Please share far and wide!

Search This Blog

Thursday, April 8, 2021

Death Rate From the Jab May Be 100 Times Higher Than CDC is Reporting, The Sauce Is HERE!!

I have the sauce. A recent detailed study on 64,000 medical workers who got the vaccine.


https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777417?guestAccessKey=e4d454f9-7f06-42b5-81e1-0ea01d143ed3&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jama&utm_content=olf&utm_term=030821#jld210017r4


using peer reviewed medical journals, to show that only about 1 in 100 Vax Adverse Reactions are reported to VAERS.  This holds true for even the Severe Events requiring medical intervention, and DEATH.


And then they compare to CDC claims of miniscule numbers of severe acute reactions, of .025 per 10,000 jabs.   They are saying 2.5 per million jabs.   This is from the VAERS system.


Knowing that 16 of Mass General recipients needed severe and immediate medical care, of the 64,900 total jabs, or 249 cases per Million needing severe and immediate medical care.


This indicates a reporting ratio to the VAERS of just 1 in 100.  i.e. 249 in a tight study, versus 2.5 per million in a self reported study VAERS.

2 comments:

  1. Are Fewer Than 1% of Vaccine Injuries Reported to VAERS?
    By Vincent Iannelli, MD / September 3, 2019 / CISA, ESP:VAERS, Harvard study, intussusception, ITP, signs, vaccine injury stories, Vaccine Safety Datalink, vaccine safety systems, VAERS, VAPP
    It is a common anti-vaccine argument that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS.

    I’ve found that fewer than 1% of anti-vaccine signs are true…
    They even think that they have evidence from Harvard to support their claim!

    Are Fewer Than 1% of Vaccine Injuries Reported to VAERS?
    Do they?

    Are fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries reported to VAERS?

    It has long been suspected that reports to VAERS are under-reported, as it is a passive reporting system.

    The original claims for under-reporting to VAERS were based on an old study about drug reactions and were not specific to vaccines though.

    Is that the Harvard study?
    Nope.

    "They (stock) are talking about a report, Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS), that was conducted at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.

    “Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified.”

    Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)

    https://vaxopedia.org/2019/09/03/percentage-of-reports-to-vaers/

    Read the link for the truth of why 1% is not true. Or just believe stock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've seen that, my 1/100 is based on the recent Boston data.

      Adverse reactions (severe) are reported at the same rate as lesser reactions. There is less incentive to report severe reactions and death as they may implicate the HCP in some wrong doing.

      LOL you've come this....far....fauciopedia, as credible as wikipedia

      Delete

Insightful and Relevant if Irreverent Comments