats for the Gihon/Siloam Spring is a plausible claim. Ancient water systems and tunnels have been discovered in the City of David, providing evidence of sophisticated water management in ancient Jerusalem. Archaeological findings and studies by organizations like the City of David Foundation contribute to our understanding of these underground water channels.

In summary, while the comment lacks specific sources, the information aligns with biblical narratives and archaeological evidence from the City of David, supporting the historical context provided. Interested readers can further explore academic works, archaeological reports, and biblical studies to delve deeper into these topics.

———————————————–

The phrase “and had little to nothing to do with Amaleq (Exodus 13:17)” refers to a specific aspect of the biblical narrative found in the book of Exodus, highlighting that the route taken by the newly released Hebrew slaves during the Exodus was not directly connected to the Amalekites.

The biblical reference, Exodus 13:17, states: “When Pharaoh let the people go, God did not lead them on the road through the Philistine country, though that was shorter. For God said, ‘If they face war, they might change their minds and return to Egypt.'” (NIV)

This passage explains the divine decision to lead the Israelites on a longer route, avoiding the direct path through the land of the Philistines, which was seen as a more straightforward and potentially dangerous route. Instead, they were led through the wilderness toward the Red Sea.

The mention of Amalek in the phrase is significant because the Amalekites were a nomadic tribe in the region, and they are later portrayed in the biblical narrative as a recurring adversary to the Israelites.

The phrase is indicating that the chosen route was not influenced by an immediate confrontation with the Amalekites. The Amalekites do play a role later in the Exodus narrative, notably in Exodus 17 when they attack the Israelites at Rephidim, leading to the battle where Moses holds up his hands with the staff of God.

In essence, the statement in the comment is emphasizing that the decision to take an alternative route during the Exodus, as mentioned in Exodus 13:17, was not driven by an immediate threat or conflict with the Amalekites.

The avoidance of the Philistine route was primarily based on the concern that the Israelites might be discouraged by the prospect of facing war and choose to return to Egypt.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/29/i-detest-bullies-dr-rachel-clarke-on-jeremy-hunt-government-lies-and-the-long-legacy-of-covid

In early 2021 at the height of media generated covid fear the World Economic Forum released a series of panel discussions and white papers outlining a “pandemic” of a completely different nature; what they referred to as an impending “cyber-attack with covid like characteristics.” The program agenda at the WEF was titled “Cyberpolygon” and headed with unsettling zeal by globalist Klaus Schwab.

The WEF and Schwab are best known for two things:

1) Their involvement in a war game called Event 201 which simulated the global spread of a coronavirus pandemic. This simulation was held two months BEFORE the real thing happened in early 2020 and a majority of the measures played out in the game were in fact implemented almost immediately following the outbreak. [Christie’s note: The coronavirus release actually happened months earlier, before it became obvious to the world, so I think the globalists knew about it and then did the simulation.]

2) Klaus Schwab’s excited announcement that the pandemic was the perfect “opportunity” to institute what he calls the “Great Reset” of the global economy along with the rise of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is the complete centralization of world trade and governance into a global socialist empire where you will “own nothing, have no privacy, and like it.”

The globalists need another Pearl Harbor – A 9/11 attack or something even bigger. They need something that will enrage the American population, specifically conservatives. They need a disaster of epic proportions to lure us into an emotional response and the abandonment of logic. They also need a scapegoat disaster that they can use to lay the blame for the impending economic crisis.

I predict this event will come in the form of a large scale cyber-attack, and the escalation of events suggests to me that they will try to implement such an attack in the near term. Perhaps within the next couple of months and certainly before the year is over.

This is not about Russia. It’s not about Ukraine. The real war is between free peoples and the globalists. When they are removed and their puppets are removed, the majority of these disasters will stop. As long as they remain in power, the crisis events will only accelerate and increase in frequency until they find something that works; something that makes most people willing to give up their liberties in exchange for the false promise of security.

29 06 2017

– a human sacrifice for ultra rich crazies

So the psychopaths seem to want to create our own hell on earth….burn them to death, if they are lucky. Cuttlefish pulling this article together.

In a seriousness, I added high quality burn treatments to all my first aid kits.

#SEVENGATE Crime ring and the Grenfell Fire

https://www.foxnews.com/media/indiana-parents-warn-nation-after-child-removed-home-improper-pronoun-usage-can-happen-anywhere?dicbo=v2-1W4bLkB&spark_wn=1#_intcmp=fnvpl_playlist_1_Kilmeade:_Memory_lapses,_gaffes_and_bad_decisions_fueling_Biden’s_memory_concerns

“Finally, the press needs to do its job and use all its investigatory resources to find out why Tony Evers administration paroled this monster who committed this brazen act that took the life of two special, beautiful, loving people,” Weingart said, according to WISN-TV.

WISN said that in 2023, Routt said during a public appearance that, “While in prison, I decided I need help and that I needed to change my life totally around.”

“I am no longer a loser, a loner or suffer from depression,” Routt said then.

Thomas Routt appeared in court Fri for the first time in connection to the murder of 2 people in Elkhorn.
Among the 5 felony charges: 2 counts of 1st-degree intentional homicide, one count attempted 1st-degree intentional homicide
Bond was set at $2m.https://t.co/00SXkt5aqb

— Adam Rife (@AdamRifeReports) February 17, 2024

Hawaii is a Unicorn, it’s appearance is far different than it’s underlying machinations. The Hawaiian people themselves are quite kind and fairly trusting, in general. There are wide ranges though, the standard deviation is high. They can be fooled, and it seems that some Hawaiians are supported State sponsored redevelopment, they bought the lies. Hawaii is fully a fascist state, bordering on Marxist. Some people will find that hard to believe as they have been told it is “paradise”.

So here is Brush Junkie, bringing the receipts.

I really need to archive all these to Bitchute and hardrive. I find it curious that “they” allow this narrative to continue, maybe it is part of the necessary abuse. Look at me, I did this to you.

Attention to all Truth Seekers and Independent Investigators! The Ways and Means Committee is attempting to advance the Maui land grab agenda tomorrow, at 9:30 am in Conference Room 211 at the State Capitol on 415 South Beretania Street. The vote on Senate Bill 3381 appears to be a formality following an hour-long joint hearing of the Senate Energy, Economic Development and Tourism and Water and Land committees, where opposing testimonies were only given 1 minute each to voice their concerns. The state would take control of land use and development in this area — including overseeing the rebuilding of Lahaina — by seizing power from Maui County and giving it to the Lele Development District, a new entity within the Hawaii Community Development Authority. Decisions would be made by an elected nine-person board composed of district residents. “Imagine a state corporation with the power to buy property and develop it according to the corporation’s own rules. The entity could acquire land against the will of owners through eminent domain and issue bonds to pay for it. Financing would go through a special fund outside the standard budget process. The corporation’s first task would be to redevelop Lahaina. Hawaii lawmakers have introduced bills to create this corporation, called the Cultural Corridor Authority, to help rebuild Lahaina. And while the Cultural Corridor Authority, House Bill 2693, appears to have little support — a sign of the challenge legislators face trying to develop policies to address rebuilding Lahaina — lawmakers have introduced several bills this session that envision Lahaina’s redevelopment. They include a Senate bill (SB 3381) similar to the cultural corridor measure, which is scheduled for a hearing Wednesday. Senate Bill 3381 would put Lahaina’s redevelopment into the hands of the Hawaii Community Development Authority, which is best known for building Kakaako into a posh seaside community of luxury condos. The bill, which would create a new nine-member Lele Community District, is co-sponsored by Sen. Angus McKelvey, who represents Lahaina, and Senate Ways and Means Chairman Donovan Dela Cruz, a long-time supporter of expanding HCDA’s powers. The bill is slated for a hearing tomorrow on Wednesday at 9:30 a.m. Hawaii State Senate Bill (SB 3381) was proposed last week, where 2 hearings took place attempting to give overreaching authority to the Hawaii Community Development Authority (HCDA), which can acquire property and property rights through various means, such as condemnation, as well as relocate residents and their businesses from West Maui. Related links:

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessio…

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessio…

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessio…

https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/02/reb…

https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/02/bey…

1st Hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6UXk…

2nd Hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0qst…

3rd Hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41G_o…

Please SUBSCRIBE to support this channel Follow me on Rumble for exclusive content:

https://rumble.com/user/Justicenow808

email: justicenow808@proton.me

This guy is documenting but also allowing the “toxic ash” lie to exist.

The first evidence of cleanup took over 5 months to start. I believe this delay is meant to “starve them out”. Insurance is not paying out, and it is reported that many people are leaving Maui permanently. This plays into the land grab. Weird, there are 2 sailboats that “ran aground” I can imagine they were Injected.

stock here: this is so transparent as to be laughable, but let’s hold on laughing in nexus to a human death.

Navalny was effective neutered. He was no longer a threat, could no longer incite large protests. There is no reason for Putin to have him killed, and every reason to keep him alive as a reminder of the fate of dissidents.

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/4/4/15177166/bashar-al-assad-syria-poison-gas-attack-idlib-chemical-weapons-khan-sheikhoun

Everyone is sick of this deadly Ukraine operation. So who did kill Navalny? Who would have motivation and capability? Do you think someone could convince one of the other dangerous criminals at this prison outpost to do him in? Maybe 50,000 Rubles to help their family?

That is much more credible. note that Zerohedge isn’t even covering Navalny today. Old news, trying to milk it like the suspicious as hell Oct 7. And the Widow gave a speech, but no video of the speech can be found, just still pictures. No body language interpretation.

Here are the Operators of the NYP:

Every day, the most powerful and influential people in the most powerful and influential city on earth read the New York Post.

Founded in 1801 by Alexander Hamilton, the New York Post has been telling stories for over 200 years. Stories that shape your world. That make you smile. That cause you to share.

America’s oldest continuously-published newspaper, the New York Post has evolved into a national digital presence, one of the country’s most provocative, impactful, and beloved news brands. Our flagship sites, nypost.com and pagesix.com, and all of our digital products and social channels, are infused with the flavor and style of the original newspaper, but also purpose-built for the digital age.

We shine a bright light on the people and institutions that shape our readers’ lives; we break big stories and set the news agenda; and we offer engaging, fun and addictive content to the country and the world.

Leadership
Sean M Giancola: CEO/Publisher
Keith Poole: Editor-in-Chief (Group)
Stephen Lynch: Editor-in-Chief (Print)
Erin Geismar: Head of Digital

Ownership
New York Post, a unit of News Corp

News Corp (Nasdaq: NWS, NWSA; ASX: NWS, NWSLV) is a global, diversified media and information services company focused on creating and distributing authoritative and engaging content and other products and services. The company comprises businesses across a range of media, including: digital real estate services, subscription video services in Australia, news and information services and book publishing. Headquartered in New York, News Corp operates primarily in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and its content and other products and services are distributed and consumed worldwide. More information is available at: http://www.newscorp.com.

Poorly formatted but here is the Board of Directors

Lachlan K. Murdoch Chair, News Corp Executive Chair & Chief Executive Officer, Fox Corporation

Masroor Siddiqui Lead Director, News Corp Chief Executive Officer, Naya Capital Management UK Limited	Kelly Ayotte Former United States Senator for the State of New Hampshire
José María Aznar President, Foundation for Social Studies and Analysis Former President of Spain	Natalie Bancroft Director, News Corp
Ana Paula Pessoa Partner, Kunumi AI	Robert J. Thomson Chief Executive, News Corp

CORPORATE DIVERSITY STATEMENT

At News Corp, we believe that the unique experiences and perspectives of employees across our businesses are critical to creating brands and products that promote the contest of ideas and engage and inspire readers, audiences and customers around the world. Our goal is to foster an environment where all employees feel valued, included and motivated to bring great ideas to the table, and that creates a profound sense of pride across our Company.

Our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts therefore focus on:

• Across our workforce, reflecting the diverse audiences we serve
• Fostering an environment that embraces and values all perspectives and experiences and provides equal opportunities for growth and advancement
• Engaging with our readers, audiences and customers in ways that reflect and respect a rich diversity of viewpoints, and enhancing equity and inclusivity in the communities where we live and work

Our diversity, equity and inclusion objectives, and progress towards achieving them, will be assessed annually to ensure they align with our business and talent objectives.

ASX Diversity Measurable Objectives and Gender Balance

On another note, a prior article discussed a service that helps eliminate accounts and records that no longer serve a personally productive service…it appears to have worked and fairly quickly, they have 45 days to comply.

I just lost this great girl off my radar. Shes back. And she is dealing with a topic that I have covered many times. Their goal is to remove the humanity from humans, to destroy any type of spirituality, to actually degrade your soul. Because soul, spirit, and the essence of our humanity we are strong, and they hate that.

Check it out…The format is better if you go to her site.

I’ve Waited A Long Time For This…

While getting rid of a ZeroHedge Account, I noted the copyrighting agency, ABC Media, LTD. I thought ZeroHedge had been bought out by the British in 2015 or so, but it appears that was all misdirection. It is a
Bulgarian company. This led to this extremely long story, in which my thought is that there is just too much detail, that it itself is misdirection.

Check it out. It is published on newrepublic.com

https://newrepublic.com/article/156788/zero-hedge-russian-trojan-horse

https://newrepublic.com/article/156788/zero-hedge-russian-trojan-horse

Skip Navigation

The New Republic

• LATEST

BREAKING NEWSPOLITICSCLIMATECULTUREMAGAZINE

• NEWSLETTERS

Politics Homepage

• Election 2024
• Congress
• Supreme Court Watch
• Media

Getty, Courtesy of 20th Century Fox

Seth Hettena/

March 9, 2020

Is Zero Hedge a Russian Trojan Horse?

The father of the founder of the conspiratorial site filed a criminal complaint against me in Bulgaria. Then things got weird.

https://blink.net/iframe.htmlhttps://audm.herokuapp.com/player-embed/?pub=newrepublic&articleID=zero-hedge-russian-trojan-horse

About a week before Christmas, I received a most unwelcome email. A criminal complaint had been filed against me in Bulgaria, a country I have never visited and with which I had no personal connection. I stood accused of defamation; attempted censorship; illegally spreading personal, family, and business information; and insulting the memory of someone’s parents and grandparents.

The email was from a veteran Bulgarian journalist named Krassimir Ivandjiiski, who took issue with an article I had written about Zero Hedge, the hugely popular website founded by his 41-year-old son, Daniel. My article, which appeared on my personal blog, was an outgrowth of a New Republic story I wrote about the business of conspiracies, in which Zero Hedge plays a major role. Millions of readers visit Zero Hedge each month, drawn by the site’s deeply pessimistic view of Wall Street and its alarmist, conspiratorial take on international affairs. In the world according to Zero Hedge, the financial markets are always on the verge of collapse and the United States is always a power in decline.

Zero Hedge is often blamed for spreading false information. In February, Twitter permanently banned Zero Hedge’s account, which boasted more than 670,000 followers, for violating Twitter’s policy prohibiting fake accounts and spam—part of a crackdown that intensified in response to Russia’s use of social media to influence voters during the 2016 presidential election. Within hours of the ban, Zero Hedge posted a counternarrative on its site, asserting—falsely, according to Twitter—that it had been suspended over its conspiratorial, evidence-free claims that the coronavirus was a Chinese biological weapon that escaped from a lab in Wuhan, “accidentally or not.” Zero Hedge’s Twitter ban was big news, and the knee-jerk response by journalists to cover both sides further spread the bogus coronavirus conspiracy, which has continued to gain ground since Republican Senator Tom Cotton repeated it on Fox News. 

At first, I thought the criminal complaint was a joke. I couldn’t fathom why anyone would go to such lengths over a personal blog post that, at the time I received the complaint, had been read by little more than 100 people. The rambling email seemed paranoid, and it was rife with misspellings, including one for the word “comlpaint.” Ivandjiiski and his Bulgarian attorney refused to provide me a copy of the original, Bulgarian-language version of the complaint, leaving it unclear what laws I might have violated or even what country’s laws I might have stood charged with violating. Further checking, however, showed that a complaint had been lodged with the office of the Bulgarian prosecutor general.

In Bulgaria, the news that the publisher of Zero Hedge had filed a criminal complaint against an American journalist created a firestorm. I appeared on Bulgarian TV twice to answer questions, and the story was covered on multiple news sites. Journalists in Bulgaria were just as confused as I was about the criminal complaint. “Is this a common practice in the United States?” a journalist for a Bulgarian online publication asked me. No, it certainly is not. “Did you feel you were in danger?” a Bulgarian TV host asked me. Not really, though there was the possibility that I might have a Bulgarian court judgment hanging over my head. Still, an awful precedent could be set, so I decided to hire an attorney in Bulgaria and fight it.In Bulgaria, the news that the publisher of Zero Hedge had filed a criminal complaint against an American journalist created a firestorm.

Among the various “crimes” of which I stood accused was posting publicly available information that revealed Zero Hedge’s ties to Bulgaria. While Ivandjiiski’s son, Daniel, lives in an affluent northern New Jersey suburb, Zero Hedge’s domain was registered not in the U.S., but in Sofia. Court records revealed that Zero Hedge was owned by a company called ABC Media Ltd, a Bulgarian company whose sole manager was Krassimir Ivandjiiski. 

The Bulgarian connection intrigued me because Zero Hedge runs political news and commentary that “frequently echo the Kremlin line,” as a 2018 RAND Institute study put it. Among Zero Hedge’s most Russia-friendly fare were stories depicting the Mueller investigation as a hoax, pieces claiming that the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal was staged by British intelligence, and posts asserting that the Steele dossier was a work of “fanfiction” by internet trolls on 4chan. Andrew Weisburd, a private intelligence analyst who has done work for the U.S. intelligence community, has found that Zero Hedge is at the center of a web of conspiracy sites with spokes extending out into the darkest fringes of the internet. 

Zero Hedge takes a particular interest in the controversy surrounding Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, a passenger jet that was shot down in Ukraine in 2014, killing all 298 people on board. A Dutch-led criminal investigation last year charged four people, three of whom had ties to Russian intelligence, with shooting down the plane. A few days after the criminal charges were filed, Zero Hedge published a story claiming, without evidence, that the U.S. was using the MH17 crash as a pretext for a NATO invasion of eastern Ukraine. An analysis by the Digital Forensic Research Lab, a project of the Atlantic Council, found that even though Zero Hedge is written in English, this disinformation narrative was picked up by Russian-language media, demonstrating “the synergy between conspiracy outlets in English and pro-Kremlin fringe media in Russian.”

A former Zero Hedge employee named Colin Lokey, who says he earned more than $100,000 in a year writing much of the site’s political content, claimed that he felt pressure to frame issues in a misleading way. “I tried to inject as much truth as I could into my posts, but there’s no room for it,” Lokey told Bloomberg in 2016. “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.” In its published reply, Zero Hedge blasted Lokey as “deranged” and said critics had falsely called the website a Russian disinformation outlet “simply because we refused to follow the pro-U.S. script.”

All this only made the criminal complaint against me more puzzling. Why file a criminal complaint, instead of a lawsuit, in Bulgaria? Why call attention to the site’s ties to Bulgaria, and possibly to Russia? And all for a post hardly anyone had read?

It was clear I had touched a nerve. But how? What had I stumbled into? 

The story of the criminal charges against me carried deeper meaning in Bulgaria, which is still coming to grips with its Communist past. Bulgaria today is a member of both NATO and the European Union, but it has close historic and cultural ties with Russia, which continues to cast a shadow over what had been one of its most loyal vassal states during the Cold War. In 2006, as Bulgaria prepared to formally join the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, Russia’s long-serving ambassador to the EU, said, “Bulgaria is in a good position to become our special partner, a sort of a Trojan horse in the EU.” Last year, authorities in Bulgaria charged a socialist lawmaker in an espionage investigation examining how Russia was using nongovernment organizations to influence the country’s policy to the West. As a result of the investigation, Konstantin Malofeev, a Russian billionaire and ultranationalist dubbed “Putin’s Soros,” was banned from the country.

“Bulgaria is working not as a country, not a state, but as a Russian base,” Ivo Indzhev, a well-regarded Bulgarian political blogger, told me. “They have plenty of people who are willing to work as proxies for the Russian state.” American ignorance of the country made it a perfect staging ground for Russia’s information war against the U.S. “Bulgaria is a nobody,” he said, “unknown to the general American public.”American ignorance of Bulgaria made it a perfect staging ground for Russia’s information war against the U.S.

Several sources with connections to the Bulgarian government told me that they suspected Zero Hedge may be a Trojan horse as well. “I trust it is a project of Bulgarian intelligence,” a former senior Bulgarian government official told me. “It is unlikely that they would embark on their own without the backing or funding from Moscow.” An academic who asked not to be named because of his ties to the government agreed, saying he saw the criminal complaint against me as proof of Zero Hedge’s connections to Moscow. “It is likely that Russians are the ones that have been affected,” he said. “And they may have goaded the Bulgarians in the circle that runs Zero Hedge to file a criminal complaint.”

The evidence for this was indirect and primarily stemmed from Krassimir Ivandjiiski’s past associations. “If you read carefully his career, you can see the possibilities of the KGB in the shadow of the mirror,” said Nikolay Hadjigenov, the attorney who represented me in Bulgaria.

After studying at an English-language school in Sofia and graduating from the Warsaw School of Economics in 1971, Ivandjiiski worked briefly in the Bulgarian ministry of foreign trade and served in the military before beginning his career as a journalist. The main mission of the Bulgarian press during Ivandjiiski’s days as a reporter was to disseminate Communist Party propaganda. Ivandjiiski’s online bio says he spent a dozen years abroad as a foreign correspondent and became a “special envoy” to various wars in Africa. Ivandjiiski also proudly informed me of his membership, since 1974, in the International Organization of Journalists, a front organization that a declassified CIA study described as “an instrumentality of Soviet propaganda.”

After the fall of the Soviet Union, Ivandjiiski became involved in a movement called Neutral Bulgaria that looked very much like a Russian proxy, since it shared with Moscow the goal of keeping the country “neutral”—meaning out of NATO. Ivandjiiski’s partner in Neutral Bulgaria was the son of a Communist general who played a key role in Bulgaria’s Cold War intelligence service, the Committee on State Security.  “We are talking the core of the core,” said the former senior government official.

Today, Ivandjiiski runs his own conspiracy website in Bulgaria called Strogo Sekretno (Top Secret). Another one of the “crimes” listed in the complaint against me was calling out Strogo Sekretno’s blatant anti-Semitism, such as a recent post that declared that the coronavirus was an act of bioterrorism by “colluding Zionists” in the West to weaken Russia and China. According to Ivandjiiski, this was an insult to him and his family of “anti-fascists,” which, I was told, reads as “faithful Communist” in Bulgaria.

Ivandjiiski never responded to requests for comment from me or from Bulgarian journalists who wrote stories about my case. On his website, he wrote that he had nothing to do with the KGB and threatened to sue anyone who asserts otherwise. It is nearly impossible to prove him wrong, as some 140,000 secret files on Bulgaria’s top Cold War agents have been destroyed, the former Bulgarian government official told me.

When I was a college student many years ago, someone passed me a copy of a magazine called Covert Action Information Bulletin. The magazine had been co-founded by a former CIA case officer, Phil Agee, who had turned against the agency. Covert Action Information Bulletin dedicated itself to exposing the CIA’s operations and personnel. For its first few issues, the magazine published an infamous “Naming Names” column that outed American spies, until Congress outlawed the practice in 1982 with what was popularly known as the “anti-Agee bill.”

I no longer recall the particulars of the issue I read, but the magazine reflected my nascent political beliefs, such as they were, during the first Bush administration. I was angry at the CIA, which I saw then as an evil force controlling world affairs and corporate media; as a result, I believed only people outside the mainstream could expose the truth. Decades later, while reading the revelations of a KGB defector, I learned how deeply I had been had. Files spirited out of Russia by Vasili Mitrokhin, a former archivist for the Russian intelligence service, claimed the magazine was founded “on the initiative of the KGB,” which assembled a task force to keep the publication supplied with material designed to compromise the CIA. (There was no evidence that the magazine’s staff was aware of the KGB’s role.)

It’s a cautionary tale for the disinformation wars of the internet age, or at least it should be. “Where does my news come from?” is a question not enough Americans are asking these days. Even as venerable newspapers collapse into bankruptcy and the FBI warns that Russia is poisoning our public discourse, popular sites like Zero Hedge continue to grow in power and influence. “Where does my news come from?” is a question not enough Americans are asking these days.

All of Zero Hedge’s posts are written under the nom de plume of “Tyler Durden,” the anti-establishment character played by Brad Pitt in the film Fight Club. “We believe that not only should you be comfortable with anonymous speech,” Zero Hedge contends in its “manifesto,” “but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn’t.” For whatever reason, people seem to go along with this, and it’s a strange sight to see the name of a psychopathic character in a Chuck Palahniuk novel cited as a source in a Congressional Research Service report and a scholarly law review article, or introduced as a guest on Bloomberg radio. 

Neither Zero Hedge’s anonymity nor its Bulgarian connections and pro-Kremlin views have turned off some financially savvy readers. Mark B. Spiegel, a professional investor, praised the site for its “spectacular” market coverage but panned its take on foreign policy, which he said he ignores. “I consider ZH [Zero Hedge] to be a collection of great sources (the financial stuff) and bad sources (the foreign policy stuff),” he told me. “I consider The New York Times to be a collection of bad sources (pretty much the entire op-ed and national news sections) and great sources (the feature articles).” Many other financial professionals, however, dismiss the site as the Wall Street version of Infowars.

In Fight Club, Tyler Durden declares that “it’s only after we’ve lost everything that we’re free to do anything”—a sentiment that reflects the aborted career path of Zero Hedge’s founder, Dan Ivandjiiski. Born in Soviet-era Bulgaria, Ivandjiiski was something of a wunderkind. He spoke multiple languages, was a virtuoso pianist, and emigrated to the U.S. to attend the University of Pennsylvania with hopes of becoming a doctor. He changed his mind after graduation in 2001, when he realized how much money he could make on Wall Street. Seven years later, he was banned from the securities industry for earning $780 from an insider trade. He resigned his job at a hedge fund and, in early 2009, Zero Hedge was launched.

Ivandjiiski’s early vision for Zero Hedge was a version of the sassy Wall Street blog Dealbreaker,but with quantitative content. Ivandjiiski logged 20-hour days in the site’s early years. “He’s a machine,” says a person who knows him well. “That’s all he would do is work.” He took on paragons of the financial establishment like Goldman Sachs, and the site grew quickly as Ivandjiiski won praise for calling attention to the problem of high-frequency trading. New York magazine called him a “full-blown cult hero—a blogger with a bullet.” (Ivandjiiski did not respond to messages left by The New Republic seeking comment.)

Over the years, the site—and its audience—began to evolve. Zero Hedge runs an annual story on its most popular posts of the year, which shows that in 2013 social and ideological issues edged out finance as the site’s most-read articles. The audience grew rapidly over the next few years, with a single post about whiny millennials reaching 9.4 million readers. It was around this time that hateful, toxic views began to pollute the comments section. Zero Hedge’s discrimination notice says “racism, to include religious affiliation, will not be tolerated in ANY FORM on this site,” but that’s clearly not true, as the comments section is riddled with references to “joos” (Jews) and unmentionable words for African Americans. 

What Zero Hedge became, in essence, was a forum for the hateful, conspiracy-driven voices of the angry white men of the alt-right. Racists, anti-Semites, extreme right-wingers, and conspiracy nuts were an underserved audience, and, as it turns out, a profitable one. Steve Bannon, the former White House adviser who recently described himself as a “huge fan” of Zero Hedge, has largely built his career around the similar recognition that these overlooked masses represented an untapped well of anger that could be shaped into a powerful political force.

The synergy between Zero Hedge and the Trump era was made clear last year when Facebook temporarily banned the site. Rising to the site’s defense were political and media figures whose careers thrived on outrage: Nigel Farage, leader of the Brexit Party; Katie Hopkins, the openly bigoted British media figure; and Donald Trump Jr. (The ban was lifted after Facebook identified what it called a “mistake with our automation to detect spam.”)

“The censorship continues,” the president’s son wrote on Twitter. “[Facebook] doesn’t agree with them and they hit the platform’s obvious flaws at times. That’s it and it’s disgusting!”

“Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority,” reads the Zero Hedge “manifesto,” but a conversation with one of the site’s former employees made me realize that Zero Hedge’s anonymity and murky ties to Bulgaria might be hiding something else. What Zero Hedge became, in essence, was a forum for the hateful, conspiracy-driven voices of the angry white men of the alt-right.

I had noticed that a few months after Zero Hedge launched, Daniel Ivandjiiski quietly registered the domain “zerohedge.com” overseas—first in Lichtenstein and Switzerland, two countries known for financial secrecy, then in Bulgaria in 2011, according to records compiled by domaintools.com.

I asked the former employee what this was all about. “Dan didn’t want to have the U.S. looking at anything he’s doing,” the former employee said. I thought that this meant that the younger Ivandjiiski was nervous about the FBI or U.S. intelligence agencies tracking his actions, but I was mistaken; Ivandjiiski didn’t want the government to know how many people visited his site because that would give away how much money he was making. “Five years ago, that thing had to be kicking off millions of dollars in revenue,” the former employee continued. “If you look at Dan’s tax returns, I’d bet there’s nowhere near a million dollars in revenue.”

Dan Ivandjiiski’s father, Krassimir, gave the game away when he accused me of acting as an unnamed person’s agent to exert pressure on a court in New Jersey. In his list of demands on the final page, he said I was to hand over the names of the people with which he believed I was conspiring. The purported object of this conspiracy was a divorce case in Bergen County, New Jersey, that I had not previously known about, brought by a plaintiff I have never met or spoken to, who turned out to be his estranged daughter-in-law.   

Dan Ivandjiiski’s wife filed for divorce in 2018, citing irreconcilable differences that stemmed in part from her husband’s slavish devotion to his website.  The couple are battling over custody of their one child, alimony, and child support.  Court papers, released to The New Republic under a media request, suggest that Zero Hedge paid the bills on the couple’s luxurious lifestyle (one that the fictional Tyler Durden would have no doubt abhorred), which included a $2.3 million mansion. In her complaint, Ivandjiiski’s estranged wife, Blair Kress, stated that she had inadequate means of support for herself and the couple’s only child or even funds to pay her divorce lawyer. (Her husband disputed this claim.) Attorneys for both parties either declined to discuss the case or did not return messages seeking comment.

While Zero Hedge isn’t mentioned in the court documents that I’ve seen, the website, and the money it generates, are an issue in the case. In his email informing me of a criminal complaint filed against me in Bulgaria, Ivandjiiski’s father had accused me of illegally stealing documents from his son’s divorce case—including Zero Hedge’s parent company’s registration in Bulgaria—that are protected under Bulgaria’s Personal Data Protection Act and European Union laws. This was false, but one of the hazards of writing about the business of conspiracy websites is that you occasionally find yourself cast as a central character in another person’s conspiracy.

The reason is that money, not ideology, is what drives Ivandjiiski and other successful entrepreneurs in the burgeoning conspiracy business.“They care what generates page views. Clicks. Money,” Colin Lokey, the former Zero Hedge employee, told Bloomberg. Ivandjiiski’s personal beliefs have little to do with the site’s content. “He may believe with 2 percent of his body that everything’s going to blow up,” another former employee told me, “but the other 98 percent knows this is what makes money.” Another person who knows him well says, “He’ll write about what brings in readers.”

Zero Hedge says it has been profitable from day one, but how much money the site makes is a closely guarded secret. Dan Ivandjiiski took the unusual step of requiring his wife to sign a nondisclosure agreement during the divorce to prevent disclosure of Zero Hedge’s business secrets “That’s how he is. He’s very secretive,” says the person who knows him well, adding that leaving Wall Street to start Zero Hedge may have been an even more lucrative career path. In a sign of just how profitable the site might be, Daniel Ivandjiiski and his wife paid off a $1.7 million mortgage on their New Jersey home in less than two years.

It may very well be true, as Zero Hedge claims, that it has never been in contact with anyone from Russia, the U.S., or any government.At the same time, it may also be true that Zero Hedge is, for all intents and purposes, a Russian disinformation operation. In the bizarre world of conspiracies and disinformation, both things can be true at once. The warped incentives of the internet drive sites like Zero Hedge to publish pro-Kremlin content without any help from Vladimir Putin. If conspiracies and pro-Russia propaganda keep the audience clicking on the ads that festoon Zero Hedge, then that’s what they get. This is the future we are careening toward: a world where the “news” becomes whatever material holds readers’ attention, no matter what it is, and is delivered by a machine that doesn’t distinguish between true and false or between facts and propaganda, so long as it maximizes revenue. It’s the cold logic of the markets applied to publishing.

After a district prosecutor in Bulgaria declined to press charges against me, finding insufficient evidence that I had committed a crime, I realized what had sparked the criminal complaint was not Russian or Bulgarian intelligence operations, but something much closer to home: I had threatened the golden goose. Tyler Durden wasn’t defined by how much money he had in the bank or what was in his wallet, but Dan Ivandjiiski, the man who has made a fortune writing anti-establishment posts under his name, very much is.

https://blink.net/iframe.html

Read More:

Politics, The Soapbox, Zero Hedge, Russia, Media, Bulgaria

• BREAKING NEWS

POLITICSCLIMATECULTUREMAGAZINE

• PODCASTS

• Events
• Travel
• Bookstore
• Donate
• Advertise
• FAQ
• Press
• Jobs
• Submissions

• Subscribe to The New Republic
• Sign Up for Our Newsletters

• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Settings
• Copyright 2024 © The New Republic. All rights reserved.

https://blink.net/iframe.html

https://blink.net/iframe.html

I am not sure if this “deletion service” is legitimate, but I thought it worthwhile in trying to delete some accounts. I am also going to start some accounts with my real name.

Some of you that follow me on social media are going to find some accounts deleted.

The site is Your Digital Right.org

https://yourdigitalrights.org/thankyou

——————— after generating the deletion request, they follow with

A deletion request has been copied to the clipboard, all you need to do is paste it in an email, reivew it, and click Send. Organizations have 45 days to comply, and may ask you for additional information to help identify you in their systems.

Please consider making a donation to help ensure our long-term financial stability and independence.

————————————————-

to: ads@zerohedge.com

cc: 4039238b-b510-4cc9-bd1b-ac944069ff38.request@inbound.yourdigitalrights.org

subject: Data deletion request (ref: 4039238b)

To the Attention of the Privacy Department / Data Protection Officer / Legal Department of ZeroHedge (zerohedge.com),

account name

<user name>

verify deletion by return email, thanks!

I am writing to request that you delete my personal data from all of your paper and/or computer records pursuant to Section 1798.105 of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

To the extent that you rely on consent to process my personal data, I withdraw that consent. To the extent that you rely on your ‘legitimate interest’ to process my personal data, I object to the processing as there are no overriding legitimate grounds.

If you are selling my personal data to third parties, please consider this email as my direction to you not to sell my personal data to third parties.

Please don’t ask me to perform a self-service process such as locating my information on your website, filling out a form, or providing a mobile advertising ID. These requests place an undue burden on my side.

If you are not able to comply with my request to delete all of my personal data, please advise as to the specific reason for which this request cannot be acted on. Please advise which sections and subsections of the law you are relying upon, and identify the specific reason for which you are relying on those exceptions, such as which legal obligation, or internal purpose or use. Please delete all my personal data which does not fall under these exceptions.

This email message was sent from my personal email account (as you can see in the email headers). Please use this fact to verify my identity. Please do not ask me to provide any further identifying information, as this places an undue burden on my side. If you are legally obligated to require additional identifying information in order to verify my identity, please let me know as soon as possible.

Please confirm that you have deleted my personal data from your paper and/or computer records and that you have followed up with any third-party organization with whom my information has been shared to ensure that they deleted their copy of the data.

My preferred method of contact is email.

Please note that I do not consent to any personal data which is part of this request to be used for any purpose other than fulfilling this request, except in the case of a suppression list, which you may keep in order to ensure that you do not collect any of my personal data in the future.

Please note that you have 45 days to comply with this request.

Kind regards,

deleted

Powered by YourDigitalRights.org

(JTA) — President-elect Joe Biden filled the months before Inauguration Day lining up a slate of Cabinet secretaries, assistants and advisors, many of them Jewish. Biden’s choices reflect a diverse cross-section of American Jewry and possess expertise gleaned from decades of experience in government, science and medicine and law. Here’s a rundown of the Jewish names you should know as the Biden administration begins. Athony Blinken, Secretary of State Secretary of state nominee Tony Blinken speaks at a Cabinet announcement event in Wilmington, Del., as President-elect Joe Biden looks on, Nov. 24, 2020. (Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images) Blinken, a longtime Biden advisor with an extensive diplomacy resume, is the stepson of a Holocaust survivor whose stories shaped his worldview and subsequently his policy decisions, including in the Middle East. He holds mainstream Democratic views about Israel and said during his confirmation hearing Tuesday that he wants the U.S. to reenter the Iran nuclear deal — and that he would consult with Israel on Iran policy. David Cohen, CIA Deputy Director David Cohen, seen here at a Capitol Hill hearing on Iran sanctions in 2011, was named to the No. 2 position at the Central Intelligence Agency. (Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images) Cohen, who has long been involved in Jewish causes and issues, will occupy the job he held under President Barack Obama. He does not require confirmation, meaning that Biden’s CIA has a top expert in Iran issues from Day One. Merrick Garland, Attorney General Merrick Garland, shown here in 2016, has been nominated to be the next attorney general. (Alex Wong/Getty Images) Merrick Garland shown in 2016, has been nominated to be the next attorney general. (Alex Wong/Getty Images) Garland was blocked from joining the Supreme Court in the last year of the Obama administration. Now, he’ll require Senate confirmation to become the country’s top lawyer. In his speech after being nominated, he credited his grandparents, who fled anti-Semitism in Europe before coming to the U.S. Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence Nominee for Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testifies at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Jan. 19, 2021. (Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images) Haines was deputy director of the CIA under Obama and Biden reportedly considered her to run that agency. Her mother was the Jewish painter Adrian Rappin (originally Rappaport), and her non-Jewish father once wrote in an account about a trip with Haines to Israel that the nominee identifies as Jewish. Ronald Klain, Chief of Staff Ron Klain, then President Obama’s “ebola czar,” in Washington, D.C., Jan. 13, 2015. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post/Getty Images) Klain, a longtime Biden who was the president-elect’s first major appointment in November, was previously chief of staff to Biden in his vice president days and to Vice President Al Gore. He has maintained ties with his childhood synagogue in Indianapolis, where he famously learned multiple Torah portions for his bar mitzvah, and has spoken about his commitment to raising Jewish children. Eric Lander, Office of Science and Technology Policy director Eric Lander, a renowned geneticist, will lead the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (Alex Wong/Getty Images) Lander, a leading geneticist, will require Senate confirmation after Biden elevated his position to the Cabinet level. After he was criticized for toasting James Watson, the scientist who is credited with discovering the shape of DNA and who also expressed racist and sexist views, Lander said he, too, had been the subject of anti-Semitic comments by Watson. Rachel Levine, deputy health secretary Rachel Levine in Harrisburg, Penn., May 16, 2016. (Bonnie Jo Mount/The Washington Post via Getty Images) Levine, raised in a Conservative Jewish home in Massachusetts, is Pennsylvania’s health secretary. She is the first known transgender person to be nominated for a position that requires Senate confirmation. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas Alejandro Mayorkas, then deputy secretary of Homeland Security, addresses the Orthodox Union at a conference in Washington, Sept. 21, 2016. (Orthodox Union) Mayorkas, 60, the deputy secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, was born in Cuba to a Cuban Jewish father and Romanian Jewish mother who survived the Holocaust. He has worked closely with Jewish groups and spoken often about the specific threats facing American Jews. An array of Jewish groups sought a swift confirmation given the threat of extremist violence surrounding the presidential transition, but a Republican senator who supported overturning the election results blocked that possibility on Tuesday. Anne Neuberger, National Security Agency cybersecurity director Anne Neuberger Anne Neuberger attended an Orthodox Jewish day school for girls in Brooklyn. (National Security Agency) An Orthodox Jew originally from Brooklyn and educated through college in Orthodox schools, Neuberger has worked at the NSA for more than a decade. She helped establish the U.S. Cyber Command and worked as chief risk officer, where she led the agency’s election security efforts for the 2018 midterms. Wendy Sherman, deputy secretary of state Wendy Sherman was the top U.S. negotiator in the world powers’ nuclear talks with Iran. (Eric Bridiers/U.S. Mission Geneva) Sherman was the lead negotiator for the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and took the lead in advocating for the agreement with the Jewish and pro-Israel communities, later describing tensions with Israel and some American Jewish groups over the deal as “very, very painful.” She has also played a role in hewing the Democratic Party platform to traditional pro-Israel lines. Janet Yellen, Treasury secretary Janet Yellen Janet Yellen speaks during a briefing at the Federal Reserve in Washington, D.C., Dec. 13, 2017. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images) Yellen already made history as the first woman chair of the Federal Reserve, but now she has been appointed to be the first female Treasury secretary. The respected centrist was one of three Jews featured in a 2016 Trump attack ad that reflected longstanding anti-Semitic tropes. Share this:

Thank you for providing the information. It seems you’ve shared a list of individuals of Jewish heritage who were appointed to key roles in the Biden administration. Here’s a summary of the names and their respective positions:

1. Anthony Blinken – Secretary of State
2. David Cohen – CIA Deputy Director
3. Merrick Garland – Attorney General
4. Avril Haines – Director of National Intelligence
5. Ronald Klain – Chief of Staff
6. Eric Lander – Office of Science and Technology Policy Director
7. Rachel Levine – Deputy Health Secretary
8. Alejandro Mayorkas – Secretary of Homeland Security
9. Anne Neuberger – National Security Agency Cybersecurity Director
10. Wendy Sherman – Deputy Secretary of State
11. Janet Yellen – Treasury Secretary

These individuals come from diverse backgrounds and have extensive experience in various fields. If you have any specific questions about any of them or if you’d like more information on a particular person, feel free to ask.

Full Meeting

Partial transcription by Brush

Hello to all Truth Seekers and Independent Investigators. An anonymous source from Maui PD has now come forward, with secret recordings of the 1st Commanders Meeting!

This meeting took place in December 2021, over a year and a half BEFORE 8/8. In this video, you’ll hear every quote from the meeting, including the following:

Terry Jones: “This isn’t who I invited.”

Terry Jones: “They’re commanders”,

Charles Hank: “Hold on, I don’t wanna talk with you. Please, I’m talkin’ to the chief.”

(Lieutenants are dismissed)

Pelletier: “The folks I excused is because I have their captains here.”

Introductions begin, including but not limited to:

Alana Pico, Information Specialist, introduces herself (To control the message) Terry Jones, Secretary to the Chief, introduces herself Ricky Uedoi,

Captain of Internal Affairs, introduces himself Captain Keola Tom introduces himself (he will replace Ricky 1 month before leaving for the FBI, and he’s currently already back at MPD)

Melissa Magonigle, Human Resources Director, introduces herself (She now has a substantiated claim against Pelletier that will eventually win in court!)

Moana Lutey, Corporation Counsel Attorney (To prevent the department from getting sued)

Sgt. Christina Bonacorsi, soon to be Chief of Staff to Pelletier, introduces herself

Charles Hank “The Shank” introduces himself (for awhile) Pelletier introduces himself, and barely mentions the “1 October” incident in Las Vegas, but does include another active shooter on his FIRST DAY as captain on the Vegas strip…

Pelletier uses the leg analogy (again)

Pelletier talks about drones

Pelletier is projecting about corruption, and mentions his model agency for the nation (again)

Pelletier’s lays out his strategic plan

Pelletier will allow Corporation Counsel attorney Moana Lutey to attend monthly command meetings, to prevent them from getting sued Pelletier’s “Filet” quote:

“So, let me make it real clear, I’m the administration, we know this” “I will not tolerate insubordination. I understand where it falls in codes of conduct and I understand how severe it can be, and anybody that is grossly insubordinate will not leave in good standing.

I will not have it, I just won’t. I will not have individuals or groups undermining the administration. That’s all I’m gonna say on it. I think everybody knows exactly what I’m saying, but please do not be the one I make the example out of first, because I will FILET the first one, and then everybody will understand very quickly what I mean.”

Pelletier talks about “controlling the message”, by assigning Alana Pico to the Deputy Chief as an “information specialist”.

All memos will go through her as the “gatekeeper”, and also talks about getting the story straight during a “CRITICAL EVENT”.

Pelletier assigns a “coach and mentor”, Sgt. Christina Bonacorsi, as his Chief of Staff via Special assignment, and gives her authority over the other commanders. (Assignments begin, and Captain Ricky Uedoi of Internal Affairs is transferred off island)

Pelletier “Ricky you’re going to Molokai” (To be replaced by Keola Tom, who is already leaving for the FBI in 1 month, when Internal Affairs will be left vacant for Deputy Hank to cover, which is about as much of a conflict of interest as the Chief also being Coroner.)

Hank: “Any questions on assignments for the chief before I start talking?” Ricky: “I disagree with my assignment” Pelletier: “I don’t care!”

Hank: “Well talk, hold on, hold on. So it was questions, not your opinion, ok?” (There’s a question about when ‘Captain Tom’ goes to the FBI, who will cover Internal Affairs?

It is explained that Deputy Hank will cover the vacant Internal Affairs position.)

Pelletier: “Ricky we’re gonna talk in my office.”

Hat Tip to miss Frill

Brush Junkie continues to knock it out of the Park. I also posted a full meeting, a year and a half before the 8/8 Lahaina Massacre. I wish to get an AI to provide the full transcript. See article above this one.

Hello to all Truth Seekers and Independent Investigators. Retired Assistant Police Chief Clyde Holokai secretly recorded his first private meeting with newly (s)elected Chief John Pelletier and Deputy Charles Hank (The Shank). In this tape, Clyde is basically being interrogated by Hank and Pelletier for rumors they heard about him from other officers. Clyde doesn’t back down though, and even tells them what he heard about them as well, putting them on notice about how if they’re crooked cops he’s “gonna be their worst enemy”.

Highlights: Pelletier: “I’m not gonna candy coat some of this. The administration is me. The administration is me, and we all march to the same drum, and if I have somebody that’s gonna go against the administration, that’s not gonna go very well for them, you know, and I don’t like the, bu11$h!+, and let’s be very clear, I know all about it.

And so, I aint havin’ it.” Clyde: “There’s no bu11$h!+, Chief. Secondly this is what I heard and I’m bringing it up, I’m not pointing the guy out but the guy in this room said it. Ok? This is what I heard, and it’s gotta stop, we are the leaders of this department.”

Hank (The Shank): “Said about you or about him?” Clyde: “About me.”

Hank (The Shank): “What did they say about you?” Clyde: “They said, that they’re gonna work with him [Pelletier] to remove me from my position. I know, I know!”

Hank (The Shank): “His [Pelletier’s] desire is to make this the model agency, not just for the islands, but for the whole country”

Hank (The Shank) to Clyde: “I’ma just keep it real. What I heard about you, What I heard about you. I heard you were comin’ for us, that you were trying to take us down.”

Clyde: “I’m glad you are, I’m sure you guys did hear that.”

Clyde: “It’s been brought up that we’ve all heard things about each other. In the spirit of love moving forward, unity, lets all agree to just judge each other on what we see right from here.

I know who you guys have been talking to people, and this is me; you work and I’ll be your best friend, you don’t work or you’re a crooked cop, I’m gonna be your worst enemy.

You look at my record, it speaks for itself. We’ve gone after, when I was a cop in the city, we put away plenty cops who was dirty, and I hated it, but I’ll do it again.”

Pelletier: “I waited till November, uh, till the final, uh uh confirmation meeting took place before I had set this up, and I know that there was a shake up. I’m not, let’s not sit here and (be like) ‘what does this mean’ and you know it’s, uh, I get it.

I do get it.” Hank: “We had this even come to us with the 3 guys comin’ to Vegas when we had coffee and this was brought up, and uh here’s what was really bothering me, cuz I was just getting on board, and as I start lookin’ at the Maui news and stuff like that,

you guys just caught this knucklehead again, you know the 2nd time with the ‘kiki uh, operation, got him again, and like so guess what, what do they keep doing?

They keep associating him with us, so the public’s perception is that he’s still with us, as though he’s with Maui PD, and he’s not with us.”

stock here, You AI generated this “research”

Zionism is a political and ideological movement that emerged in the late 19th century with the aim of establishing and maintaining a Jewish homeland in the historic land of Israel, known as Zion. The movement was led by Jewish intellectuals and activists who sought to address the socio-political challenges faced by Jewish communities around the world.

The comment you mentioned brings up some historical references related to the early establishment of Israel as a nation and the conflicts that arose from it. It mentions Joshua, a biblical figure who was given the task of exterminating the Amalekites, a rival tribe, but failed to fully accomplish it. This failure is said to have led to the rise of the Philistines, who produced Goliath of Gath and his brothers. The mention of “six fingers and toes” refers to a biblical account that describes certain descendants of the Philistines as having this physical trait.

The comment also alludes to the ongoing conflict between different tribes and the question of who should be considered the true prophetic inheritors of Zion. This refers to the inheritance promised by Jacob (also known as Israel) to his son Judah on his deathbed, as described in the Bible.

It is worth noting that the comment reflects a specific interpretation of historical and biblical events, and there are varying perspectives and understandings when it comes to Zionism and the history of Israel.

The coordinates of Mount Zion

Mount Zion Zoomed out

Zoomed out further, Zion Mountain, seems to the be center of the area with green mountains to the west and arid mountains to the east

LOL Zion to the Sea

Zion to the Gaza Strip

The whole region

stock here: Seems like Wikipedia and AI like to make Zion seem very vague, hmmmmm

The question of who the real prophetic inheritors of Zion are can have various interpretations and perspectives. Here are some possible answers:

1. Jewish Perspective: From a Jewish perspective, Zion is often associated with Jerusalem and the land of Israel. In this view, the Jewish people, as descendants of the ancient Israelites, are considered the inheritors of Zion. The establishment of the modern state of Israel in 1948 is seen by many as a fulfillment of the Zionist movement’s goal of creating a Jewish homeland.
2. Christian Perspective: In Christianity, Zion can have different meanings depending on the interpretation. Some Christians view Zion as a symbol of God’s kingdom on Earth, associated with righteousness, justice, and the reign of the Messiah. Others see Zion as a spiritual concept, representing the heavenly Jerusalem and the assembly of believers in Christ.
3. Latter Day Saints Perspective: Within the Latter Day Saints movement, Zion is often associated with a community of righteous individuals who practice communitarian economics and strive for unity. The concept of Zion is connected to the belief in the Second Coming of Christ and the establishment of a theodemocratic government.
4. Metaphorical Interpretation: Zion can also be understood metaphorically as a representation of the people of Israel or the chosen people of God. It symbolizes the loving and caring relationship between God and His chosen people, as described in the Old Testament.

my oh my.

A friend is actually taking on the system, pro se. Corruption is rampant, and its another uniparty example that no one cares as long as they keep their power and privilege.

Hawaii Supreme Court Says ‘Spirit Of Aloha’ Supersedes 2nd Amendment

You can hate on Alex Jones, he is a “player” that is easy to hate. I guess that is part of his appeal. He received a $1B fine in court for saying that some kids did not die at Sandy Hook. So it is obviously all theater.

These guys bring up an important point that I am trying to have go viral, this is an outlet that can promote that goal. The concept of the Classic Liberal compare to the work Neo-Liberal.

Globalist Plan To Destroy Civilization and How We Can Save It: Dr. Bret Weinstein Full Interview

Spread this far and wide! pic.twitter.com/rTKqE2Wh1v

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) February 14, 2024

stock here, some comments on substacks are just excellent.

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/bret-weinstein-confirms-depopulation

Chiadrum4 hrs ago Important facts to add to that list:Sweden had an 80% SURVIVAL rate for ICU patients in 2020. We had an 80-90% DEATH rate. Trials of early treatment protocols were deliberately designed to fail and in the case of Hydroxy, the patients were literally murdered, given toxic doses intentionally. The Lancet had to immediately retract that garbage study, but the damage was done. The headline went out that Hydroxy is a killer. No one ever heard about the correction. Ivermectin trials were rigged to fail and STILL showed a mortality benefit. Hydroxy went from over the counter in France to BANNED in January 2020, before human to human transmission was even confirmed. Attorney Ralph Lodrigo sued a Houston hospital and won dozens of lawsuits for ICU patients who were demanding Ivermectin. Nearly all survived despite being on ventilators for weeks while the court cases were argued. The WHO published the raging success story of Uttar Pradesh, citing preventative treatment as a huge success. They failed to mention that Ivermectin was part of that package. And continued to force vaccination rather than suggest using Uttar Pradesh as a blueprint for the rest of the world. The FDA lowered the already egregiously low standard of 75% mRNA purity for a large batch of Pfizer jabs to 55% so that the batch would not have to be disposed of. Pfizer told its stockholders in January 2022 that full approval would NEVER happen due to the frequency of serious adverse events. The cherry on top is that every “containment action” that was taken was IMHO designed to completely destroy the possibility of herd immunity forever. This was intentional and highly successful.